I didn't mean that toward you. I meant it more toward the people with endless negative posts in every thread.

They are perpetual losers.

We have a bad play or give up a TD and "fans" post things like

"Game is over"

"we are gonna go 3-9"

"time for basketball season"

It's old and tired. I don't know why they even watch

As long as Aranda is on board, we will stink. This is what has happened the last 4 years. We "negative" posters are relying on what we have seen on the field the last 4 years.

The question that should really be asked is " What business do positive fans really have in being positive?" The positivity, is certainly not based on reality.

Steel Eagle said:

---

Ok so, before the game started today, when I looked on the forum, I saw a lot of "blah blah blah, we're going to lose 44-0 blah blah blah we suck blah blah" Then the game starts, we hold Auburn 17 points total, and we nearly beat them if not for a poorly executed throw. Sure I can see we need to improve on offense a bit, and I think Armstrong could use some work on FGs, but when I entered the forum after the game, it's full of people seemingly ignoring how well we played considering your expectations and continuing to whine about how bad we are. And yes, I think Aranda is a really bad coach to say the least, but why are yall so convinced that we are unable to do well?

---

We lost. That's what happened. Winning cures the negativity and it decreases my negativity. Wanna know why I'm negative all the time? Look at our record since CDA took the helm. That record is the reason I assume we will lose whenever we play an average to above average squad.



Im tired of people declaring a loss in the 1st half when we are down by 3 points.

Perpetual losers are those who continue to see silver linings that don't exist or who imagine lights at the end of the tunnel that never shine.

Jack Bauer said:

---

They are perpetual losers.

We have a bad play or give up a TD and "fans" post things like

"Game is over"

"we are gonna go 3-9"

"time for basketball season"

It's old and tired. I don't know why they even watch

---

A very succinct answer. Simple to understand. At least it should be.



quote=Realitybites]Because Aranda is such a bad coach.

There are a lot of negative people on this board. I wish we had another coach and wish we had won but I am a Baylor Fan and am happy about the improvement and hope we win a lot of games this year and we keep our coach until his contract is up because we are winning.

In today's college football, every season is a new team. We have a new qb, a returning RB, and lots of new impact players. You have to be blind or stubborn to watch yesterday and not think this team is improved. A 5-7 team doesn't become a 10-2 team overnight. I'm not celebrating the moral victory, I'm celebrating the obvious improvement. The defense in particular is massively improved.

Steel Eagle said:

---

Ok so, before the game started today, when I looked on the forum, I saw a lot of "blah blah blah, we're going to lose 44-0 blah blah blah we suck blah blah" Then the game starts, we hold Auburn 17 points total, and we nearly beat them if not for a poorly executed throw. Sure I can see we need to improve on offense a bit, and I think Armstrong could use some work on FGs, but when I entered the forum after the game, it's full of people seemingly ignoring how well we played considering your expectations and continuing to whine about how bad we are. And yes, I think Aranda is a really bad coach to say the least, but why are yall so convinced that we are unable to do well?

---

Nearly beating a team means losing. That is all. So glad to clear that up.

Constant negativity comes from a loser HC that has canned like 6 assistants

Why be mad at us?

In general, negative comments in free sports forums is the norm. From what I have heard, other forums are much worse than this one.

It makes sense. People who use free college message boards are usually one of two groups - either a fan/alumni member who is looking for information about their team or wants to follow their team, but is too cheap to pay for any premium content. Nothing wrong with that, but they will often get frustrated with the other group. The other group may have been a fan at some point, but now are frustrated beyond being able to look at things objectively. They lack the financial resources to genuinely make a difference and therefore be heard by the administration, but they crave a place where they can voice their frustration and feel validated when they see that others agree with them. This second group will typically lash out at any hint of optimism, and have allowed their frustration to pollute their fandom. The first group of people become labeled as polyannas if they even suggest, "it's possible that things aren't as bad as you think they are". If you're in the first group and get annoyed - suck it up and pay for a premium board ... or just get used to it. Don't try to reason with anyone.

There is a small group of people that are simply 'trolls'. They may or may not be affiliated with the institution on that website, but they find enjoyment in stirring people up and have found a particular fanbase as easy targets. They are rare, initially annoying, but can be amusing once recognized as what they are and observing the reactions that they get from others.

KIA said:

---

In general, negative comments in free sports forums is the norm. From what I have heard, other forums are much worse than this one.

It makes sense. People who use free college message boards are usually one of two groups - either a fan/alumni member who is looking for information about their team or wants to follow their team, but is too cheap to pay for any premium content. Nothing wrong with that, but they will often get frustrated with the other group. The other group may have been a fan at some point, but now are frustrated beyond being able to look at things objectively. They lack the financial resources to genuinely make a difference and therefore be heard by the administration, but they crave a place where they can voice their frustration and feel validated when they see that others agree with them. This second group will typically lash out at any hint of optimism, and have allowed their frustration to pollute their fandom. The first group of people become labeled as polyannas if they even suggest, "it's possible that things aren't as bad as you think they are". If you're in the first group and get annoyed - suck it up and pay for a premium board ... or just get used to it. Don't try to reason with anyone.

