Should We Send Billions To Ukraine?

6,366 Views | 145 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Bear8084
Aliceinbubbleland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Interesting interview with Dror on Bloomberg. Food for thought.

Quote:

The US and its allies do not appear to be moved by Russian fears, real or imagined. They frame the war as a battle between good and evil, democracy versus authoritarian dictatorship, progress against reaction.

This is delusional. There is no such thing as an inevitable "right side of history." Not very long ago, rule by royal dynasties was regarded as the right side of history. And today, this idea is not universally held. For example, China, a highly relevant player in the world, does not share it. It has a very long political tradition and feelings of superiority that enable it to laugh off such prevailing Western notions.

If Israel has a senior global strategist, he is Yehezkel Dror. As a professor at the Hebrew University, he has educated generations of Israeli leaders. Six prime ministers have consulted him on issues of war and peace. "Crazy States: A Counterconventional Strategic Problem," written while he was working at the Rand Corp. and published in 1971, awakened the world to the imminent threat posed by fanatical third-world regimes.

Israelis sometimes refer to Dror as the Israeli Henry Kissinger. Both fled the Nazis as boys. They share German as a first language, doctorates from Harvard and a very developed and often highly controversial brand of foreign policy realism

For Dror, now in his mid-90s, realism has been largely missing from the West's game plan surrounding the war in Ukraine. In a recent interview conducted via email, he discussed what he views as Ukraine's missteps in its dealings with Russia and why he believes the US and its allies have been "delusional" in their approach to the war. The conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

This war, like most wars, will end with no absolute winner. Both sides will lose. The question is which side loses more. Ukraine is fighting bravely. President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has become a mass media hero. Western countries are condemning Russia and providing Kyiv with weapons and sanctions. But meanwhile, Ukraine is being partly devastated and depopulated. It is paying a very high price in blood and material, while Russia remains secure.

Yes, but it is hard for the West to grasp the depth of Russian strategic sensitivity to what happens in Ukraine. Russia has been invaded twice from the west, first by Napoleon and then by Germany in World War II. The German invasion was not a Clausewitzian "political war," but a war of total devastation, elimination and enslavement, with very high human and material costs for Russia. That is a major component of Russia's collective memory and military doctrine today. It does not want Western forces or Western allies on its border.


jupiter
How long do you want to ignore this user?












The Ukrainians understand what's at stake. We should too. Slava Ukraini !
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If you own LMT then yes. Send money. Lots!!!
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It is so sad. If Trump Still In power, thousands upon thousands still breathing, seeing their loved ones, living their lives.

Weakness begets world in turmoil. Same under
Obama and since Brandon's admin is just Obama's, why is anyone shocked. This is what some of you voted for. Congrats.

J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
YES. and there is no question about it. We had a Ukrainian exchange student (Alika) live with us for 2 years and went to HS with our 2 kids. She was amazing and a blessing. She is now a International Lawyer in Warsaw. Her parents were 15 klicks from Kiev and they were bombed and had to flee to Warsaw to live with their daughter Their home is destroyed. So, yes, I have some skin in the game and we need to do everything we can possible do to support a democratic (not without issues in the past) Ukraine! just my take
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There's an old saying, Perception is Reality.

People across the globe have changed their perception of Russian might. That is a huge loss for the Russians and one they may never get back.
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NO, and there is no question about it.
Your ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's hilarious watching the Socialists cheer for pouring money into Ukraine

They get exposed on a daily basis
Robert Wilson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No. Putin is a bad guy, but it is not our job to stop every perceived atrocity, and we don't really know who we are supporting or what the end game or long term ramifications look like. We are throwing money at something and guessing.
BellCountyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No.
WacoKelly83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No.
Limited IQ Redneck in PU
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No
I have found theres only two ways to go:
Living fast or dying slow.
I dont want to live forever.
But I will live while I'm here.
Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No
SIC EM 94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hell no! The US is essentially declaring war on Russia, and wasting billions of dollars on a country that has zero chance of "winning this war".
chriscbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Should we help and give aid to Ukraine, yes. Should we give a 40 billion dollar blank check, No. You can tap some unused covid funds. Devil is in the details. 40 billion seems a little excessive. God bless the Ukraine people. This could be a ploy by the US government to scare Putin and cause him to back off and with draw from the Ukraine.
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ya basta!

