Both of those are great ideas.

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

Would it be possible to auto limit the number of times a poster can reply within the first 5-10 posts of their own thread? That could cut down on the few clowns on this board that like to push their yawn threads to the top of the forum so often. Let the real market decide what conversations deserve to stay relevant.


Moderation, by the way.

---

Why don't you limit the number of times you check the number of times a poster can reply within the first 5-10 posts of their threads?

Anti regulation by the way.

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

Good idea.

I would vote for one person, one sn also.

Some posters just talk to themselves under different names.

---

Someone care to explain the internet to the new guy.

You do realize this is virtually impossible, right?

TellMeYouLoveMe said:

---

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

Good idea.

I would vote for one person, one sn also.

Some posters just talk to themselves under different names.

---

Someone care to explain the internet to the new guy.

You do realize this is virtually impossible, right?

---

How about you explain.

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

Would it be possible to auto limit the number of times a poster can reply within the first 5-10 posts of their own thread? That could cut down on the few clowns on this board that like to push their yawn threads to the top of the forum so often. Let the real market decide what conversations deserve to stay relevant.


Moderation, by the way.

---

Laf. You're asking for regulation, not a market.

TellMeYouLoveMe said:

---

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

Good idea.

I would vote for one person, one sn also.

Some posters just talk to themselves under different names.

---

Someone care to explain the internet to the new guy.

You do realize this is virtually impossible, right?

---

This was suggested very early on. Al Gore was against it.

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

TellMeYouLoveMe said:

---

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

Good idea.

I would vote for one person, one sn also.

Some posters just talk to themselves under different names.

---

Someone care to explain the internet to the new guy.

You do realize this is virtually impossible, right?

---

This was suggested very early on. Al Gore was against it.

---

Explain what is impossible and why. I don't get the point.

quash said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

TellMeYouLoveMe said:

---

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

Good idea.

I would vote for one person, one sn also.

Some posters just talk to themselves under different names.

---

Someone care to explain the internet to the new guy.

You do realize this is virtually impossible, right?

---

This was suggested very early on. Al Gore was against it.

---

Explain what is impossible and why. I don't get the point.

---

Tongue in cheek. Al Gore invented the internet. He was against this option and didn't install it.

This can also be seen as an example of why I am a member of the typical working class and not a comedian ( certainly not a successful one )

TellMeYouLoveMe said:

---

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

Good idea.

I would vote for one person, one sn also.

Some posters just talk to themselves under different names.

---

Someone care to explain the internet to the new guy.

You do realize this is virtually impossible, right?

---

What is impossible and why?

quash said:

---

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

Would it be possible to auto limit the number of times a poster can reply within the first 5-10 posts of their own thread? That could cut down on the few clowns on this board that like to push their yawn threads to the top of the forum so often. Let the real market decide what conversations deserve to stay relevant.


Moderation, by the way.

---

Laf. You're asking for regulation, not a market.

---

So you wouldn't want the police to talk to your neighbor about their loud music at 2:00 in the morning? (After you had asked them to tone it down already, of course.)

A message board itself is not a market. It has a moderator for a reason. It needs to be enjoyable for the most people it can be in order to stay in the market made up of message boards. If it becomes too restrictive, it will lose its market share. If it becomes dominated by a few clowns, it will lose its market share.

While clowns are entertaining, even the circus limits their exposure to keep them from losing their entertainment value and becoming a nuisance.

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

quash said:

---

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

Would it be possible to auto limit the number of times a poster can reply within the first 5-10 posts of their own thread? That could cut down on the few clowns on this board that like to push their yawn threads to the top of the forum so often. Let the real market decide what conversations deserve to stay relevant.


Moderation, by the way.

---

Laf. You're asking for regulation, not a market.

---

So you wouldn't want the police to talk to your neighbor about their loud music at 2:00 in the morning? (After you had asked them to tone it down already, of course.)

A message board itself is not a market. It has a moderator for a reason. It needs to be enjoyable for the most people it can be in order to stay in the market made up of message boards. If it becomes too restrictive, it will lose its market share. If it becomes dominated by a few clowns, it will lose its market share.

While clowns are entertaining, even the circus limits their exposure to keep them from losing their entertainment value and becoming a nuisance.

---

I want a free exchange of ideas. You want a curated board. Try the comments section at Foxnews.com.

quash said:

---

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

quash said:

---

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

Would it be possible to auto limit the number of times a poster can reply within the first 5-10 posts of their own thread? That could cut down on the few clowns on this board that like to push their yawn threads to the top of the forum so often. Let the real market decide what conversations deserve to stay relevant.


Moderation, by the way.

---

Laf. You're asking for regulation, not a market.

---

So you wouldn't want the police to talk to your neighbor about their loud music at 2:00 in the morning? (After you had asked them to tone it down already, of course.)

A message board itself is not a market. It has a moderator for a reason. It needs to be enjoyable for the most people it can be in order to stay in the market made up of message boards. If it becomes too restrictive, it will lose its market share. If it becomes dominated by a few clowns, it will lose its market share.

While clowns are entertaining, even the circus limits their exposure to keep them from losing their entertainment value and becoming a nuisance.

---

I want a free exchange of ideas. You want a curated board. Try the comments section at Foxnews.com.

---

Sorry, I don't go to the extremes and act like extreme choices are all there are when having a conversation.

quash said:

---

TellMeYouLoveMe said:

---

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

Good idea.

I would vote for one person, one sn also.

Some posters just talk to themselves under different names.

---

Someone care to explain the internet to the new guy.

You do realize this is virtually impossible, right?

---

What is impossible and why?

---

Are you serious with this?

cowboycwr said:

---

quash said:

---

TellMeYouLoveMe said:

---

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

Good idea.

I would vote for one person, one sn also.

Some posters just talk to themselves under different names.

---

Someone care to explain the internet to the new guy.

You do realize this is virtually impossible, right?

---

What is impossible and why?

---

Are you serious with this?

---

That's why I keep asking.

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

quash said:

---

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

quash said:

---

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

Would it be possible to auto limit the number of times a poster can reply within the first 5-10 posts of their own thread? That could cut down on the few clowns on this board that like to push their yawn threads to the top of the forum so often. Let the real market decide what conversations deserve to stay relevant.


Moderation, by the way.

---

Laf. You're asking for regulation, not a market.

---

So you wouldn't want the police to talk to your neighbor about their loud music at 2:00 in the morning? (After you had asked them to tone it down already, of course.)

A message board itself is not a market. It has a moderator for a reason. It needs to be enjoyable for the most people it can be in order to stay in the market made up of message boards. If it becomes too restrictive, it will lose its market share. If it becomes dominated by a few clowns, it will lose its market share.

While clowns are entertaining, even the circus limits their exposure to keep them from losing their entertainment value and becoming a nuisance.

---

I want a free exchange of ideas. You want a curated board. Try the comments section at Foxnews.com.

---

Sorry, I don't go to the extremes and act like extreme choices are all there are when having a conversation.

---

That has nothing to do with requesting a more restrictively moderated board.

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

quash said:

---

TellMeYouLoveMe said:

---

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

Good idea.

I would vote for one person, one sn also.

Some posters just talk to themselves under different names.

---

Someone care to explain the internet to the new guy.

You do realize this is virtually impossible, right?

---

What is impossible and why?

---

Are you serious with this?

---

That's why I keep asking.

---

Ok. There really is no way to tell if one person has multiple screen names. They could use different emails and different devices for each. Yes it is a bit cumbersome for them but nothing really stops them.

cowboycwr said:

---

quash said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

quash said:

---

TellMeYouLoveMe said:

---

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

Good idea.

I would vote for one person, one sn also.

Some posters just talk to themselves under different names.

---

Someone care to explain the internet to the new guy.

You do realize this is virtually impossible, right?

---

What is impossible and why?

---

Are you serious with this?

---

That's why I keep asking.

---

Ok. There really is no way to tell if one person has multiple screen names. They could use different emails and different devices for each. Yes it is a bit cumbersome for them but nothing really stops them.

---

Thanks.

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

Would it be possible to auto limit the number of times a poster can reply within the first 5-10 posts of their own thread? That could cut down on the few clowns on this board that like to push their yawn threads to the top of the forum so often. Let the real market decide what conversations deserve to stay relevant.


Moderation, by the way.

---

Would you like to amend your moderation request to include cornstove and his monkeyshines? Or is the bumping of dozens of threads just the market at work?

quash said:

---

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

Would it be possible to auto limit the number of times a poster can reply within the first 5-10 posts of their own thread? That could cut down on the few clowns on this board that like to push their yawn threads to the top of the forum so often. Let the real market decide what conversations deserve to stay relevant.


Moderation, by the way.

---

Would you like to amend your moderation request to include cornstove and his monkeyshines? Or is the bumping of dozens of threads just the market at work?

---

I don't believe I mentioned any particular posters. I expect the terms to apply to all. But thanks for asking so that could be made clear to you.

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

Good idea.

I would vote for one person, one sn also.

Some posters just talk to themselves under different names.

---

1. One person one sn.
2. Limit the number of posts per individual to 10 within 24 hours.
3. Limit the number of threads created by an individual within 24 hours to 3.

Would open this board to more-different people with potentially fresh perspectives.

As it stands now almost everyone can predict the various responses of everyone else regardless of the topic.

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

quash said:

---

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

Would it be possible to auto limit the number of times a poster can reply within the first 5-10 posts of their own thread? That could cut down on the few clowns on this board that like to push their yawn threads to the top of the forum so often. Let the real market decide what conversations deserve to stay relevant.


Moderation, by the way.

---

Would you like to amend your moderation request to include cornstove and his monkeyshines? Or is the bumping of dozens of threads just the market at work?

---

I don't believe I mentioned any particular posters. I expect the terms to apply to all. But thanks for asking so that could be made clear to you.

