Trump orders immediate arrests for flag burning with 1-year prison term | Fox News

Trump orders henchmen to arrest and imprison for one year anybody that burns an American flag. Either Trump doesnt know much about America or he is trying to prove he is on his way to becoming a dictator.



Trump mandates flag burners face prosecution in one of biggest challenges to the First Amendment in decades | The Independent

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

Trump orders immediate arrests for flag burning with 1-year prison term | Fox News

Trump orders henchmen to arrest and imprison for one year anybody that burns an American flag. Either Trump doesnt know much about America or he is trying to prove he is on his way to becoming a dictator.



Trump mandates flag burners face prosecution in one of biggest challenges to the First Amendment in decades | The Independent

---

IP Logged.

Expect a visit from the constabulary soon.

- el KKM

go bears!

My VPN runs out of Las Angelas

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

Trump orders immediate arrests for flag burning with 1-year prison term | Fox News

Trump orders henchmen to arrest and imprison for one year anybody that burns an American flag. Either Trump doesnt know much about America or he is trying to prove he is on his way to becoming a dictator.



Trump mandates flag burners face prosecution in one of biggest challenges to the First Amendment in decades | The Independent

---

Enough of the dictator talk. Should Donald Trump refuse to leave office in January of 2029, I will be first in line at the White House with my torch and pitchfork in hand.

LOL

No one seemed to notice when Harris 'won' the Democratic Party nomination without winning a single primary.

Have there been any arrests yet?

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

---

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

Trump orders immediate arrests for flag burning with 1-year prison term | Fox News

Trump orders henchmen to arrest and imprison for one year anybody that burns an American flag. Either Trump doesnt know much about America or he is trying to prove he is on his way to becoming a dictator.



Trump mandates flag burners face prosecution in one of biggest challenges to the First Amendment in decades | The Independent

---

Enough of the dictator talk. Should Donald Trump refuse to leave office in January of 2029, I will be first in line at the White House with my torch and pitchfork in hand.

---

You won't vote for him again, even if he runs against a Democrat?

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/feds-charge-man-who-burned-u-s-flag-outside-white-house-in-protest-of-trumps-executive-order/


Yes.

I support the right of imbeciles to burn our flag. Dodger Stadium, 1976:



I also support the right of Rick Monday to peacefully interrupt morons trying to make a statement.

fubar said:

---

I support the right of imbeciles to burn our flag. Dodger Stadium, 1976:



I also support the right of Rick Monday to peacefully interrupt morons trying to make a statement.

---

I even support Trump's right to display the flag during his speeches. If that's not desecration, I don't know what is.

A part of what the American Flag represents is the right of people, even idiots, to disagree. If the flag requires a law or Executive Order to protect it from pissants, it really ain't worth protecting.

That noted leftist extremist Antonin Scalia? He agrees with me.

Sam Lowry said:

---

fubar said:

---

I support the right of imbeciles to burn our flag. Dodger Stadium, 1976:



I also support the right of Rick Monday to peacefully interrupt morons trying to make a statement.

---

I even support Trump's right to display the flag during his speeches. If that's not desecration, I don't know what is.

---

You OK if HE actually hugs it?

Commie.

fubar said:

---

A part of what the American Flag represents is the right of people, even idiots, to disagree. If the flag requires a law or Executive Order to protect it from pissants, it really ain't worth protecting.

That noted leftist extremist Antonin Scalia? He agrees with me.

---

Lots of conservatives agree with you on this, myself included. Burning ANY flag is a form of free speech.

This is of course assuming the person doing the burning came about the flag by legal means and no other laws are being broken such as blocking traffic, burn bans etc.

Express your point by any legal means you deem necessary

KaiBear said:

---

LOL

No one seemed to notice when Harris 'won' the Democratic Party nomination without winning a single primary.

---

Dont be dumb. There was not time to hold primaries again. In many states, they had to be setup at a certain time to comply with the law. You should be grateful, because it handed Trump an easy win.

Porteroso said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

LOL

No one seemed to notice when Harris 'won' the Democratic Party nomination without winning a single primary.

---

Dont be dumb. There was not time to hold primaries again. In many states, they had to be setup at a certain time to comply with the law. You should be grateful, because it handed Trump an easy win.

---

Sure. Because the Democrats had so many qualified and popular candidates who would have won in 2024.

Oldbear83 said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

LOL

No one seemed to notice when Harris 'won' the Democratic Party nomination without winning a single primary.

---

Dont be dumb. There was not time to hold primaries again. In many states, they had to be setup at a certain time to comply with the law. You should be grateful, because it handed Trump an easy win.

---

Sure. Because the Democrats had so many qualified and popular candidates who would have won in 2024.

---

I'm not saying it would have helped them, just that it was not some anti democracy thing going on.

Porteroso said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

LOL

No one seemed to notice when Harris 'won' the Democratic Party nomination without winning a single primary.

---

Dont be dumb. There was not time to hold primaries again. In many states, they had to be setup at a certain time to comply with the law. You should be grateful, because it handed Trump an easy win.

---

Sure. Because the Democrats had so many qualified and popular candidates who would have won in 2024.

---

I'm not saying it would have helped them, just that it was not some anti democracy thing going on.

---

Idiot

The individual who won every single Democratic Party primary was blatantly forced out of the general election by party bosses.

The voters were pushed aside.

It doesn't get any more flagrant than that.

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/feds-charge-man-who-burned-u-s-flag-outside-white-house-in-protest-of-trumps-executive-order/


Yes.

---

LOL so typical. No. He was not arrested/charged for the offense of burning a flag. From the article at your link:


"...Neither charge focuses on the fact that he burned a flag, specifically: one of the counts was for lighting a fire "not in a designated area and receptacle," and another was for lighting a fire "in a manner that threatened, caused damage to, and resulted in the burning of property, real property, and park resources...."

LOL cannot make this stuff up. effin' neverTrumpers literally make shyte up to suit whatever sentiments they desire to conjure in the moment.

Porteroso said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

LOL

No one seemed to notice when Harris 'won' the Democratic Party nomination without winning a single primary.

---

Dont be dumb. There was not time to hold primaries again. In many states, they had to be setup at a certain time to comply with the law. You should be grateful, because it handed Trump an easy win.

---

Sure. Because the Democrats had so many qualified and popular candidates who would have won in 2024.

---

I'm not saying it would have helped them, just that it was not some anti democracy thing going on.

---

The anti-democracy thing that had been going on was denying the inability of the president to lead due to failing health and mental capacity.

Nobody voted for an autopen except for democrats in leadership positions. Everything else was fallout including dimwit Harris not getting any primary votes

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

fubar said:

---

A part of what the American Flag represents is the right of people, even idiots, to disagree. If the flag requires a law or Executive Order to protect it from pissants, it really ain't worth protecting.

That noted leftist extremist Antonin Scalia? He agrees with me.

---

Lots of conservatives agree with you on this, myself included. Burning ANY flag is a form of free speech.

This is of course assuming the person doing the burning came about the flag by legal means and no other laws are being broken such as blocking traffic, burn bans etc.

Express your point by any legal means you deem necessary

---

Paragraphs 2 and 3 are worthy of repeating after the above post of Whiterock's

My favorite part of this thread was being told by a leftist that the duly elected Democrat candidate incumbent Joe Biden had to be replaced on the ticket without any voter involvement because they didn't have time to replace him after poor polling, you know, cuz democracy and stuff.

whiterock said:

---

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/feds-charge-man-who-burned-u-s-flag-outside-white-house-in-protest-of-trumps-executive-order/


Yes.

---

LOL so typical. No. He was not arrested/charged for the offense of burning a flag. From the article at your link:


"...Neither charge focuses on the fact that he burned a flag, specifically: one of the counts was for lighting a fire "not in a designated area and receptacle," and another was for lighting a fire "in a manner that threatened, caused damage to, and resulted in the burning of property, real property, and park resources...."

