TellMeYouLoveMe said:

---

Methinks Cowboy is the all hat, no cattle kind.

---

Oh look another interpretation of something that was never said.

Forest Bueller said:

---

Certainly this is something that is difficult for the average person to understand. But, if a young woman has decided it is ok for 4 or 5 guys she knows and likes to "hit it" all at the same time and a couple of other guys show up uninvited thinking they are going to share in the bounty, yes as convoluted as that mess is, it is still sexual assault.

---

For clarity, does the bor count that as 6 or 7 rapist or as a couple of rapist?

NoBSU said:

---

gobbeldygook said:

---

Let it be noted that a person's level of sympathy for a victim of sexual assault isn't predicated upon having a daughter. All of us have mothers or wives or sisters. Unless you have a daughter that is a victim of the exact same crime and in the exact same manner, you don't "understand" or "sympathize" more than anyone else. It's simply theatrics and nothing more.

---

Okay, so should I assume that some posters just have a "lack of theatrics," "just don't give a crap," or "rightly care more about football wins" as compared to sympathy for victims of sexual assault?

---

Perhaps. You are free to assume anything you would like. That does not mean that you or those that you mention are necessarily following a path that is supported by fact or logic. However, I consider my statement valid and not truly worthy of debate.

Do you believe that the love you possess for your daughter is greater than that of a person that loves his or her mother or sister or wife?

gobbeldygook said:

---

NoBSU said:

---

gobbeldygook said:

---

Let it be noted that a person's level of sympathy for a victim of sexual assault isn't predicated upon having a daughter. All of us have mothers or wives or sisters. Unless you have a daughter that is a victim of the exact same crime and in the exact same manner, you don't "understand" or "sympathize" more than anyone else. It's simply theatrics and nothing more.

---

Okay, so should I assume that some posters just have a "lack of theatrics," "just don't give a crap," or "rightly care more about football wins" as compared to sympathy for victims of sexual assault?

---

Perhaps. You are free to assume anything you would like. That does not mean that you or those that you mention are necessarily following a path that is supported by fact or logic. However, I consider my statement valid and not truly worthy of debate.

Do you believe that the love you possess for your daughter is greater than that of a person that loves his or her mother or sister or wife?

---

So now people aren't worthy of debate? That's some ego you have there.

NoBSU said:

---

gobbeldygook said:

---

NoBSU said:

---

gobbeldygook said:

---

Let it be noted that a person's level of sympathy for a victim of sexual assault isn't predicated upon having a daughter. All of us have mothers or wives or sisters. Unless you have a daughter that is a victim of the exact same crime and in the exact same manner, you don't "understand" or "sympathize" more than anyone else. It's simply theatrics and nothing more.

---

Okay, so should I assume that some posters just have a "lack of theatrics," "just don't give a crap," or "rightly care more about football wins" as compared to sympathy for victims of sexual assault?

---

Perhaps. You are free to assume anything you would like. That does not mean that you or those that you mention are necessarily following a path that is supported by fact or logic. However, I consider my statement valid and not truly worthy of debate.

Do you believe that the love you possess for your daughter is greater than that of a person that loves his or her mother or sister or wife?

---

So now people aren't worthy of debate? That's some ego you have there.

---

My apologies. The reasons for not debating that issue are twofold: (a) there is no tangible measurement for love or sympathy (b) I believe it to be a truth.

A debate would be unproductive and any deviation from the original topic would only result in some form of soapboxing about a morass so mirky that it has left even the most devoted fans confused and weary of it all.

gobbeldygook said:

---

NoBSU said:

---

gobbeldygook said:

---

NoBSU said:

---

gobbeldygook said:

---

Let it be noted that a person's level of sympathy for a victim of sexual assault isn't predicated upon having a daughter. All of us have mothers or wives or sisters. Unless you have a daughter that is a victim of the exact same crime and in the exact same manner, you don't "understand" or "sympathize" more than anyone else. It's simply theatrics and nothing more.

---

Okay, so should I assume that some posters just have a "lack of theatrics," "just don't give a crap," or "rightly care more about football wins" as compared to sympathy for victims of sexual assault?

---

Perhaps. You are free to assume anything you would like. That does not mean that you or those that you mention are necessarily following a path that is supported by fact or logic. However, I consider my statement valid and not truly worthy of debate.

