Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

whiterock said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

midgett said:

---

Can you imagine if this was an attempt on Sotomayor? It would be the ONLY news and would be all about white supremacy, etc.

Conservative Justice so it barely makes the news among the MSM (liberal).

---

https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2021/02/19/report-supreme-court-justice-sotomayor-targeted-by-gunman-who-killed-federal-judges-son/

---

Dude, can you not see the disconnect? Her name was on the list of a crazy guy. That's it. Completely different from what we have going on here - grassroots activists organizing to intimidate federal judges in their homes on a specific upcoming vote (violation of federal law), creating an environment heated enough that a nutjob traveled across country to attempt to kill a specific justice, who was the target of incitement for such action by a elected Democrats, including some in party leadership.

Copied from another thread:
In most other places in the world, this would reasonably be seen as an extra-legal effort by one party to rebalance SCOTUS to its favor.....grassroots organizations of said party to incite mobs to the front yards of justices, federal law enforcement controlled by said party to refuse to arrest & disperse those mobs in clear violation of federal law, the Congress controlled by said party to refuse to deploy extra security funding, all for the purpose of creating conditions which could reasonably be expected to cause the demise of one or more justices so that the sitting POTUS of said party could appoint one or more justices more suitable to the liking of said party for confirmation to a senate controlled by that same party.

It is what it is.
Hate on the left is tearing the country apart.

---

Wow! You sure are quick to spot a seditious conspiracy when it doesn't involve Trump supporters.

---

If Trump was disqualified from running and you locked up everyone at J6 for years, you would create a scenario far worse than backing off right now.

You seriously don't even realize if the reverse happened and democrats had done J6, it wouldn't even have turned into a big topic.

---

Are you kidding? Ten Benghazi investigations over three years? A year and a half of Hillary's emails? If Democrats had done J6 you'd be in a rubber room right now with a Klonopin drip hanging out your arm.

I have actually seen news stories and social media posts from those on the left dismissing this because the man never got close enough to shoot or even pull out his gun. They are basically deflecting and saying it was not an assassination attempt or plot.

Sam Lowry said:

---

whiterock said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

midgett said:

---

Can you imagine if this was an attempt on Sotomayor? It would be the ONLY news and would be all about white supremacy, etc.

Conservative Justice so it barely makes the news among the MSM (liberal).

---

https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2021/02/19/report-supreme-court-justice-sotomayor-targeted-by-gunman-who-killed-federal-judges-son/

---

Dude, can you not see the disconnect? Her name was on the list of a crazy guy. That's it. Completely different from what we have going on here - grassroots activists organizing to intimidate federal judges in their homes on a specific upcoming vote (violation of federal law), creating an environment heated enough that a nutjob traveled across country to attempt to kill a specific justice, who was the target of incitement for such action by a elected Democrats, including some in party leadership.

Copied from another thread:
In most other places in the world, this would reasonably be seen as an extra-legal effort by one party to rebalance SCOTUS to its favor.....grassroots organizations of said party to incite mobs to the front yards of justices, federal law enforcement controlled by said party to refuse to arrest & disperse those mobs in clear violation of federal law, the Congress controlled by said party to refuse to deploy extra security funding, all for the purpose of creating conditions which could reasonably be expected to cause the demise of one or more justices so that the sitting POTUS of said party could appoint one or more justices more suitable to the liking of said party for confirmation to a senate controlled by that same party.

It is what it is.
Hate on the left is tearing the country apart.

---

Wow! You sure are quick to spot a seditious conspiracy when it doesn't involve Trump supporters.

---

I have seen what could be seditious conspiracies among the PBs and OKs.
I have seen obvious apparent seditious conspiracies among BLM, Antifa, Democrat activists, and Democrat leaders.

I have not yet seen a hint of a seditious conspiracy involving a Republican or Republican elected official.
Neither have you.

Biden yet to speak on alleged Kavanaugh assassination attempt, 2 days after arresthttps://t.co/eb5U3svV7B

— Fox News (@FoxNews) June 10, 2022

The day after a radical leftist attempted to assassinate Justice Kavanaugh, AOC is on Instagram bragging about how she stopped a bill designed to protect Supreme Court justices & their families. pic.twitter.com/G1qKncr4bl

— Arthur Schwartz (@ArthurSchwartz) June 10, 2022

Cobretti said:

---

The day after a radical leftist attempted to assassinate Justice Kavanaugh, AOC is on Instagram bragging about how she stopped a bill designed to protect Supreme Court justices & their families. pic.twitter.com/G1qKncr4bl

— Arthur Schwartz (@ArthurSchwartz) June 10, 2022

---

I flip back and forth as to whether or not I would do her. To me she is a nose job away from being attractive.

In any event she is a one bagger.

How many of you boys think thoughts and prayers are enough here?

GrowlTowel said:

---

Cobretti said:

---

The day after a radical leftist attempted to assassinate Justice Kavanaugh, AOC is on Instagram bragging about how she stopped a bill designed to protect Supreme Court justices & their families. pic.twitter.com/G1qKncr4bl

— Arthur Schwartz (@ArthurSchwartz) June 10, 2022

---

I flip back and forth as to whether or not I would do her. To me she is a nose job away from being attractive.

In any event she is a one bagger.

---

Lauren Fishface is much more your style.

Her husband Jayson is infamous for exposing himself to underaged girls at a bar.

Only a real pig would make a post like this on a public board.

‘The Boeberts Have Your Six’: Rep. Lauren Boebert Tweets Christmas Photo Of Her Young Sons With Guns To Show Support For Rep. Thomas Massie https://t.co/4Vig2ooSGA pic.twitter.com/nX0EdtH0mj

— CBSDenver (@CBSDenver) December 8, 2021

And another great Christian example of behavior you want your kids to emulate:

Looks like you didn’t have trouble finding and affording your wieners. pic.twitter.com/tmXBCC3BAx

— Politically Incorrect Purple SnorkelWhacker (@DeepStateCoup) June 10, 2022

J.B.Katz said:

---

How many of you boys think thoughts and prayers are enough here?

---

Just Mostly Peaceful Democrats....

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

whiterock said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

midgett said:

---

Can you imagine if this was an attempt on Sotomayor? It would be the ONLY news and would be all about white supremacy, etc.

Conservative Justice so it barely makes the news among the MSM (liberal).

---

https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2021/02/19/report-supreme-court-justice-sotomayor-targeted-by-gunman-who-killed-federal-judges-son/

---

Dude, can you not see the disconnect? Her name was on the list of a crazy guy. That's it. Completely different from what we have going on here - grassroots activists organizing to intimidate federal judges in their homes on a specific upcoming vote (violation of federal law), creating an environment heated enough that a nutjob traveled across country to attempt to kill a specific justice, who was the target of incitement for such action by a elected Democrats, including some in party leadership.

