I can explain it to him, but I can't understand it for him.Mothra said:It appears there were a few from that list, most of which were committed by one black metal loving white dude who hated Christianity, and burned both black and white churches. Clearly, not a racial attack.Wangchung said:Which ones after 1970 were done by a white person?Sam Lowry said:Debunked.Harrison Bergeron said:
A black church or institution has not been burned by a white person since the 1960s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_attacks_against_African-American_churches
Other than that, I saw one from the 70's that said people KKK-symphathizers burned a church in 72.
I am sure Harrison was making a general statement, and our friend Sam - in his zeal to "debunk" - thought he could play a little game of gotcha.
If only he could locate that massive underground group of white maga supremacist terrorists that are causing havoc all across the country!
Seven fires in Memphis
3,912 Views |
66 Replies |
Last: 1 yr ago by Wangchung
I understand. I was talking about Quash not being able to identify the idiot in the room.LIB,MR BEARS said:First paragraph.contrario said:I was agreeing with you and adding onto what you said…not sure what this post is aboutLIB,MR BEARS said:sarcasm is hardcontrario said:If you can't identify who the idiot is in the room then you are the idiot.LIB,MR BEARS said:Quash, as an attorney, you've probably seen instances where some idiot jumped to conclusions and either made or implied a false narrative. I can't even imagine the embarrassment someone would feel being so ignorant to do this. Of course if they're not embarrassed and willing to admit their error then it must have been done with ill intentions.quash said:
On election day.
Seven churches and an HBCU.
So transparent. Those ANTIFA ****ers should be aware by now that we all know only the left engages in violence.
Paul Pelosi all over again.
Have you represented idiots like this before?
It's amazing how quash just disappeared after starting this thread. He is always saying we need to wait until all the facts are out when it involves a democrat, but always jumps to conclusions when it could possibly be a white conservative.
Soon the story will be turned to "the fact that a white conservative COULD have done it" is the issue at hand.
There's no voice inflection here so it's understandable. No harm, no foul.
some people have an aversion to mirrors so it could be an honest mistake on his part.contrario said:I understand. I was talking about Quash not being able to identify the idiot in the room.LIB,MR BEARS said:First paragraph.contrario said:I was agreeing with you and adding onto what you said…not sure what this post is aboutLIB,MR BEARS said:sarcasm is hardcontrario said:If you can't identify who the idiot is in the room then you are the idiot.LIB,MR BEARS said:Quash, as an attorney, you've probably seen instances where some idiot jumped to conclusions and either made or implied a false narrative. I can't even imagine the embarrassment someone would feel being so ignorant to do this. Of course if they're not embarrassed and willing to admit their error then it must have been done with ill intentions.quash said:
On election day.
Seven churches and an HBCU.
So transparent. Those ANTIFA ****ers should be aware by now that we all know only the left engages in violence.
Paul Pelosi all over again.
Have you represented idiots like this before?
It's amazing how quash just disappeared after starting this thread. He is always saying we need to wait until all the facts are out when it involves a democrat, but always jumps to conclusions when it could possibly be a white conservative.
Soon the story will be turned to "the fact that a white conservative COULD have done it" is the issue at hand.
There's no voice inflection here so it's understandable. No harm, no foul.
Just a mistake.
I pretty much knew when I couldn't Google it what the situation was.
If it had been that person type, it would be totally dominating the MSM today.
I pretty much knew when I couldn't Google it what the situation was.
If it had been that person type, it would be totally dominating the MSM today.
quash said:
On election day.
Seven churches and an HBCU.
So transparent. Those ANTIFA ****ers should be aware by now that we all know only the left engages in violence.
Paul Pelosi all over again.
Oh Quuuaaaasssh?????
Need to bookmark this thread so I can come back in a few months for a good laugh
About two-thirds of them.Wangchung said:Which ones after 1970 were done by a white person?Sam Lowry said:Debunked.Harrison Bergeron said:
A black church or institution has not been burned by a white person since the 1960s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_attacks_against_African-American_churches
can you be more specific? Your Wikipedia link didn't bother mention race in almost every one listed.Sam Lowry said:About two-thirds of them.Wangchung said:Which ones after 1970 were done by a white person?Sam Lowry said:Debunked.Harrison Bergeron said:
A black church or institution has not been burned by a white person since the 1960s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_attacks_against_African-American_churches
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?
Yeah, that was a vexing omission on their part. I actually had to Google it.Wangchung said:can you be more specific? Your Wikipedia link didn't bother mention race in almost every one listed.Sam Lowry said:About two-thirds of them.Wangchung said:Which ones after 1970 were done by a white person?Sam Lowry said:Debunked.Harrison Bergeron said:
A black church or institution has not been burned by a white person since the 1960s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_attacks_against_African-American_churches
Cool, so you have more links to share that you found on Google? That's good, because Wikipedia tried to claim Dillon Roof was part of the whole "burning black churches" thing but he didn't set anything on fire, so immediately that list became suspect. Thanks in advance for those links you found.Sam Lowry said:Yeah, that was a vexing omission on their part. I actually had to Google it.Wangchung said:can you be more specific? Your Wikipedia link didn't bother mention race in almost every one listed.Sam Lowry said:About two-thirds of them.Wangchung said:Which ones after 1970 were done by a white person?Sam Lowry said:Debunked.Harrison Bergeron said:
A black church or institution has not been burned by a white person since the 1960s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_attacks_against_African-American_churches
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?
