https://www.campusreform.org/article/rutgers-womens-rugby-adopts-womxns-branding-university-men-compete-women/30683

BIG BLACK HOLE

Wokeism consumes all

rutgers == the university of new joisey............

- el UF

D!

Go Bears!!

Wear Ochre!!!

Tibetan Bowl Night Nov 21st!!!!

"woke is dead"

Nope...not even close

It will metasticize if dems win the midterms

Danielsjackson114 said:

---

Wokeism consumes all

---

Why did respected thinkers say “woke is dead”?

— Andy Ngo (@MrAndyNgo) October 3, 2026

There is nothing more fragile than conservative white men.

quash said:

---

There is nothing more fragile than conservative white men.

---

Lesbian mask bar says "Hold my Beer!"

Lesbian bar at center of mask dispute has Google reviews shut down

Quash is a liberal clown...

If you do not let tranniez in women's sports, let habibs continue to abuse H1B visas, and don't let illegal brown immigrants over run cities then you are a "fragile conservative white man"

What a imbecile

quash said:

---

There is nothing more fragile than conservative white men.

---

How many statues have conservative white men pulled down over the last 20 years?

How many buildings have they demanded be renamed?

How often have they forced others through narcissistic race focused "training" programs that verge on to struggle secession style.

How many programs, departments, scholarships, and other resources have been demanded to be created only for them and for their advancement and benefit?

Redbrickbear said:

---

Danielsjackson114 said:

---

Wokeism consumes all

---

Why did respected thinkers say “woke is dead”?

— Andy Ngo (@MrAndyNgo) October 3, 2026

---

I don't remember any respected thinkers saying that. I remember a lot of people saying we should credit Trump for defeating the forces of wokeness, but it never made much sense.

Please can some men play on the rugby team, permanently impair some woke women, and those women sue the university. Even better if the people who made this decision can be held personally liable. I'd like to see some civil suits.

Virtue signaling dies quick when the pocket book takes a hit.

Redbrickbear said:

---

Danielsjackson114 said:

---

Wokeism consumes all

---

Why did respected thinkers say “woke is dead”?

— Andy Ngo (@MrAndyNgo) October 3, 2026

---

If white women can't wear corn rows, then black women can't wear blonde wigs.

El Oso said:

---

Since his reelection, Trump has

1. Tried to rename Penn Station
2. Proposed renaming Washington Dulles International Airport
3. Rebranded the United States Institute of Peace HQ
4. Tried to rename the Kennedy Center

All after himself.

---

Did he come up with a woke social justice reason for this?

If not then it's just a politician being a politician….and not the same phenomenon playing out as we have seen for two decades now

El Oso said:

---

Just checking to see what hairs we're splitting here. Now I know.

---

Naw, just seeing if you want an honest conversation about woke iconoclast movement that has been taking place for 20 years now…or want to engage in a fallacy argument about a single President.

The original post was about white men being the most thin skinned/fragile group.

The response was a factual statement that we have not had 20+ years of white men tearing down statues, reorienting public symbols and commemorations to increase their representation (and lessen others), developing endless scholarships, programs, departments, and vast tax funding to support themselves as an ethnic-cultural grouping.

When you can given an example of something close to this level of mass movement…then we can have a debate.

Or maybe if Trump melts down a statue of a historic person of color in the name of equity & justice….until then it's a form of whataboutism-via-Trump and not a serious response.

El Oso said:

---

This was your question.

How many buildings have they demanded be renamed?

I gave an off the top of my head answer. It just so happens it is the most powerful man in the world and he's a conservative.

---

And you have a inaccurate example…since none of those things have actually been legally renamed at all

Requires Congress to do so. They officially remain their legal names.

[The John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts has not been legally renamed, as federal courts have repeatedly ruled that any official name change or addition of presidential memorials requires an act of Congress.]

[The legal name established by Congress under the United States Institute of Peace Act is the United States Institute of Peace (USIP)
Current Status: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit recently issued a ruling blocking the administration from permanently carving the Trump name into the building's stone facade,]

But you have I guess successfully derailed the conversation to one about Trump now. Which we can assume was your intention.

And again….these attempts at a renaming are not done on behalf of an equity agenda or racial justice ideology.

They were not attempts to support or promote white males as a group. Just one man trying to name some things for himself (none that have succeeded)

When we see a large scale mass movement of the same kind sustained for decades then maybe we can start taking about labeling this or that racial-ethnic group "fragile".

Again, your question wasn't about success. It was about people who have demanded. You're even admitting he demanded in your deflection.

Danielsjackson114 said:

---

Quash is a liberal clown...

If you do not let tranniez in women's sports, let habibs continue to abuse H1B visas, and don't let illegal brown immigrants over run cities then you are a "fragile conservative white man"

What a imbecile

---

So much lying.

I made a long post setting out why and when I oppose trans athletes in women's sports. Probably too long and nuanced for a rage baiter like you.

Not all H1Bs are abused. But I have been pointing out the problem of visa overstays for over a decade. On this board.

As to your racist fears? Thanks for proving the point I made in the very post you replied to.

El Oso said:

---

Again, your question wasn't about success. It was about people who have demanded. You're even admitting he demanded in your deflection.

---

And you came up with one person making a demand.

Not a movement for a ethnic or racial group

That was the actual written point of the post

What racial-ethnic group is "fragile"…and what group needs to be placated, pacified, & coddled when it comes to public symbols/statues/place names/programs

You then brought up Trump…..

Redbrickbear said:

---

El Oso said:

---

Again, your question wasn't about success. It was about people who have demanded. You're even admitting he demanded in your deflection.