Copied from another thread:
In most other places in the world, this would reasonably be seen as an extra-legal effort by one party to rebalance SCOTUS to its favor.....grassroots organizations of said party to incite mobs to the front yards of justices, federal law enforcement controlled by said party to refuse to arrest & disperse those mobs in clear violation of federal law, the Congress controlled by said party to refuse to deploy extra security funding, all for the purpose of creating conditions which could reasonably be expected to cause the demise of one or more justices so that the sitting POTUS of said party could appoint one or more justices more suitable to the liking of said party for confirmation to a senate controlled by that same party.

It is what it is.
Hate on the left is tearing the country apart.

---

Wow! You sure are quick to spot a seditious conspiracy when it doesn't involve Trump supporters.

---

If Trump was disqualified from running and you locked up everyone at J6 for years, you would create a scenario far worse than backing off right now.

You seriously don't even realize if the reverse happened and democrats had done J6, it wouldn't even have turned into a big topic.

---

Are you kidding? Ten Benghazi investigations over three years? A year and a half of Hillary's emails? If Democrats had done J6 you'd be in a rubber room right now with a Klonopin drip hanging out your arm.

---

Nah you wouldn't even be aware of the events had it been lefties.

Just like nobody in DC gave a damn when they burned downed cities.

J.B.Katz said:

---

GrowlTowel said:

---

Cobretti said:

---

The day after a radical leftist attempted to assassinate Justice Kavanaugh, AOC is on Instagram bragging about how she stopped a bill designed to protect Supreme Court justices & their families. pic.twitter.com/G1qKncr4bl

— Arthur Schwartz (@ArthurSchwartz) June 10, 2022

---

I flip back and forth as to whether or not I would do her. To me she is a nose job away from being attractive.

In any event she is a one bagger.

---

Lauren Fishface is much more your style.

Only a real pig would make a post like this on a public board.

‘The Boeberts Have Your Six’: Rep. Lauren Boebert Tweets Christmas Photo Of Her Young Sons With Guns To Show Support For Rep. Thomas Massie https://t.co/4Vig2ooSGA pic.twitter.com/nX0EdtH0mj

— CBSDenver (@CBSDenver) December 8, 2021

---

Time of the month or something? We are talking about banging ******s here..

J.B.Katz said:

---

muddybrazos said:

---

J.B.Katz said:

---

Where's the thread on this story: A man executed a retired judge in Wisconsin in a targeted attack. He had a list of other targets that included Mitch McConnell and Gretchen Whitmer & WI Gov. Tony Evers, so he was a bipartisan sicko.

And there was the plot to kidnap Gretchen Witmer. - FBI did that

And the very credible plot to hurt Mike Pence for not going along with Trump's coup. - more FBI

Not to mention 19 dead kids, 2 dead teachers and more people who are injured in Uvalde. - lots of weird here so probably some more FBI involvement

And 10 dead people and more injured in Buffalo. - FBI had prior knowledge

But Republicans don't get exorcized about the need for more security until Kavanaugh is threatened.

Got it.

---

---

Believe what you want to believe, bro.

But take off the tinfoil and watch some different channels. The FBI did not kill all those people. And it was Trump who threatened Mike Pence and tried to sic a mob on him and others in the Capitol.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/03/us/politics/trump-pence-safety-jan-6.html?smtyp=cur&smid=tw-nytimes

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/nov/12/trump-capitol-attack-rioters-mike-pence

---

Bruh



Cmon man

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

whiterock said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

midgett said:

---

Can you imagine if this was an attempt on Sotomayor? It would be the ONLY news and would be all about white supremacy, etc.

Conservative Justice so it barely makes the news among the MSM (liberal).

---

https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2021/02/19/report-supreme-court-justice-sotomayor-targeted-by-gunman-who-killed-federal-judges-son/

---

Dude, can you not see the disconnect? Her name was on the list of a crazy guy. That's it. Completely different from what we have going on here - grassroots activists organizing to intimidate federal judges in their homes on a specific upcoming vote (violation of federal law), creating an environment heated enough that a nutjob traveled across country to attempt to kill a specific justice, who was the target of incitement for such action by a elected Democrats, including some in party leadership.

Copied from another thread:
In most other places in the world, this would reasonably be seen as an extra-legal effort by one party to rebalance SCOTUS to its favor.....grassroots organizations of said party to incite mobs to the front yards of justices, federal law enforcement controlled by said party to refuse to arrest & disperse those mobs in clear violation of federal law, the Congress controlled by said party to refuse to deploy extra security funding, all for the purpose of creating conditions which could reasonably be expected to cause the demise of one or more justices so that the sitting POTUS of said party could appoint one or more justices more suitable to the liking of said party for confirmation to a senate controlled by that same party.

It is what it is.
Hate on the left is tearing the country apart.

---

Wow! You sure are quick to spot a seditious conspiracy when it doesn't involve Trump supporters.

---

If Trump was disqualified from running and you locked up everyone at J6 for years, you would create a scenario far worse than backing off right now.

You seriously don't even realize if the reverse happened and democrats had done J6, it wouldn't even have turned into a big topic.

---

Is J6 Ashli Babbitt Day?

cowboycwr said:

---

I have actually seen news stories and social media posts from those on the left dismissing this because the man never got close enough to shoot or even pull out his gun. They are basically deflecting and saying it was not an assassination attempt or plot.

---

Washington Post has classified an assassination attempt on a sitting SCOTUS justice as "local crime" story pic.twitter.com/DwzThPwuQQ

— Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) June 10, 2022

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

whiterock said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

midgett said:

---

Can you imagine if this was an attempt on Sotomayor? It would be the ONLY news and would be all about white supremacy, etc.

Conservative Justice so it barely makes the news among the MSM (liberal).

---

https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2021/02/19/report-supreme-court-justice-sotomayor-targeted-by-gunman-who-killed-federal-judges-son/

---

Dude, can you not see the disconnect? Her name was on the list of a crazy guy. That's it. Completely different from what we have going on here - grassroots activists organizing to intimidate federal judges in their homes on a specific upcoming vote (violation of federal law), creating an environment heated enough that a nutjob traveled across country to attempt to kill a specific justice, who was the target of incitement for such action by a elected Democrats, including some in party leadership.

Copied from another thread:
In most other places in the world, this would reasonably be seen as an extra-legal effort by one party to rebalance SCOTUS to its favor.....grassroots organizations of said party to incite mobs to the front yards of justices, federal law enforcement controlled by said party to refuse to arrest & disperse those mobs in clear violation of federal law, the Congress controlled by said party to refuse to deploy extra security funding, all for the purpose of creating conditions which could reasonably be expected to cause the demise of one or more justices so that the sitting POTUS of said party could appoint one or more justices more suitable to the liking of said party for confirmation to a senate controlled by that same party.

