RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:
ShooterTX said:
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:
Redbrickbear said:
Darwin assumed we would fill in the gaps in his theory pretty quickly.
200 years on we still have not.....and in many places they have only grown.
The weakness of Darwinian evolution Theory as an all encompassing answer to the origins of live on this planet are shown by the increasing shrillness of the academic class in defending it.
Wisdom teeth and the appendix are two pretty good real examples of Evolution. I think it is possible to believe in science and Adam and Eve running around nekkid in the Garden of Eden. You don't have to pick just one.
Please explain how wisdom teeth and the appendix are examples of evolution.
At one time, man needed wisdom teeth to crush food. As man's diet changed and he EVOLVED, they were no longer necessary. At one time, the appendix was an organ that served a purpose (many think digestion), but as man EVOLVED, the organ no longer served no purpose.
Do I think man evolved from apes? No. But I do believe we evolved from a much more primitive and hairier form of man.
Please explain how to be a gazillionaire when the stock market goes up and the stock market goes down.
You need to do some reading on the appendix. It serves a very vital function indeed. In fact, the whole idea of vestigial organs which harken back to past levels of evolution... is junk. Every so called vestigial organ has been proven to have a role in the human body. For example, the tail bone is not done remnant of when we used to be monkeys with tails. It is a vital connection point for ligaments & muscles, which makes bipedal motion possible. And our DNA is not filled with old worthless code that is left over from previous stages of evolution. That worthless code is actual viral information which directly affects the "active code" that we use everyday.
The more and more were discover through science & technology, the more and more impossible it becomes to support the theory of evolution.
And then there is the math. Don't even get started on that... the number of attempts needed to achieve even 1 tiny productive protein from a group of amino acids is so large that it would take trillions on top of trillions of years to maybe achieve a single cell organism.
Of course, all of this is impossible because amino acids require very specific circumstances and very complex systems to be formed into proteins. This happens in nature, in the cells of living beings. DNA is required to create proteins, which means that you could not have had the essential proteins for life, without a living being too create those proteins. Bit of a chicken & egg issue there. This had been known for decades, but evolutionists always believed that technology would explain this conundrum. Unfortunately, technology had only revealed that they problem is far more complex than they originally realized.
Most competent scientist are aware that evolution is a broken theory. There have been scientific summits around the world, trying to deal with the mathematical & microbiological problems with evolution. You should really look into it.
