I have a feeling you will hear some more apologies from RGIII and then he may disappear.

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

bear2be2 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

bear2be2 said:

---

Jack Bauer said:

---

bear2be2 said:

---

Johnny Bear said:

---

Alf said:

---

Bug a boos makes about as much sense as what actually came out of his mouth. He couldn't just say naysayers?
If a white analyst would have made the same mistake it would be the lead story on CNN and been summarily dismissed from the job.

---

And had that been the case, no number of apologies and pleas for forgiveness would ever be enough - the person would automatically be toast.

---

I've never understood the frustration some white boomers experience at the hypothetical prospect of being restricted from saying racially insensitive or demeaning things.

If a white person had said this on air or in public, it would say something completely different about their inner feelings and character. This was a really poor weird choice by Robert, obviously, but no one really believes he looks down on Black people. Unless it's truly a tongue-tie situation, racial slurs don't slip out of the mouths of non-racist white people. That some of you struggle with this concept is truly baffling to me.

---

I think it's about forgiveness. A HS teenager was uninvited from attending UTennessee because she said the n-word in a snapshot 3 years before.

If we are on a zero tolerance policy, it should be implemented fairly.

---

Forgiveness doesn't require that we grant people who have shown themselves to be racist/hateful special privileges. And admittance to a university -- like employment and patronage of a private business -- is a privilege, not a right.

I'm all for personal growth and forgiveness, but I don't have any problem with holding people accountable for the things they say and do. And again a white person using racial slurs for other races isn't the same thing as someone of the same race doing it. The psychology and motive is completely different.

Anyone who could be caught using racial slurs is racist. And they need to reckon with that. If you're not racist, those words aren't an active part of your vocabulary.

---

I believe everyone is racist. Tribalism is normal. Time to move past all the woke virtue signaling. Culture matters.

---

Textbook projection.

Tribalism is a bug, not a feature of humanity. It's responsible for virtually all of the worst episodes/atrocities in human history, and it will eventually end our species.

---

Stupid assertions. Evil people are responsible for virtually all of the worst blah, blah, blah.

Tribalism allows for the formation of instruments of unity without which we end up in a multi culti chaos that invites fascists/statists/Marxist/collectivists of all kinds whose only motivation is will to power. """"The reverse is true. Tribalism ends in Holocaust and genocide"""


Choose freedom. Embrace and enlarge your tribe.

---

---

The collective state ends in Holocaust/genocide on a scale previously unimaginable. Don't be stupid.

---

Tribalism like Nazism ends in genocide I don't what a collective state" is.
Here let me call myself stupid so the immature condescending name calling we can get out the way.

---

Nazism is an expression of the state just as communism is. Stalin, Mao, and Hitler are all functional equivalents. We would likely be better off in tribes rather than enabling/substituting the modern nation state. Have read enough of your crap for years to not care if you take offense, btw.

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

bear2be2 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

bear2be2 said:

---

Jack Bauer said:

---

bear2be2 said:

---

Johnny Bear said:

---

Alf said:

---

Bug a boos makes about as much sense as what actually came out of his mouth. He couldn't just say naysayers?
If a white analyst would have made the same mistake it would be the lead story on CNN and been summarily dismissed from the job.

---

And had that been the case, no number of apologies and pleas for forgiveness would ever be enough - the person would automatically be toast.

---

I've never understood the frustration some white boomers experience at the hypothetical prospect of being restricted from saying racially insensitive or demeaning things.

If a white person had said this on air or in public, it would say something completely different about their inner feelings and character. This was a really poor weird choice by Robert, obviously, but no one really believes he looks down on Black people. Unless it's truly a tongue-tie situation, racial slurs don't slip out of the mouths of non-racist white people. That some of you struggle with this concept is truly baffling to me.

---

I think it's about forgiveness. A HS teenager was uninvited from attending UTennessee because she said the n-word in a snapshot 3 years before.

If we are on a zero tolerance policy, it should be implemented fairly.

---

Forgiveness doesn't require that we grant people who have shown themselves to be racist/hateful special privileges. And admittance to a university -- like employment and patronage of a private business -- is a privilege, not a right.

I'm all for personal growth and forgiveness, but I don't have any problem with holding people accountable for the things they say and do. And again a white person using racial slurs for other races isn't the same thing as someone of the same race doing it. The psychology and motive is completely different.

Anyone who could be caught using racial slurs is racist. And they need to reckon with that. If you're not racist, those words aren't an active part of your vocabulary.