- el KKM
Fetterman2024
SIC EM 94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chriscbear said:

Should we help and give aid to Ukraine, yes. Should we give a 40 billion dollar blank check, No. You can tap some unused covid funds. Devil is in the details. 40 billion seems a little excessive. God bless the Ukraine people. This could be a ploy by the US government to scare Putin and cause him to back off and with draw from the Ukraine.
I think we've already given $54B, the $40B is an additional request correct?
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And how much are the sanctions costing this country? $40 Billion seems a little trivial given the amount of economic impact we're feeling from the sanction strategy,
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chriscbear said:

Should we help and give aid to Ukraine, yes. Should we give a 40 billion dollar blank check, No. You can tap some unused covid funds. Devil is in the details. 40 billion seems a little excessive. God bless the Ukraine people. This could be a ploy by the US government to scare Putin and cause him to back off and with draw from the Ukraine.


Zero chance of this. And what this administration has done ironically is only enriching Putin

At the average americams expense

Let's go Brandon

I miss the peace times under Orange Man Bad
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We're have given billions to Russia, might as well give more billions to the neo-national socialists.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
jupiter said:




No sure how propaganda videos made by NGOs and marketing firms aligned with NATO (and shot in Poland or Lviv) change the situation on the ground.

This is a bloody stalemate of a war.

Western weapons flowing into this war means that Russia can not win (not to mention Russian military incompetence and corruption).

And yet Ukraine does not have or will never have the man power needed to drive Russia completely out of the eastern part of the country.

The United States should work to stop this proxy war that is destroying Ukraine and killing thousands of people.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.theamericanconservative.com/washington-is-prolonging-ukraines-suffering/


[When things go badly for Washington's foreign policy, the true believers in the great cause always draw deeply from the well of ideological self-delusion to steel themselves for the final battle. Blinken, Klain, Austin, and the rest of the war party continue to pledge eternal support for Kiev regardless of the cost. Like the "best and the brightest" of the 1960s they are eager to sacrifice realism to wishful thinking, to wallow in the splash of publicity and self-promotion in one public visit to Ukraine after another.

This spectacle is frighteningly reminiscent of events more than 50 years ago, when Washington's proxy war in Vietnam was failing. Doubters within the Johnson administration about the wisdom of intervening on the ground to rescue Saigon from certain destruction went into hiding. In 1963, Washington already had 16,000 military advisors in Vietnam. The idea that Washington was supporting a government in South Vietnam that might not win against North Vietnam was dismissed out of hand. Secretary of State Dean Rusk said, "We will not pull out until the war is won."

By the spring of 1965, American military advisors were already dying. General Westmoreland, then commander of Military Assistance Command Vietnam, reported to LBJ: "It is increasingly apparent that the existing levels of United States aid cannot prevent the collapse of South Vietnam... North Vietnam is moving in for the kill... Acting on the request of the South Vietnamese government, the decision must be made to commit as soon as possible 125,000 United States troops to prevent the Communist takeover."

The Biden administration's unconditional support for the Zelensky regime in Kiev is reaching a strategic inflection point not unlike the one LBJ reached in 1965. Just as LBJ suddenly determined in 1964 that peace and security in Southeast Asia was a vital U.S. strategic interest, the Biden administration is making a similar argument now for Ukraine. Like South Vietnam in the 1960s, Ukraine is losing its war with Russia.

Ukraine's hospitals and morgues are filled to capacity with wounded and dying Ukrainian soldiers. Washington's proxy in Kiev has squandered its human capital and considerable Western aid in a series of self-defeating counter-offensives. Ukrainian soldiers manning the defensive lines facing Russian soldiers in Southern Ukraine are brave men, but they are not fools.]
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We should secure our Southern Border first. Our country is being invaded every day! And it is about to get worse. After we do that, we can talk about more aid to Ukraine. The other NATO countries need to step up.
"Never underestimate Joe's ability to **** things up!"

-- Barack Obama
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aliceinbubbleland said:

Interesting interview with Dror on Bloomberg. Food for thought.

Quote:

The US and its allies do not appear to be moved by Russian fears, real or imagined. They frame the war as a battle between good and evil, democracy versus authoritarian dictatorship, progress against reaction.

This is delusional. There is no such thing as an inevitable "right side of history." Not very long ago, rule by royal dynasties was regarded as the right side of history. And today, this idea is not universally held. For example, China, a highly relevant player in the world, does not share it. It has a very long political tradition and feelings of superiority that enable it to laugh off such prevailing Western notions.

