Longhorn Game Analysis (quick take after reviewing accelerated replay)

2,472 Views | 39 Replies | Last: 6 min ago by Adriacus Peratuun
Adriacus Peratuun
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Some meandering thoughts:

1) missed the live game due to attending a Christmas Themed Wedding. A CTW is an interesting item to experience once. Second experience likely never needed.

2) thought that not much can be worse than Dee Kantner the referee (there is a reason that the NBA fired her as they otherwise fought fiercely to promote female refs). I was wrong. Dee Kantner the broadcaster opining about refereeing is far worse. Like her ref days, she was consistently wrong and highly annoying. But with a microphone.

3) Rebecca Lobo spent five minutes explaining how Vic couldn't sub out regulars due to bench issues and then spent two minutes (starting with 90 seconds left in game) praising him for doing the thing she said he couldn't do.
Vic is a dick for pressing up 30+ under five minutes. A huge asshat. CNC shouldn't have hugged him after the game, she should have kneed him in the nuts.

4) people complaining about UT's D fouling are missing the mark. Both D's were allowed to grab, the calls on that end were consistent. Cows were simply more physical, had better depth, played harder.

5) the real complaint about refs was the moving screen calls/noncalls. Cows got away with murder. Their post to post side to side screen were illegal about 95% of the time and saw zero calls. They used a rubscreen on diagonal cuts and diagonal drives and it was illegal every time and basically uncalled. Baylor got called on two moving screens that I saw. CNC should have gone ballistic after the first call (even if it got a technical foul). Some blow ups to change how a game is called are simply necessary. She is too timid. Yelling isn't always enough.

6) 99% of the offensive woes stem from the same root issue……we can't win the dribble and force D rotations. Our two players who can do some dribble creation (Scott and Deng) do it to score and not to create. Unless teams run a pure Princeton motion O, winning the dribble consistently is a prerequisite to every other O scheme.

7) player development is a huge issue. Buggs and Fontleroy simply stopped improving (to any significant degree) two years ago.

8) when teams press and Baylor never attacks for easy baskets, that means the upside is turnovers and easy buckets and there is no downside.

9) the secondary value of pressing Baylor is that half the shot clock is expired before we initiate half-court O.

10) when teams rise high and deny the wings, back cuts to relieve pressure should happen routinely. We clearly have zero idea of how to punish either ball pressure or wing pressure.

11) when your teammate picks up their dribble under pressure, you have one job…..create a passing lane. We stand glued to the court leading to turnovers. Or we push off.

12) Buggs in year four still has little idea of shot selection based on shot clock.

13) Cows had better depth. They are happy recruiting five stars but also recruiting kids that do 1-2 things well on O but play D all out. Maybe we should learn the lesson.

14) The Cows do a great job creating passing angles. We do not.

15) The cows run backside action while running front side action. We stand around on the backside.

16) ideally every defender would be long, have great reach, and be quick. Having none of the above shouldn't be playing.

17) CNC has to see the writing on the wall. New boss and the team is seriously underperforming. Recruiting is a disaster. Time to finish any home repairs.

18) Team is having to make passes and shots into tiny windows because we cannot space the floor (shooting woes) or move secondary defenders with dribble drive.

19) No Scott = .500 in conference if we are lucky.

20) everyone throwing the "hater" label at the realists should apologize profusely. Pollyanna **** the bed today.

GrizBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Adriacus Peratuun said:

Some meandering thoughts:

1) missed the live game due to attending a Christmas Themed Wedding. A CTW is an interesting item to experience once. Second experience likely never needed.

2) thought that not much can be worse than Dee Kantner the referee (there is a reason that the NBA fired her as they otherwise fought fiercely to promote female refs). I was wrong. Dee Kantner the broadcaster opining about refereeing is far worse. Like her ref days, she was consistently wrong and highly annoying. But with a microphone.

