I think this will sink him
"Bradley effect" which refers to a tendency of voters to tell interviewers or pollsters that they are undecided or likely to vote for a black candidate, but then actually vote for his white opponent
Do Polls Exaggerate the Challenges for a Gay Presidential Candidate?
They have a poor record on predicting behavior around social issues and disfavored groups.
By Nathaniel Frank
Mr. Frank is the author of "Awakening: How Gays and Lesbians Brought Marriage Equality to America."
As Pete Buttigieg, the openly gay mayor of South Bend, Ind., has surged to a top position in Iowa polls in the Democratic presidential primary, media reports have emerged warnings that his sexuality may yet derail his White House bid. A recent national Politico/Morning Consult poll found that a plurality of voters, 45 percent, think the country is not ready for an openly gay president, with only 40 percent saying it's ready. Consultants have chimed into say the mayor may be less electable than coastal elites realize because he's gay.
Ordinary voters are quoted saying they or their "devout Christian" mother "would never vote for a gay." And the Buttigieg campaign's own focus groups recently found that many undecided black voters in South Carolina regard the candidate's sexual orientation as a "barrier" to winning their votes.
But the power of polls to predict behavior around social issues and disfavored groups has always been poor, and what we know about people's attitudes and actions when it comes to L.G.B.T. concerns tells a cautionary tale about how to interpret claims by voters that they won't support an openly gay candidate for president.
Pollsters have long known about the poor predictive power of asking respondents how they would treat members of an unfavored minority group, especially in politically polarized climates. In the 1930s, following a period, like today, of growing anti-immigrant sentiment, the Stanford researcher Richard LaPiere crisscrossed the country with a Chinese couple, visiting hundreds of hotels and restaurants. Nearly all of them welcomed the group as patrons.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/04/opinion/pete-buttigieg-polls.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage
"Bradley effect" which refers to a tendency of voters to tell interviewers or pollsters that they are undecided or likely to vote for a black candidate, but then actually vote for his white opponent
Do Polls Exaggerate the Challenges for a Gay Presidential Candidate?
They have a poor record on predicting behavior around social issues and disfavored groups.
By Nathaniel Frank
Mr. Frank is the author of "Awakening: How Gays and Lesbians Brought Marriage Equality to America."
As Pete Buttigieg, the openly gay mayor of South Bend, Ind., has surged to a top position in Iowa polls in the Democratic presidential primary, media reports have emerged warnings that his sexuality may yet derail his White House bid. A recent national Politico/Morning Consult poll found that a plurality of voters, 45 percent, think the country is not ready for an openly gay president, with only 40 percent saying it's ready. Consultants have chimed into say the mayor may be less electable than coastal elites realize because he's gay.
Ordinary voters are quoted saying they or their "devout Christian" mother "would never vote for a gay." And the Buttigieg campaign's own focus groups recently found that many undecided black voters in South Carolina regard the candidate's sexual orientation as a "barrier" to winning their votes.
But the power of polls to predict behavior around social issues and disfavored groups has always been poor, and what we know about people's attitudes and actions when it comes to L.G.B.T. concerns tells a cautionary tale about how to interpret claims by voters that they won't support an openly gay candidate for president.
Pollsters have long known about the poor predictive power of asking respondents how they would treat members of an unfavored minority group, especially in politically polarized climates. In the 1930s, following a period, like today, of growing anti-immigrant sentiment, the Stanford researcher Richard LaPiere crisscrossed the country with a Chinese couple, visiting hundreds of hotels and restaurants. Nearly all of them welcomed the group as patrons.
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/04/opinion/pete-buttigieg-polls.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage
