Thanks HairyBear and Slimecap for the info/input.
Pale Rider said:
Dang sis, that's great reporting.
Pale Rider said:
Seems to me that this young lady would be a truly valuable addition to our program. I loved reading the story. What a blessing.
RioRata said:
Counterpoint: Cara Ursin {HGz#64 & PN-TBA} meets this same criteria, except at PG. We signed her...mistake?
BFWorldwide said:RioRata said:
Counterpoint: Cara Ursin {HGz#64 & PN-TBA} meets this same criteria, except at PG. We signed her...mistake?
Not necessarily. My point was that it is MUCH harder to scout players who aren't playing in the tougher competition offered by AAU. For example, posters implied that we should be "after" a recruit that has played one year at the very lowest level of high school ball in Washington state. And did not dominate that competition. They cited the ranking of a website and one reporter's comments. Without AAU comparison, a coach has a FAR more difficult time determining whether a player has sufficient speed and quickness since the player's "tape" is against much lesser talent. Most coaches will agree that the best way to determine a player's talent in any sport is to see "good on good". That is why summer camps and 7 on 7 are huge in football and AAU is huge in basketball.
Not every player has to come from the AAU circuit, but judging players witheition is MUCH harder. Coaches have "invite only" elite camps separated from "anyone" camps for a reason. One is to scout talent; the other is to build goodwill and get some easy paydays for people.
Ditto me in also, lets go get her.RioRata said:Pale Rider said:
Seems to me that this young lady would be a truly valuable addition to our program. I loved reading the story. What a blessing.
Ditto
With the growing number of high value standard transfers and immediately eligible grad student transfers, most teams keep 2 scholarships open. With 13 scholarships, a Top Tier team using a fifth scholarship [heck, any scholarship any year] on a project player is a thing of the past. The use of male practice players renders the value of scholarship "practice players" to almost nothing. Baylor should be well past the time of making reaches on scholarship offers. Take 3-4 elite talents each year. Players that don't pan out go on medical or encouraged to go elsewhere for playing time. Using a scholarship on a "maybe" should no longer be in the zone of where we are as a program. TCU can make reaches. We are an Elite program.....and we should recruit like one.RioRata said:
I agree that AAU ball makes evaluation of prospects easier and yet the NCAA allows WBB 15 total scholarships of which Kim usually doesn't use them all. At this point in Stephanie's development I would rank her between Melanie Hamerly and Griner.
Given time to develop she could become Kim's version of Josh Lomars (Top 100 & #10 ranked C). It took Josh 2+ seasons for the light to switch on. If Soares' light never comes on her heigth alone would be valuable in practice (see Hamerly) .
Actually, I'm pretty sure Khadijah Kave was much closer to 6-4 than her listed height of 6-2 in the Baylor program. So she was pretty much the same height as Ms Soares. The point I was making was that the "long, athletic, quick up and down the court" comments about Soares are very comparable - as well as the possible "project" tag. Though I definitely feel Ms Soares has more polish to her game at this stage of her development than KK did coming out of high school. KK was one helluvan athlete, and ran track as well...Pale Rider said:But 5" taller.BuinmyBlood said:
KK 2.0?
Good, I see the comparison. But I still would question KK being over 6'2".BuinmyBlood said:Actually, I'm pretty sure Khadijah Kave was much closer to 6-4 than her listed height of 6-2 in the Baylor program. So she was pretty much the same height as Ms Soares. The point I was making was that the "long, athletic, quick up and down the court" comments about Soares are very comparable - as well as the possible "project" tag. Though I definitely feel Ms Soares has more polish to her game at this stage of her development than KK did coming out of high school. KK was one helluvan athlete, and ran track as well...Pale Rider said:But 5" taller.BuinmyBlood said:
KK 2.0?
BFWorldwide said:With the growing number of high value standard transfers and immediately eligible grad student transfers, most teams keep 2 scholarships open. With 13 scholarships, a Top Tier team using a fifth scholarship [heck, any scholarship any year] on a project player is a thing of the past. The use of male practice players renders the value of scholarship "practice players" to almost nothing. Baylor should be well past the time of making reaches on scholarship offers. Take 3-4 elite talents each year. Players that don't pan out go on medical or encouraged to go elsewhere for playing time. Using a scholarship on a "maybe" should no longer be in the zone of where we are as a program. TCU can make reaches. We are an Elite program.....and we should recruit like one.RioRata said:
I agree that AAU ball makes evaluation of prospects easier and yet the NCAA allows WBB 15 total scholarships of which Kim usually doesn't use them all. At this point in Stephanie's development I would rank her between Melanie Hamerly and Griner.
Given time to develop she could become Kim's version of Josh Lomars (Top 100 & #10 ranked C). It took Josh 2+ seasons for the light to switch on. If Soares' light never comes on her heigth alone would be valuable in practice (see Hamerly) .
It would be very difficult to find them now but I am certain there were team pictures of KK alongside Sune Agbuke (6-4) and some other Baylor players with known heights and it was obvious that she was at least as tall as Sune, and a good bit taller than some of the other girls like Alexis prince who were supposed to have been 6-2 or so. Prior to committing and signing with Baylor there were several articles about KK that actually had her listed at 6-4 or even 6-5.Pale Rider said:Good, I see the comparison. But I still would question KK being over 6'2".BuinmyBlood said:Actually, I'm pretty sure Khadijah Kave was much closer to 6-4 than her listed height of 6-2 in the Baylor program. So she was pretty much the same height as Ms Soares. The point I was making was that the "long, athletic, quick up and down the court" comments about Soares are very comparable - as well as the possible "project" tag. Though I definitely feel Ms Soares has more polish to her game at this stage of her development than KK did coming out of high school. KK was one helluvan athlete, and ran track as well...Pale Rider said:But 5" taller.BuinmyBlood said:
KK 2.0?


Right. Should be banned. If he he hasn't already been.BaylorBears_254 said:
Twhaley isn't even a Baylor fan right?
JWAL hasn't been around much at all, maybe none since the E 8 loss. That was devastating. I visited with him quite a bit during the ncaa tourney. We had lunch a time or two etc. He'll probably come back when the season gets going.Bone Squad said:
Speaking of who visits these boards (and at the risk of a derail - please forgive me!), where the heck is JWAL?
lookin4awin said:
I would have defended you! Ha.
RioRata said:lookin4awin said:
I would have defended you! Ha.
Ditto!