No, it didn't.Wangchung said:That's good, because Wikipedia tried to claim Dillon Roof was part of the whole "burning black churches" thingSam Lowry said:Yeah, that was a vexing omission on their part. I actually had to Google it.Wangchung said:can you be more specific? Your Wikipedia link didn't bother mention race in almost every one listed.Sam Lowry said:About two-thirds of them.Wangchung said:Which ones after 1970 were done by a white person?Sam Lowry said:Debunked.Harrison Bergeron said:
A black church or institution has not been burned by a white person since the 1960s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_attacks_against_African-American_churches
Sam Lowry said:No, it didn't.Wangchung said:That's good, because Wikipedia tried to claim Dillon Roof was part of the whole "burning black churches" thingSam Lowry said:Yeah, that was a vexing omission on their part. I actually had to Google it.Wangchung said:can you be more specific? Your Wikipedia link didn't bother mention race in almost every one listed.Sam Lowry said:About two-thirds of them.Wangchung said:Which ones after 1970 were done by a white person?Sam Lowry said:Debunked.Harrison Bergeron said:
A black church or institution has not been burned by a white person since the 1960s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_attacks_against_African-American_churches
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?
It's a list of attacks, not just arsons.
Ah, I suppose they didn't have enough recent history of black church fires lit by white people so they had to add in ANY attacks on a black church and then leave out the race of the perps in 99% of the examples. Sometimes a good victimhood narrative needs a little help. ;-)Sam Lowry said:
It's list of attacks, not just arsons.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?
Why would you assume "they" were looking for a certain number of black church fires lit by white people?Wangchung said:Ah, I suppose they didn't have enough recent history of black church fires lit by white people so they had to add in ANY attacks on a black church and then leave out the race of the perps in 99% of the examples. Sometimes a good victimhood narrative need a little help. ;-)Sam Lowry said:
It's list of attacks, not just arsons.
There is no "certain number" for them any more than an alcoholic has a certain number of beers they desire.Sam Lowry said:Why would you assume "they" were looking for a certain number of black church fires lit by white people?Wangchung said:Ah, I suppose they didn't have enough recent history of black church fires lit by white people so they had to add in ANY attacks on a black church and then leave out the race of the perps in 99% of the examples. Sometimes a good victimhood narrative need a little help. ;-)Sam Lowry said:
It's list of attacks, not just arsons.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?
Okay.Wangchung said:There is no "certain number" for them any more than an alcoholic has a certain number of beers they desire.Sam Lowry said:Why would you assume "they" were looking for a certain number of black church fires lit by white people?Wangchung said:Ah, I suppose they didn't have enough recent history of black church fires lit by white people so they had to add in ANY attacks on a black church and then leave out the race of the perps in 99% of the examples. Sometimes a good victimhood narrative need a little help. ;-)Sam Lowry said:
It's list of attacks, not just arsons.
I'm still waiting for BaylorBJM to show up again. Now I will have to wait for quash as well.
Bob Dole burned a lot of churches in 1996. At least that is what the dems were saying at the time.
"vexing omission", spoken like a true libtard. Race first, race last, race always.Sam Lowry said:Yeah, that was a vexing omission on their part. I actually had to Google it.Wangchung said:can you be more specific? Your Wikipedia link didn't bother mention race in almost every one listed.Sam Lowry said:About two-thirds of them.Wangchung said:Which ones after 1970 were done by a white person?Sam Lowry said:Debunked.Harrison Bergeron said:
A black church or institution has not been burned by a white person since the 1960s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_attacks_against_African-American_churches
King saw social colorblindness as a goal while others see it as a detriment to society. Sad
If the facts aren't on your side, the other side must be racist. Classic MAGA logic.LIB,MR BEARS said:"vexing omission", spoken like a true libtard. Race first, race last, race always.Sam Lowry said:Yeah, that was a vexing omission on their part. I actually had to Google it.Wangchung said:can you be more specific? Your Wikipedia link didn't bother mention race in almost every one listed.Sam Lowry said:About two-thirds of them.Wangchung said:Which ones after 1970 were done by a white person?Sam Lowry said:Debunked.Harrison Bergeron said:
A black church or institution has not been burned by a white person since the 1960s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_attacks_against_African-American_churches
King saw social colorblindness as a goal while others see it as a detriment to society. Sad
Have we found a fire started by a white person yet?