Do you believe that the love you possess for your daughter is greater than that of a person that loves his or her mother or sister or wife?

---

So now people aren't worthy of debate? That's some ego you have there.

---

My apologies. The reasons for not debating that issue are twofold: (a) there is no tangible measurement for love or sympathy (b) I believe it to be a truth.

A debate would be unproductive and any deviation from the original topic would only result in some form of soapboxing about a morass so mirky that it has left even the most devoted fans confused and weary of it all.

---

I am bored and just having a little fun. How about I find something else to do.

Brian Ethridge said:

---

Thee University said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Thee University said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

Thee University said:

---

Aliceinbubbleland said:

---

Thee University said:

---

Do either of you Einsteins have a daughter?

---

Yes, three actually, and I can guarantee you they wouldn't be hanging out in some jocks apartment drinking with "a group". Good God Thee, get a grip man. We had some very bad dudes. We had some very stupid women. Talk about a powder keg.

And the response by your BOR was to "cry". Sheesh.

---

I wasn't talking to you. My post was to the Einsteins posting by the screen names Timmy and Cowboy.

I agree 100% with your first paragraph. I think "MY" BOR was a little bit more than crying.

---

And I will ask again for the 3rd time. What in any of my posts had been critical of the victim?

Posting a link to a news article and pointing out that Baylor settled another lawsuit is not negative, mean, victim shaming or any other type of attack towards the victim. It was nothing but providing facts. I said nothing about the victim. So man up and answer the question of why you have felt to include me in your attack.

---

I asked a simple yes or no question. You never answered the question. Who said anything about being critical of the victim?

Attack? You called asking that question an attack? I'm playing softball with you.

Let me ask the question one more time without generously labeling you with the Einstein monicker. I obviously made an assumption you guys were intelligent. Do you and Timmy have a daughter?

---

Yes calling another poster is an attack. But you can't get beyond acting like a tough guy and throwing out attacks while hiding behind your keyboard.

If you weren't assuming I was being critical of the victim then what does having a daughter or not have anything to do with posting a link to a news article.

Because it doesn't.

---

You must be one of those soft, millenial snowflakes I keep hearing about. Are you?

Tough guy act? It is no act. I'm a tough *****willow.

You still can't answer the question and at this point, I would not believe your reply even if you did answer.

I never considered myself tough but if I compare myself to you I am:


A mushroom cloud laying MFer MFer
Superfly TNT
Guns of the Navarone

---

<iframe src="https://giphy.com/embed/J2cwtl8OGeLMQ" width="480" height="203" frameBorder="0" class="giphy-embed" allowFullScreen></iframe><p><a href="https://giphy.com/gifs/tropic-thunder-J2cwtl8OGeLMQ">via GIPHY</a></p>

---

You wont let us blue star this, but it is worthy.

57Bear said:

---

Forest Bueller said:

---

Certainly this is something that is difficult for the average person to understand. But, if a young woman has decided it is ok for 4 or 5 guys she knows and likes to "hit it" all at the same time and a couple of other guys show up uninvited thinking they are going to share in the bounty, yes as convoluted as that mess is, it is still sexual assault.

---

For clarity, does the bor count that as 6 or 7 rapist or as a couple of rapist?

---

Looking at the original 19-17-2 figure I would suppose 2. Too many what ever the number.

But, what one poster said was accurate. If any of you have a really handsome teenage son, you know young girls are all over them. They are like a magnet to them.

I'd imagine there is blame all around in a some of these cases. In others probably just outright assault.

After this past Friday, I wanted to know if the mighty $10k reward money from our former rich regent is still on the table?
Also, the rich alumni didn't really explain the reward and how someone wins it.
It is one thing to act like the late great game show mogul, Merv Griffin. It is another thing to act like Big Enos from the 1970s "Smokey and the Bandit" movies.
What are the rules for collecting the reward? Is the reward just a sound bite that made us look like a little Bible college or real? Is it a joke? Is it set up where debate is allowed, officials in place to fairly judge a winner or it set up where there is so much red tape no one can win.
Also, I don't remember a phone number or contact person for the reward. Who is the contact person?

BREAKING NEWS: We might have a winner.

Looks real bad breaking into that apartment.

