Don't disagree with this, but politics don't have much of a place in it.Porteroso said:
Not surprising. Cannabis has incredible medicinal properties. To think many Republicans want to ban a God made plant that can save lives.
I agree, it should be legal, but it's also very psychologically addicting.Porteroso said:
Not surprising. Cannabis has incredible medicinal properties. To think many Republicans want to ban a God made plant that can save lives.
I am aware of these. I think they have some other deltas that theyre working on too. Delta 8 is very mild and it helps a lot of people sleep. I need to try the other varieties.Doc Holliday said:I agree, it should be legal, but it's also very psychologically addicting.Porteroso said:
Not surprising. Cannabis has incredible medicinal properties. To think many Republicans want to ban a God made plant that can save lives.
Dependency on cannabis is rampant. Concentrates carry negative/dangerous effects like Cannabis Hyperemesis syndrome (CHS).
Alcohol is still worse and we have no issue with it.
They need to take it off schedule 1 so we can study it more.
Are you aware of Delta-8, THC-O, THC-V and newer products derived from hemp?
D8 is mild but if you get hooked and try to quit it's not going to be fun. You won't be able to sleep and you'll vomit occasionally for about a week.muddybrazos said:I am aware of these. I think they have some other deltas that theyre working on too. Delta 8 is very mild and it helps a lot of people sleep. I need to try the other varieties.Doc Holliday said:I agree, it should be legal, but it's also very psychologically addicting.Porteroso said:
Not surprising. Cannabis has incredible medicinal properties. To think many Republicans want to ban a God made plant that can save lives.
Dependency on cannabis is rampant. Concentrates carry negative/dangerous effects like Cannabis Hyperemesis syndrome (CHS).
Alcohol is still worse and we have no issue with it.
They need to take it off schedule 1 so we can study it more.
Are you aware of Delta-8, THC-O, THC-V and newer products derived from hemp?
The effects of prolonged THC vape are nothing. I have done self research for like 8 years. I prefer the gummies now and dont find them to be addictive at all especially compared to alcohol.Doc Holliday said:D8 is mild but if you get hooked and try to quit it's not going to be fun. You won't be able to sleep and you'll vomit occasionally for about a week.muddybrazos said:I am aware of these. I think they have some other deltas that theyre working on too. Delta 8 is very mild and it helps a lot of people sleep. I need to try the other varieties.Doc Holliday said:I agree, it should be legal, but it's also very psychologically addicting.Porteroso said:
Not surprising. Cannabis has incredible medicinal properties. To think many Republicans want to ban a God made plant that can save lives.
Dependency on cannabis is rampant. Concentrates carry negative/dangerous effects like Cannabis Hyperemesis syndrome (CHS).
Alcohol is still worse and we have no issue with it.
They need to take it off schedule 1 so we can study it more.
Are you aware of Delta-8, THC-O, THC-V and newer products derived from hemp?
The other issue is THC prevents REM sleep.
Not sure what the effects of prolonged THC vape are either?
BornAgain said:
no REM?
Republicans want to ban medicinal use of Cannabis? Link?Porteroso said:
Not surprising. Cannabis has incredible medicinal properties. To think many Republicans want to ban a God made plant that can save lives.
Mothra said:Republicans want to ban medicinal use of Cannabis? Link?Porteroso said:
Not surprising. Cannabis has incredible medicinal properties. To think many Republicans want to ban a God made plant that can save lives.
Gummies give me horrible heartburn. D8 is harsh.muddybrazos said:The effects of prolonged THC vape are nothing. I have done self research for like 8 years. I prefer the gummies now and dont find them to be addictive at all especially compared to alcohol.Doc Holliday said:D8 is mild but if you get hooked and try to quit it's not going to be fun. You won't be able to sleep and you'll vomit occasionally for about a week.muddybrazos said:I am aware of these. I think they have some other deltas that theyre working on too. Delta 8 is very mild and it helps a lot of people sleep. I need to try the other varieties.Doc Holliday said:I agree, it should be legal, but it's also very psychologically addicting.Porteroso said:
Not surprising. Cannabis has incredible medicinal properties. To think many Republicans want to ban a God made plant that can save lives.
Dependency on cannabis is rampant. Concentrates carry negative/dangerous effects like Cannabis Hyperemesis syndrome (CHS).
Alcohol is still worse and we have no issue with it.
They need to take it off schedule 1 so we can study it more.
Are you aware of Delta-8, THC-O, THC-V and newer products derived from hemp?
The other issue is THC prevents REM sleep.
Not sure what the effects of prolonged THC vape are either?