3) Rebecca Lobo spent five minutes explaining how Vic couldn't sub out regulars due to bench issues and then spent two minutes (starting with 90 seconds left in game) praising him for doing the thing she said he couldn't do.
Vic is a dick for pressing up 30+ under five minutes. A huge asshat. CNC shouldn't have hugged him after the game, she should have kneed him in the nuts.

4) people complaining about UT's D fouling are missing the mark. Both D's were allowed to grab, the calls on that end were consistent. Cows were simply more physical, had better depth, played harder.

5) the real complaint about refs was the moving screen calls/noncalls. Cows got away with murder. Their post to post side to side screen were illegal about 95% of the time and saw zero calls. They used a rubscreen on diagonal cuts and diagonal drives and it was illegal every time and basically uncalled. Baylor got called on two moving screens that I saw. CNC should have gone ballistic after the first call (even if it got a technical foul). Some blow ups to change how a game is called are simply necessary. She is too timid. Yelling isn't always enough.

6) 99% of the offensive woes stem from the same root issue……we can't win the dribble and force D rotations. Our two players who can do some dribble creation (Scott and Deng) do it to score and not to create. Unless teams run a pure Princeton motion O, winning the dribble consistently is a prerequisite to every other O scheme.

7) player development is a huge issue. Buggs and Fontleroy simply stopped improving (to any significant degree) two years ago.

8) when teams press and Baylor never attacks for easy baskets, that means the upside is turnovers and easy buckets and there is no downside.

9) the secondary value of pressing Baylor is that half the shot clock is expired before we initiate half-court O.

10) when teams rise high and deny the wings, back cuts to relieve pressure should happen routinely. We clearly have zero idea of how to punish either ball pressure or wing pressure.

11) when your teammate picks up their dribble under pressure, you have one job…..create a passing lane. We stand glued to the court leading to turnovers. Or we push off.

12) Buggs in year four still has little idea of shot selection based on shot clock.

13) Cows had better depth. They are happy recruiting five stars but also recruiting kids that do 1-2 things well on O but play D all out. Maybe we should learn the lesson.

14) The Cows do a great job creating passing angles. We do not.

15) The cows run backside action while running front side action. We stand around on the backside.

16) ideally every defender would be long, have great reach, and be quick. Having none of the above shouldn't be playing.

17) CNC has to see the writing on the wall. New boss and the team is seriously underperforming. Recruiting is a disaster. Time to finish any home repairs.

18) Team is having to make passes and shots into tiny windows because we cannot space the floor (shooting woes) or move secondary defenders with dribble drive.

19) No Scott = .500 in conference if we are lucky.

20) everyone throwing the "hater" label at the realists should apologize profusely. Pollyanna **** the bed today.


21) We had a WBB dynasty with coach Kim Mulkey and you cheered when Rhodes ran her out of town.

22) You tried to sell everyone on the "modern offense" we'd run under a WNBA coach and now all you can do is post 20 points of criticism.

23) Time to admit you are out of your depth.
Adriacus Peratuun
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrizBear said:

Adriacus Peratuun said:



21) We had a WBB dynasty with coach Kim Mulkey and you cheered when Rhodes ran her out of town.

22) You tried to sell everyone on the "modern offense" we'd run under a WNBA coach and now all you can do is post 20 points of criticism.

23) Time to admit you are out of your depth.



His name is Rhoades.
he didn't run her out of town. with the blessing of both the BOR and the admin he formed behavioral guidelines. She balked and quit. She wasn't fired.

There is nothing wrong with the O scheme. The physical talent and player development are issues.

time to admit you are an anus and know little.
joseywales
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Adriacus Peratuun said:

Some meandering thoughts:

1) missed the live game due to attending a Christmas Themed Wedding. A CTW is an interesting item to experience once. Second experience likely never needed.

2) thought that not much can be worse than Dee Kantner the referee (there is a reason that the NBA fired her as they otherwise fought fiercely to promote female refs). I was wrong. Dee Kantner the broadcaster opining about refereeing is far worse. Like her ref days, she was consistently wrong and highly annoying. But with a microphone.

