Time played by starters

781 Views | 7 Replies | Last: 3 days ago by FFA0329
fredbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I do ponder why we have any starting players on the court in a 4th quarter when we are up by miles. I see Abraham limping around, LPB hitting the deck, and Scott diving for a ball that makes no difference. I appreciate the 100 percent effort philosophy, but should there be a balance? Don't starters need to stay fresh and injury free? Don't rotation players need more development time so they will be ready when destiny calls?
I just read an article from the Indiana football coach in USAToday articulating the value of Less contact time and more mental development. His players are exposed to the minimal required risk prone activity in order to be physically and mentally prepared to play the NEXT game. He would see no value in risking injury in a game you have already won. If Scott goes down trying to reach 30 points or JVG trying for triple double and injuries occur, are we not striving for the wrong goal? Doesn't game time accumulation have a direct correlation with future injuries? How would coach feel if Scott tears an ACL trying to make sure we beat a weaker opponent by 60? I may be wrong, and I'm sure there are multiple approaches, but we always run out of steam early in the tournament because our players look spent and less than 100 percent healthy. I prefer a long game approach rather than seeing every game as our last game of the season. Your thoughts?
chorne68
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Agree.
Delmar 2.0
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There's only 10 healthy bodies on the roster, so if all 5 starters sat the 4th you'd have Deng, Nelms, Pemberton, Abraham, and Marcayla on the floor. All good players, they're at BU after all, but honestly it seems like the coaches don't want to play those 5 together for extended minutes for whatever reason. ?????
fredbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good point. I am, however, certain those 5 would have benefited from the 10 min on the floor and would have extended the lead against alabama state. Would have been fun to watch.
blackie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think you are delving into areas that only the coaches can answer. There are a lot more factors involved and ones we cannot see. I know not very long ago, CNC flat out stated that Nelms, for example, was not seeing more playing time because of how she practiced (wasn't treating it seriously enough, at least that was the way I interpreted what she said). I suspect some of it is trying to allow as much time for the starting group with rotation to work with each other as a group before we hit the games where they are going to have to be on the court to compete with the opponent.

I too feel sometimes that Scott plays too much, but I don't think it has to do with scoring points. I think once again, it may be that the coaches are convinced that as much time as possible is needed to fit these pieces together. NONE of our team from last year has ever played at Baylor with anyone like her. You need to hopefully learn her moves, anticipations, etc. to make the team flow smoothly and efficiently.

I do think yesterday that JVG was left in for the triple double and in this rare case, I think justified to do so.

However, the point here is correct that you do want your backups to have experience as well. No one will ever convince me that we would not have held our good lead and beaten UConn and gone to the Final Four if Kim had played Andrews and Oliver more during the season when there were plenty of opportunities to do so during conference play. Neither was ready when DiDi went down, and it showed. We seldom saw them play meaningful minutes that season.
geewago
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Delmar 2.0 said:

There's only 10 healthy bodies on the roster, so if all 5 starters sat the 4th you'd have Deng, Nelms, Pemberton, Abraham, and Marcayla on the floor. All good players, they're at BU after all, but honestly it seems like the coaches don't want to play those 5 together for extended minutes for whatever reason. ?????

The score was 76 - 28 at the start of the 4th. It probably wouldn't have changed too much to let the benchers handle it all from there on out. But you want to talk something that has never made sense to me = the NFL and how they handle their QB's. 6 minutes left in a game with a 42 - 3 lead and the starter is still out there taking hits.
Delmar 2.0
How long do you want to ignore this user?
geewago said:

Delmar 2.0 said:

There's only 10 healthy bodies on the roster, so if all 5 starters sat the 4th you'd have Deng, Nelms, Pemberton, Abraham, and Marcayla on the floor. All good players, they're at BU after all, but honestly it seems like the coaches don't want to play those 5 together for extended minutes for whatever reason. ?????

The score was 76 - 28 at the start of the 4th. It probably wouldn't have changed too much to let the benchers handle it all from there on out....

It's a question someone should ask Coach Nicki at one of the pressers.
FFA0329
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fredbear, I agree one million percent. It makes zero sense to me. The second group should have played most of the second half, and ALL of the fourth quarter. Why in the world would you not rest/protect the starters in a game like that???? Not letting second tamers play much in these games is baffling, drives me crazy, and I will never understand why. The second group NEEDS more playing time, and if not in that game, WHEN????? And an injury to a key player when up by 50 can easily occur. I have many times seen teams getting killed get chippy and embarrassed. Perfect environment for a bad injury.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.