Rawhide said:

---

dumbocrats think that can't be racist. After all, dementia joe is only just trying to help minorities.

Wonder what they would think if he was only trying to help the whities and disqualified everyone else based on color and ethnicity.

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Over the next 20 years, as the ruling class makes an explicitly anti-white ideological turn, we will start to find out what the 1960s civil rights and anti-discrimination legislation introduced all over the West was actually intended to be about.

Most mainstream people at the time argued it was a general movement to remove race from government decisions, policy, and actions. To create a fair and neutral policy among all citizens.

Some outside the mainstream argued at the time that it was just meant as simply a tactic by the radical left, Marxists, and anti-whites to soften up the Western populations for their eventually overthrow/subjugation. AKA that the civil rights laws would never be used in a situation when it was whites or men who were being discriminated against or hate crimes laws would never be used when it was whites being beating and killed.

Again we are going to find out over the next 20 years if the Supreme Court (the condensed body of the ruling class) means by "no discrimination by race". Is that what the laws actual mean or if whites need not apply for such protections?

Christopher Caldwell's recent book, The Age of Entitlement, outlines how elites have been able to use Civil Rights precedents where laws are decided in courts rather than by elected representatives and referendum to radically transform American society by in many cases overruling the US Constitution and the will of the people.

We will find out if the elite intend to use those precedents to create a race neutral state or one where whites are driving into becoming 2nd class citizens.

---

bularry said:

---

nein51 said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

dumbocrats think that can't be racist. After all, dementia joe is only just trying to help minorities.

Wonder what they would think if he was only trying to help the whities and disqualified everyone else based on color and ethnicity.

---

I think there are a bunch of current policies that will not stand up to legal scrutiny. It's literally crazy to me that people dont seem to get that you can do something based strictly on race, it's almost like this sort of thing was already legislated.

---

in this case, there are many historical examples of race being used against black farmers for loans, etc. This law is an effort to correct some of that...

I don't see why that rubs people so wrong. It isn't hurting anyone, it is helping people where it is proven they have suffered harm.

---

bularry said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

Over the next 20 years, as the ruling class makes an explicitly anti-white ideological turn, we will start to find out what the 1960s civil rights and anti-discrimination legislation introduced all over the West was actually intended to be about.

Most mainstream people at the time argued it was a general movement to remove race from government decisions, policy, and actions. To create a fair and neutral policy among all citizens.

Some outside the mainstream argued at the time that it was just meant as simply a tactic by the radical left, Marxists, and anti-whites to soften up the Western populations for their eventually overthrow/subjugation. AKA that the civil rights laws would never be used in a situation when it was whites or men who were being discriminated against or hate crimes laws would never be used when it was whites being beating and killed.

Again we are going to find out over the next 20 years if the Supreme Court (the condensed body of the ruling class) means by "no discrimination by race". Is that what the laws actual mean or if whites need not apply for such protections?

Christopher Caldwell's recent book, The Age of Entitlement, outlines how elites have been able to use Civil Rights precedents where laws are decided in courts rather than by elected representatives and referendum to radically transform American society by in many cases overruling the US Constitution and the will of the people.

We will find out if the elite intend to use those precedents to create a race neutral state or one where whites are driving into becoming 2nd class citizens.

---

we are a long, long, long way away from whites becoming 2nd class citizens. Where this paranoia comes from I have no idea...

read this to yourself "Some outside the mainstream argued at the time that it was just meant as simply a tactic by the radical left, Marxists, and anti-whites to soften up the Western populations for their eventually overthrow/subjugation" that sounds like the ravings of some manifesto of a guy that blows up a mosque or jewish temple.

who are "anti-whites"?? You just make up lables. It is really remarkable.

---

bularry said:

---

nein51 said:

---

Rawhide said:

---

dumbocrats think that can't be racist. After all, dementia joe is only just trying to help minorities.

Wonder what they would think if he was only trying to help the whities and disqualified everyone else based on color and ethnicity.

---

I think there are a bunch of current policies that will not stand up to legal scrutiny. It's literally crazy to me that people dont seem to get that you can do something based strictly on race, it's almost like this sort of thing was already legislated.

---

in this case, there are many historical examples of race being used against black farmers for loans, etc. This law is an effort to correct some of that...

I don't see why that rubs people so wrong. It isn't hurting anyone, it is helping people where it is proven they have suffered harm.

---