3) Rebecca Lobo spent five minutes explaining how Vic couldn't sub out regulars due to bench issues and then spent two minutes (starting with 90 seconds left in game) praising him for doing the thing she said he couldn't do.
Vic is a dick for pressing up 30+ under five minutes. A huge asshat. CNC shouldn't have hugged him after the game, she should have kneed him in the nuts.

4) people complaining about UT's D fouling are missing the mark. Both D's were allowed to grab, the calls on that end were consistent. Cows were simply more physical, had better depth, played harder.

5) the real complaint about refs was the moving screen calls/noncalls. Cows got away with murder. Their post to post side to side screen were illegal about 95% of the time and saw zero calls. They used a rubscreen on diagonal cuts and diagonal drives and it was illegal every time and basically uncalled. Baylor got called on two moving screens that I saw. CNC should have gone ballistic after the first call (even if it got a technical foul). Some blow ups to change how a game is called are simply necessary. She is too timid. Yelling isn't always enough.

6) 99% of the offensive woes stem from the same root issue……we can't win the dribble and force D rotations. Our two players who can do some dribble creation (Scott and Deng) do it to score and not to create. Unless teams run a pure Princeton motion O, winning the dribble consistently is a prerequisite to every other O scheme.

7) player development is a huge issue. Buggs and Fontleroy simply stopped improving (to any significant degree) two years ago.

8) when teams press and Baylor never attacks for easy baskets, that means the upside is turnovers and easy buckets and there is no downside.

9) the secondary value of pressing Baylor is that half the shot clock is expired before we initiate half-court O.

10) when teams rise high and deny the wings, back cuts to relieve pressure should happen routinely. We clearly have zero idea of how to punish either ball pressure or wing pressure.

11) when your teammate picks up their dribble under pressure, you have one job…..create a passing lane. We stand glued to the court leading to turnovers. Or we push off.

12) Buggs in year four still has little idea of shot selection based on shot clock.

13) Cows had better depth. They are happy recruiting five stars but also recruiting kids that do 1-2 things well on O but play D all out. Maybe we should learn the lesson.

14) The Cows do a great job creating passing angles. We do not.

15) The cows run backside action while running front side action. We stand around on the backside.

16) ideally every defender would be long, have great reach, and be quick. Having none of the above shouldn't be playing.

17) CNC has to see the writing on the wall. New boss and the team is seriously underperforming. Recruiting is a disaster. Time to finish any home repairs.

18) Team is having to make passes and shots into tiny windows because we cannot space the floor (shooting woes) or move secondary defenders with dribble drive.

19) No Scott = .500 in conference if we are lucky.

20) everyone throwing the "hater" label at the realists should apologize profusely. Pollyanna **** the bed today.



It is simply an NIL issue, the talent level difference was crazy. It is not her fault for the recruiting we simply dont compete financially.
drahthaar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It is simply an NIL issue, the talent level difference was crazy. It is not her fault for the recruiting we simply dont compete financially.


If this is truly the case, then Livingstone, McNamee and the BOR need to move out of the P4 playing field and admit they "can't compete" with the adults in college athletics. The quote above is being proffered for every sport at BU currently. For an institution as insular as BU, I'm certain they can develop a good rationalization for doing so. I suspect the leadership to continue status quo as soon as they decide what that is.
Bulldog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
But…but…but….ADRIACUS…. YOU specifically said on this message board a few years ago that Vic Schaefer was not a good coach and would not succeed at Texas….lmao…. He's made the Elite Eight 3 out of his first 4 years at Texas and the Final Four last year. Now ranked #2 in the nation having beaten #3 UCLA, #2, South Carolina, #11North Carolina, and now a 35 point drubbing of the #13 Bears….all without one starter, and TWO key subs. AND lest we forget you bragging about that new high octane offense.. Omg…you're such an expert….. ROFLMAO…. SENSELESS DRIVEL….
Bear3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What are your suggestions for improving recruiting if we don't have NIL money to compete with Big 10 and SEC for top players?

Chelsea Whitaker said we need a coach who can recruit Texas. Nicki recruited 4 or 5 Texas players very hard for 2026' class and we were in top 2 or 3 for several of them. We lost them to Tennessee, Duke and Notre Dame.