Thee University said:

---

Do either of you Einsteins have a daughter?

---

I did not have to scroll through this thread. Thee posted. He is such a hater. And a ***** he will throw names out. He will threaten to beat people up. He will talk about how he ran Baylor campus as a jock and president of phi delt. Then he will talk about what a bad ass he is. Then he will puss out when you call him out

xiledinok said:

---

After this past Friday, I wanted to know if the mighty $10k reward money from our former rich regent is still on the table?
Also, the rich alumni didn't really explain the reward and how someone wins it.
It is one thing to act like the late great game show mogul, Merv Griffin. It is another thing to act like Big Enos from the 1970s "Smokey and the Bandit" movies.
What are the rules for collecting the reward? Is the reward just a sound bite that made us look like a little Bible college or real? Is it a joke? Is it set up where debate is allowed, officials in place to fairly judge a winner or it set up where there is so much red tape no one can win.
Also, I don't remember a phone number or contact person for the reward. Who is the contact person?

BREAKING NEWS: We might have a winner.

Looks real bad breaking into that apartment.

---

What are you talking about? Too much 3.2 beer this afternoon?

xiledinok said:

---

After this past Friday, I wanted to know if the mighty $10k reward money from our former rich regent is still on the table?
Also, the rich alumni didn't really explain the reward and how someone wins it.
It is one thing to act like the late great game show mogul, Merv Griffin. It is another thing to act like Big Enos from the 1970s "Smokey and the Bandit" movies.
What are the rules for collecting the reward? Is the reward just a sound bite that made us look like a little Bible college or real? Is it a joke? Is it set up where debate is allowed, officials in place to fairly judge a winner or it set up where there is so much red tape no one can win.
Also, I don't remember a phone number or contact person for the reward. Who is the contact person?

BREAKING NEWS: We might have a winner.

Looks real bad breaking into that apartment.

---

http://www.kwtx.com/content/news/While-BU-pays-ex-regent-offers-reward-for-true-reason-for-firings-397024891.html

Call KWTX - they might arrange to have you on a show revealing the answer.

Buck Whiskey said:

---

Thee University said:

---

Do either of you Einsteins have a daughter?

---

I did not have to scroll through this thread. Thee posted. He is such a hater. And a ***** he will throw names out. He will threaten to beat people up. He will talk about how he ran Baylor campus as a jock and president of phi delt. Then he will talk about what a bad ass he is. Then he will puss out when you call him out

---

I'm a lover, not a hater. I already called myself a *****............willow so you are right on.

Throwing names out???? Threaten to beat people up??? You got the wrong guy. I think you are remembering a KOT or Chamberboy.

I was not a badass. I was a pansy just like Ian & Art's non-con schedules.

I offered one pencil neck a chocolate milk. You sound like you need one of those pearl bubble teas.

57Bear said:

---

xiledinok said:

---

After this past Friday, I wanted to know if the mighty $10k reward money from our former rich regent is still on the table?
Also, the rich alumni didn't really explain the reward and how someone wins it.
It is one thing to act like the late great game show mogul, Merv Griffin. It is another thing to act like Big Enos from the 1970s "Smokey and the Bandit" movies.
What are the rules for collecting the reward? Is the reward just a sound bite that made us look like a little Bible college or real? Is it a joke? Is it set up where debate is allowed, officials in place to fairly judge a winner or it set up where there is so much red tape no one can win.
Also, I don't remember a phone number or contact person for the reward. Who is the contact person?

BREAKING NEWS: We might have a winner.

Looks real bad breaking into that apartment.

---

http://www.kwtx.com/content/news/While-BU-pays-ex-regent-offers-reward-for-true-reason-for-firings-397024891.html

Call KWTX - they might arrange to have you on a show revealing the answer.

---

Definitely in the category of Big Enos. Why would I want to reveal it on KWTX? They have added fake news to our issues moving forward. They are below reward announcements of any portion. They need to stick to free car washes and nickel and dime contests. It's debatable weather or not he is serious. Looks like he's taping a name to the bottom of the hat with the terms in that article's explanation.
The "real reason" is a cross between Paul Harvey leaving out facts and Big Enos Burdette.
The Waco Tribune guest editorial used the reward in his reasoning. This comes off like Enos Burdette style of business.