Does this mean all of the Kurdish fighters who helped us with ISIS will now be slaughtered?

Redbrickbear said:

---

The Turks hate the Kurds.

The Kurds hate the Turks.

The Iranians (Persians) hate the Arabs.

The Arabs hate the Iranians.

The jews hate all the of them....and all of them hate the hebrews in return.

Screw all these barbaric Semites.

Let them kill each other.

I just wish we could get off middle eastern heroin....sorry they call it oil...and then treat the whole region the way we do central Africa.....a big who cares.

---

So, does this mean the Kurds who have helped us contain ISIS, will be slaughtered?

YoakDaddy said:

---

cinque said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

The Turks hate the Kurds.

The Kurds hate the Turks.

The Iranians (Persians) hate the Arabs.

The Arabs hate the Iranians.

The jews hate all the of them....and all of them hate the hebrews in return.

Screw all these barbaric Semites.

Let them kill each other.

I just wish we could get off middle eastern heroin....sorry they call it oil...and then treat the whole region the way we do central Africa.....a big who cares.

---

So, does this mean the Kurds who have helped us contain ISIS, will be slaughtered?

---

It means we have an America First foreign policy. #KAG2020

---

Does this mean Putin's foreign policy objectives will be satisfied while our allies around the world watch us put the Kurds at risk?

Kurds screwed again

fubar said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

cinque said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

cinque said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

The Turks hate the Kurds.

The Kurds hate the Turks.

The Iranians (Persians) hate the Arabs.

The Arabs hate the Iranians.

The jews hate all the of them....and all of them hate the hebrews in return.

Screw all these barbaric Semites.

Let them kill each other.

I just wish we could get off middle eastern heroin....sorry they call it oil...and then treat the whole region the way we do central Africa.....a big who cares.

---

So, does this mean the Kurds who have helped us contain ISIS, will be slaughtered?

---

It means we have an America First foreign policy. #KAG2020

---

Does this mean Putin's foreign policy objectives will be satisfied while our allies around the world watch us put the Kurds at risk?

---

It means we have an America First foreign policy no longer attached to who John McCain and Obama wanted us to drop bombs on.

---

Who did McCain and Obama want to drop bombs on? And what does that have to do with Trump's incredibly ill-conceived decision?

I'll wait patiently for your answers.

---

Right question. Who?

Don't tell anyone that President Trump used to be pro-abortion ... you'll have the largest acceptance of Pro-Life in history.

fubar said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

fubar said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

cinque said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

cinque said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

The Turks hate the Kurds.

The Kurds hate the Turks.

The Iranians (Persians) hate the Arabs.

The Arabs hate the Iranians.

The jews hate all the of them....and all of them hate the hebrews in return.

Screw all these barbaric Semites.

Let them kill each other.

I just wish we could get off middle eastern heroin....sorry they call it oil...and then treat the whole region the way we do central Africa.....a big who cares.

---

So, does this mean the Kurds who have helped us contain ISIS, will be slaughtered?

---

It means we have an America First foreign policy. #KAG2020

---

Does this mean Putin's foreign policy objectives will be satisfied while our allies around the world watch us put the Kurds at risk?

---

It means we have an America First foreign policy no longer attached to who John McCain and Obama wanted us to drop bombs on.

---

Who did McCain and Obama want to drop bombs on? And what does that have to do with Trump's incredibly ill-conceived decision?

I'll wait patiently for your answers.

---

Sorry. It was Obama that was a poosy and didn't stand up to Assad when he passed "the red line". McCain saw an opportunity to drop bombs on Assad and implement a meddle first, fix later foreign policy like GW Bush did in Iraq where we sought regime change for WMDs that were never found when we should've gone after the Saudis. I'm not saying Assad didn't deserve a few bombs up his a ss because he's a scumbag dictator just like Erdogan.

This is a centuries old fight between rival ethnic groups. They don't need encouragement or protection when in McCains own words "we've trained and equipped them". What's the objective and how many dead Americans are you willing to accept for something that's not our fight?

---

I will certainly agree with you in that Obama screwed the pooch in Syria. I'm not quite sure that answers "who did McCain and Obama want to drop bombs on?" Neither wanted to drop bombs on Turkey or the Kurds, that's for sure, so I think your original question was irrelevant.

As to how many dead Americans I'm willing to accept, I'll ask another question first: How many allies do we desert before we realize we have nobody willing to partner with us ... at all?

And I'll point out that the last time we retreated into isolationism the world went to hell in a handbasket that eventually cost over 400,000 American dead. Which was a drop in the bucket of world dead.

Make a commitment, keep it. Stay engaged. It may cost some in the short term, but it will save in the long run.

It isn't just McCain and Obama saying that.

---

So sacrificing a few Americans now for nothing is worth it in the long term? I hope you'll visit those dead GI's families.