---

I believe everyone is racist. Tribalism is normal. Time to move past all the woke virtue signaling. Culture matters.

---

Textbook projection.

Tribalism is a bug, not a feature of humanity. It's responsible for virtually all of the worst episodes/atrocities in human history, and it will eventually end our species.

---

Stupid assertions. Evil people are responsible for virtually all of the worst blah, blah, blah.

Tribalism allows for the formation of instruments of unity without which we end up in a multi culti chaos that invites fascists/statists/Marxist/collectivists of all kinds whose only motivation is will to power. """"The reverse is true. Tribalism ends in Holocaust and genocide"""


Choose freedom. Embrace and enlarge your tribe.

---

---

The collective state ends in Holocaust/genocide on a scale previously unimaginable. Don't be stupid.

---

Tribalism like Nazism ends in genocide I don't what a collective state" is.
Here let me call myself stupid so the immature condescending name calling we can get out the way.

---

Nazism is an expression of the state just as communism is. Stalin, Mao, and Hitler are all functional equivalents. We would likely be better off in tribes rather than enabling/substituting the modern nation state. Have read enough of your crap for years to not care if you take offense, btw.

---

How immature you are that simple dialogue only gets me disdain and put downs. You are a sad human if offending others does not matter to you. What a terrible world you live in.

What we can probably be certain of is a word like 70% of the US population didn't even know existed has no been said by them multiple times a day since RG3 Freudian slip for the first time in half a century.

****boo

Aliceinbubbleland said:

---

bear2be2 said:

---

The idea that morality can't exist outside of a Christian worldview is nonsense. The golden rule works as a functional societal guidepost with or without a god myth attached. And it may work even better without because pragmatism is a more pure and foundational driver than fear of damnation.

---

This is 100% accurate but will fall upon deaf ears because momma told them so.

---

Morality is based on free will/choice and absolute truth. Neither has a naturalistic/materialistic basis.

That's not momma talking, that's just logic.

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

bear2be2 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

bear2be2 said:

---

Jack Bauer said:

---

bear2be2 said:

---

Johnny Bear said:

---

Alf said:

---

Bug a boos makes about as much sense as what actually came out of his mouth. He couldn't just say naysayers?
If a white analyst would have made the same mistake it would be the lead story on CNN and been summarily dismissed from the job.

---

And had that been the case, no number of apologies and pleas for forgiveness would ever be enough - the person would automatically be toast.

---

I've never understood the frustration some white boomers experience at the hypothetical prospect of being restricted from saying racially insensitive or demeaning things.

If a white person had said this on air or in public, it would say something completely different about their inner feelings and character. This was a really poor weird choice by Robert, obviously, but no one really believes he looks down on Black people. Unless it's truly a tongue-tie situation, racial slurs don't slip out of the mouths of non-racist white people. That some of you struggle with this concept is truly baffling to me.

---

I think it's about forgiveness. A HS teenager was uninvited from attending UTennessee because she said the n-word in a snapshot 3 years before.

If we are on a zero tolerance policy, it should be implemented fairly.

---

Forgiveness doesn't require that we grant people who have shown themselves to be racist/hateful special privileges. And admittance to a university -- like employment and patronage of a private business -- is a privilege, not a right.

I'm all for personal growth and forgiveness, but I don't have any problem with holding people accountable for the things they say and do. And again a white person using racial slurs for other races isn't the same thing as someone of the same race doing it. The psychology and motive is completely different.

Anyone who could be caught using racial slurs is racist. And they need to reckon with that. If you're not racist, those words aren't an active part of your vocabulary.

---

I believe everyone is racist. Tribalism is normal. Time to move past all the woke virtue signaling. Culture matters.

---

Textbook projection.

Tribalism is a bug, not a feature of humanity. It's responsible for virtually all of the worst episodes/atrocities in human history, and it will eventually end our species.

---

Stupid assertions. Evil people are responsible for virtually all of the worst blah, blah, blah.

Tribalism allows for the formation of instruments of unity without which we end up in a multi culti chaos that invites fascists/statists/Marxist/collectivists of all kinds whose only motivation is will to power. """"The reverse is true. Tribalism ends in Holocaust and genocide"""


Choose freedom. Embrace and enlarge your tribe.

---

---

The collective state ends in Holocaust/genocide on a scale previously unimaginable. Don't be stupid.

---

Tribalism like Nazism ends in genocide I don't what a collective state" is.
Here let me call myself stupid so the immature condescending name calling we can get out the way.

---

Nazism is an expression of the state just as communism is. Stalin, Mao, and Hitler are all functional equivalents. We would likely be better off in tribes rather than enabling/substituting the modern nation state. Have read enough of your crap for years to not care if you take offense, btw.

---

How immature you are that simple dialogue only gets me disdain and put downs. You are a sad human if offending others does not matter to you. What a terrible world you live in.

---

If the combination of stupidity and heresy you typically spout are the hallmarks of maturity in your world, you are welcome to it. You've earned it.

Um ok. Getting away from the Fascism stuff and back on topic, I really like RGIIIs commentary, because he doesn't follow the script. People complaining that he's inappropriate have probably never worked a job in a factory or any blue-collar environment.

I miss Keith Jackson.

Johnny Bear said:

---

bear2be2 said:

---

Johnny Bear said:

---

Alf said:

---

Bug a boos makes about as much sense as what actually came out of his mouth. He couldn't just say naysayers?
If a white analyst would have made the same mistake it would be the lead story on CNN and been summarily dismissed from the job.

---

And had that been the case, no number of apologies and pleas for forgiveness would ever be enough - the person would automatically be toast.

---

I've never understood the frustration some white boomers experience at the hypothetical prospect of being restricted from saying racially insensitive or demeaning things.

If a white person had said this on air or in public, it would say something completely different about their inner feelings and character. This was a really poor weird choice by Robert, obviously, but no one really believes he looks down on Black people. Unless it's truly a tongue-tie situation, racial slurs don't slip out of the mouths of non-racist white people. That some of you struggle with this concept is truly baffling to me.

---

What's truly baffling to me is how badly someone like you can miss the point entirely.

It's exactly 0% about frustration over being "restricted from saying racially insensitive things". I am offended by racially insensitive things being said by anybody (regardless of their race) directed at another race (regardless of which race the insensitive comment is being directed at). The point is about the societal double standard that treats white offenders differently from black ones. In RGIII's case I'm sure this was a true slip of the tongue which he subsequently clarified. He will be forgiven - as he should be - and likely nothing more will happen - as it also should be. The point is RGIII should be treated the same way if he was a white guy that had a slip of the tongue, but most people with at least half of a brain know that wouldn't be the case. And that's the point - the double standard.

---

i understand your sentiment and i do agree that there is disparity (for example, the MSNBC reporter talking about Kobe's death mixed Knicks and Lakers to say "Nakers" and every assumed she said the n-word...obviously ridiculous that anyone would believe she would intentionally say that on air to refer to Bryant).

there are other similar examples where people clearly slip on their words. but at the same time, the analogy here would be if Matt Leinart accidentally said honkey or cracker. OR another analogy would be if RG3 had said ch!nk or some other word that's racist against a different ethnicity.

so the better question is this: if RG3 and Leinart each said a term that's racist against Asians, would they both be punished equally? i believe the answer is yes.

i also believe that people are too quick to call others racist and it's not only infuriating (the far right and far left have both mastered the art of race-baiting, so neither extreme is exempt), but it's hindering the very cause people are trying to promote.

I think RGiii has a bright future ahead of him but agree with a prior post saying he tries to hard to be cute and funny at times. He has some great lines and commentary but then drops a cringy line. He's already better than a number of announcers and it's only his first or second year?

boykin_spaniel said:

---

I think RGiii has a bright future ahead of him but agree with a prior post saying he tries to hard to be cute and funny at times. He has some great lines and commentary but then drops a cringy line. He's already better than a number of announcers and it's only his first or second year?

---

A lot of it is cringey, but that's just kind of who he is. I think many people find it endearing and a breath of fresh air over the guys that are trying to sound overly proper and sterile

I appreciate him being himself and breaking the sterile announcer mold, but if he toned down trying to be cute the whole game I think he'd have a solid balance.

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

bear2be2 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

bear2be2 said:

---

Jack Bauer said:

---

bear2be2 said:

---

Johnny Bear said:

---

Alf said:

---

Bug a boos makes about as much sense as what actually came out of his mouth. He couldn't just say naysayers?
If a white analyst would have made the same mistake it would be the lead story on CNN and been summarily dismissed from the job.

---

And had that been the case, no number of apologies and pleas for forgiveness would ever be enough - the person would automatically be toast.

---

I've never understood the frustration some white boomers experience at the hypothetical prospect of being restricted from saying racially insensitive or demeaning things.

