Post Reply
1 of 1
Yes! Federal Judge overturns RFK, Jr. vaccine schedule recommendations!
633 Views |
9 Replies |
Last: 1 mo ago by historian
So the TDSers really want kings as long as the kings agree with them.
'Ladies And Gentlemen, We Got Him': RFK Jr. Announces Seal Team Six Has Neutralized The Kool-Aid Man https://t.co/G0dNlxeh72
— The Babylon Bee (@TheBabylonBee) October 4, 2026
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Psalm 119:36
Harrison Bergeron said:
So the TDSers really want kings as long as the kings agree with them.
Bingo. Pharmaceutical companies had too much $$$ to lose to let this stand. Had to find a democratically-appointed activist judge to keep those profits in place. Apparently the minimalist approach that Denmark utilizes would be unconstitutional. Somehow.
It will be overturned of course, but for now it's a temporary victory for Big Pharma.
Tempus Edax Rerum said:
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1DnGZP39EB/
Because judges have the necessary scientific background to be involving themselves in these decisions.
Realitybites said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1DnGZP39EB/
Because judges have the necessary scientific background to be involving themselves in these decisions.
Interesting take in that RFK, Jr. is not a scientist or doctor, but apparently, he has the scientific background to drive all this.
Also, one of the big conservative wins of the second Trump term was a SCOTUS ruling saying that federal judges do not have to defer to the scientific expertise of federal agencies. I guess that was a mistake now?
I think this ruling is based on an earlier decision that RFK had unlawfully fired the entire 18-member board and replaced it entirely with vaccine skeptics.
In other words, the judge isn't relying on this science or that science but rather on violations of the APA.
But I can't find the actual decision to read, so whatever.
In other words, the judge isn't relying on this science or that science but rather on violations of the APA.
But I can't find the actual decision to read, so whatever.
Frank Galvin said:Realitybites said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1DnGZP39EB/
Because judges have the necessary scientific background to be involving themselves in these decisions.
Interesting take in that RFK, Jr. is not a scientist or doctor, but apparently, he has the scientific background to drive all this.
Also, one of the big conservative wins of the second Trump term was a SCOTUS ruling saying that federal judges do not have to defer to the scientific expertise of federal agencies. I guess that was a mistake now?
Good Lord, that is not what that opinion said at all.
The opinion stands for the separation of powers. The judicial branch is not bound by what the executive branch determines its regulations to mean.
GrowlTowel said:Frank Galvin said:Realitybites said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1DnGZP39EB/
Because judges have the necessary scientific background to be involving themselves in these decisions.
Interesting take in that RFK, Jr. is not a scientist or doctor, but apparently, he has the scientific background to drive all this.
Also, one of the big conservative wins of the second Trump term was a SCOTUS ruling saying that federal judges do not have to defer to the scientific expertise of federal agencies. I guess that was a mistake now?
Good Lord, that is not what that opinion said at all.
The opinion stands for the separation of powers. The judicial branch is not bound by what the executive branch determines its regulations to mean.
It was never "bound" to the interpretations; it was supposed to give some deference to them. Why? Because the federal agencies had the most expertise, often scientific, in the subject matter.
With so much junk science and so many "experts" lying about everything, it's a good thing that SCOTUS does not try to impose government fraud and coercion on the people.
The courts are not bound by science but by the constitution and the law.
Does no one remember Dr Fauci???
The courts are not bound by science but by the constitution and the law.
Does no one remember Dr Fauci???
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Psalm 119:36