This is actually really good for us long term. Erdogan liked ISIS until they got too big to deal with...again. Now that they're done with, Erdogan is trying to carve out an area in NW Syria for his own Turkish interests. Trump has told Erdogan that ISIS is now his problem if they come back; thus Erdogan's buffer zone in NW Syria of resettled Sunnis. At the same time Russia has promised to maintain the territorial integrity of Syria. So how does Russia now deal with Erdogan carving out a piece of Syria for his own purposes? Iran is now pissed because it has no direct connectivity to its Shia population in Lebanon because of the Sunnis that Erdogan is resettling in NW Syria; therefore, they're now isolated even further. The bottom line is that they all 4 must confront each other and not have the US as a common enemy.

This thing is way to complicated for any of us to know since we have no clue what intelligence the administration has on this but I thought this was an interesting take. Clearly people are all over the place on this.

fubar said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

fubar said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

fubar said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

cinque said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

cinque said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

The Turks hate the Kurds.

The Kurds hate the Turks.

The Iranians (Persians) hate the Arabs.

The Arabs hate the Iranians.

The jews hate all the of them....and all of them hate the hebrews in return.

Screw all these barbaric Semites.

Let them kill each other.

I just wish we could get off middle eastern heroin....sorry they call it oil...and then treat the whole region the way we do central Africa.....a big who cares.

---

So, does this mean the Kurds who have helped us contain ISIS, will be slaughtered?

---

It means we have an America First foreign policy. #KAG2020

---

Does this mean Putin's foreign policy objectives will be satisfied while our allies around the world watch us put the Kurds at risk?

---

It means we have an America First foreign policy no longer attached to who John McCain and Obama wanted us to drop bombs on.

---

Who did McCain and Obama want to drop bombs on? And what does that have to do with Trump's incredibly ill-conceived decision?

I'll wait patiently for your answers.

---

Sorry. It was Obama that was a poosy and didn't stand up to Assad when he passed "the red line". McCain saw an opportunity to drop bombs on Assad and implement a meddle first, fix later foreign policy like GW Bush did in Iraq where we sought regime change for WMDs that were never found when we should've gone after the Saudis. I'm not saying Assad didn't deserve a few bombs up his a ss because he's a scumbag dictator just like Erdogan.

This is a centuries old fight between rival ethnic groups. They don't need encouragement or protection when in McCains own words "we've trained and equipped them". What's the objective and how many dead Americans are you willing to accept for something that's not our fight?

---

I will certainly agree with you in that Obama screwed the pooch in Syria. I'm not quite sure that answers "who did McCain and Obama want to drop bombs on?" Neither wanted to drop bombs on Turkey or the Kurds, that's for sure, so I think your original question was irrelevant.

As to how many dead Americans I'm willing to accept, I'll ask another question first: How many allies do we desert before we realize we have nobody willing to partner with us ... at all?

And I'll point out that the last time we retreated into isolationism the world went to hell in a handbasket that eventually cost over 400,000 American dead. Which was a drop in the bucket of world dead.

Make a commitment, keep it. Stay engaged. It may cost some in the short term, but it will save in the long run.

It isn't just McCain and Obama saying that.

---

So sacrificing a few Americans now for nothing is worth it in the long term? I hope you'll visit those dead GI's families.

---

Two questions: For nothing? How many American soldiers have died in Syria so far? Why do you think deaths are imminent?

That's actually three questions, not two, so sue me.

Make a commitment, keep it. It saves lives in the long run.

---

The Kurds have been dying in our place.

cinque said:

---

fubar said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

fubar said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

fubar said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

cinque said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

cinque said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

The Turks hate the Kurds.

The Kurds hate the Turks.

The Iranians (Persians) hate the Arabs.

The Arabs hate the Iranians.

The jews hate all the of them....and all of them hate the hebrews in return.

Screw all these barbaric Semites.

Let them kill each other.

I just wish we could get off middle eastern heroin....sorry they call it oil...and then treat the whole region the way we do central Africa.....a big who cares.

---

So, does this mean the Kurds who have helped us contain ISIS, will be slaughtered?

---

It means we have an America First foreign policy. #KAG2020

---

Does this mean Putin's foreign policy objectives will be satisfied while our allies around the world watch us put the Kurds at risk?

---

It means we have an America First foreign policy no longer attached to who John McCain and Obama wanted us to drop bombs on.

---

Who did McCain and Obama want to drop bombs on? And what does that have to do with Trump's incredibly ill-conceived decision?

I'll wait patiently for your answers.

---

Sorry. It was Obama that was a poosy and didn't stand up to Assad when he passed "the red line". McCain saw an opportunity to drop bombs on Assad and implement a meddle first, fix later foreign policy like GW Bush did in Iraq where we sought regime change for WMDs that were never found when we should've gone after the Saudis. I'm not saying Assad didn't deserve a few bombs up his a ss because he's a scumbag dictator just like Erdogan.

This is a centuries old fight between rival ethnic groups. They don't need encouragement or protection when in McCains own words "we've trained and equipped them". What's the objective and how many dead Americans are you willing to accept for something that's not our fight?

---

I will certainly agree with you in that Obama screwed the pooch in Syria. I'm not quite sure that answers "who did McCain and Obama want to drop bombs on?" Neither wanted to drop bombs on Turkey or the Kurds, that's for sure, so I think your original question was irrelevant.

