Fauci Hold Patents on a Key HIV Component Used to Create COVID-19???

41,528 Views | 11 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Married A Horn
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FYI - draw your own conclusions:

>>
Fauci Hold Patents on a Key HIV Component Used to Create COVID-19

By Dr. Jerome Corsi| April 28th, 2020

Why does Dr. Anthony Fauci's name appear on 4 U.S. patents for a key glycoprotein that appears to have been inserted into a SARS virus chassis to create the current COVID-19 epidemic?

The legal portal Justia.com lists the following "patents by inventor Anthony S. Fauci" involving a glycoprotein found in the HIV-1, a disease that attacks the human immune system, leading to the Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome, more commonly known as AIDS. In 1990, Fauci held the same position at the NIH that he holds today. Fauci made his mark around the anti-viral medications that were developed by Big Pharma to combat the AIDS epidemic raging at that time.

This same glycoprotein, identified as Glycoprotein 120, or simply as GP120, has also been found to be a key component of the current COVID-19, a disease that appears to combine a HIV-1 attack on the human immune system, with SARS CoV-1, the pathogen from the original SARS ("Severe Acute Respiratory System") that created an international pandemic in 2002-2003. The pathogen in COVID-19 is named SARS CoV-2 in medical scientific literature.

The four patents on which Fauci is named as an inventor are the following:

Patent Number: 9896509, patent granted August 3, 2016. "Use of antagonists of the interaction between HIV120 and ?4?7 integrin.

Publication Number: 20160333309, patent application filed August 3, 2016. "Use of Antagonists of the Interaction Between HIV GP120 and A4B7 Integrin.

Patent Number: 9441041, patent granted September 13, 2016. "Use of antagonists between HIV GP120 and ?4?7 integrin."

Publication Number 2016007586, patent application filed September 21, 2015. "Use of antagonists of the Interaction Between HIV GP120 and A4B7 Integrin."

An article published by a group of medical scientists in India in the medical science journal BioRXiv in January 2020 was entitled "Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCov spike protein to HIV-1 and Gag."

In a highly controversial finding, the medical scientists in India reported: "We found 4 insertions in the spike glycoprotein (S) which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses. Importantly, amino acid residues in all 4 inserts have identity or similarity to those in the HIV-1 gp120 or HIV-Gag, all of which have identity/similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature."

The article almost immediately was withdrawn after disinformation experts recognized the medical scientists in India were suggesting that COVID-19 was created by inserting the particular glycoprotein from the HIV-1 disease that involve patents held by or applied for by Fauci. Even more upsetting to disinformation operatives was the suggestion that the insertion of these 4 inserts into a SARS virus is not likely to occur in nature.

The clear suggestion was that COVID-19 was laboratory-created, possibly as a bioweapon, and that the creator of the virus used GP120 to do so, a glycoprotein from the HIV-1 1990s era that tied back to Fauci.
<<

https://corsination.com/fauci-patents-on-hiv-covid-19-components/

pro ecclesia, pro javelina
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://patents.justia.com/inventor/anthony-s-fauci
pro ecclesia, pro javelina
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.irishcentral.com/news/robert-f-kennedy-jr-dr-fauci-covid19-vaccine

>>

Robert F. Kennedy Jr says Dr. Fauci and Bill Gates stand to profit from COVID-19 vaccine

Robert F. Kennedy's son claims that Dr. Tony Fauci and the Gates Foundation stand to make a hefty profit from the manufacture of the COVID-19 vaccine.

Shane O'Brien

Apr 27, 2020

Robert F. Kennedy's son claims that Dr. Tony Fauci and the Gates Foundation stand to make a hefty profit from the manufacture of the COVID-19 vaccine.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., son of Robert and nephew of John F. Kennedy, said that the National Institute for Allergic and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), Dr. Fauci's agency, will collect 50% of all royalties from a potential coronavirus vaccine.

Read More: COVID-19 vaccine may be ready by September says Oxford scientist

Speaking to far-right podcast The Gateway Pundit, Kennedy Jr said that Dr. Fauci owns a number of vaccine patents, including one that is being trialed to fight coronavirus by some of America's biggest vaccine manufacturers.