It is what it is.
Hate on the left is tearing the country apart.

---

Wow! You sure are quick to spot a seditious conspiracy when it doesn't involve Trump supporters.

---

If Trump was disqualified from running and you locked up everyone at J6 for years, you would create a scenario far worse than backing off right now.

You seriously don't even realize if the reverse happened and democrats had done J6, it wouldn't even have turned into a big topic.

---

Are you kidding? Ten Benghazi investigations over three years? A year and a half of Hillary's emails? If Democrats had done J6 you'd be in a rubber room right now with a Klonopin drip hanging out your arm.

---

Nah you wouldn't even be aware of the events had it been lefties.

Just like nobody in DC gave a damn when they burned downed cities.

---

I'm not saying the left wouldn't downplay it. I'm saying you wouldn't. The media would make the same excuses they made for Antifa and BLM, the same ones you're making now, and you'd call them out for being hypocrites. Let's be honest. The J6 committee won't change any opinions because there's nothing to change. You already know they're right. You just don't care because you've decided the left plays dirty so the right needs to play dirty too.

Am I wrong?

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

whiterock said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

midgett said:

---

Can you imagine if this was an attempt on Sotomayor? It would be the ONLY news and would be all about white supremacy, etc.

Conservative Justice so it barely makes the news among the MSM (liberal).

---

https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2021/02/19/report-supreme-court-justice-sotomayor-targeted-by-gunman-who-killed-federal-judges-son/

---

Dude, can you not see the disconnect? Her name was on the list of a crazy guy. That's it. Completely different from what we have going on here - grassroots activists organizing to intimidate federal judges in their homes on a specific upcoming vote (violation of federal law), creating an environment heated enough that a nutjob traveled across country to attempt to kill a specific justice, who was the target of incitement for such action by a elected Democrats, including some in party leadership.

Copied from another thread:
In most other places in the world, this would reasonably be seen as an extra-legal effort by one party to rebalance SCOTUS to its favor.....grassroots organizations of said party to incite mobs to the front yards of justices, federal law enforcement controlled by said party to refuse to arrest & disperse those mobs in clear violation of federal law, the Congress controlled by said party to refuse to deploy extra security funding, all for the purpose of creating conditions which could reasonably be expected to cause the demise of one or more justices so that the sitting POTUS of said party could appoint one or more justices more suitable to the liking of said party for confirmation to a senate controlled by that same party.

It is what it is.
Hate on the left is tearing the country apart.

---

Wow! You sure are quick to spot a seditious conspiracy when it doesn't involve Trump supporters.

---

If Trump was disqualified from running and you locked up everyone at J6 for years, you would create a scenario far worse than backing off right now.

You seriously don't even realize if the reverse happened and democrats had done J6, it wouldn't even have turned into a big topic.

---

Are you kidding? Ten Benghazi investigations over three years? A year and a half of Hillary's emails? If Democrats had done J6 you'd be in a rubber room right now with a Klonopin drip hanging out your arm.

---

Nah you wouldn't even be aware of the events had it been lefties.

Just like nobody in DC gave a damn when they burned downed cities.

---

I'm not saying the left wouldn't downplay it. I'm saying you wouldn't. The media would make the same excuses they made for Antifa and BLM, the same ones you're making now, and you'd call them out for being hypocrites. Let's be honest. The Ashli
Babbitt Day committee won't change any opinions because there's nothing to change. You already know they're right. You just don't care because you've decided the left plays dirty so the right needs to play dirty too.

Am I wrong?

---

Fify

Jacques Strap said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

I have actually seen news stories and social media posts from those on the left dismissing this because the man never got close enough to shoot or even pull out his gun. They are basically deflecting and saying it was not an assassination attempt or plot.

---

Washington Post has classified an assassination attempt on a sitting SCOTUS justice as "local crime" story pic.twitter.com/DwzThPwuQQ

— Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) June 10, 2022

---

The New York Times ran a little story on page A-20. I wonder if it would have been front page if it was a lefty justice?

GrowlTowel said:

---

J.B.Katz said:

---

GrowlTowel said:

---

Cobretti said:

---

The day after a radical leftist attempted to assassinate Justice Kavanaugh, AOC is on Instagram bragging about how she stopped a bill designed to protect Supreme Court justices & their families. pic.twitter.com/G1qKncr4bl

— Arthur Schwartz (@ArthurSchwartz) June 10, 2022

---

I flip back and forth as to whether or not I would do her. To me she is a nose job away from being attractive.

In any event she is a one bagger.

---

Lauren Fishface is much more your style.

Only a real pig would make a post like this on a public board.

‘The Boeberts Have Your Six’: Rep. Lauren Boebert Tweets Christmas Photo Of Her Young Sons With Guns To Show Support For Rep. Thomas Massie https://t.co/4Vig2ooSGA pic.twitter.com/nX0EdtH0mj

— CBSDenver (@CBSDenver) December 8, 2021

---

Time of the month or something? We are talking about banging ******s here..

---

What would JBK have said if Boebert had dressed her kids up in drag?

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

whiterock said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

midgett said:

---

Can you imagine if this was an attempt on Sotomayor? It would be the ONLY news and would be all about white supremacy, etc.

Conservative Justice so it barely makes the news among the MSM (liberal).

---

https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2021/02/19/report-supreme-court-justice-sotomayor-targeted-by-gunman-who-killed-federal-judges-son/

---

Dude, can you not see the disconnect? Her name was on the list of a crazy guy. That's it. Completely different from what we have going on here - grassroots activists organizing to intimidate federal judges in their homes on a specific upcoming vote (violation of federal law), creating an environment heated enough that a nutjob traveled across country to attempt to kill a specific justice, who was the target of incitement for such action by a elected Democrats, including some in party leadership.

Copied from another thread:
In most other places in the world, this would reasonably be seen as an extra-legal effort by one party to rebalance SCOTUS to its favor.....grassroots organizations of said party to incite mobs to the front yards of justices, federal law enforcement controlled by said party to refuse to arrest & disperse those mobs in clear violation of federal law, the Congress controlled by said party to refuse to deploy extra security funding, all for the purpose of creating conditions which could reasonably be expected to cause the demise of one or more justices so that the sitting POTUS of said party could appoint one or more justices more suitable to the liking of said party for confirmation to a senate controlled by that same party.

It is what it is.
Hate on the left is tearing the country apart.

---

Wow! You sure are quick to spot a seditious conspiracy when it doesn't involve Trump supporters.