If Israel has a senior global strategist, he is Yehezkel Dror. As a professor at the Hebrew University, he has educated generations of Israeli leaders. Six prime ministers have consulted him on issues of war and peace. "Crazy States: A Counterconventional Strategic Problem," written while he was working at the Rand Corp. and published in 1971, awakened the world to the imminent threat posed by fanatical third-world regimes.

Israelis sometimes refer to Dror as the Israeli Henry Kissinger. Both fled the Nazis as boys. They share German as a first language, doctorates from Harvard and a very developed and often highly controversial brand of foreign policy realism

For Dror, now in his mid-90s, realism has been largely missing from the West's game plan surrounding the war in Ukraine. In a recent interview conducted via email, he discussed what he views as Ukraine's missteps in its dealings with Russia and why he believes the US and its allies have been "delusional" in their approach to the war. The conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

This war, like most wars, will end with no absolute winner. Both sides will lose. The question is which side loses more. Ukraine is fighting bravely. President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has become a mass media hero. Western countries are condemning Russia and providing Kyiv with weapons and sanctions. But meanwhile, Ukraine is being partly devastated and depopulated. It is paying a very high price in blood and material, while Russia remains secure.

Yes, but it is hard for the West to grasp the depth of Russian strategic sensitivity to what happens in Ukraine. Russia has been invaded twice from the west, first by Napoleon and then by Germany in World War II. The German invasion was not a Clausewitzian "political war," but a war of total devastation, elimination and enslavement, with very high human and material costs for Russia. That is a major component of Russia's collective memory and military doctrine today. It does not want Western forces or Western allies on its border.



I agree with supporting Ukriane. Either we believe that struggling Nations that want to be Democratic desrve support or we don't. I thought Congressman Fitzpatrick - PA (R) stated it very well this morning that we should support Ukraine and if we don't it sends the wrong message to S Korea, Taiwan, Israel, and Greece. I am for it as we are doing.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RMF5630 said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Interesting interview with Dror on Bloomberg. Food for thought.

Quote:

The US and its allies do not appear to be moved by Russian fears, real or imagined. They frame the war as a battle between good and evil, democracy versus authoritarian dictatorship, progress against reaction.

This is delusional. There is no such thing as an inevitable "right side of history." Not very long ago, rule by royal dynasties was regarded as the right side of history. And today, this idea is not universally held. For example, China, a highly relevant player in the world, does not share it. It has a very long political tradition and feelings of superiority that enable it to laugh off such prevailing Western notions.

If Israel has a senior global strategist, he is Yehezkel Dror. As a professor at the Hebrew University, he has educated generations of Israeli leaders. Six prime ministers have consulted him on issues of war and peace. "Crazy States: A Counterconventional Strategic Problem," written while he was working at the Rand Corp. and published in 1971, awakened the world to the imminent threat posed by fanatical third-world regimes.

Israelis sometimes refer to Dror as the Israeli Henry Kissinger. Both fled the Nazis as boys. They share German as a first language, doctorates from Harvard and a very developed and often highly controversial brand of foreign policy realism

For Dror, now in his mid-90s, realism has been largely missing from the West's game plan surrounding the war in Ukraine. In a recent interview conducted via email, he discussed what he views as Ukraine's missteps in its dealings with Russia and why he believes the US and its allies have been "delusional" in their approach to the war. The conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

This war, like most wars, will end with no absolute winner. Both sides will lose. The question is which side loses more. Ukraine is fighting bravely. President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has become a mass media hero. Western countries are condemning Russia and providing Kyiv with weapons and sanctions. But meanwhile, Ukraine is being partly devastated and depopulated. It is paying a very high price in blood and material, while Russia remains secure.

Yes, but it is hard for the West to grasp the depth of Russian strategic sensitivity to what happens in Ukraine. Russia has been invaded twice from the west, first by Napoleon and then by Germany in World War II. The German invasion was not a Clausewitzian "political war," but a war of total devastation, elimination and enslavement, with very high human and material costs for Russia. That is a major component of Russia's collective memory and military doctrine today. It does not want Western forces or Western allies on its border.



I agree with supporting Ukriane. Either we believe that struggling Nations that want to be Democratic desrve support or we don't. I thought Congressman Fitzpatrick - PA (R) stated it very well this morning that we should support Ukraine and if we don't it sends the wrong message to S Korea, Taiwan, Israel, and Greece. I am for it as we are doing.

