Hey... tell me why again we worked to bump up the kill rate of covid in a lab?
It seemed like a good idea at the time.... oh and grant money.

How many times did virologists say they were not making chimeric SARS viruses more deadly? How many???

Latest preprint shows they made a chimeric SARS-CoV-2 w/ Omicron S gene and ancestral SARS-CoV-2 backbone that showed 80% mortality in humanised mice. pic.twitter.com/KVYGTXPb7E

— Paul D. Thacker (@thackerpd) October 17, 2022

Help me, what is latest preprint?

It is not at all surprising, scientists have said from the beginning it was probably man made.

Porteroso said:

---

Help me, what is latest preprint?

It is not at all surprising, scientists have said from the beginning it was probably man made.

---

Hey, Ray, this is a new man made strain that has an 80% mortality rate in humanized mice. This thing may actually be worth the fear.

Just in time fo yo mail in votes!!!

Porteroso said:

---

Help me, what is latest preprint?

It is not at all surprising, scientists have said from the beginning it was probably man made.

---

That's a lie. They said time and time again it was from an animal.

"If it isn't manipulated in the lab and you're trying to say it escaped from the lab, then how did it get in the lab? It got in the lab because somebody isolated it from the environment," Fauci told National Geographic in May. "That's why I don't spend a lot of time in that circular argument."

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackbrewster/2021/06/16/heres-what-dr-fauci-has-said-about-covids-origins-and-the-lab-leak-theory/?sh=11f9f50da853

Bauctalk said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Help me, what is latest preprint?

It is not at all surprising, scientists have said from the beginning it was probably man made.

---

That's a lie. They said time and time again it was from an animal.

"If it isn't manipulated in the lab and you're trying to say it escaped from the lab, then how did it get in the lab? It got in the lab because somebody isolated it from the environment," Fauci told National Geographic in May. "That's why I don't spend a lot of time in that circular argument."

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackbrewster/2021/06/16/heres-what-dr-fauci-has-said-about-covids-origins-and-the-lab-leak-theory/?sh=11f9f50da853

---

It was not too long ago people were getting kicked off social media for questioning the animal theory.

Bauctalk said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Help me, what is latest preprint?

It is not at all surprising, scientists have said from the beginning it was probably man made.

---

That's a lie. They said time and time again it was from an animal.

"If it isn't manipulated in the lab and you're trying to say it escaped from the lab, then how did it get in the lab? It got in the lab because somebody isolated it from the environment," Fauci told National Geographic in May. "That's why I don't spend a lot of time in that circular argument."

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackbrewster/2021/06/16/heres-what-dr-fauci-has-said-about-covids-origins-and-the-lab-leak-theory/?sh=11f9f50da853

---

A lab optimized the virus for human transmission. These labs serially passage them in human cells…

Every major virus has many cases found in nature. Not one Covid-19 case has been found in nature. Not a single one.

The legacy of Dr. Fauci will forever be that he allowed and enabled the Wuhan lab to create deadly pathogens.

"[T]he research team did not clear the work with..NIAID, which was one of the funders of the project. Late Monday afternoon, the agency indicated it is going to be looking for some answers as to why it first learned of the work through media reports."https://t.co/8hGwDYDdON

— Richard H. Ebright (@R_H_Ebright) October 18, 2022

Mary Shelley knew that there will always be scientists who will go too far.

Bauctalk said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Help me, what is latest preprint?

It is not at all surprising, scientists have said from the beginning it was probably man made.

---

That's a lie. They said time and time again it was from an animal.

"If it isn't manipulated in the lab and you're trying to say it escaped from the lab, then how did it get in the lab? It got in the lab because somebody isolated it from the environment," Fauci told National Geographic in May. "That's why I don't spend a lot of time in that circular argument."

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackbrewster/2021/06/16/heres-what-dr-fauci-has-said-about-covids-origins-and-the-lab-leak-theory/?sh=11f9f50da853

---

I'm sorry, I'm not talking about what the government said, but scientists. Many said it seemed too perfect to have randomly come about through nature.

Porteroso said:

---

Bauctalk said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Help me, what is latest preprint?

It is not at all surprising, scientists have said from the beginning it was probably man made.

---

That's a lie. They said time and time again it was from an animal.

"If it isn't manipulated in the lab and you're trying to say it escaped from the lab, then how did it get in the lab? It got in the lab because somebody isolated it from the environment," Fauci told National Geographic in May. "That's why I don't spend a lot of time in that circular argument."

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackbrewster/2021/06/16/heres-what-dr-fauci-has-said-about-covids-origins-and-the-lab-leak-theory/?sh=11f9f50da853

---

I'm sorry, I'm not talking about what the government said, but scientists. Many said it seemed too perfect to have randomly come about through nature.

---

Correct, and those were initially bullied by Fauci and his cabal into silence, and anyone positing to likelihood of man-made were barred for spreading "misinformation."

I think it is pretty much 99% certain it was created in the lab. I have listened to several scientists lay out a pretty clear case both practically and scientifically. Unlike SARS-1, MERS, Zia, etc., there has SARS-CoV-2 has never been found in a non-human. In other pandemics, scientists were able to find bats, etc., carrying the virus. Also there are some technical features of the virus that make naturally occurring low probability. Not to mention the basic common sense of this virus gets released in the city where there is a lab studying gain of function research around coronaviruses. Sometimes Occam's Razor is the sharpest.

Porteroso said:

---

Bauctalk said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Help me, what is latest preprint?

It is not at all surprising, scientists have said from the beginning it was probably man made.

---

That's a lie. They said time and time again it was from an animal.

"If it isn't manipulated in the lab and you're trying to say it escaped from the lab, then how did it get in the lab? It got in the lab because somebody isolated it from the environment," Fauci told National Geographic in May. "That's why I don't spend a lot of time in that circular argument."