I believe you stated the lack of including race was a vexing omission. The would put the race thing squarely in your court. Care to try again Qua… uh SamSam Lowry said:If the facts aren't on your side, the other side must be racist. Classic MAGA logic.LIB,MR BEARS said:"vexing omission", spoken like a true libtard. Race first, race last, race always.Sam Lowry said:Yeah, that was a vexing omission on their part. I actually had to Google it.Wangchung said:can you be more specific? Your Wikipedia link didn't bother mention race in almost every one listed.Sam Lowry said:About two-thirds of them.Wangchung said:Which ones after 1970 were done by a white person?Sam Lowry said:Debunked.Harrison Bergeron said:
A black church or institution has not been burned by a white person since the 1960s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_attacks_against_African-American_churches
King saw social colorblindness as a goal while others see it as a detriment to society. Sad
I believe this thread has been ....
DEBUNKED!!!!
DEBUNKED!!!!
Obviously white racists still do racist things. But white on black violence is about the lowest it's ever been. And interracial violence very low. Of all the crimes to solve, putting so much effort into solving white racists' crimes would give very little return. Society already swung that pendulum.
Porteroso said:
Obviously white racists still do racist things. But white on black violence is about the lowest it's ever been. And interracial violence very low. Of all the crimes to solve, putting so much effort into solving white racists' crimes would give very little return. Society already swung that pendulum.
Dude - stop being a *****. Bleks comit an exponentially over represented amount of hate crimes and total crimes ... it's not even close.
Wangchung said:Imagine the sponsorship level Quash would jump at for a delete button right now. HahahaBearN said:
What is the over/under on number of tweets that were deleted after that picture was posted? I'm gonna say 8.1 million.
Why? I had ANTIFA instead of BLM.
Half a dozen of one, six of the other.quash said:Wangchung said:Imagine the sponsorship level Quash would jump at for a delete button right now. HahahaBearN said:
What is the over/under on number of tweets that were deleted after that picture was posted? I'm gonna say 8.1 million.
Why? I had ANTIFA instead of BLM.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?
Sam Lowry said:If the facts aren't on your side, the other side must be racist. Classic MAGA logic.LIB,MR BEARS said:"vexing omission", spoken like a true libtard. Race first, race last, race always.Sam Lowry said:Yeah, that was a vexing omission on their part. I actually had to Google it.Wangchung said:can you be more specific? Your Wikipedia link didn't bother mention race in almost every one listed.Sam Lowry said:About two-thirds of them.Wangchung said:Which ones after 1970 were done by a white person?Sam Lowry said:Debunked.Harrison Bergeron said:
A black church or institution has not been burned by a white person since the 1960s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_attacks_against_African-American_churches
King saw social colorblindness as a goal while others see it as a detriment to society. Sad
MAGA logic? I remember hearing back in the late '70s that the definition of a racist was "someone winning an argument with a liberal."
Only in this context, arguing with people who pretend not to know that whites attack black churches.LIB,MR BEARS said:I believe you stated the lack of including race was a vexing omission.Sam Lowry said:If the facts aren't on your side, the other side must be racist. Classic MAGA logic.LIB,MR BEARS said:"vexing omission", spoken like a true libtard. Race first, race last, race always.Sam Lowry said:Yeah, that was a vexing omission on their part. I actually had to Google it.Wangchung said:can you be more specific? Your Wikipedia link didn't bother mention race in almost every one listed.Sam Lowry said:About two-thirds of them.Wangchung said:Which ones after 1970 were done by a white person?Sam Lowry said:Debunked.Harrison Bergeron said:
A black church or institution has not been burned by a white person since the 1960s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_attacks_against_African-American_churches
King saw social colorblindness as a goal while others see it as a detriment to society. Sad
That's the irony.JXL said:Sam Lowry said:If the facts aren't on your side, the other side must be racist. Classic MAGA logic.LIB,MR BEARS said:"vexing omission", spoken like a true libtard. Race first, race last, race always.Sam Lowry said:Yeah, that was a vexing omission on their part. I actually had to Google it.Wangchung said:can you be more specific? Your Wikipedia link didn't bother mention race in almost every one listed.Sam Lowry said:About two-thirds of them.Wangchung said:Which ones after 1970 were done by a white person?Sam Lowry said:Debunked.Harrison Bergeron said:
A black church or institution has not been burned by a white person since the 1960s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_attacks_against_African-American_churches
King saw social colorblindness as a goal while others see it as a detriment to society. Sad
MAGA logic? I remember hearing back in the late '70s that the definition of a racist was "someone winning an argument with a liberal."
FIFYSam Lowry said:That's the projection.JXL said:Sam Lowry said:If the facts aren't on your side, the other side must be racist. Classic MAGA logic.LIB,MR BEARS said:"vexing omission", spoken like a true libtard. Race first, race last, race always.Sam Lowry said:Yeah, that was a vexing omission on their part. I actually had to Google it.Wangchung said:can you be more specific? Your Wikipedia link didn't bother mention race in almost every one listed.Sam Lowry said:About two-thirds of them.Wangchung said:Which ones after 1970 were done by a white person?Sam Lowry said:Debunked.Harrison Bergeron said:
A black church or institution has not been burned by a white person since the 1960s.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_attacks_against_African-American_churches
King saw social colorblindness as a goal while others see it as a detriment to society. Sad
MAGA logic? I remember hearing back in the late '70s that the definition of a racist was "someone winning an argument with a liberal."
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?