Rawhide said:
So, we've been told over and over and over that Trump questioning the legitimacy of the 2020 election is a threat to democracy.
There are democrats now calling the Supreme Court illegitimate, certainly that would be a threat to our democracy, no?
Rawhide said:
So, we've been told over and over and over that Trump questioning the legitimacy of the 2020 election is a threat to democracy.
There are democrats now calling the Supreme Court illegitimate, certainly that would be a threat to our democracy, no?
Links?SIC EM 94 said:Rawhide said:
So, we've been told over and over and over that Trump questioning the legitimacy of the 2020 election is a threat to democracy.
There are democrats now calling the Supreme Court illegitimate, certainly that would be a threat to our democracy, no?
Of course it is. The Democratic "leaders" are going well beyond simply questioning the Supreme Court, they are calling for physical violence, intimidation, and civil disobedience. Those that follow the Democrats call for insurrection should all be rounded up and punished to the fullest extent of the law.
This. You nailed it.whiterock said:
This is what repressive tolerance looks like.
THEY can do anything they want, because they are the good guys.
YOU have to play by rules enforced to a contrivance of the moment, because you are the bad guys.
Left is good, right is bad.
Violence by the left is just good intentions gone a little too far.
Violence by the right is fascism and must be crushed to save society.
Porteroso said:Rawhide said:
So, we've been told over and over and over that Trump questioning the legitimacy of the 2020 election is a threat to democracy.
There are democrats now calling the Supreme Court illegitimate, certainly that would be a threat to our democracy, no?
It depends. Many things are called illegitimate. But what actions people take based on that matters. Words are cheap in politics. You will need more than words to equivocate this past election with anything the Dems are doing.
We will see if justices are attacked or not. Either way, attacking a justice is a little different from trying to stop the certified votes from being accepted.
I won't call it the "democrats" but the progressive left has always used violence, threats of violence, riots, insurrection, bodily physical and property destruction and other forms of mayhem to further their cause, and basically force their way.SIC EM 94 said:Rawhide said:
So, we've been told over and over and over that Trump questioning the legitimacy of the 2020 election is a threat to democracy.
There are democrats now calling the Supreme Court illegitimate, certainly that would be a threat to our democracy, no?
Of course it is. The Democratic "leaders" are going well beyond simply questioning the Supreme Court, they are calling for physical violence, intimidation, and civil disobedience. Those that follow the Democrats call for insurrection should all be rounded up and punished to the fullest extent of the law.
The only thing in Washington that we know for certain is illegitimate is Joe Biden's grandbaby.Porteroso said:Rawhide said:
So, we've been told over and over and over that Trump questioning the legitimacy of the 2020 election is a threat to democracy.
There are democrats now calling the Supreme Court illegitimate, certainly that would be a threat to our democracy, no?
It depends. Many things are called illegitimate. But what actions people take based on that matters. Words are cheap in politics. You will need more than words to equivocate this past election with anything the Dems are doing.
We will see if justices are attacked or not. Either way, attacking a justice is a little different from trying to stop the certified votes from being accepted.
We should call it democrats. It's their voters, pushing their agenda, on money raised at Democrat crowd-funding platforms, while being lauded by Democrat elected officials.Forest Bueller_bf said:I won't call it the "democrats" but the progressive left has always used violence, threats of violence, riots, insurrection, bodily physical and property destruction and other forms of mayhem to further their cause, and basically force their way.SIC EM 94 said:Rawhide said:
So, we've been told over and over and over that Trump questioning the legitimacy of the 2020 election is a threat to democracy.
There are democrats now calling the Supreme Court illegitimate, certainly that would be a threat to our democracy, no?
Of course it is. The Democratic "leaders" are going well beyond simply questioning the Supreme Court, they are calling for physical violence, intimidation, and civil disobedience. Those that follow the Democrats call for insurrection should all be rounded up and punished to the fullest extent of the law.
The way the left has reacted to Jan 6th is one of the most hypocritical displays I have ever seen. Not that it wasn't wrong, it certainly was, but it came right out of their playbook, that obviously they feel they have the sole ownership of and think nobody else should be able to use it.
Booray said:Links?SIC EM 94 said:Rawhide said:
So, we've been told over and over and over that Trump questioning the legitimacy of the 2020 election is a threat to democracy.
There are democrats now calling the Supreme Court illegitimate, certainly that would be a threat to our democracy, no?
Of course it is. The Democratic "leaders" are going well beyond simply questioning the Supreme Court, they are calling for physical violence, intimidation, and civil disobedience. Those that follow the Democrats call for insurrection should all be rounded up and punished to the fullest extent of the law.
thats right, attacking a judge would change the court and future decisions for decades and possibly forever..Porteroso said:Rawhide said:
So, we've been told over and over and over that Trump questioning the legitimacy of the 2020 election is a threat to democracy.
There are democrats now calling the Supreme Court illegitimate, certainly that would be a threat to our democracy, no?
