Post Reply
1 of 1
That evil mRNA keeps on winning!!!!
953 Views |
21 Replies |
Last: 13 days ago by Mothra
That's gonna be huge.
Mitch Blood Green said:
That's gonna be huge.
I agree, it will be.
Winning is not flooding our youth with vaccines like RFK has reversed
Danielsjackson114 said:
Winning is not flooding our youth with vaccines like RFK has reversed
If I had deadly cancer, I would absolutely take an mRNA vaccine that may damage or alter DNA. Definitely worth the risk.
For a glorified cold, however? No thanks.
Mothra said:Danielsjackson114 said:
Winning is not flooding our youth with vaccines like RFK has reversed
If I had deadly cancer, I would absolutely take an mRNA vaccine that may damage or alter DNA. Definitely worth the risk.
For a glorified cold, however? No thanks.
Explain the difference?
Danielsjackson114 said:
Winning is not flooding our youth with vaccines like RFK has reversed
How many viral and bacterial particles are you and your kids exposed to each and every day? And why would I trust a Non expert over experts?
Tempus Edax Rerum said:Mothra said:Danielsjackson114 said:
Winning is not flooding our youth with vaccines like RFK has reversed
If I had deadly cancer, I would absolutely take an mRNA vaccine that may damage or alter DNA. Definitely worth the risk.
For a glorified cold, however? No thanks.
Explain the difference?
Just to be clear, you don't understand the significant risk assessment differences between taking an experimental vaccine for a deadly cancer versus a bad cold?
Mothra said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Mothra said:Danielsjackson114 said:
Winning is not flooding our youth with vaccines like RFK has reversed
If I had deadly cancer, I would absolutely take an mRNA vaccine that may damage or alter DNA. Definitely worth the risk.
For a glorified cold, however? No thanks.
Explain the difference?
Just to be clear, you don't understand the significant risk assessment differences between taking an experimental vaccine for a deadly cancer versus a bad cold?
Oh I do, but you do not. The science is clear and you can't admit it.
Tempus Edax Rerum said:Mothra said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Mothra said:Danielsjackson114 said:
Winning is not flooding our youth with vaccines like RFK has reversed
If I had deadly cancer, I would absolutely take an mRNA vaccine that may damage or alter DNA. Definitely worth the risk.
For a glorified cold, however? No thanks.
Explain the difference?
Just to be clear, you don't understand the significant risk assessment differences between taking an experimental vaccine for a deadly cancer versus a bad cold?
Oh I do, but you do not. The science is clear and you can't admit it.
I can admit you're a glib pin cushion that doesn't understand the difference in risk assessment for a deadly disease and a bad cold.
Mothra said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Mothra said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Mothra said:Danielsjackson114 said:
Winning is not flooding our youth with vaccines like RFK has reversed
If I had deadly cancer, I would absolutely take an mRNA vaccine that may damage or alter DNA. Definitely worth the risk.
For a glorified cold, however? No thanks.
Explain the difference?
Just to be clear, you don't understand the significant risk assessment differences between taking an experimental vaccine for a deadly cancer versus a bad cold?
Oh I do, but you do not. The science is clear and you can't admit it.
I can admit you're a glib pin cushion that doesn't understand the difference in risk assessment for a deadly disease and a bad cold.
Flu deaths can be as high as 50,000 in some years. You have a very strange concept of risk assessment.
Tempus Edax Rerum said:Danielsjackson114 said:
Winning is not flooding our youth with vaccines like RFK has reversed
How many viral and bacterial particles are you and your kids exposed to each and every day? And why would I trust a Non expert over experts?
Just to be clear Mothra, you failed to answer this. Clearly, you don't want to since you know it will destroy your argument. But that's what little b i t c h e s do.
Tempus Edax Rerum said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Danielsjackson114 said:
Winning is not flooding our youth with vaccines like RFK has reversed
How many viral and bacterial particles are you and your kids exposed to each and every day? And why would I trust a Non expert over experts?
Just to be clear Mothra, you failed to answer this. Clearly, you don't want to since you know it will destroy your argument. But that's what little b i t c h e s do.
I failed to answer a question posed to another poster?
LOL.
Tempus Edax Rerum said:Mothra said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Mothra said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Mothra said:Danielsjackson114 said:
Winning is not flooding our youth with vaccines like RFK has reversed
If I had deadly cancer, I would absolutely take an mRNA vaccine that may damage or alter DNA. Definitely worth the risk.
For a glorified cold, however? No thanks.
Explain the difference?
Just to be clear, you don't understand the significant risk assessment differences between taking an experimental vaccine for a deadly cancer versus a bad cold?
Oh I do, but you do not. The science is clear and you can't admit it.
I can admit you're a glib pin cushion that doesn't understand the difference in risk assessment for a deadly disease and a bad cold.
Flu deaths can be as high as 50,000 in some years. You have a very strange concept of risk assessment.