---

And you came up with one person making a demand.

Not a movement for a ethnic or racial group

That was the actual written point of the post

What racial-ethnic group is "fragile"…and what group needs to be placated, pacified, & coddled when it comes to public symbols/statues/place names/programs

You then brought up Trump…..

---

These are the first two questions in your post (word for word; bold is mine).
How many statues have conservative white men pulled down over the last 20 years?

How many buildings have they demanded be renamed?

You asked about conservative white men who had done these things. I found one who had done one of those thing. Four times.

Now you're doubling down and still proving my answer exposed you.

fragile--make Trump mad and he resembles a petulant toddler. If he were a toddler, I would call that normal. Since he's an adult, I would call that fragile.

Placated, pacified, coddled: Trump frequently penalizes or publicly attacks any Republican who offers even mild criticism. When Republican lawmakers break ranks, such as voting against his preferences on major bills or war powers resolutions, Trump's public reactions, labeling them "lowlifes" or "human scum" are often characterized by critics as the reactions of a leader who cannot tolerate dissent and requires careful management.

In political circles, aligning with him is often treated as a necessity for lawmakers seeking to avoid primary challenges. Biographers frequently assert that Trump's ego is central to his decision-making. Reports from international relations experts have suggested that foreign leaders and domestic allies alike use tailored flattery as a standard psychological tactic to successfully negotiate with him or shift his policy stances.

I found a conservative white man. Without initial prompting, I found one that is fragile and prone to be in need of placating, pacifying, and coddling.

El Oso said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

El Oso said:

---

Again, your question wasn't about success. It was about people who have demanded. You're even admitting he demanded in your deflection.

---

And you came up with one person making a demand.

Not a movement for a ethnic or racial group

That was the actual written point of the post

What racial-ethnic group is "fragile"…and what group needs to be placated, pacified, & coddled when it comes to public symbols/statues/place names/programs

You then brought up Trump…..

---

These are the first two questions in your post (word for word; bold is mine).
How many statues have conservative white men pulled down over the last 20 years?

How many buildings have they demanded be renamed?

You asked about conservative white men who had done these things. I found one who had done one of those thing. Four times.

Now you're doubling down and still proving my answer exposed you.

fragile--make Trump mad and he resembles a petulant toddler. If he were a toddler, I would call that normal. Since he's an adult, I would call that fragile.

Placated, pacified, coddled: Trump frequently penalizes or publicly attacks any Republican who offers even mild criticism. When Republican lawmakers break ranks, such as voting against his preferences on major bills or war powers resolutions, Trump's public reactions, labeling them "lowlifes" or "human scum" are often characterized by critics as the reactions of a leader who cannot tolerate dissent and requires careful management.

In political circles, aligning with him is often treated as a necessity for lawmakers seeking to avoid primary challenges. Biographers frequently assert that Trump's ego is central to his decision-making. Reports from international relations experts have suggested that foreign leaders and domestic allies alike use tailored flattery as a standard psychological tactic to successfully negotiate with him or shift his policy stances.

I found a conservative white man. Without initial prompting, I found one that is fragile and prone to be in need of placating, pacifying, and coddling.

---

Gotcha

So we have established that Trump pulled down no historic statues.

And the only things he tried to rename were not about narcissistic "woke" principles around race-ethnicity-gender. (Renaming things or taking things down things because people from history scared him)

Just regular old politician style narcissism…and so far nothing has actually been legally renamed at all.

But it is good to know we could only find one single (rather not accurate type) of example of a conservative male playing the game the other side has been playing for 20+ years

So now we're still playing the two wrongs make a right game?

Not exactly on the rename statement either. The United States Institute of Peace had removable silver letters spelling out Trump's name bolted onto the front facade of the Washington, D.C., headquarters in December 2025. To the best of my knowledge, it remains in place today.

Palm Beach International Airport (left off my original list) features the new name (President Donald J. Trump International Airport) on its updated exterior signage and highway markers, and the updated branding is rolling out across official airport materials, letterheads, and self-service screens.

**I assume this airport replaces the rename attempt of Dulles since two airports can't be named the same thing, but maybe Trump sees that differently than me and he's going for two still.

Conservative white men aren't likely to tear down or rename what they built and named in the first place, so your question doesn't really illuminate anything. It is understandable that whites would be protective of our heritage and legacy. The fragility is something else -- partly a reaction to the left's extremes, partly a result of manipulation by right-wing demagogues. It's not something that should be cultivated.

Sam Lowry said:

---

Conservative white men aren't likely to tear down or rename what they built and named in the first place, so your question doesn't really illuminate anything...

---

Your answer seems to illustrate who built the Western world …..

El Oso said:

---

So now we're still playing the two wrongs make a right game?

.

---

More just trying to be the accurate "game"

Trump has not legally renamed anything.

We might call it accuracy a rebranding that is not legal..and that will revert to the legal congressional name once he is out of office. Maybe sooner

And none of it has been done that can not be undone or that is in service to a racial-ethnic ideology

The names are still there legally, the courts prevent him from doing anything permanent, and his attempted actions are in service to simple politician level narcissism "name things after me"

Let me know when thousands of statues, buildings, and places are renamed, altered, and desecrated.

(Including at Baylor…a place where the president has no power…but statues & place names are still changed in service to a new radical ideology)

P.S.

You still have not explained how this plays into what ethnic-racial group is "fragile"

Is Trump demanding this changes in the name of "representation" or for "righting historic wrongs" or for "giving voice to a quote oppressed racial group"?