If a white person had said this on air or in public, it would say something completely different about their inner feelings and character. This was a really poor weird choice by Robert, obviously, but no one really believes he looks down on Black people. Unless it's truly a tongue-tie situation, racial slurs don't slip out of the mouths of non-racist white people. That some of you struggle with this concept is truly baffling to me.

---

I think it's about forgiveness. A HS teenager was uninvited from attending UTennessee because she said the n-word in a snapshot 3 years before.

If we are on a zero tolerance policy, it should be implemented fairly.

---

Forgiveness doesn't require that we grant people who have shown themselves to be racist/hateful special privileges. And admittance to a university -- like employment and patronage of a private business -- is a privilege, not a right.

I'm all for personal growth and forgiveness, but I don't have any problem with holding people accountable for the things they say and do. And again a white person using racial slurs for other races isn't the same thing as someone of the same race doing it. The psychology and motive is completely different.

Anyone who could be caught using racial slurs is racist. And they need to reckon with that. If you're not racist, those words aren't an active part of your vocabulary.

---

I believe everyone is racist. Tribalism is normal. Time to move past all the woke virtue signaling. Culture matters.

---

Textbook projection.

Tribalism is a bug, not a feature of humanity. It's responsible for virtually all of the worst episodes/atrocities in human history, and it will eventually end our species.

---

Stupid assertions. Evil people are responsible for virtually all of the worst blah, blah, blah.

Tribalism allows for the formation of instruments of unity without which we end up in a multi culti chaos that invites fascists/statists/Marxist/collectivists of all kinds whose only motivation is will to power. """"The reverse is true. Tribalism ends in Holocaust and genocide"""


Choose freedom. Embrace and enlarge your tribe.

---

---

The collective state ends in Holocaust/genocide on a scale previously unimaginable. Don't be stupid.

---

Tribalism like Nazism ends in genocide I don't what a collective state" is.
Here let me call myself stupid so the immature condescending name calling we can get out the way.

---

Nazism is an expression of the state just as communism is. Stalin, Mao, and Hitler are all functional equivalents. We would likely be better off in tribes rather than enabling/substituting the modern nation state. Have read enough of your crap for years to not care if you take offense, btw.

---

How immature you are that simple dialogue only gets me disdain and put downs. You are a sad human if offending others does not matter to you. What a terrible world you live in.

---

If the combination of stupidity and heresy you typically spout are the hallmarks of maturity in your world, you are welcome to it. You've earned it. This is not dialogue but a putdown:"Have read enough of your crap for years to not care if you take offense, btw.

---

To me RG3 has improved since the BYU game. Whitetrash did a great job of critiquing him

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

bear2be2 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

bear2be2 said:

---

Jack Bauer said:

---

bear2be2 said:

---

Johnny Bear said:

---

Alf said:

---

Bug a boos makes about as much sense as what actually came out of his mouth. He couldn't just say naysayers?
If a white analyst would have made the same mistake it would be the lead story on CNN and been summarily dismissed from the job.

---

And had that been the case, no number of apologies and pleas for forgiveness would ever be enough - the person would automatically be toast.

---

I've never understood the frustration some white boomers experience at the hypothetical prospect of being restricted from saying racially insensitive or demeaning things.

If a white person had said this on air or in public, it would say something completely different about their inner feelings and character. This was a really poor weird choice by Robert, obviously, but no one really believes he looks down on Black people. Unless it's truly a tongue-tie situation, racial slurs don't slip out of the mouths of non-racist white people. That some of you struggle with this concept is truly baffling to me.

---

I think it's about forgiveness. A HS teenager was uninvited from attending UTennessee because she said the n-word in a snapshot 3 years before.

If we are on a zero tolerance policy, it should be implemented fairly.

---

Forgiveness doesn't require that we grant people who have shown themselves to be racist/hateful special privileges. And admittance to a university -- like employment and patronage of a private business -- is a privilege, not a right.

I'm all for personal growth and forgiveness, but I don't have any problem with holding people accountable for the things they say and do. And again a white person using racial slurs for other races isn't the same thing as someone of the same race doing it. The psychology and motive is completely different.

Anyone who could be caught using racial slurs is racist. And they need to reckon with that. If you're not racist, those words aren't an active part of your vocabulary.

---

I believe everyone is racist. Tribalism is normal. Time to move past all the woke virtue signaling. Culture matters.

---

Textbook projection.

Tribalism is a bug, not a feature of humanity. It's responsible for virtually all of the worst episodes/atrocities in human history, and it will eventually end our species.

---

Stupid assertions. Evil people are responsible for virtually all of the worst blah, blah, blah.