I am really interested to hear what people think our options are if we don't have NIL to compete. I unfortunately don't see Baylor giving Wbb the funding we need to compete. Nicki can recruit. She had a top 10 recruiting class her first year and when NIL started high school recruiting fell apart. Nicki gets many top 40 players to visit but in the end we can't provide money they want.

I am not sure of any current coach other than Geno, Staley and Kim who could influence recruit any at all with their name alone. And as someone said. even that has diminished with NIL. If Mulkey was still here she could pull a few recruits with her name but with our current NIL she would not have success she is having at LSU.

To add further context to what NIL has caused, Big 12 schools got 2 of the top 40 recruits and a big 0 of top 20 recruits for 2026.

So, what are our options for recruiting going forward?

BUFan10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well said.
Adriacus Peratuun
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bulldog said:

But…but…but….ADRIACUS…. YOU specifically said on this message board a few years ago that Vic Schaefer was not a good coach and would not succeed at Texas….lmao…. He's made the Elite Eight 3 out of his first 4 years at Texas and the Final Four last year. Now ranked #2 in the nation having beaten #3 UCLA, #2, South Carolina, #11North Carolina, and now a 35 point drubbing of the #13 Bears….all without one starter, and TWO key subs. AND lest we forget you bragging about that new high octane offense.. Omg…you're such an expert….. ROFLMAO…. SENSELESS DRIVEL….

Provide the entire quote.

or we see you.
Bulldog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why would I go to that trouble? You've prob erased it. You ABSOLUTELY said it…you KNOW you said it…everyone on here KNOWS you said it. Talk about no kahunas…. Won't even admit such a gaffe. As usual, running your mouth and now running from what you said because of how foolish you look. Complete open mouth insert foot…LMAO…. How does your big toe taste now??? LOL…..
GrizBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Adriacus Peratuun said:

Bulldog said:

But…but…but….ADRIACUS…. YOU specifically said on this message board a few years ago that Vic Schaefer was not a good coach and would not succeed at Texas….lmao…. He's made the Elite Eight 3 out of his first 4 years at Texas and the Final Four last year. Now ranked #2 in the nation having beaten #3 UCLA, #2, South Carolina, #11North Carolina, and now a 35 point drubbing of the #13 Bears….all without one starter, and TWO key subs. AND lest we forget you bragging about that new high octane offense.. Omg…you're such an expert….. ROFLMAO…. SENSELESS DRIVEL….

Provide the entire quote.

or we see you.
Are there others in the room with you right now?
Adriacus Peratuun
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bulldog said:

Why would I go to that trouble? You've prob erased it. You ABSOLUTELY said it…you KNOW you said it…everyone on here KNOWS you said it. Talk about no kahunas…. Won't even admit such a gaffe. As usual, running your mouth and now running from what you said because of how foolish you look. Complete open mouth insert foot…LMAO…. How does your big toe taste now??? LOL…..

So you have nothing. We see you.

real people have data backup.
Bulldog
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Awww….itty bitty gonna cry…lol. You made a Complete fool of yourself…AS USUAL…. WONT even own it….. NO KAHUNAS…ZILCH…NADA…..
Adriacus Peratuun
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bulldog said:

Awww….itty bitty gonna cry…lol. You made a Complete fool of yourself…AS USUAL…. WONT even own it….. NO KAHUNAS…ZILCH…NADA…..

since you seem to be substantially ******ed, here is your path to find the nonsense you are spouting.





go to search, insert whatever your terms you like, limit it to my account.
i have deleted nothing.

your ignorance can be confirmed. assuming you aren't all bluster and no manhood.
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If this argument is whether AP downplayed Vic's coaching than the answer is 100% yes on multiple occasions. And no I'm not going to go look for the specifics because I could care less what AP thinks of Vic. But Bulldog is 100000% correct if that's what he's implying.
Adriacus Peratuun
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another Team Mulkey Charter Member spews nonsense without one single quote.

