Technically. It doesn't.Doc Holliday said:
It dies in the Senate.
GrowlTowel said:
Censure for what?
He is up for election. Make "corruption" an issue and let the people decide.
Wallace said:
Take his red hat. His illegal alien maid says that makes him mad.
You are correct. CHOO CHOOOOOO!!!!!!!cinque said:
The impeachment train has already left the station.
Canada2017 said:GrowlTowel said:
Censure for what?
He is up for election. Make "corruption" an issue and let the people decide.
Dems don't trust the majority of voters these days .....they have jobs .
The Democratic Party is splintered. The new Socialists vs. Older Democrats (55 + yrs.)HuMcK said:Canada2017 said:GrowlTowel said:
Censure for what?
He is up for election. Make "corruption" an issue and let the people decide.
Dems don't trust the majority of voters these days .....they have jobs .
It's not the people they're afraid of, Hillary did get signifigantly more votes after all, it's the Electoral College. One of the neat tricks Trump pulls is to convince his supporters to think and act like they are the majority, when they aren't.
With something like 15 Democrats currently running for president, of course that party is splintered. The question remains what happens once a nominee emerges.RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:The Democratic Party is splintered. The new Socialists vs. Older Democrats (55 + yrs.)HuMcK said:Canada2017 said:GrowlTowel said:
Censure for what?
He is up for election. Make "corruption" an issue and let the people decide.
Dems don't trust the majority of voters these days .....they have jobs .
It's not the people they're afraid of, Hillary did get signifigantly more votes after all, it's the Electoral College. One of the neat tricks Trump pulls is to convince his supporters to think and act like they are the majority, when they aren't.
The Republican Party for the most part is united.
You would be trying to cover it up just like you try to run disinformation on all your establishment Democrat multi millionaire white heroes.HuMcK said:
OPs calls for a quick censure vote instead of impeachment is exactly the kind of weakness that holds Dems back. Y'all think the GOP would be censuring a President Hillary if she had done what Trump is accused of? No, they would spin up the Fox propaganda machine and build up enough support to either oust her from office or handicap her term.
This Ukraine business isn't even the worst thing Trump is accused of, there is no reason whatsoever to play nice with him and just "move on" after a meaningless censure motion. That would literally be giving Trump the go-ahead to cheat his way to victory in the 2020 election...again.
HuMcK said:Canada2017 said:GrowlTowel said:
Censure for what?
He is up for election. Make "corruption" an issue and let the people decide.
Dems don't trust the majority of voters these days .....they have jobs .
It's not the people they're afraid of, Hillary did get signifigantly more votes after all, it's the Electoral College. One of the neat tricks Trump pulls is to convince his supporters to think and act like they are the majority, when they aren't.
twd74 said:
It appears that the Dems are being drawn into Impeachment like bugs into a zapper. I understand the pressure from the progressive left (from the idiot billionaire, Steyer) to proceed with a trial that has absolutely 0 chance of conviction in the Senate. Why? What sense of justice will be accomplished. What political aims will be accomplished?
My question to Legal experts (which I am not): While it is unstated in the Constitution, it is highly unlikely a President might be impeached a second time. As the process ends in an Acquittal announced by the the Chief Justice, is it fair to assume that a President acquitted of Obstruction of Justice could not be charged again for that crime?