LOL cannot make this stuff up. effin' neverTrumpers literally make shyte up to suit whatever sentiments they desire to conjure in the momenT

---

Trump lied again. He said burning flag would be 1 year jail time. Trump was just bull****ting. How can you trust such a liar? lol cannot make this stuff up. Trump slurpers think he is telling the truth. Clown show

Porteroso said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

LOL

No one seemed to notice when Harris 'won' the Democratic Party nomination without winning a single primary.

---

Dont be dumb. There was not time to hold primaries again. In many states, they had to be setup at a certain time to comply with the law. You should be grateful, because it handed Trump an easy win.

---

Sure. Because the Democrats had so many qualified and popular candidates who would have won in 2024.

---

I'm not saying it would have helped them, just that it was not some anti democracy thing going on.

---

LOL, the Democrats certainly had other options than shoving the VP into the slot and ignoring their convention delegates.

Porteroso said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

LOL

No one seemed to notice when Harris 'won' the Democratic Party nomination without winning a single primary.

---

Dont be dumb. There was not time to hold primaries again. In many states, they had to be setup at a certain time to comply with the law. You should be grateful, because it handed Trump an easy win.

---

Sure. Because the Democrats had so many qualified and popular candidates who would have won in 2024.

---

I'm not saying it would have helped them, just that it was not some anti democracy thing going on.

---

Keeping a dementia-ridden candidate on the ticket wasn't anti-democracy? How was it that Biden was supposed to have a chance? Not by any communication directly with the public. How was he supposed to do his job? He couldn't. The Democrat party wanted four more years of rule by non-elected bureaucrats.

Nothing screams "democracy" like not allowing people to vote and pick a candidate. Democracy is party bosses selecting candidates.

100% disagree with Trump on this one. I think burning the flag is tacky and distasteful, and I think it makes you look like an ass, but I also think it is a form of political speech that must be allowed if we are serious about having free speech.

Robert Wilson said:

---

100% disagree with Trump on this one. I think burning the flag is tacky and distasteful, and I think it makes you look like an ass, but I also think it is a form of political speech that must be allowed if we are serious about having free speech.

---

I don't think anyone, including Trump, believes this will stand under judicial scrutiny. I think he is trying to get democrats to start burning the flag more often.

Wangchung said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

100% disagree with Trump on this one. I think burning the flag is tacky and distasteful, and I think it makes you look like an ass, but I also think it is a form of political speech that must be allowed if we are serious about having free speech.

---

I don't think anyone, including Trump, believes this will stand under judicial scrutiny. I think he is trying to get democrats to start burning the flag more often.

---

Maybe, but there are other ways to get them to do that.

If the other side has gotten their nose way over their toes calling you anti free speech, no reason to give them a little bit of ammo.

If ****ty a** food is an American Value or Tradition, Stean 'n Shake is the national leader.

I think he is flexing his clout to how powerful he really is.

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

I think he is flexing his clout to how powerful he really is.

---

has it ever occurred to you that your reaction might have much more to do with you than him?

KaiBear said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

LOL

No one seemed to notice when Harris 'won' the Democratic Party nomination without winning a single primary.

---

Dont be dumb. There was not time to hold primaries again. In many states, they had to be setup at a certain time to comply with the law. You should be grateful, because it handed Trump an easy win.

---

Sure. Because the Democrats had so many qualified and popular candidates who would have won in 2024.

---

I'm not saying it would have helped them, just that it was not some anti democracy thing going on.

---

Idiot

The individual who won every single Democratic Party primary was blatantly forced out of the general election by party bosses.

The voters were pushed aside.

It doesn't get any more flagrant than that.

---

What? Is your memory that bad?

He dropped out once he had a disastrous appearance and it started to become clear in polling he was going to lose badly. And he did not win a primary. He was an incumbent. The way you frame it is peak conspiracy nut.