Schedule Release?

1,986 Views | 18 Replies | Last: 7 hrs ago by LTBear19
TxRainMkr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's odd that Baylor women's basketball hasn't released its nonconference schedule. Some conferences have already released their conference schedule.
ScottyB_The_Baylor_King
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Maybe they are waiting on conference days to release all games at once, but I admit it is a little odd too that they haven't revealed the rest of the nonconference slate yet.
TxRainMkr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It sometimes seems like Baylor womens basketball is a marketing afterthought. The season starts in 2 months and we have no schedule.
Baylorbearsupporter
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They always take so long too put out the schedule, i never understood why
12au
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Last year it came out August 28. The year before that it came out September 19. So should be soon
Mmotta3
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Michael from the staff here, our non-conference schedule has been complete, we are waiting for the contract to be finished from a neutral site game and then hope to release early next week!
TxRainMkr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm excited! And ready to start organizing my fall and winter schedule. I still say Baylor Womens Basketball is one of the most enjoyable sports we have to attend.
ScottyB_The_Baylor_King
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ScottyB_The_Baylor_King
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LTBear19
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Man, that home slate is AWFUL.
Wbbfan29
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I agree! There is no home game that would produce a large crowd.
Chibears2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
According to those in the know, big name programs want to participate in these outside hosted neutral site venues. They don't want home and homes anymore. If we want to play in the big time matchups, and we do, we have to embrace those neutral site venues. Doesn't leave a whole lot else for home games. Plus, I would imagine the share of the gate demand is less for lower league opponents. Want that money directed to different needs.

Not particularly fun for us fans, I would certainly agree, but I think that will be the trend for awhile.
Adriacus Peratuun
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chibears2 said:

According to those in the know, big name programs want to participate in these outside hosted neutral site venues. They don't want home and homes anymore. If we want to play in the big time matchups, and we do, we have to embrace those neutral site venues. Doesn't leave a whole lot else for home games. Plus, I would imagine the share of the gate demand is less for lower league opponents. Want that money directed to different needs.

Not particularly fun for us fans, I would certainly agree, but I think that will be the trend for awhile.


Zero NIL for On Campus games. Other than Conference games, high profile games will all be Neutral Court until something changes. Fans must adapt.

Baylor getting high profile NIL games is a great sign.
LTBear19
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Adriacus Peratuun said:

Chibears2 said:

According to those in the know, big name programs want to participate in these outside hosted neutral site venues. They don't want home and homes anymore. If we want to play in the big time matchups, and we do, we have to embrace those neutral site venues. Doesn't leave a whole lot else for home games. Plus, I would imagine the share of the gate demand is less for lower league opponents. Want that money directed to different needs.

Not particularly fun for us fans, I would certainly agree, but I think that will be the trend for awhile.


Zero NIL for On Campus games. Other than Conference games, high profile games will all be Neutral Court until something changes. Fans must adapt.

Baylor getting high profile NIL games is a great sign.


Unless you're winning (which we aren't), it's gonna be hard to expand your fanbase with mediocre matchups at home.

I think we all realize that it will be a challenge to get Top 10 teams to come to our place, but is it really that hard to get a few mid-level programs to come to town?

Teams like Oregon State, Miami, Stanford, and even Nebraska might be open to a home and home.

When your best home matchup is UTSA, you're really scraping the bottom of the barrel.
ctxbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LTBear19 said:


Unless you're winning (which we aren't)...

In the past five seasons, our record is 127-45. I get that isn't up to Baylor's standards. But it's a long way from being accurately described as "not winning".
Adriacus Peratuun
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LTBear19 said:

Adriacus Peratuun said:

Chibears2 said:

According to those in the know, big name programs want to participate in these outside hosted neutral site venues. They don't want home and homes anymore. If we want to play in the big time matchups, and we do, we have to embrace those neutral site venues. Doesn't leave a whole lot else for home games. Plus, I would imagine the share of the gate demand is less for lower league opponents. Want that money directed to different needs.

Not particularly fun for us fans, I would certainly agree, but I think that will be the trend for awhile.


Zero NIL for On Campus games. Other than Conference games, high profile games will all be Neutral Court until something changes. Fans must adapt.

Baylor getting high profile NIL games is a great sign.


Unless you're winning (which we aren't), it's gonna be hard to expand your fanbase with mediocre matchups at home.

I think we all realize that it will be a challenge to get Top 10 teams to come to our place, but is it really that hard to get a few mid-level programs to come to town?

Teams like Oregon State, Miami, Stanford, and even Nebraska might be open to a home and home.

When your best home matchup is UTSA, you're really scraping the bottom of the barrel.