Doc Holliday said:I agree, it should be legal, but it's also very psychologically addicting.Porteroso said:
Not surprising. Cannabis has incredible medicinal properties. To think many Republicans want to ban a God made plant that can save lives.
Dependency on cannabis is rampant. Concentrates carry negative/dangerous effects like Cannabis Hyperemesis syndrome (CHS).
Alcohol is still worse and we have no issue with it.
They need to take it off schedule 1 so we can study it more.
Are you aware of Delta-8, THC-O, THC-V and newer products derived from hemp?
Mothra said:Republicans want to ban medicinal use of Cannabis? Link?Porteroso said:
Not surprising. Cannabis has incredible medicinal properties. To think many Republicans want to ban a God made plant that can save lives.
Porteroso said:Mothra said:Republicans want to ban medicinal use of Cannabis? Link?Porteroso said:
Not surprising. Cannabis has incredible medicinal properties. To think many Republicans want to ban a God made plant that can save lives.
Remember the famous Romney incident? Not about to do your googling for you.
Mothra said:Porteroso said:Mothra said:Republicans want to ban medicinal use of Cannabis? Link?Porteroso said:
Not surprising. Cannabis has incredible medicinal properties. To think many Republicans want to ban a God made plant that can save lives.
Remember the famous Romney incident? Not about to do your googling for you.
So in other words you can't support your bull**** statement? What a shock.
So Mitch Romney is now "many" Republicans. Interesting.Porteroso said:Mothra said:Porteroso said:Mothra said:Republicans want to ban medicinal use of Cannabis? Link?Porteroso said:
Not surprising. Cannabis has incredible medicinal properties. To think many Republicans want to ban a God made plant that can save lives.
Remember the famous Romney incident? Not about to do your googling for you.
So in other words you can't support your bull**** statement? What a shock.
Common knowledge doesn't normally require a link. Can you follow the clues I've left you?
Romney. Weed. Incident.
Take it from there, put that Baylor education to work!
He is kind of a buzz kill, isn't he?quash said:Mothra said:Republicans want to ban medicinal use of Cannabis? Link?Porteroso said:
Not surprising. Cannabis has incredible medicinal properties. To think many Republicans want to ban a God made plant that can save lives.
Fortunately, in Texas, I can only think of one
Unfortunately, he's the Lt. Gov.
Mothra said:So Mitch Romney is now "many" Republicans. Interesting.Porteroso said:Mothra said:Porteroso said:Mothra said:Republicans want to ban medicinal use of Cannabis? Link?Porteroso said:
Not surprising. Cannabis has incredible medicinal properties. To think many Republicans want to ban a God made plant that can save lives.
Remember the famous Romney incident? Not about to do your googling for you.
So in other words you can't support your bull**** statement? What a shock.
Common knowledge doesn't normally require a link. Can you follow the clues I've left you?
Romney. Weed. Incident.
Take it from there, put that Baylor education to work!
You know, I know some rather sensitive posters on this board who might argue that your statement that many Republicans want to ban medicinal use of Cannabis based on the beliefs of a lone Republican is misleading.
Now, see, you have our respective burdens mixed up again. I didn't make the statement, you did.Porteroso said:Mothra said:So Mitch Romney is now "many" Republicans. Interesting.Porteroso said:Mothra said:Porteroso said:Mothra said:Republicans want to ban medicinal use of Cannabis? Link?Porteroso said:
Not surprising. Cannabis has incredible medicinal properties. To think many Republicans want to ban a God made plant that can save lives.
Remember the famous Romney incident? Not about to do your googling for you.
So in other words you can't support your bull**** statement? What a shock.
Common knowledge doesn't normally require a link. Can you follow the clues I've left you?
Romney. Weed. Incident.
Take it from there, put that Baylor education to work!
You know, I know some rather sensitive posters on this board who might argue that your statement that many Republicans want to ban medicinal use of Cannabis based on the beliefs of a lone Republican is misleading.
No, Romney is 1 guy. Keep trying to get me to do your googling for you!
What about the other already named in this thread?Mothra said:Now, see, you have our respective burdens mixed up again. I didn't make the statement, you did.Porteroso said:No, Romney is 1 guy. Keep trying to get me to do your googling for you!Mothra said:So Mitch Romney is now "many" Republicans. Interesting.Porteroso said:Common knowledge doesn't normally require a link. Can you follow the clues I've left you?Mothra said:So in other words you can't support your bull**** statement? What a shock.Porteroso said:Remember the famous Romney incident? Not about to do your googling for you.Mothra said:Republicans want to ban medicinal use of Cannabis? Link?Porteroso said:
Not surprising. Cannabis has incredible medicinal properties. To think many Republicans want to ban a God made plant that can save lives.