---

If Trump was disqualified from running and you locked up everyone at J6 for years, you would create a scenario far worse than backing off right now.

You seriously don't even realize if the reverse happened and democrats had done J6, it wouldn't even have turned into a big topic.

---

Are you kidding? Ten Benghazi investigations over three years? A year and a half of Hillary's emails? If Democrats had done J6 you'd be in a rubber room right now with a Klonopin drip hanging out your arm.

---

Nah you wouldn't even be aware of the events had it been lefties.

Just like nobody in DC gave a damn when they burned downed cities.

---

I'm not saying the left wouldn't downplay it. I'm saying you wouldn't. The media would make the same excuses they made for Antifa and BLM, the same ones you're making now, and you'd call them out for being hypocrites. Let's be honest. The J6 committee won't change any opinions because there's nothing to change. You already know they're right. You just don't care because you've decided the left plays dirty so the right needs to play dirty too.

Am I wrong?

---

Leftists and Democrats don't threaten the power structure of DC. Populists do. This is why it wouldn't get coverage if the people who carried out J6 also want a giant ever-growing government .

The J6 crowd has equated anyone critical of big government as a right wing terrorist.

To question election integrity is now off limits thanks to people like you. That's very undemocratic.

JXL said:

---

Jacques Strap said:

---

cowboycwr said:

---

I have actually seen news stories and social media posts from those on the left dismissing this because the man never got close enough to shoot or even pull out his gun. They are basically deflecting and saying it was not an assassination attempt or plot.

---

Washington Post has classified an assassination attempt on a sitting SCOTUS justice as "local crime" story pic.twitter.com/DwzThPwuQQ

— Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) June 10, 2022

---

The New York Times ran a little story on page A-20. I wonder if it would have been front page if it was a lefty justice?

---

For sure.

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

whiterock said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

midgett said:

---

Can you imagine if this was an attempt on Sotomayor? It would be the ONLY news and would be all about white supremacy, etc.

Conservative Justice so it barely makes the news among the MSM (liberal).

---

https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2021/02/19/report-supreme-court-justice-sotomayor-targeted-by-gunman-who-killed-federal-judges-son/

---

Dude, can you not see the disconnect? Her name was on the list of a crazy guy. That's it. Completely different from what we have going on here - grassroots activists organizing to intimidate federal judges in their homes on a specific upcoming vote (violation of federal law), creating an environment heated enough that a nutjob traveled across country to attempt to kill a specific justice, who was the target of incitement for such action by a elected Democrats, including some in party leadership.

Copied from another thread:
In most other places in the world, this would reasonably be seen as an extra-legal effort by one party to rebalance SCOTUS to its favor.....grassroots organizations of said party to incite mobs to the front yards of justices, federal law enforcement controlled by said party to refuse to arrest & disperse those mobs in clear violation of federal law, the Congress controlled by said party to refuse to deploy extra security funding, all for the purpose of creating conditions which could reasonably be expected to cause the demise of one or more justices so that the sitting POTUS of said party could appoint one or more justices more suitable to the liking of said party for confirmation to a senate controlled by that same party.

It is what it is.
Hate on the left is tearing the country apart.

---

Wow! You sure are quick to spot a seditious conspiracy when it doesn't involve Trump supporters.

---

If Trump was disqualified from running and you locked up everyone at J6 for years, you would create a scenario far worse than backing off right now.

You seriously don't even realize if the reverse happened and democrats had done J6, it wouldn't even have turned into a big topic.

---

Are you kidding? Ten Benghazi investigations over three years? A year and a half of Hillary's emails? If Democrats had done J6 you'd be in a rubber room right now with a Klonopin drip hanging out your arm.

---

Nah you wouldn't even be aware of the events had it been lefties.

Just like nobody in DC gave a damn when they burned downed cities.

---

I'm not saying the left wouldn't downplay it. I'm saying you wouldn't. The media would make the same excuses they made for Antifa and BLM, the same ones you're making now, and you'd call them out for being hypocrites. Let's be honest. The J6 committee won't change any opinions because there's nothing to change. You already know they're right. You just don't care because you've decided the left plays dirty so the right needs to play dirty too.

Am I wrong?

---

Leftists and Democrats don't threaten the power structure of DC. Populists do. This is why it wouldn't get coverage if the people who carried out J6 also want a giant ever-growing government .

The J6 crowd has equated anyone critical of big government as a right wing terrorist.

To question election integrity is now off limits thanks to people like you. That's very undemocratic.

---

If there are legitimate questions about election integrity, they can and will be raised. Abusing the public trust with a sustained campaign of fraud based on trumped-up evidence is a different matter. If people are wary next time, don't blame me. They should be.

*They are being raised

J.B.Katz said:

---

muddybrazos said:

---

J.B.Katz said:

---

Where's the thread on this story: A man executed a retired judge in Wisconsin in a targeted attack. He had a list of other targets that included Mitch McConnell and Gretchen Whitmer & WI Gov. Tony Evers, so he was a bipartisan sicko.

And there was the plot to kidnap Gretchen Witmer. - FBI did that

And the very credible plot to hurt Mike Pence for not going along with Trump's coup. - more FBI

Not to mention 19 dead kids, 2 dead teachers and more people who are injured in Uvalde. - lots of weird here so probably some more FBI involvement

And 10 dead people and more injured in Buffalo. - FBI had prior knowledge

But Republicans don't get exorcized about the need for more security until Kavanaugh is threatened.

Got it.

---

---

Believe what you want to believe, bro.

But take off the tinfoil and watch some different channels. The FBI did not kill all those people. And it was Trump who threatened Mike Pence and tried to sic a mob on him and others in the Capitol.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/03/us/politics/trump-pence-safety-jan-6.html?smtyp=cur&smid=tw-nytimes

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/nov/12/trump-capitol-attack-rioters-mike-pence

---

Yeah bra, Trump telling people to go peacefully protest and have their voices heard is really Trump turning the mob loose on Pence.

You're a wack job jinx

GrowlTowel said:

---

Cobretti said:

---

The day after a radical leftist attempted to assassinate Justice Kavanaugh, AOC is on Instagram bragging about how she stopped a bill designed to protect Supreme Court justices & their families. pic.twitter.com/G1qKncr4bl

— Arthur Schwartz (@ArthurSchwartz) June 10, 2022

---

I flip back and forth as to whether or not I would do her. To me she is a nose job away from being attractive.

In any event she is a one bagger.

---

Throw a flag over her face and do her for your country

Didn't take long for this thread to go off topic and down the hill.