So its not what is best for the people of Ukraine but what is best for USA geostrategic ambitions (sending a message and maintaining the empire)....
muddybrazos
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RMF5630 said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Interesting interview with Dror on Bloomberg. Food for thought.

Quote:

The US and its allies do not appear to be moved by Russian fears, real or imagined. They frame the war as a battle between good and evil, democracy versus authoritarian dictatorship, progress against reaction.

This is delusional. There is no such thing as an inevitable "right side of history." Not very long ago, rule by royal dynasties was regarded as the right side of history. And today, this idea is not universally held. For example, China, a highly relevant player in the world, does not share it. It has a very long political tradition and feelings of superiority that enable it to laugh off such prevailing Western notions.

If Israel has a senior global strategist, he is Yehezkel Dror. As a professor at the Hebrew University, he has educated generations of Israeli leaders. Six prime ministers have consulted him on issues of war and peace. "Crazy States: A Counterconventional Strategic Problem," written while he was working at the Rand Corp. and published in 1971, awakened the world to the imminent threat posed by fanatical third-world regimes.

Israelis sometimes refer to Dror as the Israeli Henry Kissinger. Both fled the Nazis as boys. They share German as a first language, doctorates from Harvard and a very developed and often highly controversial brand of foreign policy realism

For Dror, now in his mid-90s, realism has been largely missing from the West's game plan surrounding the war in Ukraine. In a recent interview conducted via email, he discussed what he views as Ukraine's missteps in its dealings with Russia and why he believes the US and its allies have been "delusional" in their approach to the war. The conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

This war, like most wars, will end with no absolute winner. Both sides will lose. The question is which side loses more. Ukraine is fighting bravely. President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has become a mass media hero. Western countries are condemning Russia and providing Kyiv with weapons and sanctions. But meanwhile, Ukraine is being partly devastated and depopulated. It is paying a very high price in blood and material, while Russia remains secure.

Yes, but it is hard for the West to grasp the depth of Russian strategic sensitivity to what happens in Ukraine. Russia has been invaded twice from the west, first by Napoleon and then by Germany in World War II. The German invasion was not a Clausewitzian "political war," but a war of total devastation, elimination and enslavement, with very high human and material costs for Russia. That is a major component of Russia's collective memory and military doctrine today. It does not want Western forces or Western allies on its border.



I agree with supporting Ukriane. Either we believe that struggling Nations that want to be Democratic desrve support or we don't. I thought Congressman Fitzpatrick - PA (R) stated it very well this morning that we should support Ukraine and if we don't it sends the wrong message to S Korea, Taiwan, Israel, and Greece. I am for it as we are doing.
They dont want to be democratic, though. Theyre a tinpot dictatorship and Zelensky is persecuting Christians and has outlawed his opposition. The fact you believe this democracy crap shows that the propaganda is working.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
muddybrazos said:

RMF5630 said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Interesting interview with Dror on Bloomberg. Food for thought.

Quote:

The US and its allies do not appear to be moved by Russian fears, real or imagined. They frame the war as a battle between good and evil, democracy versus authoritarian dictatorship, progress against reaction.

This is delusional. There is no such thing as an inevitable "right side of history." Not very long ago, rule by royal dynasties was regarded as the right side of history. And today, this idea is not universally held. For example, China, a highly relevant player in the world, does not share it. It has a very long political tradition and feelings of superiority that enable it to laugh off such prevailing Western notions.

If Israel has a senior global strategist, he is Yehezkel Dror. As a professor at the Hebrew University, he has educated generations of Israeli leaders. Six prime ministers have consulted him on issues of war and peace. "Crazy States: A Counterconventional Strategic Problem," written while he was working at the Rand Corp. and published in 1971, awakened the world to the imminent threat posed by fanatical third-world regimes.

Israelis sometimes refer to Dror as the Israeli Henry Kissinger. Both fled the Nazis as boys. They share German as a first language, doctorates from Harvard and a very developed and often highly controversial brand of foreign policy realism

For Dror, now in his mid-90s, realism has been largely missing from the West's game plan surrounding the war in Ukraine. In a recent interview conducted via email, he discussed what he views as Ukraine's missteps in its dealings with Russia and why he believes the US and its allies have been "delusional" in their approach to the war. The conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

This war, like most wars, will end with no absolute winner. Both sides will lose. The question is which side loses more. Ukraine is fighting bravely. President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has become a mass media hero. Western countries are condemning Russia and providing Kyiv with weapons and sanctions. But meanwhile, Ukraine is being partly devastated and depopulated. It is paying a very high price in blood and material, while Russia remains secure.

