Canon said:
Canada2017 said:
C. Jordan said:
Booray said:
Spent the day in Fredericksburg. Took in the Museum of the War in the Pacific.
Just awesome, highly recommend it.
Wonder if we could respond to that sort of challenge today.
I think we could. We were deeply divided in 1941 about many things, including involvement in the war.
Pearl Harbor kind of brought things into clarity!
We think there was some magical time in the past when we were all together and united. We've known brief moments of that, like after 9/11. But by and large we've been in constant struggle with each other.
Was true even during World War Two.
On his only visit home ( Los Angles ) during the war Dad was so disgusted with the attitudes of civilians he couldn't wait to return to his ship.
Told me the majority of civilians were totally clueless of the sacrifices men in the combat zones were making .
By Vietnam, Walter Cronkite and his ilk had filled that ignorant void with a 'baby killer' narrative and was turning US victories like the Tet offensive into losses.
Obviously, you weren't alive at the time or weren't paying attention.
I watched Cronkite every night in those days. He was in an old time when news people just did the news. He didn't do an editorial against the war until pretty late in the war, after the disastrous Tet offensive.
Technically, the Tet offensive was a win in terms of a battle. But overall it was a loss because it showed that we were in a bigger mess than we had been told. You have to see it in the context of what Johnson and the military were telling us about that war. It was under control, we were winning, blah, blah, blah, and it was all lies.
Sadly, the press didn't do enough to oppose the war. Don't you know that EVERY U.S. president, from Kennedy to Nixon, knew the war was unwinnable. But they all lacked the political will to get out, except for Nixon. And he did it on the sly.