They really are a very inbred crowd.
Team Mulkey where the family tree is a wreath.
blackie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear said:

If this argument is whether AP downplayed Vic's coaching than the answer is 100% yes on multiple occasions. And no I'm not going to go look for the specifics because I could care less what AP thinks of Vic. But Bulldog is 100000% correct if that's what he's implying.

Vic is a great coach. UT is obviously as good or better than anyone else in the country right now. Whether they can win it all will depend somewhat on how loose the refs will allow play as if called tightly they might have to back off the defense a bit, and how the absent players come back. Booker could be considered to be on any particular college team's all-time players roster. And Harmon isn't too far behind.

I will never forget one of Mulkey's comments after one of our games against A&M where Vic was in charge of the defense. It went somewhat along the lines of "I don't know what those kids (A&M) were playing on defense, but it wasn't basketball.".

Edit...
After doing some thinking, I believe all would agree that the recognized truly elite coaches active in WBB right now are Auriemma, Mulkey, Staley, and I believe Vic. I might be forgetting someone, but is there anyone else out there that anyone believes will ever reach their status and have shown staying power at that level.....barring of course someone who can head up a team that has all the money they need to stack a roster.
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
What does Vic have to do with Mulkey? Why do you bring Mulkey into every thread? What did that lady do to hurt your feelings? You're incredibly thin skinned. It's easy to see why you're universally hated on these boards.
Please tell me your thoughts on Vic. I can assume as defensive as you're getting that you consider him an excellent HC right?
blackie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear said:

What does Vic have to do with Mulkey? Why do you bring Mulkey into every thread? What did that lady do to hurt your feelings? You're incredibly thin skinned. It's easy to see why you're universally hated on these boards.
Please tell me your thoughts on Vic. I can assume as defensive as you're getting that you consider him an excellent HC right?

Man, you are obsessed. You tie innocent comments as an attack on her. I thought her comment was funny and depicted how tight a defense Vic plays. Should I have said "an coach not to be named" made the comment. How you can take what I wrote and make into what you responded is unbelievable.

I think in my response prior to this I gave my opinion of Vic (one of the top 4 still in the game).....but perhaps I haven't used the right adjectives for you?
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I was responding to AP… try to keep up. The comment shows who I'm responding to. I hadn't even looked at your comment
blackie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear said:

I was responding to AP… try to keep up. The comment shows who I'm responding to. I hadn't even looked at your comment

Sorry, didn't see to whom you were responding, just that the post was right after mine.
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Per usual I find your comments mostly accurate. Vic's style of defense is incredibly handsy. As long a ms refs let em play that's going to favor a Vic team. Not sure if they'll win it this year. But they'll definitely be right there in the mix come March
BUVA
How long do you want to ignore this user?

"I will never forget one of Mulkey's comments after one of our games against A&M where Vic was in charge of the defense. It went somewhat along the lines of "I don't know what those kids (A&M) were playing on defense, but it wasn't basketball.".


Vic learned from Gary Blair while at A&M: "Foul every play, they can't catch 'em all".
Man is the only animal that blushes. Or needs to. ~ Mark Twain
ECBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Moving past all of the fighting, I actually agree with Adriacus' point about lack of player development. Looking at our players who have been here multiple years, which ones have gotten better?
itsjuzme
How long do you want to ignore this user?
100%
itsjuzme
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bulldog said:

Awww….itty bitty gonna cry…lol. You made a Complete fool of yourself…AS USUAL…. WONT even own it….. NO KAHUNAS…ZILCH…NADA…..

Right on Bulldog!
itsjuzme
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bulldog said:

But…but…but….ADRIACUS…. YOU specifically said on this message board a few years ago that Vic Schaefer was not a good coach and would not succeed at Texas….lmao…. He's made the Elite Eight 3 out of his first 4 years at Texas and the Final Four last year. Now ranked #2 in the nation having beaten #3 UCLA, #2, South Carolina, #11North Carolina, and now a 35 point drubbing of the #13 Bears….all without one starter, and TWO key subs. AND lest we forget you bragging about that new high octane offense.. Omg…you're such an expert….. ROFLMAO…. SENSELESS DRIVEL….