Tribalism allows for the formation of instruments of unity without which we end up in a multi culti chaos that invites fascists/statists/Marxist/collectivists of all kinds whose only motivation is will to power. """"The reverse is true. Tribalism ends in Holocaust and genocide"""


Choose freedom. Embrace and enlarge your tribe.

---

---

The collective state ends in Holocaust/genocide on a scale previously unimaginable. Don't be stupid.

---

Tribalism like Nazism ends in genocide I don't what a collective state" is.
Here let me call myself stupid so the immature condescending name calling we can get out the way.

---

Nazism is an expression of the state just as communism is. Stalin, Mao, and Hitler are all functional equivalents. We would likely be better off in tribes rather than enabling/substituting the modern nation state. Have read enough of your crap for years to not care if you take offense, btw.

---

How immature you are that simple dialogue only gets me disdain and put downs. You are a sad human if offending others does not matter to you. What a terrible world you live in.

---

If the combination of stupidity and heresy you typically spout are the hallmarks of maturity in your world, you are welcome to it. You've earned it. This is not dialogue but a putdown:"Have read enough of your crap for years to not care if you take offense, btw.

---

---

Just to be clear, not concerned in the least about dialogue with you. No point in worrying over the opinions of your kind. Very content to just be insulting.

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

bear2be2 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

bear2be2 said:

---

Jack Bauer said:

---

bear2be2 said:

---

Johnny Bear said:

---

Alf said:

---

Bug a boos makes about as much sense as what actually came out of his mouth. He couldn't just say naysayers?
If a white analyst would have made the same mistake it would be the lead story on CNN and been summarily dismissed from the job.

---

And had that been the case, no number of apologies and pleas for forgiveness would ever be enough - the person would automatically be toast.

---

I've never understood the frustration some white boomers experience at the hypothetical prospect of being restricted from saying racially insensitive or demeaning things.

If a white person had said this on air or in public, it would say something completely different about their inner feelings and character. This was a really poor weird choice by Robert, obviously, but no one really believes he looks down on Black people. Unless it's truly a tongue-tie situation, racial slurs don't slip out of the mouths of non-racist white people. That some of you struggle with this concept is truly baffling to me.

---

I think it's about forgiveness. A HS teenager was uninvited from attending UTennessee because she said the n-word in a snapshot 3 years before.

If we are on a zero tolerance policy, it should be implemented fairly.

---

Forgiveness doesn't require that we grant people who have shown themselves to be racist/hateful special privileges. And admittance to a university -- like employment and patronage of a private business -- is a privilege, not a right.

I'm all for personal growth and forgiveness, but I don't have any problem with holding people accountable for the things they say and do. And again a white person using racial slurs for other races isn't the same thing as someone of the same race doing it. The psychology and motive is completely different.

Anyone who could be caught using racial slurs is racist. And they need to reckon with that. If you're not racist, those words aren't an active part of your vocabulary.

---

I believe everyone is racist. Tribalism is normal. Time to move past all the woke virtue signaling. Culture matters.

---

Textbook projection.

Tribalism is a bug, not a feature of humanity. It's responsible for virtually all of the worst episodes/atrocities in human history, and it will eventually end our species.

---

Stupid assertions. Evil people are responsible for virtually all of the worst blah, blah, blah.

Tribalism allows for the formation of instruments of unity without which we end up in a multi culti chaos that invites fascists/statists/Marxist/collectivists of all kinds whose only motivation is will to power. """"The reverse is true. Tribalism ends in Holocaust and genocide"""


Choose freedom. Embrace and enlarge your tribe.

---

---

The collective state ends in Holocaust/genocide on a scale previously unimaginable. Don't be stupid.

---

Tribalism like Nazism ends in genocide I don't what a collective state" is.
Here let me call myself stupid so the immature condescending name calling we can get out the way.

---

Nazism is an expression of the state just as communism is. Stalin, Mao, and Hitler are all functional equivalents. We would likely be better off in tribes rather than enabling/substituting the modern nation state. Have read enough of your crap for years to not care if you take offense, btw.

---

How immature you are that simple dialogue only gets me disdain and put downs. You are a sad human if offending others does not matter to you. What a terrible world you live in.

---

If the combination of stupidity and heresy you typically spout are the hallmarks of maturity in your world, you are welcome to it. You've earned it. This is not dialogue but a putdown:"Have read enough of your crap for years to not care if you take offense, btw.