You missed the part about "experimental" apparently.
Buried 3 people that Faucci Murdered with the shot
Oh and a 4th vaccinated that died if turbo cancer this summer in 3 months.
Oh and a 4th vaccinated that died if turbo cancer this summer in 3 months.
Fre3dombear said:
Buried 3 people that Faucci Murdered with the shot
Oh and a 4th vaccinated that died if turbo cancer this summer in 3 months.
Liar
Mothra said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Danielsjackson114 said:
Winning is not flooding our youth with vaccines like RFK has reversed
How many viral and bacterial particles are you and your kids exposed to each and every day? And why would I trust a Non expert over experts?
Just to be clear Mothra, you failed to answer this. Clearly, you don't want to since you know it will destroy your argument. But that's what little b i t c h e s do.
I failed to answer a question posed to another poster?
LOL.
Apparently you can't answer it either, but then again we all know why.
Mothra said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Mothra said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Mothra said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Mothra said:Danielsjackson114 said:
Winning is not flooding our youth with vaccines like RFK has reversed
If I had deadly cancer, I would absolutely take an mRNA vaccine that may damage or alter DNA. Definitely worth the risk.
For a glorified cold, however? No thanks.
Explain the difference?
Just to be clear, you don't understand the significant risk assessment differences between taking an experimental vaccine for a deadly cancer versus a bad cold?
Oh I do, but you do not. The science is clear and you can't admit it.
I can admit you're a glib pin cushion that doesn't understand the difference in risk assessment for a deadly disease and a bad cold.
Flu deaths can be as high as 50,000 in some years. You have a very strange concept of risk assessment.
You missed the part about "experimental" apparently.
You missed the expertly reviewed and given the green light part apparently, but then again, numbnuts like you pick and choose the medical parts you like over the experts since you seem to know it all.
Tempus Edax Rerum said:Mothra said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Mothra said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Mothra said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Mothra said:Danielsjackson114 said:
Winning is not flooding our youth with vaccines like RFK has reversed
If I had deadly cancer, I would absolutely take an mRNA vaccine that may damage or alter DNA. Definitely worth the risk.
For a glorified cold, however? No thanks.
Explain the difference?
Just to be clear, you don't understand the significant risk assessment differences between taking an experimental vaccine for a deadly cancer versus a bad cold?
Oh I do, but you do not. The science is clear and you can't admit it.
I can admit you're a glib pin cushion that doesn't understand the difference in risk assessment for a deadly disease and a bad cold.
Flu deaths can be as high as 50,000 in some years. You have a very strange concept of risk assessment.
You missed the part about "experimental" apparently.
You missed the expertly reviewed and given the green light part apparently, but then again, numbnuts like you pick and choose the medical parts you like over the experts since you seem to know it all.
I love when you randomly refer to experts like there is some unified consensus.
I'd suggest getting jabbed as much as possible. The upside is, eventually, it will rid the board of a trash poster.
Which COVID booster are you on?
Tempus Edax Rerum said:Mothra said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Danielsjackson114 said:
Winning is not flooding our youth with vaccines like RFK has reversed
How many viral and bacterial particles are you and your kids exposed to each and every day? And why would I trust a Non expert over experts?
Just to be clear Mothra, you failed to answer this. Clearly, you don't want to since you know it will destroy your argument. But that's what little b i t c h e s do.
I failed to answer a question posed to another poster?
LOL.
Apparently you can't answer it either, but then again we all know why.
Why would I? It's a dumb question and completely irrelevant.
Mothra said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Mothra said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Danielsjackson114 said:
Winning is not flooding our youth with vaccines like RFK has reversed
How many viral and bacterial particles are you and your kids exposed to each and every day? And why would I trust a Non expert over experts?
Just to be clear Mothra, you failed to answer this. Clearly, you don't want to since you know it will destroy your argument. But that's what little b i t c h e s do.
I failed to answer a question posed to another poster?
LOL.
Apparently you can't answer it either, but then again we all know why.
Why would I? It's a dumb question and completely irrelevant.
Yeah right!!! It only blows apart your argument. Totally see why you refuse to respond to it.
Tempus Edax Rerum said:Mothra said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Mothra said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Danielsjackson114 said:
Winning is not flooding our youth with vaccines like RFK has reversed
How many viral and bacterial particles are you and your kids exposed to each and every day? And why would I trust a Non expert over experts?
Just to be clear Mothra, you failed to answer this. Clearly, you don't want to since you know it will destroy your argument. But that's what little b i t c h e s do.
I failed to answer a question posed to another poster?
LOL.
Apparently you can't answer it either, but then again we all know why.
Why would I? It's a dumb question and completely irrelevant.
Yeah right!!! It only blows apart your argument. Totally see why you refuse to respond to it.
What does the number of viral and bacterial particles my kids are exposed to each and every day have to do with whether they should get an experimental vaccine to prevent a bad cold?
You do realize kids have a really good immune system, don't you?