BREAKING: DC DISTRICT COURT partially unsealed hundreds of indictments

8,394 Views | 9 Replies | Last: 7 yr ago by cowboycwr
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/sites/dcd/files/Attachments.pdf

Judge ordering unsealed:
https://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/sites/dcd/files/2018StandingOrderOct2017thruMarch2018.pdf
October 2nd, 2018. Before Sessions gone; unrelated?

Charges include bribery of public officials, conspiracy, public embezzlement, providing material support for terrorists, arms dealing, child sexual abuse, sexual exploitation of children

Panic in DC.

Search for these in the document:
18 US CODE 1956 -- Money laundering
18 US CODE 1343 -- Wire fraud
21 USC 841(a)(1) -- Narcotics distribution
18 US Code 2252 -- Child Sexual Abuse
21 US Code 2251 -- Sexual exploitation of children
18 US Code 641 -- Public Embezzlement
18 US Code 201 -- Bribery of Public Officials
18 US Code 1349 -- Conspiracy
18 US Code 373 -- Solicitation to commit a crime of violence / murder
18 US Code 471 -- Public securities fraud
18 US Code 1546 -- Identity fraud / VISA Immigration fraud
18 US Code 2339B -- Providing material support for terrorists
18 US Code 922(g) -- Illegal firearms / possession
18 US Code 922(a)(1)(a) -- Illegal firearms / distribution
50 US Code 1705 -- Emergency powers act
18 US Code 371 -- Conspiracy against the USA
18 US Code 201 -- Bribery of public officials
18 US Code 1344 -- Bank fraud
18 US Code 1001 -- Making false statements to a federal agent
22 US Code 2778 -- Arms export violations / arms dealing

The 50 USC 1701 & 1702 references are pretty interesting.

That's straight from POTUS: 50 U.S. Code 1701 - Unusual and extraordinary threat; declaration of national emergency; exercise of Presidential authorities

Very interesting!
"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." ~ John Adams
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm guessing by the lack of comments that nobody has a clue what kind of major happenings are taking place behind the scenes.

This is real guys. This isn't conspiracy theory. I have linked government documents.

Extremely unusual just FYI.
"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." ~ John Adams
fadskier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

I'm guessing by the lack of comments that nobody has a clue what kind of major happenings are taking place behind the scenes.

This is real guys. This isn't conspiracy theory. I have linked government documents.

Extremely unusual just FYI.
Indictments on whom?
Salute the Marines - Joe Biden
Justin Kates
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I havent clicked. Cliff notes?
-Justin Kates
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fadskier said:

Doc Holliday said:

I'm guessing by the lack of comments that nobody has a clue what kind of major happenings are taking place behind the scenes.

This is real guys. This isn't conspiracy theory. I have linked government documents.

Extremely unusual just FYI.
Indictments on whom?
Thousands of people. It's very strange.
"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." ~ John Adams
YoakDaddy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Q
cryptotee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ya$$$& the storm has arrived
Gunny Hartman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I asked an attorney buddy to help me understand what this means. Here's his response:

These are just requests for pen register and trap and trace surveillance requests, not indictments. A journalist from Vice sued to get that information released to show how often the government seeks surveillance and how often the court allows it.

The same judge did the same thing in 2016:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/us-judge-lists-one-years-government-electronic-surveillance-requests-in-dc/2016/09/21/7911b044-7c26-11e6-beac-57a4a412e93a_story.html


The judge issued an opinion in February saying he would periodically release this information:

https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/leopold-buzz.pdf


So sadly, this appears to me to be much ado about nothing.
riflebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
riflebear said:






They have to "take down" Assange publicly

Surprised it's taken this long

Democrats make public examples of those that injure them. Really surprised Assange is still alive!
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The dems want to take down the person (Assange) who has exposed their illegal activities... not stop their illegal activities.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.