“The New York Times buried this. If this had been a liberal Supreme Court justice that someone came to kill, it would’ve been on the front page...They wear their bias on their sleeves and if it’s not part of something that feeds our narrative, fuck it” – @BillMaher #RealTime pic.twitter.com/0amc13ddlf

— Brent Baker 🇺🇦 (@BrentHBaker) June 11, 2022

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

whiterock said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

midgett said:

---

Can you imagine if this was an attempt on Sotomayor? It would be the ONLY news and would be all about white supremacy, etc.

Conservative Justice so it barely makes the news among the MSM (liberal).

---

https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2021/02/19/report-supreme-court-justice-sotomayor-targeted-by-gunman-who-killed-federal-judges-son/

---

Dude, can you not see the disconnect? Her name was on the list of a crazy guy. That's it. Completely different from what we have going on here - grassroots activists organizing to intimidate federal judges in their homes on a specific upcoming vote (violation of federal law), creating an environment heated enough that a nutjob traveled across country to attempt to kill a specific justice, who was the target of incitement for such action by a elected Democrats, including some in party leadership.

Copied from another thread:
In most other places in the world, this would reasonably be seen as an extra-legal effort by one party to rebalance SCOTUS to its favor.....grassroots organizations of said party to incite mobs to the front yards of justices, federal law enforcement controlled by said party to refuse to arrest & disperse those mobs in clear violation of federal law, the Congress controlled by said party to refuse to deploy extra security funding, all for the purpose of creating conditions which could reasonably be expected to cause the demise of one or more justices so that the sitting POTUS of said party could appoint one or more justices more suitable to the liking of said party for confirmation to a senate controlled by that same party.

It is what it is.
Hate on the left is tearing the country apart.

---

Wow! You sure are quick to spot a seditious conspiracy when it doesn't involve Trump supporters.

---

If Trump was disqualified from running and you locked up everyone at J6 for years, you would create a scenario far worse than backing off right now.

You seriously don't even realize if the reverse happened and democrats had done J6, it wouldn't even have turned into a big topic.

---

Are you kidding? Ten Benghazi investigations over three years? A year and a half of Hillary's emails? If Democrats had done J6 you'd be in a rubber room right now with a Klonopin drip hanging out your arm.

---

You do realize Democrats have literally bombed the Capitol multiple times, right?

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

whiterock said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

midgett said:

---

Can you imagine if this was an attempt on Sotomayor? It would be the ONLY news and would be all about white supremacy, etc.

Conservative Justice so it barely makes the news among the MSM (liberal).

---

https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2021/02/19/report-supreme-court-justice-sotomayor-targeted-by-gunman-who-killed-federal-judges-son/

---

Dude, can you not see the disconnect? Her name was on the list of a crazy guy. That's it. Completely different from what we have going on here - grassroots activists organizing to intimidate federal judges in their homes on a specific upcoming vote (violation of federal law), creating an environment heated enough that a nutjob traveled across country to attempt to kill a specific justice, who was the target of incitement for such action by a elected Democrats, including some in party leadership.

Copied from another thread:
In most other places in the world, this would reasonably be seen as an extra-legal effort by one party to rebalance SCOTUS to its favor.....grassroots organizations of said party to incite mobs to the front yards of justices, federal law enforcement controlled by said party to refuse to arrest & disperse those mobs in clear violation of federal law, the Congress controlled by said party to refuse to deploy extra security funding, all for the purpose of creating conditions which could reasonably be expected to cause the demise of one or more justices so that the sitting POTUS of said party could appoint one or more justices more suitable to the liking of said party for confirmation to a senate controlled by that same party.

It is what it is.
Hate on the left is tearing the country apart.

---

Wow! You sure are quick to spot a seditious conspiracy when it doesn't involve Trump supporters.

---

If Trump was disqualified from running and you locked up everyone at J6 for years, you would create a scenario far worse than backing off right now.

You seriously don't even realize if the reverse happened and democrats had done J6, it wouldn't even have turned into a big topic.

---

Are you kidding? Ten Benghazi investigations over three years? A year and a half of Hillary's emails? If Democrats had done J6 you'd be in a rubber room right now with a Klonopin drip hanging out your arm.

---

You do realize Democrats have literally bombed the Capitol multiple times, right?

---

I know it's been bombed by communists. Not sure about Democrats.

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

whiterock said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

midgett said:

---

Can you imagine if this was an attempt on Sotomayor? It would be the ONLY news and would be all about white supremacy, etc.

Conservative Justice so it barely makes the news among the MSM (liberal).

---

https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2021/02/19/report-supreme-court-justice-sotomayor-targeted-by-gunman-who-killed-federal-judges-son/

---

Dude, can you not see the disconnect? Her name was on the list of a crazy guy. That's it. Completely different from what we have going on here - grassroots activists organizing to intimidate federal judges in their homes on a specific upcoming vote (violation of federal law), creating an environment heated enough that a nutjob traveled across country to attempt to kill a specific justice, who was the target of incitement for such action by a elected Democrats, including some in party leadership.

Copied from another thread:
In most other places in the world, this would reasonably be seen as an extra-legal effort by one party to rebalance SCOTUS to its favor.....grassroots organizations of said party to incite mobs to the front yards of justices, federal law enforcement controlled by said party to refuse to arrest & disperse those mobs in clear violation of federal law, the Congress controlled by said party to refuse to deploy extra security funding, all for the purpose of creating conditions which could reasonably be expected to cause the demise of one or more justices so that the sitting POTUS of said party could appoint one or more justices more suitable to the liking of said party for confirmation to a senate controlled by that same party.

It is what it is.
Hate on the left is tearing the country apart.

---

Wow! You sure are quick to spot a seditious conspiracy when it doesn't involve Trump supporters.

---

If Trump was disqualified from running and you locked up everyone at J6 for years, you would create a scenario far worse than backing off right now.

You seriously don't even realize if the reverse happened and democrats had done J6, it wouldn't even have turned into a big topic.

---

Are you kidding? Ten Benghazi investigations over three years? A year and a half of Hillary's emails? If Democrats had done J6 you'd be in a rubber room right now with a Klonopin drip hanging out your arm.

---

Nah you wouldn't even be aware of the events had it been lefties.

Just like nobody in DC gave a damn when they burned downed cities.

---

I'm not saying the left wouldn't downplay it. I'm saying you wouldn't. The media would make the same excuses they made for Antifa and BLM, the same ones you're making now, and you'd call them out for being hypocrites. Let's be honest. The J6 committee won't change any opinions because there's nothing to change. You already know they're right. You just don't care because you've decided the left plays dirty so the right needs to play dirty too.

Am I wrong?

---

Leftists and Democrats don't threaten the power structure of DC. Populists do. This is why it wouldn't get coverage if the people who carried out J6 also want a giant ever-growing government .

The J6 crowd has equated anyone critical of big government as a right wing terrorist.

To question election integrity is now off limits thanks to people like you. That's very undemocratic.