As to how many dead Americans I'm willing to accept, I'll ask another question first: How many allies do we desert before we realize we have nobody willing to partner with us ... at all?

And I'll point out that the last time we retreated into isolationism the world went to hell in a handbasket that eventually cost over 400,000 American dead. Which was a drop in the bucket of world dead.

Make a commitment, keep it. Stay engaged. It may cost some in the short term, but it will save in the long run.

It isn't just McCain and Obama saying that.

---

So sacrificing a few Americans now for nothing is worth it in the long term? I hope you'll visit those dead GI's families.

---

Two questions: For nothing? How many American soldiers have died in Syria so far? Why do you think deaths are imminent?

That's actually three questions, not two, so sue me.

Make a commitment, keep it. It saves lives in the long run.

---

The Kurds have been dying in our place.

---

It's not our place. We've equipped and trained them. It's their centuries old fight.

fubar said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

fubar said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

fubar said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

cinque said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

cinque said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

The Turks hate the Kurds.

The Kurds hate the Turks.

The Iranians (Persians) hate the Arabs.

The Arabs hate the Iranians.

The jews hate all the of them....and all of them hate the hebrews in return.

Screw all these barbaric Semites.

Let them kill each other.

I just wish we could get off middle eastern heroin....sorry they call it oil...and then treat the whole region the way we do central Africa.....a big who cares.

---

So, does this mean the Kurds who have helped us contain ISIS, will be slaughtered?

---

It means we have an America First foreign policy. #KAG2020

---

Does this mean Putin's foreign policy objectives will be satisfied while our allies around the world watch us put the Kurds at risk?

---

It means we have an America First foreign policy no longer attached to who John McCain and Obama wanted us to drop bombs on.

---

Who did McCain and Obama want to drop bombs on? And what does that have to do with Trump's incredibly ill-conceived decision?

I'll wait patiently for your answers.

---

Sorry. It was Obama that was a poosy and didn't stand up to Assad when he passed "the red line". McCain saw an opportunity to drop bombs on Assad and implement a meddle first, fix later foreign policy like GW Bush did in Iraq where we sought regime change for WMDs that were never found when we should've gone after the Saudis. I'm not saying Assad didn't deserve a few bombs up his a ss because he's a scumbag dictator just like Erdogan.

This is a centuries old fight between rival ethnic groups. They don't need encouragement or protection when in McCains own words "we've trained and equipped them". What's the objective and how many dead Americans are you willing to accept for something that's not our fight?

---

I will certainly agree with you in that Obama screwed the pooch in Syria. I'm not quite sure that answers "who did McCain and Obama want to drop bombs on?" Neither wanted to drop bombs on Turkey or the Kurds, that's for sure, so I think your original question was irrelevant.

As to how many dead Americans I'm willing to accept, I'll ask another question first: How many allies do we desert before we realize we have nobody willing to partner with us ... at all?

And I'll point out that the last time we retreated into isolationism the world went to hell in a handbasket that eventually cost over 400,000 American dead. Which was a drop in the bucket of world dead.

Make a commitment, keep it. Stay engaged. It may cost some in the short term, but it will save in the long run.

It isn't just McCain and Obama saying that.

---

So sacrificing a few Americans now for nothing is worth it in the long term? I hope you'll visit those dead GI's families.

---

Two questions: For nothing? How many American soldiers have died in Syria so far? Why do you think deaths are imminent?

That's actually three questions, not two, so sue me.

Make a commitment, keep it. It saves lives in the long run.

---

Can't address the strategy can you? Turkey has announced its plans for NW Syria. Russia's policy for Syria is known. Iran will be further isolated. We just won't participate. We've got zero reason for being there, zero exit strategy if we stay, and it's a centuries old ethnic fight.

The PKK is a listed terrorist organization. Their affiliates in Syria had everything to gain and nothing to lose by accepting our aid. Maintaining a permanent alliance with them makes as much sense as remaining allied with Stalin after WWII.

Canada2017 said:

---

tommie said:

---

Canada2017 said:

---

tommie said:

---

YoakDaddy said:

---

cinque said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

The Turks hate the Kurds.

The Kurds hate the Turks.

The Iranians (Persians) hate the Arabs.

The Arabs hate the Iranians.

The jews hate all the of them....and all of them hate the hebrews in return.

Screw all these barbaric Semites.

Let them kill each other.

I just wish we could get off middle eastern heroin....sorry they call it oil...and then treat the whole region the way we do central Africa.....a big who cares.

---

So, does this mean the Kurds who have helped us contain ISIS, will be slaughtered?

---

It means we have an America First foreign policy. #KAG2020

---

What if protecting the Kurds is putting America first?

I can't think of anything more pro America than being a reliable, dependable partner.

---

The Kurd-Turk blood feud has been going on for decades .

How many years would you keep US servicemen in Syria acting as a buffer ?

---

That's short sighted. What is important is our reliability as a partner.

---

We have zero strategic interest in Syria now that ISIS has been crushed .

And after over 70 years in Korea and 18 years in Afghanistan it's not worth the additional body bags to shield 2 ethnic groups who have hated each other for generations.

---

Miss Lindsay says ISIS has not been crushed in any way, shape or form