Thank you Bulldog! AP is a total ass and an embarrassment to Baylor fans. Texas took the Lady Bears to the woodshed and whipped them soundly. Texas is better in every facet... and that includes talent and coaching!
blackie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
itsjuzme said:

Bulldog said:

But…but…but….ADRIACUS…. YOU specifically said on this message board a few years ago that Vic Schaefer was not a good coach and would not succeed at Texas….lmao…. He's made the Elite Eight 3 out of his first 4 years at Texas and the Final Four last year. Now ranked #2 in the nation having beaten #3 UCLA, #2, South Carolina, #11North Carolina, and now a 35 point drubbing of the #13 Bears….all without one starter, and TWO key subs. AND lest we forget you bragging about that new high octane offense.. Omg…you're such an expert….. ROFLMAO…. SENSELESS DRIVEL….


Thank you Bulldog! AP is an ass a total ass and an embarrassment to Baylor fans. Texas took the Lady Bears to the woodshed and whipped them soundly. Texas is better in every facet... and that includes talent and coaching!

With the resources they have and what they are paying Shaffer, I would hope so. This should not be a surprise. Any of our past teams would have their hands full beating them. Booker and Harmon may be as good as any pair we have ever faced. It would be interesting to be able to see a game between the 2011 Aggies and this year's UT team to gauge something to which we could compare as we had troubles with the 2011 Ags, even with the team we had at the time.

I think the only thing that will slow them down are key injuries, which are always a danger.
BearlyNose
How long do you want to ignore this user?
itsjuzme said:

Bulldog said:

But…but…but….ADRIACUS…. YOU specifically said on this message board a few years ago that Vic Schaefer was not a good coach and would not succeed at Texas….lmao…. He's made the Elite Eight 3 out of his first 4 years at Texas and the Final Four last year. Now ranked #2 in the nation having beaten #3 UCLA, #2, South Carolina, #11North Carolina, and now a 35 point drubbing of the #13 Bears….all without one starter, and TWO key subs. AND lest we forget you bragging about that new high octane offense.. Omg…you're such an expert….. ROFLMAO…. SENSELESS DRIVEL….


Thank you Bulldog! AP is an ass a total ass and an embarrassment to Baylor fans. Texas took the Lady Bears to the woodshed and whipped them soundly. Texas is better in every facet... and that includes talent and coaching!

I disagree with your assessment of AP. His viewpoints have been helpful to me and I appreciate his thorough take on what is currently not working with the WBB team. While you have a right to disagree, using vulgar language on this site is not appreciated. We are all Baylor supporters. Surely you can agree to disagree and do it amicably.
IowaBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Vulgar language… like AP does with EVERYONE he disagrees with?
itsjuzme
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlyNose said:

itsjuzme said:

Bulldog said:

But…but…but….ADRIACUS…. YOU specifically said on this message board a few years ago that Vic Schaefer was not a good coach and would not succeed at Texas….lmao…. He's made the Elite Eight 3 out of his first 4 years at Texas and the Final Four last year. Now ranked #2 in the nation having beaten #3 UCLA, #2, South Carolina, #11North Carolina, and now a 35 point drubbing of the #13 Bears….all without one starter, and TWO key subs. AND lest we forget you bragging about that new high octane offense.. Omg…you're such an expert….. ROFLMAO…. SENSELESS DRIVEL….


Thank you Bulldog! AP is an ass a total ass and an embarrassment to Baylor fans. Texas took the Lady Bears to the woodshed and whipped them soundly. Texas is better in every facet... and that includes talent and coaching!

I disagree with your assessment of AP. His viewpoints have been helpful to me and I appreciate his thorough take on what is currently not working with the WBB team. While you have a right to disagree, using vulgar language on this site is not appreciated. We are all Baylor supporters. Surely you can agree to disagree and do it amicably.


The word "ass" appears frequently in the Bible and I apologize if it offends you. While AP does, in fact, share some knowledgeable insight... their delivery is rude, condescending, and leaves much to be desired. None of those things are amicable. Any reference to AP being referred to as an ass, or any other colorful name for that matter, is absolutely justified by that person's own behavior.
ParkerCoBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Presentations of perspectives notwithstanding, I think that AP has made a good point. Regardless of the talent level/disparity of our squad, we consistently appear to be under-coached. That, in and of itself, is not an NIL issue. I'm hopeful that our new AD is willing to take a hard look at a number of our underperforming sports, and make some decisions which lead to a brighter future.

I am of the opinion that WBB is one of those sports.
Adriacus Peratuun
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearlyNose said:

itsjuzme said:

Bulldog said:

But…but…but….ADRIACUS…. YOU specifically said on this message board a few years ago that Vic Schaefer was not a good coach and would not succeed at Texas….lmao…. He's made the Elite Eight 3 out of his first 4 years at Texas and the Final Four last year. Now ranked #2 in the nation having beaten #3 UCLA, #2, South Carolina, #11North Carolina, and now a 35 point drubbing of the #13 Bears….all without one starter, and TWO key subs. AND lest we forget you bragging about that new high octane offense.. Omg…you're such an expert….. ROFLMAO…. SENSELESS DRIVEL….


Thank you Bulldog! AP is an ass a total ass and an embarrassment to Baylor fans. Texas took the Lady Bears to the woodshed and whipped them soundly. Texas is better in every facet... and that includes talent and coaching!

I disagree with your assessment of AP. His viewpoints have been helpful to me and I appreciate his thorough take on what is currently not working with the WBB team. While you have a right to disagree, using vulgar language on this site is not appreciated. We are all Baylor supporters. Surely you can agree to disagree and do it amicably.



Unfortunately the SE365 WBB Forum (true of each forum but especially true of this one) is often a cesspool. People unable to disagree without name calling.

The WBB Forum seems to be populated by:

60% Mulkey apologists who think she did only wonderful things and was a misunderstood angel.
30% Baylor apologists who think the school and athletes are above reproach.
10% people who prefer to talk sports, willing to acknowledge things done well, and willing to critique things done poorly.

What you see above is a purely basketball post which becomes quickly derailed by personal attacks. That is the MO of both the larger two groups. They seem unable to simply post their own thoughts on their own threads.

Adriacus Peratuun
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ParkerCoBear said:

Presentations of perspectives notwithstanding, I think that AP has made a good point. Regardless of the talent level/disparity of our squad, we consistently appear to be under-coached. That, in and of itself, is not an NIL issue. I'm hopeful that our new AD is willing to take a hard look at a number of our underperforming sports, and make some decisions which lead to a brighter future.

I am of the opinion that WBB is one of those sports.


There are definitely hard conversations upcoming.
CNC reminds me of Rhoades, really strong in some areas but really weak in others. And like Rhoades she doesn't seem to address the weaknesses.


She is a solid man to man O and D tactician. She is likeable.
But the talent evaluation is spotty. Also Every season the first time the team faces a Zone D it is like no player has ever seen a Zone before. And the biggest problem appears to be strategic lapses.

Baylor WBB is basically akin to the Texas Rangers when it comes to NIL. Not the Dodgers or Yankees but also not the Rays or Twins. Our priorities on spending are headscratching. If we are going to run pro Flo to Iso O, the priority has to be players that can create for themselves and others. Win the dribble. We have zero players who consistently create for themselves and others. Buggs and Fontleroy are solid finishers but we are paying them like creators. It is great to keep players but at some point the spend has to be justified.

Baylor needs to focus the bulk of its spending on three creators and use the remainder to acquire the best finishers, rim protectors, and perimeter defenders that the remaining money allows. And we have to stop paying deep rotation players. Simply not enough money to spend any that way. Would be great to have a huge payroll but the program has enough money to be competitive.

And install Zone O before the season starts.
BUBBFAN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Solution, move to CUSA
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.