---

If there are legitimate questions about election integrity, they can and will be raised. Abusing the public trust with a sustained campaign of fraud based on trumped-up evidence is a different matter. If people are wary next time, don't blame me. They should be.

---

Unless you belong to the right party - then it's perfectly okay.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/being-a-democrat-means-never-having-to-accept-an-election-loss

JXL said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

whiterock said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

midgett said:

---

Can you imagine if this was an attempt on Sotomayor? It would be the ONLY news and would be all about white supremacy, etc.

Conservative Justice so it barely makes the news among the MSM (liberal).

---

https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2021/02/19/report-supreme-court-justice-sotomayor-targeted-by-gunman-who-killed-federal-judges-son/

---

Dude, can you not see the disconnect? Her name was on the list of a crazy guy. That's it. Completely different from what we have going on here - grassroots activists organizing to intimidate federal judges in their homes on a specific upcoming vote (violation of federal law), creating an environment heated enough that a nutjob traveled across country to attempt to kill a specific justice, who was the target of incitement for such action by a elected Democrats, including some in party leadership.

Copied from another thread:
In most other places in the world, this would reasonably be seen as an extra-legal effort by one party to rebalance SCOTUS to its favor.....grassroots organizations of said party to incite mobs to the front yards of justices, federal law enforcement controlled by said party to refuse to arrest & disperse those mobs in clear violation of federal law, the Congress controlled by said party to refuse to deploy extra security funding, all for the purpose of creating conditions which could reasonably be expected to cause the demise of one or more justices so that the sitting POTUS of said party could appoint one or more justices more suitable to the liking of said party for confirmation to a senate controlled by that same party.

It is what it is.
Hate on the left is tearing the country apart.

---

Wow! You sure are quick to spot a seditious conspiracy when it doesn't involve Trump supporters.

---

If Trump was disqualified from running and you locked up everyone at J6 for years, you would create a scenario far worse than backing off right now.

You seriously don't even realize if the reverse happened and democrats had done J6, it wouldn't even have turned into a big topic.

---

Are you kidding? Ten Benghazi investigations over three years? A year and a half of Hillary's emails? If Democrats had done J6 you'd be in a rubber room right now with a Klonopin drip hanging out your arm.

---

Nah you wouldn't even be aware of the events had it been lefties.

Just like nobody in DC gave a damn when they burned downed cities.

---

I'm not saying the left wouldn't downplay it. I'm saying you wouldn't. The media would make the same excuses they made for Antifa and BLM, the same ones you're making now, and you'd call them out for being hypocrites. Let's be honest. The J6 committee won't change any opinions because there's nothing to change. You already know they're right. You just don't care because you've decided the left plays dirty so the right needs to play dirty too.

Am I wrong?

---

Leftists and Democrats don't threaten the power structure of DC. Populists do. This is why it wouldn't get coverage if the people who carried out J6 also want a giant ever-growing government .

The J6 crowd has equated anyone critical of big government as a right wing terrorist.

To question election integrity is now off limits thanks to people like you. That's very undemocratic.

---

If there are legitimate questions about election integrity, they can and will be raised. Abusing the public trust with a sustained campaign of fraud based on trumped-up evidence is a different matter. If people are wary next time, don't blame me. They should be.

---

Unless you belong to the right party - then it's perfectly okay.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/being-a-democrat-means-never-having-to-accept-an-election-loss

---

2000 and 2004 aren't even in the same ballpark. Gore and Kerry conceded, and that was it. Hillary's conduct was a bit more similar, though even she never claimed she won the election. And while the Russia investigation was to a large extent based on her opposition research, it was never under her control.

Sam Lowry said:

---

JXL said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

whiterock said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

midgett said:

---

Can you imagine if this was an attempt on Sotomayor? It would be the ONLY news and would be all about white supremacy, etc.

Conservative Justice so it barely makes the news among the MSM (liberal).

---

https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2021/02/19/report-supreme-court-justice-sotomayor-targeted-by-gunman-who-killed-federal-judges-son/

---

Dude, can you not see the disconnect? Her name was on the list of a crazy guy. That's it. Completely different from what we have going on here - grassroots activists organizing to intimidate federal judges in their homes on a specific upcoming vote (violation of federal law), creating an environment heated enough that a nutjob traveled across country to attempt to kill a specific justice, who was the target of incitement for such action by a elected Democrats, including some in party leadership.

Copied from another thread:
In most other places in the world, this would reasonably be seen as an extra-legal effort by one party to rebalance SCOTUS to its favor.....grassroots organizations of said party to incite mobs to the front yards of justices, federal law enforcement controlled by said party to refuse to arrest & disperse those mobs in clear violation of federal law, the Congress controlled by said party to refuse to deploy extra security funding, all for the purpose of creating conditions which could reasonably be expected to cause the demise of one or more justices so that the sitting POTUS of said party could appoint one or more justices more suitable to the liking of said party for confirmation to a senate controlled by that same party.

It is what it is.
Hate on the left is tearing the country apart.

---

Wow! You sure are quick to spot a seditious conspiracy when it doesn't involve Trump supporters.

---

If Trump was disqualified from running and you locked up everyone at J6 for years, you would create a scenario far worse than backing off right now.

You seriously don't even realize if the reverse happened and democrats had done J6, it wouldn't even have turned into a big topic.

---

Are you kidding? Ten Benghazi investigations over three years? A year and a half of Hillary's emails? If Democrats had done J6 you'd be in a rubber room right now with a Klonopin drip hanging out your arm.

---

Nah you wouldn't even be aware of the events had it been lefties.

Just like nobody in DC gave a damn when they burned downed cities.

---

I'm not saying the left wouldn't downplay it. I'm saying you wouldn't. The media would make the same excuses they made for Antifa and BLM, the same ones you're making now, and you'd call them out for being hypocrites. Let's be honest. The J6 committee won't change any opinions because there's nothing to change. You already know they're right. You just don't care because you've decided the left plays dirty so the right needs to play dirty too.

Am I wrong?

---

Leftists and Democrats don't threaten the power structure of DC. Populists do. This is why it wouldn't get coverage if the people who carried out J6 also want a giant ever-growing government .

The J6 crowd has equated anyone critical of big government as a right wing terrorist.

To question election integrity is now off limits thanks to people like you. That's very undemocratic.

---

If there are legitimate questions about election integrity, they can and will be raised. Abusing the public trust with a sustained campaign of fraud based on trumped-up evidence is a different matter. If people are wary next time, don't blame me. They should be.

---

Unless you belong to the right party - then it's perfectly okay.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/being-a-democrat-means-never-having-to-accept-an-election-loss

---

2000 and 2004 aren't even in the same ballpark. Gore and Kerry conceded, and that was it. Hillary's conduct was a bit more similar, though even she never claimed she won the election. And while the Russia investigation was to a large extent based on her opposition research, it was never under her control.

