LOL. That is not even close to what I said. At all.SATXBear said:cowboycwr said:SATXBear said:cowboycwr said:Then please provide posts where I have defended CAB, praised him or anything.SATXBear said:cowboycwr said:LOL.SATXBear said:Bear8084 said:S11 said:cowboycwr said:
LOL!!!!!!!
You ragged on the BOR all the time and propped up Briles all the time. Had to put you on block for a while you were so ridiculous and biased. You are definitely a CABer.
Wow that was a great laugh.
Offenses will NEVER go back to 3 yards and a cloud of dust. High schools across the country have mostly gone to the spread. Most colleges have gone to the spread or some sort of modified version of it.
A few schools still run older style offenses and one of the reasons it works for them is that it is now the unique offense and no one has experience defending against it. Players don't understand/know the wing t so playing that one game against the team that does run it is different for them and hard to read everything in it.
Heck even the NFL is adapting (and has been for years) and the passing game has grown larger and larger with more teams spreading the field more and more.
RBs used to be the stars of the NFL along with QBs. Now they are just plug and play pieces. The stud running back can hold out, demand a trade, etc and the teams just put next man up in and chug right along. However, not with the QB. They need more mobile and pass speedy QBS who know the spread. In the 90s to early 2000s fullbacks were even still big names.
Now I don't think I could name but 2 NFL fullbacks. And one of them I think is an RB who plays FB in goal line packages.
The only difference why the spread is not as big in the NFL as college and below is the speed of players prevents it from taking over as much/ completely.
He isn't claiming the Big 12 going to 3 yards and a cloud of dust. He's accurately saying schools like OU, UT, ISU, the new Tech staff, OSU, and others have made use of bigger personnel to stress defenses. Many of those use the same guys in both bigger sets and 4 wide sets. That makes it tougher on defenses to adjust, makes it tougher on DC's to scout tendencies, and still allows the offense to leverage successful spread tactics.
The Pats won the super bowl on a drive where they used I formation personnel to get predictable defensive adjustments and then went Five wide with the same guys.
This, this, this. Just because he said players and certain formation packages are getting bigger doesn't mean they are going back to the power I all the time. Like you said, he is recognizing that these teams are starting to look like power spread teams that can pound and throw the ball with bigger formations while keeping the spread playbook.
Cowboycr is just your typical CABer who is willing to minimize Rhule's success in order to prop up anything remotely associated with Briles. Kinda pathetic.
I'm a caber??? That is news to me. Seeing as I have not mentioned him once in this thread. Or defended him or anything like that.
I spent my entire post talking about how more teams are adapting their offenses to include more spread, gave examples and pointed out Snow was wrong.
I get flack though for pointing out that Rhule lost to the mighty powerhouse of Liberty.
Because apparently it is blind support or nothing.
I get flack for pointing out that Rhule will be gone after this year or next when the NFL comes calling with a job he likes.
And then because I do not blindly support the coach I am a caber......
This site is such a good laugh.
Your reputation precedes itself.
I will wait.
And it will be a long wait because I haven't.
Your endless criticism of Baylor, Rhule, BOR and how unfairly Briles was treated became ridiculous. I had you on ignore for several months.
Rhule- yes I criticize him a lot. Liberty. UTSA. 1-11. Flirting with the NFL after both seasons.
BOR- yes. The created, deepened and pushed much of the mess we were/are in.
Baylor- never really criticized the school.
Briles- yes I do think he was/is treated unfairly and given way more blame than he deserves.
But you couldn't provide a single post to back up your claim. Because you have nothing.
Put me on ignore again. I don't care because I know you have nothing against me and can't stand that I am right and pointing out the truth.
There you go proving my point. You have a track record and can't get over the Briles' firing. You will never accept Rhule because you think Briles should have never been fired. That is all your posts essentially revolve around. Your opinions are wrong also. BOR did the right thing getting rid of Briles. School had to move on and clean house top to bottom.
Just do us both a favor and put me on ignore again since you clearly have your mind made up about me, even if it is wrong and you clearly have me confused with someone else.
