Ryelan Morris is a smooth operator

1,780 Views | 19 Replies | Last: 7 hrs ago by Guitarbiscuit
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He was a leading rusher. He just glides down the sideline.
Delmar 2.0
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I've been impressed too, he looks very good in the little time he's had on the field so far. Sadly, he'll probably be in the portal at the end of the season, its just how modern CFB works (and it sucks).
I ain't quite as dumb as I seem
-- (P.C. 1974)
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm a fan of Morris. He's the only back we have who consistently shows a spark when he's in the game.

His time has been limited, but he's flashed every time he's played.

I want to see more of him for sure.
Bear51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We need to play him more than Knighten and Turner and then priority pay him for next year.
BearlyBeloved
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bear51 said:

We need to play him more than Knighten and Turner and then priority pay him for next year.

Agree
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bear51 said:

We need to play him more than Knighten and Turner and then priority pay him for next year.

I hate to say it because I like him a lot, but at this point, Dawson Pendergrass is the running back most deserving of ceding carries.

We're quickly reaching a similar point with him that we did with Richard Reese in 2023 and 2024. When you're consistently posting the lowest yards-per-carry average of all backs, the numbers are what they are.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2 said:

Bear51 said:

We need to play him more than Knighten and Turner and then priority pay him for next year.

I hate to say it because I like him a lot, but at this point, Dawson Pendergrass is the running back most deserving of ceding carries.

We're quickly reaching a similar point with him that we did with Richard Reese in 2023 and 2024. When you're consistently posting the lowest yards-per-carry average of all backs, the numbers are what they are.


He's a fighter and scraps for every yard he can get and almost always falls forward...but he's not a P4 RB1. He's a great complementary back.
Timbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pendergrass is not explosive enough to start.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I believe there are shackles on our RBs. I see holes to the outside but the coaches don't like for them to dance to the outside. I think they've had a drilled into them always going north and south. Sometimes east and west opens up the holes then straight ahead.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

I believe there are shackles on our RBs. I see holes to the outside but the coaches don't like for them to dance to the outside. I think they've had a drilled into them always going north and south. Sometimes east and west opens up the holes then straight ahead.

Our running backs are absolutely limited by the lack of running room provided by our O-line. But I don't think any of them are particularly dynamic either.

Morris is the only one I've seen that looks like he's potentially got the ability to operate effectively without a ton of space. And the sample is very small with him.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dave has been reading the forum

Ewalker80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If DJ comes back and can run a bit, it will likely open up a lot more for our RBs, and we will start to see some big gainers, particularly with Knighten and Morris on the edge and Dawson and Turner late in games. A running QB is the most predictable game changer in college football. It's nearly like a hockey power play.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ryeland show begins at 18:52
Waco1947
BUGWBBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dave Aranda needs more baseball bat cracks at his skull.

Period.
BangorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2 said:

Bear51 said:

We need to play him more than Knighten and Turner and then priority pay him for next year.

I hate to say it because I like him a lot, but at this point, Dawson Pendergrass is the running back most deserving of ceding carries.

We're quickly reaching a similar point with him that we did with Richard Reese in 2023 and 2024. When you're consistently posting the lowest yards-per-carry average of all backs, the numbers are what they are.

That is on the offensive coach for running him on first down up the middle, you need to mix up your play calling to allow him to excel! Predictable play calling is hard on offensive line and the backs!
BangorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BUGWBBear said:

Dave Aranda needs more baseball bat cracks at his skull.

Period.

Are you calling for violence BOY?
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BangorBear said:

bear2be2 said:

Bear51 said:

We need to play him more than Knighten and Turner and then priority pay him for next year.

I hate to say it because I like him a lot, but at this point, Dawson Pendergrass is the running back most deserving of ceding carries.

We're quickly reaching a similar point with him that we did with Richard Reese in 2023 and 2024. When you're consistently posting the lowest yards-per-carry average of all backs, the numbers are what they are.

That is on the offensive coach for running him on first down up the middle, you need to mix up your play calling to allow him to excel! Predictable play calling is hard on offensive line and the backs!

The other backs are getting those exact same first-down runs. We don't split time at RB by down. We split time by drive unless someone has to go out to get a blow.

These guys are all running behind the same line on the same downs. And while none of them are lighting the world on fire, Dawson is consistently the least productive on a per-carry basis.

It brings me no joy to say that. It's just the truth. Just as it was with Terence Williams in 2017 and Richard Reese in 2023 and 2024.
BEAR 45
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2 said:

Bear51 said:

We need to play him more than Knighten and Turner and then priority pay him for next year.

I hate to say it because I like him a lot, but at this point, Dawson Pendergrass is the running back most deserving of ceding carries.

We're quickly reaching a similar point with him that we did with Richard Reese in 2023 and 2024. When you're consistently posting the lowest yards-per-carry average of all backs, the numbers are what they are.

Pendergrass and Knighten are both quality backs, but their presence as the single back in the backfield limits our offense. Both are power backs , but don't pose a serious threat to run the ball outside the tackles. I am encouraged to see Morris emerge as a back that opens the entire field to our running game. Opponents defensive coordinators have to change their defensive play calls when having to cover the entire width of the field.
toughbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A few NFL players in the Morris family
Guitarbiscuit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2 said:

Bear51 said:

We need to play him more than Knighten and Turner and then priority pay him for next year.

I hate to say it because I like him a lot, but at this point, Dawson Pendergrass is the running back most deserving of ceding carries.

We're quickly reaching a similar point with him that we did with Richard Reese in 2023 and 2024. When you're consistently posting the lowest yards-per-carry average of all backs, the numbers are what they are.


I really thought Pendergrass would have a breakout year this year. I am a bit baffled by his lackluster performance. Either he's still injured or I"m just a dupe for thinking he would be a very big factor in any success we had this year. Come to think of it, I have a feeling he may just not be the same after the surgery. You don't just go that far down in production for no reason.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.