Lohner Recognition

4,886 Views | 53 Replies | Last: 8 mo ago by DanaDane
Johnny Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Crawfoso1973 said:

Little doesn't score, but I think Little has been terrific since Love went down. Little is a tremendous passer with elite court vision. The ball always moves crisply when he is involved, leading to open looks for others. He has also been playing with much more aggressiveness and confidence defensively. When Love comes back we will be even better because the experience Little has gained will help our team immensely down the stretch.

I agree - just wish at least as long as Love is still out that he and Lohner could also be counted on to give us 5-6 points a game each which would be huge.
Crawfoso1973
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah....fortunately for us Nunn has been UNCONSCIOUS the past few games to offset the loss of Love's scoring. All big "ifs" but if Love comes back fully healthy and regains his rhythm, if Nunn stays this hot and if Walter gets hot, we are going to be DANGEROUS come tournament time.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
guadalupeoso said:

bear2be2 said:

historian said:

JP1037 said:

I like Lohner now and last year. He rebounds and adds a physical element we need.


I like that we can see signs of improvement. I hope his progression continues & even accelerates.
He's a fourth-year player who went from averaging 7 and 7 in almost 24 minutes as a freshman at BYU to averaging 2.4 and 2.4 in less than 10 minutes per game as a senior -- and much worse in Big 12 play.

He's not making quite as many mistakes this year and he's good for a hustle play here and there. But I'm not sure he's earned a thread on his improvement or the level of defense some are offering in regards to his career contributions -- especially at Baylor.

The guy is the definition of a replacement level player.
Weren't you the same guy last week basically arguing that we should all not actually be that impressed with Yves Missi because he makes some freshman mistakes sometimes, despite the fact that almost everyone in the country is fawning over him and thinks he's a phenomenal talent who has exceeded expectations in nearly every way? Btw, since you took your stand, Missi has averaged 16 points and 5 rebounds over the last 4 games and hasn't even played 30 minutes in any single contest. I'm not sure you get to be the arbiter of "definition of a replacement level player."

Also, I don't remember anyone expecting Lohner to blow the doors off the program and become the next Mark Vital or even the next Terry Maston. I don't think it's a cardinal sin to acknowledge the fact that he seems to be doing exactly what is being asked of him by the program at this time which is to rebound, hustle, avoid turnovers, and maintain defensive position in the limited minutes he plays while our regular rotation guys get a breather.
When have I ever said you shouldn't be impressed with Missi? I've been fawning over his athleticism and coordination since November. In fact, I've said on multiple occasions I think he's going to be a special NBA player, which is something I rarely say about anyone.

My only frustration with Missi is the same frustration I have with all one-and-done freshmen. We're seeing him at his developmental floor and will never get to watch him even close to his ceiling in a Baylor uniform. And because he's still raw and phyically immature, he tends to struggle with physical, veteran bigs -- something we saw against Edwards yesterday.

But I feel the same way about Missi I do about Sochan, who I loved as a Baylor Bear. Unlike the guys we've had who were anointed one-and-dones upon arriving, Missi -- like Sochan -- has earned every bit of the hype he's getting with his performance and impact. When he gets drafted in the top 10 in the next draft, I'll be thrilled for Missi. He'll have 100 percent earned it.

As for Lohner, the revisionist history continues. No one expected him to be as good as Mark Vital on defense or TJ Maston on offense, but he was absolutely expected to be a 15 to 20-minute-per-game rotation player. He came with similar expectations to Bridges and was expected to give us some the same things he gave BYU. He hasn't come close to delivering on that.

I don't dislike Lohner. He's a hustler and seems like a good culture guy. But his only discernible skill is rebounding. He looks like a SLC player any time he steps out of his very limited energy role. That is not the player we thought we were getting or frankly the player we needed from that scholarship. And his failure to meet the demands we had/have for him have left us with one playable forward, which limits us. That's just a fact.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EvilTroyAndAbed said:

bear2be2 said:

historian said:

JP1037 said:

I like Lohner now and last year. He rebounds and adds a physical element we need.


I like that we can see signs of improvement. I hope his progression continues & even accelerates.
He's a fourth-year player who went from averaging 7 and 7 in almost 24 minutes as a freshman at BYU to averaging 2.4 and 2.4 in less than 10 minutes per game as a senior -- and much worse in Big 12 play.

He's not making quite as many mistakes this year and he's good for a hustle play here and there. But I'm not sure he's earned a thread on his improvement or the level of defense some are offering in regards to his career contributions -- especially at Baylor.

The guy is the definition of a replacement level player.


Are we seriously demanding that players have to "earn" a thread on a free message board? I think people here take themselves way too seriously when it comes to a fan's basketball knowledge.
People can start whatever thread they want. My point is that facts don't actually support this improvement narrative. Other than not turning the ball over the instant he touches it like he did last year, Lohner is the same limited energy guy he's always been in a Baylor uniform. And he was a considerably better player as a freshman for BYU than he is now.

I'm just surprised the guy has so many fans/defenders, that's all. I'm glad he's been a usable rotation player in Love's absence. And I appreciate the effort he plays with. But he hasn't brought the skill set we've needed from him or that position. And it's left us vulnerable to certain matchups.

It just frustrates me that our expectations for him have dropped so far that we're praising him like we would a walk-on and then pretending that nothing more was ever expected of him as a player. That's not the reality of the situation.
Chuckroast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Crawfoso1973 said:

Little doesn't score, but I think Little has been terrific since Love went down. Little is a tremendous passer with elite court vision. The ball always moves crisply when he is involved, leading to open looks for others. He has also been playing with much more aggressiveness and confidence defensively. When Love comes back we will be even better because the experience Little has gained will help our team immensely down the stretch.