Yes, but it is hard for the West to grasp the depth of Russian strategic sensitivity to what happens in Ukraine. Russia has been invaded twice from the west, first by Napoleon and then by Germany in World War II. The German invasion was not a Clausewitzian "political war," but a war of total devastation, elimination and enslavement, with very high human and material costs for Russia. That is a major component of Russia's collective memory and military doctrine today. It does not want Western forces or Western allies on its border.



I agree with supporting Ukriane. Either we believe that struggling Nations that want to be Democratic desrve support or we don't. I thought Congressman Fitzpatrick - PA (R) stated it very well this morning that we should support Ukraine and if we don't it sends the wrong message to S Korea, Taiwan, Israel, and Greece. I am for it as we are doing.
They dont want to be democratic, though. Theyre a tinpot dictatorship and Zelensky is persecuting Christians and has outlawed his opposition. The fact you believe this democracy crap shows that the propaganda is working.
There is propaganda from both sides...
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RMF5630 said:

muddybrazos said:

RMF5630 said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Interesting interview with Dror on Bloomberg. Food for thought.

Quote:

The US and its allies do not appear to be moved by Russian fears, real or imagined. They frame the war as a battle between good and evil, democracy versus authoritarian dictatorship, progress against reaction.

This is delusional. There is no such thing as an inevitable "right side of history." Not very long ago, rule by royal dynasties was regarded as the right side of history. And today, this idea is not universally held. For example, China, a highly relevant player in the world, does not share it. It has a very long political tradition and feelings of superiority that enable it to laugh off such prevailing Western notions.

If Israel has a senior global strategist, he is Yehezkel Dror. As a professor at the Hebrew University, he has educated generations of Israeli leaders. Six prime ministers have consulted him on issues of war and peace. "Crazy States: A Counterconventional Strategic Problem," written while he was working at the Rand Corp. and published in 1971, awakened the world to the imminent threat posed by fanatical third-world regimes.

Israelis sometimes refer to Dror as the Israeli Henry Kissinger. Both fled the Nazis as boys. They share German as a first language, doctorates from Harvard and a very developed and often highly controversial brand of foreign policy realism

For Dror, now in his mid-90s, realism has been largely missing from the West's game plan surrounding the war in Ukraine. In a recent interview conducted via email, he discussed what he views as Ukraine's missteps in its dealings with Russia and why he believes the US and its allies have been "delusional" in their approach to the war. The conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

This war, like most wars, will end with no absolute winner. Both sides will lose. The question is which side loses more. Ukraine is fighting bravely. President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has become a mass media hero. Western countries are condemning Russia and providing Kyiv with weapons and sanctions. But meanwhile, Ukraine is being partly devastated and depopulated. It is paying a very high price in blood and material, while Russia remains secure.

Yes, but it is hard for the West to grasp the depth of Russian strategic sensitivity to what happens in Ukraine. Russia has been invaded twice from the west, first by Napoleon and then by Germany in World War II. The German invasion was not a Clausewitzian "political war," but a war of total devastation, elimination and enslavement, with very high human and material costs for Russia. That is a major component of Russia's collective memory and military doctrine today. It does not want Western forces or Western allies on its border.



I agree with supporting Ukriane. Either we believe that struggling Nations that want to be Democratic desrve support or we don't. I thought Congressman Fitzpatrick - PA (R) stated it very well this morning that we should support Ukraine and if we don't it sends the wrong message to S Korea, Taiwan, Israel, and Greece. I am for it as we are doing.
They dont want to be democratic, though. Theyre a tinpot dictatorship and Zelensky is persecuting Christians and has outlawed his opposition. The fact you believe this democracy crap shows that the propaganda is working.
There is propaganda from both sides...
How would you feel if this war lasts a decade and cost taxpayers $5 trillion?

Not far fetched figures if you look at the "war on terror".
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

RMF5630 said:

muddybrazos said:

RMF5630 said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Interesting interview with Dror on Bloomberg. Food for thought.

Quote:

The US and its allies do not appear to be moved by Russian fears, real or imagined. They frame the war as a battle between good and evil, democracy versus authoritarian dictatorship, progress against reaction.