There is a small group of people that are simply 'trolls'. They may or may not be affiliated with the institution on that website, but they find enjoyment in stirring people up and have found a particular fanbase as easy targets. They are rare, initially annoying, but can be amusing once recognized as what they are and observing the reactions that they get from others.

---

The problem is that truth and objectivity often equates to another person's negativity.

Get this guy an orange slice and a pat on the back. We're sick of this coach and we're sick of losing. I will always support Baylor and BU fb, but until this shiet bag is gone and this experiment is over with I will continue to be negative prik and wish we lose every game.

Youre a clown said:

---

KIA said:

---

In general, negative comments in free sports forums is the norm. From what I have heard, other forums are much worse than this one.

It makes sense. People who use free college message boards are usually one of two groups - either a fan/alumni member who is looking for information about their team or wants to follow their team, but is too cheap to pay for any premium content. Nothing wrong with that, but they will often get frustrated with the other group. The other group may have been a fan at some point, but now are frustrated beyond being able to look at things objectively. They lack the financial resources to genuinely make a difference and therefore be heard by the administration, but they crave a place where they can voice their frustration and feel validated when they see that others agree with them. This second group will typically lash out at any hint of optimism, and have allowed their frustration to pollute their fandom. The first group of people become labeled as polyannas if they even suggest, "it's possible that things aren't as bad as you think they are". If you're in the first group and get annoyed - suck it up and pay for a premium board ... or just get used to it. Don't try to reason with anyone.

There is a small group of people that are simply 'trolls'. They may or may not be affiliated with the institution on that website, but they find enjoyment in stirring people up and have found a particular fanbase as easy targets. They are rare, initially annoying, but can be amusing once recognized as what they are and observing the reactions that they get from others.

---

The problem is that truth and objectivity often equates to another person's negativity.

---

Well put. Reality.

Also I have no clue what financial resources has to do with anything really. Met plenty of rich but objective people and plenty of poorer non objective people and vice versa.

This is nothing more than experiment, and BU Football is the guinea pig

I have been saying this for years

0-1

dycbaylor02 said:

---

Get this guy an orange slice and a pat on the back. We're sick of this coach and we're sick of losing. I will always support Baylor and BU fb, but until this shiet bag is gone and this experiment is over with I will continue to be negative prik and wish we lose every game.

---

I must say I'm not quite on your level of vitriol. But I'm getting close. Just give me a few weeks.

KIA said:

---

In general, negative comments in free sports forums is the norm. From what I have heard, other forums are much worse than this one.

It makes sense. People who use free college message boards are usually one of two groups - either a fan/alumni member who is looking for information about their team or wants to follow their team, but is too cheap to pay for any premium content. Nothing wrong with that, but they will often get frustrated with the other group. The other group may have been a fan at some point, but now are frustrated beyond being able to look at things objectively. They lack the financial resources to genuinely make a difference and therefore be heard by the administration, but they crave a place where they can voice their frustration and feel validated when they see that others agree with them. This second group will typically lash out at any hint of optimism, and have allowed their frustration to pollute their fandom. The first group of people become labeled as polyannas if they even suggest, "it's possible that things aren't as bad as you think they are". If you're in the first group and get annoyed - suck it up and pay for a premium board ... or just get used to it. Don't try to reason with anyone.

There is a small group of people that are simply 'trolls'. They may or may not be affiliated with the institution on that website, but they find enjoyment in stirring people up and have found a particular fanbase as easy targets. They are rare, initially annoying, but can be amusing once recognized as what they are and observing the reactions that they get from others.

---

my

I have noticed that most in your number 1 category have done what the reasonable have done with the R&P board several years ago and left or minimized conversing here over the last year. U fortunately that means the quality of this whole site is headed down the tubes.

You must have been living under a rock the last 4 years

Guitarbiscuit said:

---

Youre a clown said:

---

KIA said:

---

In general, negative comments in free sports forums is the norm. From what I have heard, other forums are much worse than this one.

It makes sense. People who use free college message boards are usually one of two groups - either a fan/alumni member who is looking for information about their team or wants to follow their team, but is too cheap to pay for any premium content. Nothing wrong with that, but they will often get frustrated with the other group. The other group may have been a fan at some point, but now are frustrated beyond being able to look at things objectively. They lack the financial resources to genuinely make a difference and therefore be heard by the administration, but they crave a place where they can voice their frustration and feel validated when they see that others agree with them. This second group will typically lash out at any hint of optimism, and have allowed their frustration to pollute their fandom. The first group of people become labeled as polyannas if they even suggest, "it's possible that things aren't as bad as you think they are". If you're in the first group and get annoyed - suck it up and pay for a premium board ... or just get used to it. Don't try to reason with anyone.

There is a small group of people that are simply 'trolls'. They may or may not be affiliated with the institution on that website, but they find enjoyment in stirring people up and have found a particular fanbase as easy targets. They are rare, initially annoying, but can be amusing once recognized as what they are and observing the reactions that they get from others.