Romney. Weed. Incident.
Take it from there, put that Baylor education to work!
You know, I know some rather sensitive posters on this board who might argue that your statement that many Republicans want to ban medicinal use of Cannabis based on the beliefs of a lone Republican is misleading.
So, you can't name even one other Republican then?
Romney and Patrick are "many" Republicans then? Humor me, old boy. If it's common knowledge that "many" Repubs oppose medicinal marijuana, surely you can name more than two.Porteroso said:What about the other already named in this thread?Mothra said:Now, see, you have our respective burdens mixed up again. I didn't make the statement, you did.Porteroso said:No, Romney is 1 guy. Keep trying to get me to do your googling for you!Mothra said:So Mitch Romney is now "many" Republicans. Interesting.Porteroso said:Common knowledge doesn't normally require a link. Can you follow the clues I've left you?Mothra said:So in other words you can't support your bull**** statement? What a shock.Porteroso said:Remember the famous Romney incident? Not about to do your googling for you.Mothra said:Republicans want to ban medicinal use of Cannabis? Link?Porteroso said:
Not surprising. Cannabis has incredible medicinal properties. To think many Republicans want to ban a God made plant that can save lives.
Romney. Weed. Incident.
Take it from there, put that Baylor education to work!
You know, I know some rather sensitive posters on this board who might argue that your statement that many Republicans want to ban medicinal use of Cannabis based on the beliefs of a lone Republican is misleading.
So, you can't name even one other Republican then?
And again, if you're thinking I'm feeling some sort of burden, oh my I'm just stumbling around with this thing in a daze, because I posted some common knowledge, oh boy, I've got some news for you!
Mothra said:Romney and Patrick are "many" Republicans then? Humor me, old boy. If it's common knowledge that "many" Repubs oppose medicinal marijuana, surely you can name more than two.Porteroso said:What about the other already named in this thread?Mothra said:Now, see, you have our respective burdens mixed up again. I didn't make the statement, you did.Porteroso said:No, Romney is 1 guy. Keep trying to get me to do your googling for you!Mothra said:So Mitch Romney is now "many" Republicans. Interesting.Porteroso said:Common knowledge doesn't normally require a link. Can you follow the clues I've left you?Mothra said:So in other words you can't support your bull**** statement? What a shock.Porteroso said:Remember the famous Romney incident? Not about to do your googling for you.Mothra said:Republicans want to ban medicinal use of Cannabis? Link?Porteroso said:
Not surprising. Cannabis has incredible medicinal properties. To think many Republicans want to ban a God made plant that can save lives.
Romney. Weed. Incident.
Take it from there, put that Baylor education to work!
You know, I know some rather sensitive posters on this board who might argue that your statement that many Republicans want to ban medicinal use of Cannabis based on the beliefs of a lone Republican is misleading.
So, you can't name even one other Republican then?
And again, if you're thinking I'm feeling some sort of burden, oh my I'm just stumbling around with this thing in a daze, because I posted some common knowledge, oh boy, I've got some news for you!
Better be careful. I really hope some of our more sensitive posters don't get too upset about you severely overstating your case. You're liable to be labeled dishonest.
So your rant against those "many" unnamed Republicans opposing medical cannabis is based on your "guess" that 10% would oppose it?Porteroso said:Mothra said:Romney and Patrick are "many" Republicans then? Humor me, old boy. If it's common knowledge that "many" Repubs oppose medicinal marijuana, surely you can name more than two.Porteroso said:What about the other already named in this thread?Mothra said:Now, see, you have our respective burdens mixed up again. I didn't make the statement, you did.Porteroso said:No, Romney is 1 guy. Keep trying to get me to do your googling for you!Mothra said:So Mitch Romney is now "many" Republicans. Interesting.Porteroso said:Common knowledge doesn't normally require a link. Can you follow the clues I've left you?Mothra said:So in other words you can't support your bull**** statement? What a shock.Porteroso said:Remember the famous Romney incident? Not about to do your googling for you.Mothra said:Republicans want to ban medicinal use of Cannabis? Link?Porteroso said:
Not surprising. Cannabis has incredible medicinal properties. To think many Republicans want to ban a God made plant that can save lives.
Romney. Weed. Incident.
Take it from there, put that Baylor education to work!
You know, I know some rather sensitive posters on this board who might argue that your statement that many Republicans want to ban medicinal use of Cannabis based on the beliefs of a lone Republican is misleading.
So, you can't name even one other Republican then?
And again, if you're thinking I'm feeling some sort of burden, oh my I'm just stumbling around with this thing in a daze, because I posted some common knowledge, oh boy, I've got some news for you!
Better be careful. I really hope some of our more sensitive posters don't get too upset about you severely overstating your case. You're liable to be labeled dishonest.
The thing about facts, is either they are facts, or they aren't. There are millions of Republicans that think cannabis should be illegal. If you don't think there are more than 2, you can just start to pay attention.
I'd guess more than 10% would oppose medical cannabis.
I think he intentionally used the word "many" to avoid this. "Many" is beautifully ambiguous. And I think if you looked at any poll, you would find "many" republicans that oppose it. The route you should have gone though is that "many" democrats also oppose it.Mothra said:So your rant against those "many" unnamed Republicans opposing medical cannabis is based on your "guess" that 10% would oppose it?Porteroso said:Mothra said:Romney and Patrick are "many" Republicans then? Humor me, old boy. If it's common knowledge that "many" Repubs oppose medicinal marijuana, surely you can name more than two.Porteroso said:What about the other already named in this thread?Mothra said:Now, see, you have our respective burdens mixed up again. I didn't make the statement, you did.Porteroso said:No, Romney is 1 guy. Keep trying to get me to do your googling for you!Mothra said:So Mitch Romney is now "many" Republicans. Interesting.Porteroso said:Common knowledge doesn't normally require a link. Can you follow the clues I've left you?Mothra said:So in other words you can't support your bull**** statement? What a shock.Porteroso said:Remember the famous Romney incident? Not about to do your googling for you.Mothra said:Republicans want to ban medicinal use of Cannabis? Link?Porteroso said:
Not surprising. Cannabis has incredible medicinal properties. To think many Republicans want to ban a God made plant that can save lives.
Romney. Weed. Incident.
Take it from there, put that Baylor education to work!
You know, I know some rather sensitive posters on this board who might argue that your statement that many Republicans want to ban medicinal use of Cannabis based on the beliefs of a lone Republican is misleading.
So, you can't name even one other Republican then?
And again, if you're thinking I'm feeling some sort of burden, oh my I'm just stumbling around with this thing in a daze, because I posted some common knowledge, oh boy, I've got some news for you!
Better be careful. I really hope some of our more sensitive posters don't get too upset about you severely overstating your case. You're liable to be labeled dishonest.
The thing about facts, is either they are facts, or they aren't. There are millions of Republicans that think cannabis should be illegal. If you don't think there are more than 2, you can just start to pay attention.
I'd guess more than 10% would oppose medical cannabis.
LMAO. As big a clown as you are, I doubt that even you buy your own bull*****
Porteroso said:Mothra said:Romney and Patrick are "many" Republicans then? Humor me, old boy. If it's common knowledge that "many" Repubs oppose medicinal marijuana, surely you can name more than two.Porteroso said:What about the other already named in this thread?Mothra said:Now, see, you have our respective burdens mixed up again. I didn't make the statement, you did.Porteroso said:No, Romney is 1 guy. Keep trying to get me to do your googling for you!Mothra said:So Mitch Romney is now "many" Republicans. Interesting.Porteroso said:Common knowledge doesn't normally require a link. Can you follow the clues I've left you?Mothra said:So in other words you can't support your bull**** statement? What a shock.Porteroso said:Remember the famous Romney incident? Not about to do your googling for you.Mothra said:Republicans want to ban medicinal use of Cannabis? Link?Porteroso said:
Not surprising. Cannabis has incredible medicinal properties. To think many Republicans want to ban a God made plant that can save lives.
Romney. Weed. Incident.
Take it from there, put that Baylor education to work!
You know, I know some rather sensitive posters on this board who might argue that your statement that many Republicans want to ban medicinal use of Cannabis based on the beliefs of a lone Republican is misleading.
So, you can't name even one other Republican then?
And again, if you're thinking I'm feeling some sort of burden, oh my I'm just stumbling around with this thing in a daze, because I posted some common knowledge, oh boy, I've got some news for you!
Better be careful. I really hope some of our more sensitive posters don't get too upset about you severely overstating your case. You're liable to be labeled dishonest.
The thing about facts, is either they are facts, or they aren't. There are millions of Republicans that think cannabis should be illegal. If you don't think there are more than 2, you can just start to pay attention.
I'd guess more than 10% would oppose medical cannabis.
What's the frequency Kenneth?tommie said:BornAgain said:
no REM?
REM forever.
Smack, crack, bushwhacked
Tie another one to the racks, baby
Hey kids, rock and roll
Nobody tells you where to go, baby