Democrats Undermining Election Legitimacy: Any Republican Win is a 'Stolen' Election

927 Views | 9 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by midgett
Bearitto
How long do you want to ignore this user?
In the last two decades there hasn't been one Republican presidential win (Democrat loss) that the Democrats haven't claimed was 'stolen'. Indeed there are ever more elections lost by Democrats which they explain away as stolen (see Stacy Abrams and Andrew Gillum).

Whether it's because they are sore losers, because they can't stand not being in control over their fellow man or because they think the average voter must be a fool and a bigot who votes against his own self interest (after all look at the cash giveaways they promise), or all three, the fact of the matter is, this is dangerous.

Now, Adam Schiff claims, preemptively that " The President's misconduct cannot be decided at the ballot boxfor we cannot be assured that the vote will be fairly won." This of course on the heels of Nancy Pelosi claiming "The weak response to these hearings has been, 'Let the election decide'. That dangerous position only adds to the urgency of our action, because POTUS is jeopardizing the integrity of the 2020 elections."

The real dangerous position is that of Democrats constantly claiming any election they lose is stolen or illegitimate. They have tried 'hanging chads'. They have tried to destroy the electoral college. They have tried false claims of Russian collusion. Now they are trying impeachment and preemptively claiming a stolen election. The bottom line is, the Democrat party cares only about power and nothing for America. They have done nothing but attempt to divide our country and pit us against one another. This must be stopped.
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
2004. That wasn't stolen. Just a lot of sad faces the day after.

It will happen again this year. No sitting president has ever lost re-election without opposition from within his own party.
Your ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
Bearitto
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.commondreams.org/views06/0601-34.htm

https://www.motherjones.com/media/2005/11/recounting-ohio/


Jack and DP
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dems attempting to destroy the election process.

contrario
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack and DP said:

Dems attempting to destroy the election process.


Effectively Schiff is saying the electorate is too dumb to do what is best, so he and the elites will make the decision for us.
Bearitto
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here's the latest in the Democrat attack

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/02/hes-going-cheat/606643/

Trump Is Going to Cheat
How should Democrats fight against a president who has no moral or legal compass?

But these concerns about policy and broad cultural appeal are secondary to the true "electability" crisis facing whichever Democrat wins the nomination: He or she will need to run against a president seemingly prepared, and empowered, to lie and cheat his way to reelection.
Kyle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Given typical projection, that is just the Democrats acknowledging they have a plan to steal the election.
Forest Bueller_bf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack and DP said:

Dems attempting to destroy the election process.



Good grief, that is a frootloop.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bearitto said:

How should Democrats fight against a president who has no moral or legal compass?

If they're desperate enough, they could try nominating someone who does.
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
midgett
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:




You beat me to it. Trump pre-emptively played their card last time and Hillary went into an uproar since she had the election in the bag (cough!).

Oops
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.