This is delusional. There is no such thing as an inevitable "right side of history." Not very long ago, rule by royal dynasties was regarded as the right side of history. And today, this idea is not universally held. For example, China, a highly relevant player in the world, does not share it. It has a very long political tradition and feelings of superiority that enable it to laugh off such prevailing Western notions.

If Israel has a senior global strategist, he is Yehezkel Dror. As a professor at the Hebrew University, he has educated generations of Israeli leaders. Six prime ministers have consulted him on issues of war and peace. "Crazy States: A Counterconventional Strategic Problem," written while he was working at the Rand Corp. and published in 1971, awakened the world to the imminent threat posed by fanatical third-world regimes.

Israelis sometimes refer to Dror as the Israeli Henry Kissinger. Both fled the Nazis as boys. They share German as a first language, doctorates from Harvard and a very developed and often highly controversial brand of foreign policy realism

For Dror, now in his mid-90s, realism has been largely missing from the West's game plan surrounding the war in Ukraine. In a recent interview conducted via email, he discussed what he views as Ukraine's missteps in its dealings with Russia and why he believes the US and its allies have been "delusional" in their approach to the war. The conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

This war, like most wars, will end with no absolute winner. Both sides will lose. The question is which side loses more. Ukraine is fighting bravely. President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has become a mass media hero. Western countries are condemning Russia and providing Kyiv with weapons and sanctions. But meanwhile, Ukraine is being partly devastated and depopulated. It is paying a very high price in blood and material, while Russia remains secure.

Yes, but it is hard for the West to grasp the depth of Russian strategic sensitivity to what happens in Ukraine. Russia has been invaded twice from the west, first by Napoleon and then by Germany in World War II. The German invasion was not a Clausewitzian "political war," but a war of total devastation, elimination and enslavement, with very high human and material costs for Russia. That is a major component of Russia's collective memory and military doctrine today. It does not want Western forces or Western allies on its border.



I agree with supporting Ukriane. Either we believe that struggling Nations that want to be Democratic desrve support or we don't. I thought Congressman Fitzpatrick - PA (R) stated it very well this morning that we should support Ukraine and if we don't it sends the wrong message to S Korea, Taiwan, Israel, and Greece. I am for it as we are doing.
They dont want to be democratic, though. Theyre a tinpot dictatorship and Zelensky is persecuting Christians and has outlawed his opposition. The fact you believe this democracy crap shows that the propaganda is working.
There is propaganda from both sides...
How would you feel if this war lasts a decade and cost taxpayers $5 trillion?

Not far fetched figures if you look at the "war on terror".
I guess my question is it Ukraine support that is hurting the economy or the trillions of "free money" dumped into the system during COVID? Most of the money being released now was already approved and alot of it is going to replenishing ordinance and weapons we shipped to Ukraine. Rep Fitzpatrick had a real good breakdown on Fox this morning.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RMF5630 said:

Doc Holliday said:

RMF5630 said:

muddybrazos said:

RMF5630 said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Interesting interview with Dror on Bloomberg. Food for thought.

Quote:

The US and its allies do not appear to be moved by Russian fears, real or imagined. They frame the war as a battle between good and evil, democracy versus authoritarian dictatorship, progress against reaction.

This is delusional. There is no such thing as an inevitable "right side of history." Not very long ago, rule by royal dynasties was regarded as the right side of history. And today, this idea is not universally held. For example, China, a highly relevant player in the world, does not share it. It has a very long political tradition and feelings of superiority that enable it to laugh off such prevailing Western notions.

If Israel has a senior global strategist, he is Yehezkel Dror. As a professor at the Hebrew University, he has educated generations of Israeli leaders. Six prime ministers have consulted him on issues of war and peace. "Crazy States: A Counterconventional Strategic Problem," written while he was working at the Rand Corp. and published in 1971, awakened the world to the imminent threat posed by fanatical third-world regimes.

Israelis sometimes refer to Dror as the Israeli Henry Kissinger. Both fled the Nazis as boys. They share German as a first language, doctorates from Harvard and a very developed and often highly controversial brand of foreign policy realism

For Dror, now in his mid-90s, realism has been largely missing from the West's game plan surrounding the war in Ukraine. In a recent interview conducted via email, he discussed what he views as Ukraine's missteps in its dealings with Russia and why he believes the US and its allies have been "delusional" in their approach to the war. The conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

This war, like most wars, will end with no absolute winner. Both sides will lose. The question is which side loses more. Ukraine is fighting bravely. President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has become a mass media hero. Western countries are condemning Russia and providing Kyiv with weapons and sanctions. But meanwhile, Ukraine is being partly devastated and depopulated. It is paying a very high price in blood and material, while Russia remains secure.