It depends. Many things are called illegitimate. But what actions people take based on that matters. Words are cheap in politics. You will need more than words to equivocate this past election with anything the Dems are doing.
We will see if justices are attacked or not. Either way, attacking a justice is a little different from trying to stop the certified votes from being accepted.
We are witnessing a judicial coup in process.
— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) June 30, 2022
If the President and Congress do not restrain the Court now, the Court is signaling they will come for the Presidential election next.
All our leaders - regardless of party - must recognize this Constitutional crisis for what it is. https://t.co/DzoIh4n08D
At this point we should be well beyond partisanship.
— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) June 30, 2022
Members of Congress have sworn an oath to the Constitution. It is our duty to check the Court’s gross overreach of power in violating people’s inalienable rights and seizing for itself the powers of Congress and the President.
Catastrophic. A filibuster carveout is not enough. We need to reform or do away with the whole thing, for the sake of the planet. https://t.co/if8PIbfs42
— Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) June 30, 2022
NEW: A 12-year-old child victim of rape and incest should be forced to carry and birth her father's child, Mississippi House Speaker Philip Gunn says.
— Ashton Pittman (@ashtonpittman) June 29, 2022
Even in such cases, he opposes abortion exceptions.
"Every life is valuable," Gunn said.https://t.co/gCzlfG1MmN
Undoing Roe is awful. Kneecapping environmental regulation is existential. This Supreme Court has just come down on the side of civilizational collapse.
— Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) June 30, 2022
J.B.Katz said:
And here's what really happened today, and you're celebrating it:Undoing Roe is awful. Kneecapping environmental regulation is existential. This Supreme Court has just come down on the side of civilizational collapse.
— Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) June 30, 2022
Sounds like you'd be happier in California.J.B.Katz said:
When 6 people can, literally in the blink of an eye, make a decision that means, in my state, that the only safe course of action for my daughters/daughters in law is to avoid pregnancy altogether, because if you get pregnant in this state, you cede your ability to make any healthcare decisions for yourself (as everything a pregnant woman does affects her fetus), then, Houston, we got a problem.
I no longer have confidence that healthcare providers in my state would act affirmative to provide lifesaving treatment for an ectopic pregnancy, and I'm concerned about prosecution if there's a miscarriage. Amnesty International considers forcing women to bear the children of their rapists a human rights violation. The Taliban did that to Yazidi women. Now some states intend to do that to American citizens who just lost an important freedom--control over their own bodies.
The Christian Taliban is no better than the Muslim Taliban.
And now all the climate deniers and corporate interests are free to do nothing to address climate change, so more babies will be born into a dying world.
Here's a good Christian crowing about the effect of what SCOTUS has done:NEW: A 12-year-old child victim of rape and incest should be forced to carry and birth her father's child, Mississippi House Speaker Philip Gunn says.
— Ashton Pittman (@ashtonpittman) June 29, 2022
Even in such cases, he opposes abortion exceptions.
"Every life is valuable," Gunn said.https://t.co/gCzlfG1MmN
And here's what really happened today, and you're celebrating it:Undoing Roe is awful. Kneecapping environmental regulation is existential. This Supreme Court has just come down on the side of civilizational collapse.
— Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) June 30, 2022
Rawhide said:Sounds like you'd be happier in California.J.B.Katz said:
When 6 people can, literally in the blink of an eye, make a decision that means, in my state, that the only safe course of action for my daughters/daughters in law is to avoid pregnancy altogether, because if you get pregnant in this state, you cede your ability to make any healthcare decisions for yourself (as everything a pregnant woman does affects her fetus), then, Houston, we got a problem.
I no longer have confidence that healthcare providers in my state would act affirmative to provide lifesaving treatment for an ectopic pregnancy, and I'm concerned about prosecution if there's a miscarriage. Amnesty International considers forcing women to bear the children of their rapists a human rights violation. The Taliban did that to Yazidi women. Now some states intend to do that to American citizens who just lost an important freedom--control over their own bodies.
The Christian Taliban is no better than the Muslim Taliban.
And now all the climate deniers and corporate interests are free to do nothing to address climate change, so more babies will be born into a dying world.
Here's a good Christian crowing about the effect of what SCOTUS has done:NEW: A 12-year-old child victim of rape and incest should be forced to carry and birth her father's child, Mississippi House Speaker Philip Gunn says.
— Ashton Pittman (@ashtonpittman) June 29, 2022
Even in such cases, he opposes abortion exceptions.
"Every life is valuable," Gunn said.https://t.co/gCzlfG1MmN
And here's what really happened today, and you're celebrating it:Undoing Roe is awful. Kneecapping environmental regulation is existential. This Supreme Court has just come down on the side of civilizational collapse.
— Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) June 30, 2022
SIC EM 94 said:Porteroso said:Rawhide said:
So, we've been told over and over and over that Trump questioning the legitimacy of the 2020 election is a threat to democracy.