The Gates Foundation invests in Dr. Fauci's NIAID as part of its Decade of Vaccines program which aims to introduce a Global Vaccine Action Plan.

Kennedy Jr said that Dr. Fauci owns a patent for a specific type of vaccine that packages a virus in a protein sheet. The virus is then delivered to the human body through the vaccine and Kennedy Jr said that it very quickly reaches the organs necessary to give a person immunity to a certain illness.

He also said that the patent is currently being used by at least one of the major American vaccine manufacturers to make vaccines for coronavirus.

The four major vaccine manufacturers in the US are Pfizer, Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, and Sanofi, and if one of those four companies successfully develops a Coronavirus vaccine, Fauci and the NIAID stand to collect half of the royalties, according to Kennedy Jr.

He said that companies who used that patent have to split the profits 50/50 with the NIAID and he claimed that the Gates Foundation had invested in that particular patent.

He said that there was no limit on how much the NIAID can collect from the coronavirus vaccine and said that there need to be more government regulations to prevent it from doing so.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is notoriously and controversially anti-vaccination and his own family members penned an op-ed in Politico last year challenging his campaign of "misinformation" about vaccination.

Billionaire Bill Gates, meanwhile, has been a target of conspiracy theories and misinformation from far-right political pundits during the COVID-19 pandemic. The misinformation campaign spread exponentially after Gates publically criticized US President Donald Trump's handling of the pandemic.

Online fact-checker Politifact said that there is no evidence that the Gates Foundation has a patent for a Coronavirus vaccine. The website said that the Gates Foundation is currently funding 70 potential coronavirus vaccines in the United States.

USA Today also debunked an earlier theory that the Pirbright Institute in Britain, which the Gates Foundation invests in, also has a patent for the Coronavirus vaccine. The USA Today article said that those claims were unfounded and that the Gates Foundation is funding an initiative to speed up research into COVID-19 treatments and vaccines.

The theory claimed that the Gates Foundation had engineered the Coronavirus and the necessary vaccine in order to make a profit off the vaccine.

Dr. Tony Fauci, on the other hand, has served as the NIAID's Director since 1984. He is part of the Trump Administration's Coronavirus Task Force and is widely regarded as one of the most trusted medical officials in the United States. He has been an advisor to every US President since Ronald Reagan.

<<
pro ecclesia, pro javelina
Saltykid41
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It is interesting to note that BLAST is available to all, at no cost. Verifying or debunkinh claims of "uncanny similarities" is quite simple.

As a long covid patient with immune deficiency that appeared following my third infection, I wish I hadn't looked at it myself....
Saltykid41
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Facebook fact check calls the patent issue misinformation, but that is patently untrue - and this too, is something one can look up easily enough.
STxBear81
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So Fauci : Dr Jekyll?
ScottS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Saltykid41 said:

Facebook fact check calls the patent issue misinformation, but that is patently untrue - and this too, is something one can look up easily enough.

I think you mean Fakebook
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DEBUNKED!
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Saltykid41 said:

Facebook fact check calls the patent issue misinformation, but that is patently untrue - and this too, is something one can look up easily enough.


Oxymoronic
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

DEBUNKED!
Don't forget the link.

https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-factcheck-hiv-covid-explained/fact-check-sars-cov-2-was-not-created-using-genes-from-hiv-fauci-does-not-hold-patents-for-an-hiv-component-to-sars-cov-2-idUSKBN29C26E
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
All papers/articles referenced in this thread are very old news on the sars2 front (newest is the article Sam referenced written in January of 2021.

Covid knowledge and changes have multiplied quite a bit since.

I really don't think we will have a firm handle on the origin of the virus in our lifetimes. Too much international fallout is possible no matter what is determined.
Married A Horn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

All papers/articles referenced in this thread are very old news on the sars2 front (newest is the article Sam referenced written in January of 2021.

Covid knowledge and changes have multiplied quite a bit since.

I really don't think we will have a firm handle on the origin of the virus in our lifetimes. Too much international fallout is possible no matter what is determined.


People with common sense that are honest with themselves have a firm handle on where it came from.
Married A Horn

Hutto Hippo
Trinity Trojan
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.