fredbear said:
Observations.
Note I wanted WV to win.
1. WV plays thug ball. They constantly slap, reach in. Push and pull, but seldom get called
2. Miles was plowed over by WV player in third quarter (4th foul on Miles) and was not even facing the guard.
3. These 2 coaches are the best in the big 12
4. I can't imagine WV pays big bucks; but they get it done with coaching and motivation.
5. TCU seemed unmotivated from the coach down.
6. Glass floor causes slips and seemed underwhelming on TV. Why pay all the money if you can only expose its tricks to the 5,000 there.
7. Baylor better get serious about WBB
I not only wanted WVU to win, but I thought all along before the tourney even started that I would not be surprised if they did. WVU plays a style that most teams face infrequently in a season and are not really ready for. Sort of like going up against Army in football. On paper it is a team people expect you to steamroll.....but it seldom works that way.
That style will carry you a long way, but in and of itself likely won't get you to the finish line against the elite. The thing I saw hurting WVU earlier in the season was that they could not score (kind of like a team which we all follow here). They lost the games where they hosted TCU and TT solely because they couldn't hit the ocean in the fourth quarter. Both games should have been WV wins. But later in the season they started scoring. Why, who knows. Probably as hard to answer as to why teams stop scoring.
You probably don't have to pay up a lot for players that fit into the WVU scheme as they are usually not the type that are looked for by the "headliner" teams. The thing that makes it work however, is that the players buy into that style and the coach looks for those players. A lot of coaches look a lot better if they have the players that match what they want in their system. But most don't get those players to a degree that is needed to make the system work. Kellogg does.
As another mentioned, the danger is that you run into a set of refs in the NCAA that get picky and you find your starters in dangerous foul trouble early. I am not against the style of play....there have many times I wish we were able to put on the pressure as they do. We did that some in the TCU game late, and we started turning TCU over. But we are not built to do that throughout the game.
I recall that once after a game with A&M when Vic was in charge of the defense, KM made the comment "I don't know what that was out there, but it wasn't basketball".
WVU will be a tough out for anyone that has not faced that style of play to any great extent and their shots keep falling.