---

It's not the poster it's the tactic. Where do you stand on bumping dozens of threads, restrict them? Ban the bumper?

I'd say do nothing.

quash said:

---

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

quash said:

---

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

Would it be possible to auto limit the number of times a poster can reply within the first 5-10 posts of their own thread? That could cut down on the few clowns on this board that like to push their yawn threads to the top of the forum so often. Let the real market decide what conversations deserve to stay relevant.


Moderation, by the way.

---

Would you like to amend your moderation request to include cornstove and his monkeyshines? Or is the bumping of dozens of threads just the market at work?

---

I don't believe I mentioned any particular posters. I expect the terms to apply to all. But thanks for asking so that could be made clear to you.

---

It's not the poster it's the tactic. Where do you stand on bumping dozens of threads, restrict them? Ban the bumper?

I'd say do nothing.

---

I believe the original request will naturally slow the tactic you mention. Discourteous posters beget more discourteous posters. They feed on each other.

I do prefer that the one poster cabals were weedable back to one screen name per cabal. Would be (is?) a constant battle to keep down those multi-account posters, but conversations are easier and more sane when there is one name per person.

quash said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

TellMeYouLoveMe said:

---

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

Good idea.

I would vote for one person, one sn also.

Some posters just talk to themselves under different names.

---

Someone care to explain the internet to the new guy.

You do realize this is virtually impossible, right?

---

This was suggested very early on. Al Gore was against it.

---

Explain what is impossible and why. I don't get the point.

---

My guess is this site goes from banning accounts to then banning IPs. But if someone was determined to share their brilliance here they could use a Proxy, vpn, or TOR.

Canada2017 said:

---

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

---

Good idea.

I would vote for one person, one sn also.

Some posters just talk to themselves under different names.

---

1. One person one sn.
2. Limit the number of posts per individual to 10 within 24 hours.
3. Limit the number of threads created by an individual within 24 hours to 3.

Would open this board to more-different people with potentially fresh perspectives.

As it stands now almost everyone can predict the various responses of everyone else regardless of the topic.

---

1- there really is no way to do this
2- I would say a little higher than 10. This is my 4th post this morning and 3 of them were replies to people who specifically addressed me.
3- This I could get behind.

how about posters limited to creating one thread every 24 hours

LOL

children of the corn

quash said:

---

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

quash said:

---

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

Would it be possible to auto limit the number of times a poster can reply within the first 5-10 posts of their own thread? That could cut down on the few clowns on this board that like to push their yawn threads to the top of the forum so often. Let the real market decide what conversations deserve to stay relevant.


Moderation, by the way.

---

Would you like to amend your moderation request to include cornstove and his monkeyshines? Or is the bumping of dozens of threads just the market at work?

---

I don't believe I mentioned any particular posters. I expect the terms to apply to all. But thanks for asking so that could be made clear to you.

---

It's not the poster it's the tactic. Where do you stand on bumping dozens of threads, restrict them? Ban the bumper?

I'd say do nothing.

---

ValhallaBear said:

---

quash said:

---

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

quash said:

---

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

Would it be possible to auto limit the number of times a poster can reply within the first 5-10 posts of their own thread? That could cut down on the few clowns on this board that like to push their yawn threads to the top of the forum so often. Let the real market decide what conversations deserve to stay relevant.


Moderation, by the way.

---

Would you like to amend your moderation request to include cornstove and his monkeyshines? Or is the bumping of dozens of threads just the market at work?

---

I don't believe I mentioned any particular posters. I expect the terms to apply to all. But thanks for asking so that could be made clear to you.

---

It's not the poster it's the tactic. Where do you stand on bumping dozens of threads, restrict them? Ban the bumper?

I'd say do nothing.

---

---

My preference for not restricting bothers you?

Hit the road quash.. America needs ball bearings and sprockets... more than your bitter commentary

corncob pipe said:

---

Hit the road quash.. America needs ball bearings and sprockets... more than your bitter commentary

---

If you find bitterness you brought it with you.

quash said:

---

ValhallaBear said:

---

quash said:

---

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

quash said:

---

EatMoreSalmon said:

---

Would it be possible to auto limit the number of times a poster can reply within the first 5-10 posts of their own thread? That could cut down on the few clowns on this board that like to push their yawn threads to the top of the forum so often. Let the real market decide what conversations deserve to stay relevant.


Moderation, by the way.

---

Would you like to amend your moderation request to include cornstove and his monkeyshines? Or is the bumping of dozens of threads just the market at work?

---

I don't believe I mentioned any particular posters. I expect the terms to apply to all. But thanks for asking so that could be made clear to you.

---

It's not the poster it's the tactic. Where do you stand on bumping dozens of threads, restrict them? Ban the bumper?

I'd say do nothing.

---

---

My preference for not restricting bothers you?

---

Wait for Mueller's report

HURRY Special "Republican" Counselor Mueller Hurry !!!!

Roy Moore is definitely a pedo