---

The problem is that truth and objectivity often equates to another person's negativity.

---

Well put. Reality.

Also I have no clue what financial resources has to do with anything really. Met plenty of rich but objective people and plenty of poorer non objective people and vice versa.

---

Some people are able to buy themself a seat at the table and are able to voice their complaints directly to the people who make the decisions. Those that do not have the resources are simply screaming into the void. Professional people who make decisions in business, don't listen to idiots on free message boards.

KIA said:

---

Guitarbiscuit said:

---

Youre a clown said:

---

KIA said:

---

In general, negative comments in free sports forums is the norm. From what I have heard, other forums are much worse than this one.

It makes sense. People who use free college message boards are usually one of two groups - either a fan/alumni member who is looking for information about their team or wants to follow their team, but is too cheap to pay for any premium content. Nothing wrong with that, but they will often get frustrated with the other group. The other group may have been a fan at some point, but now are frustrated beyond being able to look at things objectively. They lack the financial resources to genuinely make a difference and therefore be heard by the administration, but they crave a place where they can voice their frustration and feel validated when they see that others agree with them. This second group will typically lash out at any hint of optimism, and have allowed their frustration to pollute their fandom. The first group of people become labeled as polyannas if they even suggest, "it's possible that things aren't as bad as you think they are". If you're in the first group and get annoyed - suck it up and pay for a premium board ... or just get used to it. Don't try to reason with anyone.

There is a small group of people that are simply 'trolls'. They may or may not be affiliated with the institution on that website, but they find enjoyment in stirring people up and have found a particular fanbase as easy targets. They are rare, initially annoying, but can be amusing once recognized as what they are and observing the reactions that they get from others.

---

The problem is that truth and objectivity often equates to another person's negativity.

---

Well put. Reality.

Also I have no clue what financial resources has to do with anything really. Met plenty of rich but objective people and plenty of poorer non objective people and vice versa.

---

Some people are able to buy themself a seat at the table and are able to voice their complaints directly to the people who make the decisions. Those that do not have the resources are simply screaming into the void. Professional people who make decisions in business, don't listen to idiots on free message boards.

---

You have no real clue who has money and who does not. Attempting to divine exactly who does and who does not based on message board writings is a fool's errand.

It was in jest, Sir. Well aware of our garbage record post 2021.

I'm just thankful for the ignore feature and will use it liberally.

KIA said:

---

Guitarbiscuit said:

---

Youre a clown said:

---

KIA said:

---

In general, negative comments in free sports forums is the norm. From what I have heard, other forums are much worse than this one.

It makes sense. People who use free college message boards are usually one of two groups - either a fan/alumni member who is looking for information about their team or wants to follow their team, but is too cheap to pay for any premium content. Nothing wrong with that, but they will often get frustrated with the other group. The other group may have been a fan at some point, but now are frustrated beyond being able to look at things objectively. They lack the financial resources to genuinely make a difference and therefore be heard by the administration, but they crave a place where they can voice their frustration and feel validated when they see that others agree with them. This second group will typically lash out at any hint of optimism, and have allowed their frustration to pollute their fandom. The first group of people become labeled as polyannas if they even suggest, "it's possible that things aren't as bad as you think they are". If you're in the first group and get annoyed - suck it up and pay for a premium board ... or just get used to it. Don't try to reason with anyone.

There is a small group of people that are simply 'trolls'. They may or may not be affiliated with the institution on that website, but they find enjoyment in stirring people up and have found a particular fanbase as easy targets. They are rare, initially annoying, but can be amusing once recognized as what they are and observing the reactions that they get from others.

---

The problem is that truth and objectivity often equates to another person's negativity.

---

Well put. Reality.

Also I have no clue what financial resources has to do with anything really. Met plenty of rich but objective people and plenty of poorer non objective people and vice versa.

---

Some people are able to buy themself a seat at the table and are able to voice their complaints directly to the people who make the decisions. Those that do not have the resources are simply screaming into the void. Professional people who make decisions in business, don't listen to idiots on free message boards.

---

Meh. Never assume that the people with money and power aren't also morons when it comes to sports. I assume that they aren't morons when it comes to whatever business enterprise made them rich. Warren Buffett could join this board, and I really wouldn't care what he has to say about Baylor football anymore than anyone else on here, but I would listen to him on investment advice

Youre a clown said:

---

BigGameBaylorBear said:

---

Jack Bauer said:

---

BigGameBaylorBear said:

---

Yall aren't tired of moral victories yet?

---

Im tired of people declaring a loss in the 1st half when we are down by 3 points.

---

And they need the dues.

Negativity on the message board has no impact on the performance of the players. Don't want negativity? Start winning games. Dave is in year 7 and we're celebrating beating the spread to a bottom tier SEC school.

---

Joining the premium board is also a good option. Seriously, if this loss energizes you and you want a place where negativity is banned, you will find your people on the premium board. They are already penciling in wins over there

---