Ok....I know in the long run this will all settle itself since we will play them at least once....but just for internet forum discussion sake....how do voters justify having 1 loss OU ranked ahead undefeated BU right now?
They played stronger opponents in their non-con....but both Houston and UCLA are not exactly stalwarts both sitting with records at 3-5.
OU's best win is over Texas who is no longer ranked. Our best win is over #22 KSU who they just lost to.
I don't see how when looking at the resumes side by side you can justify putting 1 loss OU ahead of no loss BU.
What am I missing? I know OU had the head start of having been highly ranked all year....anything else?
They played stronger opponents in their non-con....but both Houston and UCLA are not exactly stalwarts both sitting with records at 3-5.
OU's best win is over Texas who is no longer ranked. Our best win is over #22 KSU who they just lost to.
I don't see how when looking at the resumes side by side you can justify putting 1 loss OU ahead of no loss BU.
What am I missing? I know OU had the head start of having been highly ranked all year....anything else?