Fake Subpoenas Issued by the House

337 Views | 0 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by riflebear
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not one of the fake subpoenas issued by the House Committees had any legal force.

The full House never took the required vote to authorize the impeachment investigation. Every single time Schiff or Nadler whines about subpoenas they want the Senate to authorize, remember that.

When House Democrats sent one of these fake subpoenas to Charles Kupperman, he took it before a federal judge so the judge could rule on this exact issue. Was this a real subpoena with legal force and did Kupperman have to comply with it? THE DEMOCRATS IMMEDIATELY RUSHED TO THE COURTROOM TO WITHDRAW THE FAKE SUBPOENA **BEFORE THE JUDGE COULD RULE ON IT**

So if you watch THREE FULL DAYS of the Democratic House managers whining incessantly about the mean old Senate not sending REAL subpoenas to people the House COULD HAVE issued their fake subpoenas to during the investigation phase, BUT DIDN'T?

Doing a real impeachment investigation with real subpoenas that real teeth would have required a full House vote. But that's not what happened.

Instead, House speaker Nancy Pelosi began an "impeachment inquiry" **without** the full House having voted.

So NONE of those subpoenas had any legal force. Democrats managed to SUCCESSFULLY hide his fact from their base.

It didn't make much of a ripple in the news when they tried their fake subpoena schtick on Kupperman & then quickly folded when he went to court to call their bluff.

BUT IT IS GOING TO COME OUT NOW.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1220372058468704266.html
riflebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

Not one of the fake subpoenas issued by the House Committees had any legal force.

The full House never took the required vote to authorize the impeachment investigation. Every single time Schiff or Nadler whines about subpoenas they want the Senate to authorize, remember that.

When House Democrats sent one of these fake subpoenas to Charles Kupperman, he took it before a federal judge so the judge could rule on this exact issue. Was this a real subpoena with legal force and did Kupperman have to comply with it? THE DEMOCRATS IMMEDIATELY RUSHED TO THE COURTROOM TO WITHDRAW THE FAKE SUBPOENA **BEFORE THE JUDGE COULD RULE ON IT**

So if you watch THREE FULL DAYS of the Democratic House managers whining incessantly about the mean old Senate not sending REAL subpoenas to people the House COULD HAVE issued their fake subpoenas to during the investigation phase, BUT DIDN'T?

Doing a real impeachment investigation with real subpoenas that real teeth would have required a full House vote. But that's not what happened.

Instead, House speaker Nancy Pelosi began an "impeachment inquiry" **without** the full House having voted.

So NONE of those subpoenas had any legal force. Democrats managed to SUCCESSFULLY hide his fact from their base.

It didn't make much of a ripple in the news when they tried their fake subpoena schtick on Kupperman & then quickly folded when he went to court to call their bluff.

BUT IT IS GOING TO COME OUT NOW.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1220372058468704266.html
They know Americans have no clue about what went on so they are pushing their talking points for the media to influence the public. The plan is that when they lose the Dems & Media will get so loud and use their talking points to go after every Congressman & Senator who is up for reelection in 2020. One of the liberal Senators said this very thing yesterday. It's just a game for them to win back seats and a dangerous game it is.

Just watch, in a month the media will be at every town hall of every GOP member up for reelection. The ad campaigns will run and it will all be about they were corrupt in not allowing witnesses, etc

Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.