Yes, but it is hard for the West to grasp the depth of Russian strategic sensitivity to what happens in Ukraine. Russia has been invaded twice from the west, first by Napoleon and then by Germany in World War II. The German invasion was not a Clausewitzian "political war," but a war of total devastation, elimination and enslavement, with very high human and material costs for Russia. That is a major component of Russia's collective memory and military doctrine today. It does not want Western forces or Western allies on its border.



I agree with supporting Ukriane. Either we believe that struggling Nations that want to be Democratic desrve support or we don't. I thought Congressman Fitzpatrick - PA (R) stated it very well this morning that we should support Ukraine and if we don't it sends the wrong message to S Korea, Taiwan, Israel, and Greece. I am for it as we are doing.
They dont want to be democratic, though. Theyre a tinpot dictatorship and Zelensky is persecuting Christians and has outlawed his opposition. The fact you believe this democracy crap shows that the propaganda is working.
There is propaganda from both sides...
How would you feel if this war lasts a decade and cost taxpayers $5 trillion?

Not far fetched figures if you look at the "war on terror".
I guess my question is it Ukraine support that is hurting the economy or the trillions of "free money" dumped into the system during COVID? Most of the money being released now was already approved and alot of it is going to replenishing ordinance and weapons we shipped to Ukraine. Rep Fitzpatrick had a real good breakdown on Fox this morning.
Both.

The UK "borrowed" money from the US during WW2 and it only just finished getting paid back in the past two years.

It's going to be a VERY long time if we even get that money back.

If the USA can borrow $ to give away, why don't we LOAN it or, better yet, encourage them to take on their own debt?

However you boil it down we're printing $ we do not have to give away.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

RMF5630 said:

Doc Holliday said:

RMF5630 said:

muddybrazos said:

RMF5630 said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Interesting interview with Dror on Bloomberg. Food for thought.

Quote:

The US and its allies do not appear to be moved by Russian fears, real or imagined. They frame the war as a battle between good and evil, democracy versus authoritarian dictatorship, progress against reaction.

This is delusional. There is no such thing as an inevitable "right side of history." Not very long ago, rule by royal dynasties was regarded as the right side of history. And today, this idea is not universally held. For example, China, a highly relevant player in the world, does not share it. It has a very long political tradition and feelings of superiority that enable it to laugh off such prevailing Western notions.

If Israel has a senior global strategist, he is Yehezkel Dror. As a professor at the Hebrew University, he has educated generations of Israeli leaders. Six prime ministers have consulted him on issues of war and peace. "Crazy States: A Counterconventional Strategic Problem," written while he was working at the Rand Corp. and published in 1971, awakened the world to the imminent threat posed by fanatical third-world regimes.

Israelis sometimes refer to Dror as the Israeli Henry Kissinger. Both fled the Nazis as boys. They share German as a first language, doctorates from Harvard and a very developed and often highly controversial brand of foreign policy realism

For Dror, now in his mid-90s, realism has been largely missing from the West's game plan surrounding the war in Ukraine. In a recent interview conducted via email, he discussed what he views as Ukraine's missteps in its dealings with Russia and why he believes the US and its allies have been "delusional" in their approach to the war. The conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

This war, like most wars, will end with no absolute winner. Both sides will lose. The question is which side loses more. Ukraine is fighting bravely. President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has become a mass media hero. Western countries are condemning Russia and providing Kyiv with weapons and sanctions. But meanwhile, Ukraine is being partly devastated and depopulated. It is paying a very high price in blood and material, while Russia remains secure.

Yes, but it is hard for the West to grasp the depth of Russian strategic sensitivity to what happens in Ukraine. Russia has been invaded twice from the west, first by Napoleon and then by Germany in World War II. The German invasion was not a Clausewitzian "political war," but a war of total devastation, elimination and enslavement, with very high human and material costs for Russia. That is a major component of Russia's collective memory and military doctrine today. It does not want Western forces or Western allies on its border.



I agree with supporting Ukriane. Either we believe that struggling Nations that want to be Democratic desrve support or we don't. I thought Congressman Fitzpatrick - PA (R) stated it very well this morning that we should support Ukraine and if we don't it sends the wrong message to S Korea, Taiwan, Israel, and Greece. I am for it as we are doing.
They dont want to be democratic, though. Theyre a tinpot dictatorship and Zelensky is persecuting Christians and has outlawed his opposition. The fact you believe this democracy crap shows that the propaganda is working.
There is propaganda from both sides...
How would you feel if this war lasts a decade and cost taxpayers $5 trillion?

Not far fetched figures if you look at the "war on terror".
I guess my question is it Ukraine support that is hurting the economy or the trillions of "free money" dumped into the system during COVID? Most of the money being released now was already approved and alot of it is going to replenishing ordinance and weapons we shipped to Ukraine. Rep Fitzpatrick had a real good breakdown on Fox this morning.
Both.

The UK "borrowed" money from the US during WW2 and it only just finished getting paid back in the past two years.

It's going to be a VERY long time if we even get that money back.

If the USA can borrow $ to give away, why don't we LOAN it or, better yet, encourage them to take on their own debt?

However you boil it down we're printing $ we do not have to give away.
Ukraine is a potential trading partner and strategically located. I see a potential upside to us supporting and keeping Russia from taking over. It may not be as big as some want, but it is there. Printing money for people not to work is a waste plain and simple. I see more upside with Ukraine spending than I do with a lot of Govt spending! This would not be what I cut.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

RMF5630 said:

muddybrazos said:

RMF5630 said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Interesting interview with Dror on Bloomberg. Food for thought.

Quote:

The US and its allies do not appear to be moved by Russian fears, real or imagined. They frame the war as a battle between good and evil, democracy versus authoritarian dictatorship, progress against reaction.

This is delusional. There is no such thing as an inevitable "right side of history." Not very long ago, rule by royal dynasties was regarded as the right side of history. And today, this idea is not universally held. For example, China, a highly relevant player in the world, does not share it. It has a very long political tradition and feelings of superiority that enable it to laugh off such prevailing Western notions.

If Israel has a senior global strategist, he is Yehezkel Dror. As a professor at the Hebrew University, he has educated generations of Israeli leaders. Six prime ministers have consulted him on issues of war and peace. "Crazy States: A Counterconventional Strategic Problem," written while he was working at the Rand Corp. and published in 1971, awakened the world to the imminent threat posed by fanatical third-world regimes.

Israelis sometimes refer to Dror as the Israeli Henry Kissinger. Both fled the Nazis as boys. They share German as a first language, doctorates from Harvard and a very developed and often highly controversial brand of foreign policy realism

For Dror, now in his mid-90s, realism has been largely missing from the West's game plan surrounding the war in Ukraine. In a recent interview conducted via email, he discussed what he views as Ukraine's missteps in its dealings with Russia and why he believes the US and its allies have been "delusional" in their approach to the war. The conversation has been edited for length and clarity.

This war, like most wars, will end with no absolute winner. Both sides will lose. The question is which side loses more. Ukraine is fighting bravely. President Volodymyr Zelenskiy has become a mass media hero. Western countries are condemning Russia and providing Kyiv with weapons and sanctions. But meanwhile, Ukraine is being partly devastated and depopulated. It is paying a very high price in blood and material, while Russia remains secure.

Yes, but it is hard for the West to grasp the depth of Russian strategic sensitivity to what happens in Ukraine. Russia has been invaded twice from the west, first by Napoleon and then by Germany in World War II. The German invasion was not a Clausewitzian "political war," but a war of total devastation, elimination and enslavement, with very high human and material costs for Russia. That is a major component of Russia's collective memory and military doctrine today. It does not want Western forces or Western allies on its border.



I agree with supporting Ukriane. Either we believe that struggling Nations that want to be Democratic desrve support or we don't. I thought Congressman Fitzpatrick - PA (R) stated it very well this morning that we should support Ukraine and if we don't it sends the wrong message to S Korea, Taiwan, Israel, and Greece. I am for it as we are doing.
They dont want to be democratic, though. Theyre a tinpot dictatorship and Zelensky is persecuting Christians and has outlawed his opposition. The fact you believe this democracy crap shows that the propaganda is working.
There is propaganda from both sides...
How would you feel if this war lasts a decade and cost taxpayers $5 trillion?
I'd be appalled but also thankful. Worst-case scenario, it could be over in 30 minutes.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.