Agreed. I think Little could even be more of a scorer if we needed that from him, but we have many other scoring options when he's on the floor. I appreciate his deferential attitude and hustle. I really think he's going to develop into a special player.
Crawfoso1973
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Exactly. He is the kind of "glue guy" every program needs, and hopefully he sticks around all 4 years. And I've watched him shoot, there is nothing wrong with his mechanics. In time he will gain more confidence and hit those open looks. An offseason of strength and conditioning will also work wonders to help him add strength and improve his lateral quickness.
BearlyBeloved
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OK, the stage is set for Lohner's return to BYU tonight. If we're fortunate, he will play lights-out and have his best night ever.

  • Lights!
  • Camera!
  • Action!


joseywales
How long do you want to ignore this user?
guadalupeoso said:

Been impressed with Lohner the last few games. Doesn't fill up the box score, but it seems like he has really embraced his role and plays in total control of that role. He does a lot of little things that I think positively impact winning. He doesn't turn the ball over, hustle's back on defense, and is an extremely effective rebounder for the limited minutes that he plays.

Does he get beat by his man occasionally or get caught out of position sometimes? Sure. Is he a scoring threat? No. But it seems to me that in his limited minutes this season he finds a way to make 2-3 plays a game that positively impact winning. There have been a few times where he has snagged critical offensive rebounds at opportune moments.

I was disappointed with his performance last season, but have been pleasantly surprised with his development this year.
He was terrible tonight turnovers bad defense and fumbles the ball all the time..he played way to much. As bad as he was not as bad as our defense..
IvanBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He doesn't belong on a power conference team, he's at best a role player for a mid major team.

I understand Drew trusted too much in JTT to be playable and has failed to recruit anyone to sub in at the 4, but at this point We'd be better going 4 guard every time than putting in Lohner. He's got to be the worst player in the big 12 that is in a rotation.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
joseywales said:

guadalupeoso said:

Been impressed with Lohner the last few games. Doesn't fill up the box score, but it seems like he has really embraced his role and plays in total control of that role. He does a lot of little things that I think positively impact winning. He doesn't turn the ball over, hustle's back on defense, and is an extremely effective rebounder for the limited minutes that he plays.

Does he get beat by his man occasionally or get caught out of position sometimes? Sure. Is he a scoring threat? No. But it seems to me that in his limited minutes this season he finds a way to make 2-3 plays a game that positively impact winning. There have been a few times where he has snagged critical offensive rebounds at opportune moments.

I was disappointed with his performance last season, but have been pleasantly surprised with his development this year.
He was terrible tonight turnovers bad defense and fumbles the ball all the time..he played way to much. As bad as he was not as bad as our defense..
He's not a Big 12 caliber player. It's OK to admit it. He plays hard and gives great effort, but the requisite skill set isn't there. He was a major recruiting miss that has left a big hole on our roster at the forward position.
Crawfoso1973
How long do you want to ignore this user?
But if you look at him, and squint really hard, you might see a Mark Vital type of player doing Mark Vital things out there.
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dude…. Let it go… historian didn't even say he saw Mark Vital… you're twisting his words…
Awfully rich of you to throw stones on him when not 2 weeks ago you were telling everyone you think Drew will essentially kick Nunn to curb in the off season. Which is the stupidest post possible.
Crawfoso1973
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What about historian?

Multiple posters on here had been comparing him to Vital, hoping against hope.

Nunn kicked to the curb....what are you talking about sir.
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You've called out Historian numerous times because he ask if Lohner could fill the Vital role. He never once compared the 2. That's just you being your usual ******* self.
Crawfoso1973
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear said:

You've called out Historian numerous times because he ask if Lohner could fill the Vital role. He never once compared the 2. That's just you being your usual ******* self.
Not sure why you keep mentioning historian? Several posters have compared him to vital the past couple years. Which I always thought was a ridiculous comparison. And give the name calling a rest. dNot sure why you mad all the time?
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm not mad at all. You're just playing dumb.
I just think it's rich of you to call out comparisons that you find silly when you do the exact same thing. Seems rather hypocritical imo
gobears20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
joseywales
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2 said:

Griz said:

joseywales said:

He is a wasted scholarship.

Apparently you feel that all scholarship players need to average 10 pts and 5 rebounds, and otherwise it is a wasted scholarship. All rosters include starters and stars, roll players (like Lohner), and developmental players. Of course, some of those players don't pan out. I think Caleb is doing a very good job in his roll, which is at times to add length to the zone, or to give Bridges a breather. To say he is a wasted scholarship is nonsense. He is doing exactly what we ask of him, and I am appreciative he is a Bear.
Calling Lohner a role player is a stretch. He's a played four or fewer minutes in six of our 11 conference games with three total field goals. He's played as many as 10 minutes only twice in Big 12 play, and one of those was in a triple OT game.

Lohner is one of two healthy forwards on our roster and he can barely even get on the court because he's been so limited.

We did not recruit Lohner to be the last guy off the bench. He just hasn't been good enough to be anything more than that. He was a recruiting miss. Plain and simple.
A much better way of saying wasted scholarship. A huge miss that is costing us dearly as I have stated so many times before,
DanaDane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
From all accounts, Lohner is a pretty good dude. Having said that, I will be surprised if we don't see him at a mid major next year (his 5th and final) where he can get more playing time.
Refresh
Page 2 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.