I agree.Jack and DP said:
Should've happened years ago.
Coke Bear said:
Sad that it took this long. Hopefully he had time for redemption and remorse.
Did anyone else remember this being more about a drug deal gone WAY wrong than it was a race crime?
holy cow! I hope you limbered up befor making that stretch.tommie said:Coke Bear said:
Sad that it took this long. Hopefully he had time for redemption and remorse.
Did anyone else remember this being more about a drug deal gone WAY wrong than it was a race crime?
It was a hate crime. Now, if you're against the death penalty for tying a guy to a truck and dragging him for miles to his death, I'm interested in your argument.
LIB,MR BEARS said:holy cow! I hope you limbered up befor making that stretch.tommie said:Coke Bear said:
Sad that it took this long. Hopefully he had time for redemption and remorse.
Did anyone else remember this being more about a drug deal gone WAY wrong than it was a race crime?
It was a hate crime. Now, if you're against the death penalty for tying a guy to a truck and dragging him for miles to his death, I'm interested in your argument.
He asked a question that actually shows a little more hope for mankind than does a hate crime.
Reactionary much?
Oh, look what I found with my first google search on the subjecttommie said:LIB,MR BEARS said:holy cow! I hope you limbered up befor making that stretch.tommie said:Coke Bear said:
Sad that it took this long. Hopefully he had time for redemption and remorse.
Did anyone else remember this being more about a drug deal gone WAY wrong than it was a race crime?
It was a hate crime. Now, if you're against the death penalty for tying a guy to a truck and dragging him for miles to his death, I'm interested in your argument.
He asked a question that actually shows a little more hope for mankind than does a hate crime.
Reactionary much?
Reactionary? Really? Why? Because three guys decided to drag a mentally ******ed guy to his death.
Maybe you're hoping that they had a good reason to drag the guy to his death.
Can you help me understand what are good reasons?
The guy got due processtommie said:Coke Bear said:
Sad that it took this long. Hopefully he had time for redemption and remorse.
Did anyone else remember this being more about a drug deal gone WAY wrong than it was a race crime?
It was a hate crime. Now, if you're against the death penalty for tying a guy to a truck and dragging him for miles to his death, I'm interested in your argument.
Why the heck are you arguing over this? The guy deserves death.LIB,MR BEARS said:Oh, look what I found with my first google search on the subjecttommie said:LIB,MR BEARS said:holy cow! I hope you limbered up befor making that stretch.tommie said:Coke Bear said:
Sad that it took this long. Hopefully he had time for redemption and remorse.
Did anyone else remember this being more about a drug deal gone WAY wrong than it was a race crime?
It was a hate crime. Now, if you're against the death penalty for tying a guy to a truck and dragging him for miles to his death, I'm interested in your argument.
He asked a question that actually shows a little more hope for mankind than does a hate crime.
Reactionary much?
Reactionary? Really? Why? Because three guys decided to drag a mentally ******ed guy to his death.
Maybe you're hoping that they had a good reason to drag the guy to his death.
Can you help me understand what are good reasons?
"Over the years, King has also suggested the brutal slaying was not a hate crime, but a drug deal gone bad involving his co-defendants."
I'm not saying it wasn't a hate crime and I sure didn't read Coke's post ad that either. I'm guessing that is exactly what it was. But, this certainly gives evidence to support Coke's >>>recollection <<< not claim. It was the perp that made the claim.
The knee jerk reaction makes me think your someone's ex-wife or, soon will be.
I never said that. It was a brutal way to kill another human.tommie said:Coke Bear said:
Sad that it took this long. Hopefully he had time for redemption and remorse.
Did anyone else remember this being more about a drug deal gone WAY wrong than it was a race crime?
It was a hate crime. Now, if you're against the death penalty for tying a guy to a truck and dragging him for miles to his death, I'm interested in your argument.
LIB,MR BEARS said:Oh, look what I found with my first google search on the subjecttommie said:LIB,MR BEARS said:holy cow! I hope you limbered up befor making that stretch.tommie said:Coke Bear said:
Sad that it took this long. Hopefully he had time for redemption and remorse.
Did anyone else remember this being more about a drug deal gone WAY wrong than it was a race crime?
It was a hate crime. Now, if you're against the death penalty for tying a guy to a truck and dragging him for miles to his death, I'm interested in your argument.
He asked a question that actually shows a little more hope for mankind than does a hate crime.
Reactionary much?
Reactionary? Really? Why? Because three guys decided to drag a mentally ******ed guy to his death.
Maybe you're hoping that they had a good reason to drag the guy to his death.
Can you help me understand what are good reasons?
"Over the years, King has also suggested the brutal slaying was not a hate crime, but a drug deal gone bad involving his co-defendants."
I'm not saying it wasn't a hate crime and I sure didn't read Coke's post ad that either. I'm guessing that is exactly what it was. But, this certainly gives evidence to support Coke's >>>recollection <<< not claim. It was the perp that made the claim.
The knee jerk reaction makes me think your someone's ex-wife or, soon will be.
I was commenting on his near accusatory response to Coke's comment. Yes, the guy got what he deserved... many years too late.Alfred Anchorsen said:Why the heck are you arguing over this? The guy deserves death.LIB,MR BEARS said:Oh, look what I found with my first google search on the subjecttommie said:LIB,MR BEARS said:holy cow! I hope you limbered up befor making that stretch.tommie said:Coke Bear said:
Sad that it took this long. Hopefully he had time for redemption and remorse.
Did anyone else remember this being more about a drug deal gone WAY wrong than it was a race crime?
It was a hate crime. Now, if you're against the death penalty for tying a guy to a truck and dragging him for miles to his death, I'm interested in your argument.
He asked a question that actually shows a little more hope for mankind than does a hate crime.
Reactionary much?
Reactionary? Really? Why? Because three guys decided to drag a mentally ******ed guy to his death.
Maybe you're hoping that they had a good reason to drag the guy to his death.
Can you help me understand what are good reasons?
"Over the years, King has also suggested the brutal slaying was not a hate crime, but a drug deal gone bad involving his co-defendants."
I'm not saying it wasn't a hate crime and I sure didn't read Coke's post ad that either. I'm guessing that is exactly what it was. But, this certainly gives evidence to support Coke's >>>recollection <<< not claim. It was the perp that made the claim.
The knee jerk reaction makes me think your someone's ex-wife or, soon will be.
He had time. He never expressed remorse.Coke Bear said:
Sad that it took this long. Hopefully he had time for redemption and remorse.
Did anyone else remember this being more about a drug deal gone WAY wrong than it was a race crime?
My secretary says they should have dragged him to death. Said that if there had been a raffle to see who gets to drag him she'd have bought a ticket. And she's your basic blue hair.JXL said:
Should have happened a long time ago. He's a POS and deserved to die in a much more horrible fashion than he actually did.