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackbrewster/2021/06/16/heres-what-dr-fauci-has-said-about-covids-origins-and-the-lab-leak-theory/?sh=11f9f50da853

---

I'm sorry, I'm not talking about what the government said, but scientists. Many said it seemed too perfect to have randomly come about through nature.

---

Early on there were articles from scientists claiming it was clearly not from a lab, but the fact that there's a lab right where it showed up makes one pretty suspicious of that.

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Bauctalk said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Help me, what is latest preprint?

It is not at all surprising, scientists have said from the beginning it was probably man made.

---

That's a lie. They said time and time again it was from an animal.

"If it isn't manipulated in the lab and you're trying to say it escaped from the lab, then how did it get in the lab? It got in the lab because somebody isolated it from the environment," Fauci told National Geographic in May. "That's why I don't spend a lot of time in that circular argument."

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackbrewster/2021/06/16/heres-what-dr-fauci-has-said-about-covids-origins-and-the-lab-leak-theory/?sh=11f9f50da853

---

I'm sorry, I'm not talking about what the government said, but scientists. Many said it seemed too perfect to have randomly come about through nature.

---

Correct, and those were initially bullied by Fauci and his cabal into silence, and anyone positing to likelihood of man-made were barred for spreading "misinformation."

I think it is pretty much 99% certain it was created in the lab. I have listened to several scientists lay out a pretty clear case both practically and scientifically. Unlike SARS-1, MERS, Zia, etc., there has SARS-CoV-2 has never been found in a non-human. In other pandemics, scientists were able to find bats, etc., carrying the virus. Also there are some technical features of the virus that make naturally occurring low probability. Not to mention the basic common sense of this virus gets released in the city where there is a lab studying gain of function research around coronaviruses. Sometimes Occam's Razor is the sharpest.

---

Debunked.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/finding-conclusive-animal-origins-of-the-coronavirus-will-take-time/

Sam Lowry said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Bauctalk said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Help me, what is latest preprint?

It is not at all surprising, scientists have said from the beginning it was probably man made.

---

That's a lie. They said time and time again it was from an animal.

"If it isn't manipulated in the lab and you're trying to say it escaped from the lab, then how did it get in the lab? It got in the lab because somebody isolated it from the environment," Fauci told National Geographic in May. "That's why I don't spend a lot of time in that circular argument."

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackbrewster/2021/06/16/heres-what-dr-fauci-has-said-about-covids-origins-and-the-lab-leak-theory/?sh=11f9f50da853

---

I'm sorry, I'm not talking about what the government said, but scientists. Many said it seemed too perfect to have randomly come about through nature.

---

Correct, and those were initially bullied by Fauci and his cabal into silence, and anyone positing to likelihood of man-made were barred for spreading "misinformation."

I think it is pretty much 99% certain it was created in the lab. I have listened to several scientists lay out a pretty clear case both practically and scientifically. Unlike SARS-1, MERS, Zia, etc., there has SARS-CoV-2 has never been found in a non-human. In other pandemics, scientists were able to find bats, etc., carrying the virus. Also there are some technical features of the virus that make naturally occurring low probability. Not to mention the basic common sense of this virus gets released in the city where there is a lab studying gain of function research around coronaviruses. Sometimes Occam's Razor is the sharpest.

---

Debunked.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/finding-conclusive-animal-origins-of-the-coronavirus-will-take-time/

---

we may never find it but that doesnt mean there isnt a natural form..

Caveat: doesnt mean there is either

4th and Inches said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Bauctalk said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Help me, what is latest preprint?

It is not at all surprising, scientists have said from the beginning it was probably man made.

---

That's a lie. They said time and time again it was from an animal.

"If it isn't manipulated in the lab and you're trying to say it escaped from the lab, then how did it get in the lab? It got in the lab because somebody isolated it from the environment," Fauci told National Geographic in May. "That's why I don't spend a lot of time in that circular argument."

https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackbrewster/2021/06/16/heres-what-dr-fauci-has-said-about-covids-origins-and-the-lab-leak-theory/?sh=11f9f50da853

---

I'm sorry, I'm not talking about what the government said, but scientists. Many said it seemed too perfect to have randomly come about through nature.

---

Correct, and those were initially bullied by Fauci and his cabal into silence, and anyone positing to likelihood of man-made were barred for spreading "misinformation."

I think it is pretty much 99% certain it was created in the lab. I have listened to several scientists lay out a pretty clear case both practically and scientifically. Unlike SARS-1, MERS, Zia, etc., there has SARS-CoV-2 has never been found in a non-human. In other pandemics, scientists were able to find bats, etc., carrying the virus. Also there are some technical features of the virus that make naturally occurring low probability. Not to mention the basic common sense of this virus gets released in the city where there is a lab studying gain of function research around coronaviruses. Sometimes Occam's Razor is the sharpest.

---

Debunked.

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/finding-conclusive-animal-origins-of-the-coronavirus-will-take-time/

---

we may never find it but that doesnt mean there isnt a natural form..

Caveat: doesnt mean there is either

---

I could point out that MERS was first diagnosed in humans April 2012 and by September 2013 it was discovered widely among other species ... but why worry with data when an "expert" can debunk it! Remember the "experts" that told us it came from a wet market but yet have not found another animal in the wet market carrying SARS-CoV-2 ... but you know "TRUST T'SCIENCE!"

It's almost certain it was a lab containment breach. It will likely never be proven, so it doesn't make any sense to claim that as a fact, but all science and common sense points to that. Chinese government erased all the evidence so we will never know. Even if someone from the lab claimed to have knowledge, hard evidence is all gone.