---

What about Terry McAuliffe going around sayIng the 2000 election was stolen? Was he denounced for this during his run for governor of Virginia? How about Stacy Abrams? They belong to the right party, so they can accuse their opponents of stealing elections.

Sam Lowry said:

---

JXL said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

whiterock said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

midgett said:

---

Can you imagine if this was an attempt on Sotomayor? It would be the ONLY news and would be all about white supremacy, etc.

Conservative Justice so it barely makes the news among the MSM (liberal).

---

https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2021/02/19/report-supreme-court-justice-sotomayor-targeted-by-gunman-who-killed-federal-judges-son/

---

Dude, can you not see the disconnect? Her name was on the list of a crazy guy. That's it. Completely different from what we have going on here - grassroots activists organizing to intimidate federal judges in their homes on a specific upcoming vote (violation of federal law), creating an environment heated enough that a nutjob traveled across country to attempt to kill a specific justice, who was the target of incitement for such action by a elected Democrats, including some in party leadership.

Copied from another thread:
In most other places in the world, this would reasonably be seen as an extra-legal effort by one party to rebalance SCOTUS to its favor.....grassroots organizations of said party to incite mobs to the front yards of justices, federal law enforcement controlled by said party to refuse to arrest & disperse those mobs in clear violation of federal law, the Congress controlled by said party to refuse to deploy extra security funding, all for the purpose of creating conditions which could reasonably be expected to cause the demise of one or more justices so that the sitting POTUS of said party could appoint one or more justices more suitable to the liking of said party for confirmation to a senate controlled by that same party.

It is what it is.
Hate on the left is tearing the country apart.

---

Wow! You sure are quick to spot a seditious conspiracy when it doesn't involve Trump supporters.

---

If Trump was disqualified from running and you locked up everyone at J6 for years, you would create a scenario far worse than backing off right now.

You seriously don't even realize if the reverse happened and democrats had done J6, it wouldn't even have turned into a big topic.

---

Are you kidding? Ten Benghazi investigations over three years? A year and a half of Hillary's emails? If Democrats had done J6 you'd be in a rubber room right now with a Klonopin drip hanging out your arm.

---

Nah you wouldn't even be aware of the events had it been lefties.

Just like nobody in DC gave a damn when they burned downed cities.

---

I'm not saying the left wouldn't downplay it. I'm saying you wouldn't. The media would make the same excuses they made for Antifa and BLM, the same ones you're making now, and you'd call them out for being hypocrites. Let's be honest. The J6 committee won't change any opinions because there's nothing to change. You already know they're right. You just don't care because you've decided the left plays dirty so the right needs to play dirty too.

Am I wrong?

---

Leftists and Democrats don't threaten the power structure of DC. Populists do. This is why it wouldn't get coverage if the people who carried out J6 also want a giant ever-growing government .

The J6 crowd has equated anyone critical of big government as a right wing terrorist.

To question election integrity is now off limits thanks to people like you. That's very undemocratic.

---

If there are legitimate questions about election integrity, they can and will be raised. Abusing the public trust with a sustained campaign of fraud based on trumped-up evidence is a different matter. If people are wary next time, don't blame me. They should be.

---

Unless you belong to the right party - then it's perfectly okay.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/being-a-democrat-means-never-having-to-accept-an-election-loss

---

2000 and 2004 aren't even in the same ballpark. Gore and Kerry conceded, and that was it. Hillary's conduct was a bit more similar, though even she never claimed she won the election. And while the Russia investigation was to a large extent based on her opposition research, it was never under her control.

---

So naive.

JXL said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

JXL said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

whiterock said:

---

HuMcK said:

---

midgett said:

---

Can you imagine if this was an attempt on Sotomayor? It would be the ONLY news and would be all about white supremacy, etc.

Conservative Justice so it barely makes the news among the MSM (liberal).

---

https://www.forbes.com/sites/roberthart/2021/02/19/report-supreme-court-justice-sotomayor-targeted-by-gunman-who-killed-federal-judges-son/

---

Dude, can you not see the disconnect? Her name was on the list of a crazy guy. That's it. Completely different from what we have going on here - grassroots activists organizing to intimidate federal judges in their homes on a specific upcoming vote (violation of federal law), creating an environment heated enough that a nutjob traveled across country to attempt to kill a specific justice, who was the target of incitement for such action by a elected Democrats, including some in party leadership.

Copied from another thread:
In most other places in the world, this would reasonably be seen as an extra-legal effort by one party to rebalance SCOTUS to its favor.....grassroots organizations of said party to incite mobs to the front yards of justices, federal law enforcement controlled by said party to refuse to arrest & disperse those mobs in clear violation of federal law, the Congress controlled by said party to refuse to deploy extra security funding, all for the purpose of creating conditions which could reasonably be expected to cause the demise of one or more justices so that the sitting POTUS of said party could appoint one or more justices more suitable to the liking of said party for confirmation to a senate controlled by that same party.

It is what it is.
Hate on the left is tearing the country apart.

---

Wow! You sure are quick to spot a seditious conspiracy when it doesn't involve Trump supporters.

---

If Trump was disqualified from running and you locked up everyone at J6 for years, you would create a scenario far worse than backing off right now.

You seriously don't even realize if the reverse happened and democrats had done J6, it wouldn't even have turned into a big topic.

---

Are you kidding? Ten Benghazi investigations over three years? A year and a half of Hillary's emails? If Democrats had done J6 you'd be in a rubber room right now with a Klonopin drip hanging out your arm.

---

Nah you wouldn't even be aware of the events had it been lefties.

Just like nobody in DC gave a damn when they burned downed cities.

---

I'm not saying the left wouldn't downplay it. I'm saying you wouldn't. The media would make the same excuses they made for Antifa and BLM, the same ones you're making now, and you'd call them out for being hypocrites. Let's be honest. The J6 committee won't change any opinions because there's nothing to change. You already know they're right. You just don't care because you've decided the left plays dirty so the right needs to play dirty too.

Am I wrong?

---

Leftists and Democrats don't threaten the power structure of DC. Populists do. This is why it wouldn't get coverage if the people who carried out J6 also want a giant ever-growing government .

The J6 crowd has equated anyone critical of big government as a right wing terrorist.

To question election integrity is now off limits thanks to people like you. That's very undemocratic.

---

If there are legitimate questions about election integrity, they can and will be raised. Abusing the public trust with a sustained campaign of fraud based on trumped-up evidence is a different matter. If people are wary next time, don't blame me. They should be.

---

Unless you belong to the right party - then it's perfectly okay.

