Projected final standings, using the Bill James Pythagorean Theorem method (remember this early in the season it will fluctuate wildly)
AL EAST
1. Rays 116-46, -----
2. Yankees 101-61, 15 GB
3. Blue Jays 86-76, 30 GB
4. Red Sox 56-106, 60 GB
5. Orioles 53-109, 63 GB
AL CENTRAL
1. Twins 98-64, -----
2. Indians 82-80, 16 GB
3. Tigers 68-94, 30 GB
4. White Sox 66-96, 32 GB
5. Royals 64-98, 34 GB
AL WEST
1. Mariners 100-62, -----
2. Astros 99-63, 1 GB
3. Rangers 89-73, 11 GB
4. Athletics 76-86, 24 GB
5. Angels 71-91, 29 GB
NL EAST
1. Phillies 90-72, -----
2. Braves 89-73, 1 GB
3. Nationals 88-74, 2 GB
4. Mets 71-91, 19 GB
5. Marlins 39-123, 51 GB
NL CENTRAL
1. Cardinals 96-66, -----
2. Pirates 94-68, 2 GB
3. Cubs 93-69, 3 GB
4. Reds 83-79, 13 GB
5. Brewers 81-81, 15 GB
NL WEST
1. Dodgers 100-62, -----
2. Diamondbacks 82-80, 18 GB
3. Padres 68-94, 32 GB
4. Giants 66-96, 34 GB
5. Rockies 65-97, 35 GB
AL EAST
1. Rays 116-46, -----
2. Yankees 101-61, 15 GB
3. Blue Jays 86-76, 30 GB
4. Red Sox 56-106, 60 GB
5. Orioles 53-109, 63 GB
AL CENTRAL
1. Twins 98-64, -----
2. Indians 82-80, 16 GB
3. Tigers 68-94, 30 GB
4. White Sox 66-96, 32 GB
5. Royals 64-98, 34 GB
AL WEST
1. Mariners 100-62, -----
2. Astros 99-63, 1 GB
3. Rangers 89-73, 11 GB
4. Athletics 76-86, 24 GB
5. Angels 71-91, 29 GB
NL EAST
1. Phillies 90-72, -----
2. Braves 89-73, 1 GB
3. Nationals 88-74, 2 GB
4. Mets 71-91, 19 GB
5. Marlins 39-123, 51 GB
NL CENTRAL
1. Cardinals 96-66, -----
2. Pirates 94-68, 2 GB
3. Cubs 93-69, 3 GB
4. Reds 83-79, 13 GB
5. Brewers 81-81, 15 GB
NL WEST
1. Dodgers 100-62, -----
2. Diamondbacks 82-80, 18 GB
3. Padres 68-94, 32 GB
4. Giants 66-96, 34 GB
5. Rockies 65-97, 35 GB