2026-2027 Baylor MBB has zero nonconference P4 opponents.

You are ignoring the new reality in hopes of time traveling to the past.
LTBear19
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Adriacus Peratuun said:

LTBear19 said:

Adriacus Peratuun said:

Chibears2 said:

According to those in the know, big name programs want to participate in these outside hosted neutral site venues. They don't want home and homes anymore. If we want to play in the big time matchups, and we do, we have to embrace those neutral site venues. Doesn't leave a whole lot else for home games. Plus, I would imagine the share of the gate demand is less for lower league opponents. Want that money directed to different needs.

Not particularly fun for us fans, I would certainly agree, but I think that will be the trend for awhile.


Zero NIL for On Campus games. Other than Conference games, high profile games will all be Neutral Court until something changes. Fans must adapt.

Baylor getting high profile NIL games is a great sign.


Unless you're winning (which we aren't), it's gonna be hard to expand your fanbase with mediocre matchups at home.

I think we all realize that it will be a challenge to get Top 10 teams to come to our place, but is it really that hard to get a few mid-level programs to come to town?

Teams like Oregon State, Miami, Stanford, and even Nebraska might be open to a home and home.

When your best home matchup is UTSA, you're really scraping the bottom of the barrel.

2026-2027 Baylor MBB has zero nonconference P4 opponents.

You are ignoring the new reality in hopes of time traveling to the past.


We're not talking about the men, though.

The men have much more lucrative tv deals in place, which is why the neutral site thing happens frequently on that side of the fence.

The men are already guaranteed of getting views on a regular basis, as they benefit from having an established brand.

The women need the more intriguing matchups to draw in the casual fan, however (and even some diehards).

Sure, we might get an appealing neutral site matchup here or there.

But what good does that do if you follow it up with 5 or 6 stinkers in a row?

You lose all interest and excitement you might have gained from that one neutral site game.

On the surface, it doesn't look like we even tried to go after a brand name school with a pulse.

Was Northwestern not available?
Adriacus Peratuun
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LTBear19 said:

Adriacus Peratuun said:

LTBear19 said:

Adriacus Peratuun said:

Chibears2 said:

According to those in the know, big name programs want to participate in these outside hosted neutral site venues. They don't want home and homes anymore. If we want to play in the big time matchups, and we do, we have to embrace those neutral site venues. Doesn't leave a whole lot else for home games. Plus, I would imagine the share of the gate demand is less for lower league opponents. Want that money directed to different needs.

Not particularly fun for us fans, I would certainly agree, but I think that will be the trend for awhile.


Zero NIL for On Campus games. Other than Conference games, high profile games will all be Neutral Court until something changes. Fans must adapt.

Baylor getting high profile NIL games is a great sign.


Unless you're winning (which we aren't), it's gonna be hard to expand your fanbase with mediocre matchups at home.

I think we all realize that it will be a challenge to get Top 10 teams to come to our place, but is it really that hard to get a few mid-level programs to come to town?

Teams like Oregon State, Miami, Stanford, and even Nebraska might be open to a home and home.

When your best home matchup is UTSA, you're really scraping the bottom of the barrel.

2026-2027 Baylor MBB has zero nonconference P4 opponents.

You are ignoring the new reality in hopes of time traveling to the past.


We're not talking about the men, though.

The men have much more lucrative tv deals in place, which is why the neutral site thing happens frequently on that side of the fence.

The men are already guaranteed of getting views on a regular basis, as they benefit from having an established brand.

The women need the more intriguing matchups to draw in the casual fan, however (and even some diehards).

Sure, we might get an appealing neutral site matchup here or there.

But what good does that do if you follow it up with 5 or 6 stinkers in a row?

You lose all interest and excitement you might have gained from that one neutral site game.

On the surface, it doesn't look like we even tried to go after a brand name school with a pulse.

Was Northwestern not available?


Again……missing the point.

Every decision related to scheduling centers on post season and NIL.

P4 teams almost always (unless early in a turnaround when they are solely focused on easy wins) schedule 5-6 quality teams in NC and the rest are scrubs. Every year. With only those 5-6 opportunities to build NIL for players, no sane coach will waste one (or more) of the games simply to make fans happy. Those games are now solely NIL at neutral court. Home and Away is a dead dinosaur.

Build a Tourney resume and get your players paid….the only factors that matter in scheduling.
LTBear19
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Well, then no one should be surprised (or cry) about the smaller crowds watching games at Foster during the early part of the season.

When you don't care about pleasing your fans, an empty arena is likely what you'll get.

I doubt anyone has the Northern Kentucky game circled on their calendar.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.