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/being-a-democrat-means-never-having-to-accept-an-election-loss

---

2000 and 2004 aren't even in the same ballpark. Gore and Kerry conceded, and that was it. Hillary's conduct was a bit more similar, though even she never claimed she won the election. And while the Russia investigation was to a large extent based on her opposition research, it was never under her control.

---

What about Terry McAuliffe going around sayIng the 2000 election was stolen? Was he denounced for this during his run for governor of Virginia? How about Stacy Abrams? They belong to the right party, so they can accuse their opponents of stealing elections.

---

They were denounced by some media and given a pass by others. Same as all politicians. What matters is not who said what, but the nature of what they did.

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Dude, can you not see the disconnect? Her name was on the list of a crazy guy. That's it. Completely different from what we have going on here - grassroots activists organizing to intimidate federal judges in their homes on a specific upcoming vote (violation of federal law), creating an environment heated enough that a nutjob traveled across country to attempt to kill a specific justice, who was the target of incitement for such action by a elected Democrats, including some in party leadership.

Copied from another thread:
In most other places in the world, this would reasonably be seen as an extra-legal effort by one party to rebalance SCOTUS to its favor.....grassroots organizations of said party to incite mobs to the front yards of justices, federal law enforcement controlled by said party to refuse to arrest & disperse those mobs in clear violation of federal law, the Congress controlled by said party to refuse to deploy extra security funding, all for the purpose of creating conditions which could reasonably be expected to cause the demise of one or more justices so that the sitting POTUS of said party could appoint one or more justices more suitable to the liking of said party for confirmation to a senate controlled by that same party.

It is what it is.
Hate on the left is tearing the country apart.

---

Wow! You sure are quick to spot a seditious conspiracy when it doesn't involve Trump supporters.

---

If Trump was disqualified from running and you locked up everyone at J6 for years, you would create a scenario far worse than backing off right now.

You seriously don't even realize if the reverse happened and democrats had done J6, it wouldn't even have turned into a big topic.

---

Are you kidding? Ten Benghazi investigations over three years? A year and a half of Hillary's emails? If Democrats had done J6 you'd be in a rubber room right now with a Klonopin drip hanging out your arm.

---

Nah you wouldn't even be aware of the events had it been lefties.

Just like nobody in DC gave a damn when they burned downed cities.

---

I'm not saying the left wouldn't downplay it. I'm saying you wouldn't. The media would make the same excuses they made for Antifa and BLM, the same ones you're making now, and you'd call them out for being hypocrites. Let's be honest. The J6 committee won't change any opinions because there's nothing to change. You already know they're right. You just don't care because you've decided the left plays dirty so the right needs to play dirty too.

Am I wrong?

---

Leftists and Democrats don't threaten the power structure of DC. Populists do. This is why it wouldn't get coverage if the people who carried out J6 also want a giant ever-growing government .

The J6 crowd has equated anyone critical of big government as a right wing terrorist.

To question election integrity is now off limits thanks to people like you. That's very undemocratic.

---

If there are legitimate questions about election integrity, they can and will be raised. Abusing the public trust with a sustained campaign of fraud based on trumped-up evidence is a different matter. If people are wary next time, don't blame me. They should be.

---

Good point. Take the 2016 allegations, for instance. They got investigated by the FBI despite being manifest nonsense. It was an outrage they got investigated, but since they were, we now know the whole thing was trumped up fraud. What abuses public trust is refusing to investigate far more credible allegations of election fraud. OVER half the country thinks there was a problem, but lack of an investigation has made the public very wary about their government.

Two sets of rules is a sign of an ailing republic.
And you are defending them, earnestly, every day.

whiterock said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Dude, can you not see the disconnect? Her name was on the list of a crazy guy. That's it. Completely different from what we have going on here - grassroots activists organizing to intimidate federal judges in their homes on a specific upcoming vote (violation of federal law), creating an environment heated enough that a nutjob traveled across country to attempt to kill a specific justice, who was the target of incitement for such action by a elected Democrats, including some in party leadership.

Copied from another thread:
In most other places in the world, this would reasonably be seen as an extra-legal effort by one party to rebalance SCOTUS to its favor.....grassroots organizations of said party to incite mobs to the front yards of justices, federal law enforcement controlled by said party to refuse to arrest & disperse those mobs in clear violation of federal law, the Congress controlled by said party to refuse to deploy extra security funding, all for the purpose of creating conditions which could reasonably be expected to cause the demise of one or more justices so that the sitting POTUS of said party could appoint one or more justices more suitable to the liking of said party for confirmation to a senate controlled by that same party.

It is what it is.
Hate on the left is tearing the country apart.

---

Wow! You sure are quick to spot a seditious conspiracy when it doesn't involve Trump supporters.

---

If Trump was disqualified from running and you locked up everyone at J6 for years, you would create a scenario far worse than backing off right now.

You seriously don't even realize if the reverse happened and democrats had done J6, it wouldn't even have turned into a big topic.

---

Are you kidding? Ten Benghazi investigations over three years? A year and a half of Hillary's emails? If Democrats had done J6 you'd be in a rubber room right now with a Klonopin drip hanging out your arm.

---

Nah you wouldn't even be aware of the events had it been lefties.

Just like nobody in DC gave a damn when they burned downed cities.

---

I'm not saying the left wouldn't downplay it. I'm saying you wouldn't. The media would make the same excuses they made for Antifa and BLM, the same ones you're making now, and you'd call them out for being hypocrites. Let's be honest. The J6 committee won't change any opinions because there's nothing to change. You already know they're right. You just don't care because you've decided the left plays dirty so the right needs to play dirty too.

Am I wrong?

---

Leftists and Democrats don't threaten the power structure of DC. Populists do. This is why it wouldn't get coverage if the people who carried out J6 also want a giant ever-growing government .

The J6 crowd has equated anyone critical of big government as a right wing terrorist.

To question election integrity is now off limits thanks to people like you. That's very undemocratic.

---

If there are legitimate questions about election integrity, they can and will be raised. Abusing the public trust with a sustained campaign of fraud based on trumped-up evidence is a different matter. If people are wary next time, don't blame me. They should be.

---

Good point. Take the 2016 allegations, for instance. They got investigated by the FBI despite being manifest nonsense. It was an outrage they got investigated, but since they were, we now know the whole thing was trumped up fraud. What abuses public trust is refusing to investigate far more credible allegations of election fraud. OVER half the country thinks there was a problem, but lack of an investigation has made the public very wary about their government.

Two sets of rules is a sign of an ailing republic.
And you are defending them, earnestly, every day.

---

Actually I've been consistent in condemning the 2016 abuses as well. You are the one defending two sets of rules. Every day and with no shame.