There are democrats now calling the Supreme Court illegitimate, certainly that would be a threat to our democracy, no?
It depends. Many things are called illegitimate. But what actions people take based on that matters. Words are cheap in politics. You will need more than words to equivocate this past election with anything the Dems are doing.
We will see if justices are attacked or not. Either way, attacking a justice is a little different from trying to stop the certified votes from being accepted.
Words??? How about planning to murder a Supreme Court Justice? Your hypocrisy is disgusting!
i understand why you are miserable now.. turn off the TV, log out of social media and go outside. Go watch some kids play at the park. Go to the mall and watch people while shopling for a new outfit.J.B.Katz said:
When 6 people can, literally in the blink of an eye, make a decision that means, in my state, that the only safe course of action for my daughters/daughters in law is to avoid pregnancy altogether, because if you get pregnant in this state, you cede your ability to make any healthcare decisions for yourself (as everything a pregnant woman does affects her fetus), then, Houston, we got a problem.
I no longer have confidence that healthcare providers in my state would act affirmative to provide lifesaving treatment for an ectopic pregnancy, and I'm concerned about prosecution if there's a miscarriage. Amnesty International considers forcing women to bear the children of their rapists a human rights violation. The Taliban did that to Yazidi women. Now some states intend to do that to American citizens who just lost an important freedom--control over their own bodies.
The Christian Taliban is no better than the Muslim Taliban.
And now all the climate deniers and corporate interests are free to do nothing to address climate change, so more babies will be born into a dying world.
Here's a good Christian crowing about the effect of what SCOTUS has done:NEW: A 12-year-old child victim of rape and incest should be forced to carry and birth her father's child, Mississippi House Speaker Philip Gunn says.
— Ashton Pittman (@ashtonpittman) June 29, 2022
Even in such cases, he opposes abortion exceptions.
"Every life is valuable," Gunn said.https://t.co/gCzlfG1MmN
And here's what really happened today, and you're celebrating it:Undoing Roe is awful. Kneecapping environmental regulation is existential. This Supreme Court has just come down on the side of civilizational collapse.
— Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) June 30, 2022
I thought Jan 6 was mostly peaceful.Forest Bueller_bf said:I won't call it the "democrats" but the progressive left has always used violence, threats of violence, riots, insurrection, bodily physical and property destruction and other forms of mayhem to further their cause, and basically force their way.SIC EM 94 said:Rawhide said:
So, we've been told over and over and over that Trump questioning the legitimacy of the 2020 election is a threat to democracy.
There are democrats now calling the Supreme Court illegitimate, certainly that would be a threat to our democracy, no?
Of course it is. The Democratic "leaders" are going well beyond simply questioning the Supreme Court, they are calling for physical violence, intimidation, and civil disobedience. Those that follow the Democrats call for insurrection should all be rounded up and punished to the fullest extent of the law.
The way the left has reacted to Jan 6th is one of the most hypocritical displays I have ever seen. Not that it wasn't wrong, it certainly was, but it came right out of their playbook, that obviously they feel they have the sole ownership of and think nobody else should be able to use it.
That's the verbiage dems would use.LIB,MR BEARS said:I thought Jan 6 was mostly peaceful.Forest Bueller_bf said:I won't call it the "democrats" but the progressive left has always used violence, threats of violence, riots, insurrection, bodily physical and property destruction and other forms of mayhem to further their cause, and basically force their way.SIC EM 94 said:Rawhide said:
So, we've been told over and over and over that Trump questioning the legitimacy of the 2020 election is a threat to democracy.
There are democrats now calling the Supreme Court illegitimate, certainly that would be a threat to our democracy, no?
Of course it is. The Democratic "leaders" are going well beyond simply questioning the Supreme Court, they are calling for physical violence, intimidation, and civil disobedience. Those that follow the Democrats call for insurrection should all be rounded up and punished to the fullest extent of the law.
The way the left has reacted to Jan 6th is one of the most hypocritical displays I have ever seen. Not that it wasn't wrong, it certainly was, but it came right out of their playbook, that obviously they feel they have the sole ownership of and think nobody else should be able to use it.
Quote:
The Secret Service added: "There are approximately fifty nine (59) groups identified as potentially participating in First Amendment activities on January 6, 2021 at or around the White House Complex (WHC) ... Expected attendance is around 20,000 participants."
Six times as many protestorsas many as 120,000 would show up on the Mall on January 6, according to classified numbers still not released by the Secret Service and the FBI but seen by Newsweek. But there is still not an official estimate, nor have any of the Congressional committees or task forces offered a number. Nor is there a clear number of how many people actually entered the Capitol, or tried to get in.
jupiter said:
Moral relativism... still not the solution
Of course it isRawhide said:
So, we've been told over and over and over that Trump questioning the legitimacy of the 2020 election is a threat to democracy.
There are democrats now calling the Supreme Court illegitimate, certainly that would be a threat to our democracy, no?