---

---

Just to be clear, not concerned in the least about dialogue with you. No point in worrying over the opinions of your kind. Very content to just be insulting.

---

Then don't dialogue but you can be a decent human being.

Haven't read all three pages of this thread . . . bu while on the subject, I assumed I just misheard the "F" word several weeks ago.

Evidently not.

It was in a statement of "___________ wondering what the F--- is going on?"

Hard to mishear that.

I don't care for the word in any setting, but it definitely made the commentary something other than contrived and cliche'd.

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

bear2be2 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

bear2be2 said:

---

Jack Bauer said:

---

bear2be2 said:

---

Johnny Bear said:

---

Alf said:

---

Bug a boos makes about as much sense as what actually came out of his mouth. He couldn't just say naysayers?
If a white analyst would have made the same mistake it would be the lead story on CNN and been summarily dismissed from the job.

---

And had that been the case, no number of apologies and pleas for forgiveness would ever be enough - the person would automatically be toast.

---

I've never understood the frustration some white boomers experience at the hypothetical prospect of being restricted from saying racially insensitive or demeaning things.

If a white person had said this on air or in public, it would say something completely different about their inner feelings and character. This was a really poor weird choice by Robert, obviously, but no one really believes he looks down on Black people. Unless it's truly a tongue-tie situation, racial slurs don't slip out of the mouths of non-racist white people. That some of you struggle with this concept is truly baffling to me.

---

I think it's about forgiveness. A HS teenager was uninvited from attending UTennessee because she said the n-word in a snapshot 3 years before.

If we are on a zero tolerance policy, it should be implemented fairly.

---

Forgiveness doesn't require that we grant people who have shown themselves to be racist/hateful special privileges. And admittance to a university -- like employment and patronage of a private business -- is a privilege, not a right.

I'm all for personal growth and forgiveness, but I don't have any problem with holding people accountable for the things they say and do. And again a white person using racial slurs for other races isn't the same thing as someone of the same race doing it. The psychology and motive is completely different.

Anyone who could be caught using racial slurs is racist. And they need to reckon with that. If you're not racist, those words aren't an active part of your vocabulary.

---

I believe everyone is racist. Tribalism is normal. Time to move past all the woke virtue signaling. Culture matters.

---

Textbook projection.

Tribalism is a bug, not a feature of humanity. It's responsible for virtually all of the worst episodes/atrocities in human history, and it will eventually end our species.

---

Stupid assertions. Evil people are responsible for virtually all of the worst blah, blah, blah.

Tribalism allows for the formation of instruments of unity without which we end up in a multi culti chaos that invites fascists/statists/Marxist/collectivists of all kinds whose only motivation is will to power. """"The reverse is true. Tribalism ends in Holocaust and genocide"""


Choose freedom. Embrace and enlarge your tribe.

---

---

The collective state ends in Holocaust/genocide on a scale previously unimaginable. Don't be stupid.

---

Tribalism like Nazism ends in genocide I don't what a collective state" is.
Here let me call myself stupid so the immature condescending name calling we can get out the way.

---

Nazism is an expression of the state just as communism is. Stalin, Mao, and Hitler are all functional equivalents. We would likely be better off in tribes rather than enabling/substituting the modern nation state. Have read enough of your crap for years to not care if you take offense, btw.

---

How immature you are that simple dialogue only gets me disdain and put downs. You are a sad human if offending others does not matter to you. What a terrible world you live in.

---

If the combination of stupidity and heresy you typically spout are the hallmarks of maturity in your world, you are welcome to it. You've earned it. This is not dialogue but a putdown:"Have read enough of your crap for years to not care if you take offense, btw.

---

---

Just to be clear, not concerned in the least about dialogue with you. No point in worrying over the opinions of your kind. Very content to just be insulting.

---

Then don't dialogue but you can be a decent human being.

---

Being a decent human being involves honesty. No reason to whitewash your heresies and errors. You need to own it.

WIFE IS IN LABOR!!!!!! pic.twitter.com/Kep0Ek51vU

— Robert Griffin III (@RGIII) January 1, 2023

Wearing his BU gear

Every time you want to shower with Wifey, the kids just won’t let you. pic.twitter.com/Pfonsl7UrZ

— Robert Griffin III (@RGIII) March 10, 2023

boognish_bear said:

---

Wearing his BU gear

Every time you want to shower with Wifey, the kids just won’t let you. pic.twitter.com/Pfonsl7UrZ

— Robert Griffin III (@RGIII) March 10, 2023

---

That's how you got the kids in the first place!!