According to the Catholic church? No.J.R. said:
so is butt sex between consenting heterosexual couple ok. Or is it just wrong for Homosexuals ? Asking for a friend!
It is not the design of our sexual organs. Plus it is also prohibited in the bible.
They said "Let us marry who we want"
22,836 Views |
227 Replies |
Last: 3 yr ago by whitetrash
It is not the design of our sexual organs. Plus it is also prohibited in the bible.
Coke Bear said:According to the Catholic church? No.J.R. said:
so is butt sex between consenting heterosexual couple ok. Or is it just wrong for Homosexuals ? Asking for a friend!
It is not the design of our sexual organs. Plus it is also prohibited in the bible.
Only in a late stage declining society would it be controversial to say, "the human anus is not a sexual organ and is not designed for sexuality activity"
What about oral? Asking for a friend.
I have found theres only two ways to go:
Living fast or dying slow.
I dont want to live forever.
But I will live while I'm here.
Living fast or dying slow.
I dont want to live forever.
But I will live while I'm here.
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
What about oral? Asking for a friend.
You should watch the movie Eden. You should never trust anyone that much.
I was asking about it from a religious standpoint. I had never heard that hetero backdoor action was forbidden. Hoping hetero oral is ok.
I have found theres only two ways to go:
Living fast or dying slow.
I dont want to live forever.
But I will live while I'm here.
Living fast or dying slow.
I dont want to live forever.
But I will live while I'm here.
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
I was asking about it from a religious standpoint. I had never heard that hetero backdoor action was forbidden. Hoping hetero oral is ok.
If you are not married, then the specific act is unimportant. They will all be forbidden.
The pace we reached gay "marriage" to we must groom children was frighteningly fast.
Pedophilia will be accepted by the Establishment withing five years. The nascent movement has emerged from the shadows, and the pieces of the playbook are being created now. Mark my words in five years one could be fired for questioning pedophilia at most large companies and universities.
Pedophilia will be accepted by the Establishment withing five years. The nascent movement has emerged from the shadows, and the pieces of the playbook are being created now. Mark my words in five years one could be fired for questioning pedophilia at most large companies and universities.
He Hate Me said:Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
I was asking about it from a religious standpoint. I had never heard that hetero backdoor action was forbidden. Hoping hetero oral is ok.
If you are not married, then the specific act is unimportant. They will all be forbidden.
Thats why i said, "Asking for a friend."
I have found theres only two ways to go:
Living fast or dying slow.
I dont want to live forever.
But I will live while I'm here.
Living fast or dying slow.
I dont want to live forever.
But I will live while I'm here.
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:He Hate Me said:Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
I was asking about it from a religious standpoint. I had never heard that hetero backdoor action was forbidden. Hoping hetero oral is ok.
If you are not married, then the specific act is unimportant. They will all be forbidden.
Thats why i said, "Asking for a friend."
Ask him if his wife feels degraded by the request.
In all seriousness, according to the Church, as long as the husband climaxes vaginally, any oral stimulation is acceptable.Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
What about oral? Asking for a friend.
Coke Bear said:In all seriousness, according to the Church, as long as the husband climaxes vaginally, any oral stimulation is acceptable.Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
What about oral? Asking for a friend.
Thank you sir
I have found theres only two ways to go:
Living fast or dying slow.
I dont want to live forever.
But I will live while I'm here.
Living fast or dying slow.
I dont want to live forever.
But I will live while I'm here.
The slippery slope remains the undefeated champion https://t.co/Szz8lfb51x
— Auron MacIntyre (@AuronMacintyre) January 3, 2023
Logically consistent. Once you move from one man - one woman there is really no reason to have any limits on "marriage." The end goal always has been to have every sexual proclivity not only acknowledged but celebrated.Redbrickbear said:The slippery slope remains the undefeated champion https://t.co/Szz8lfb51x
— Auron MacIntyre (@AuronMacintyre) January 3, 2023
Can your dog or goat testify against you? Asking for a friend.
A dog will never sell out his person. I don't know about a goat.LIB,MR BEARS said:
Can your dog or goat testify against you? Asking for a friend.
Masha Gessen: Fighting for gay marriage involves lying about what we are going to do with marriage when we get there ... The institution of marriage should not exist."Harrison Bergeron said:
Logically consistent. Once you move from one man - one woman there is really no reason to have any limits on "marriage." The end goal always has been to have every sexual proclivity not only acknowledged but celebrated.
https://3speak.tv/watch?v=rairfoundation/souqkhxo
Not surprising. It is part of a larger Marxist program that has been in the works for 100+ years.He Hate Me said:Masha Gessen: Fighting for gay marriage involves lying about what we are going to do with marriage when we get there ... The institution of marriage should not exist."Harrison Bergeron said:
Logically consistent. Once you move from one man - one woman there is really no reason to have any limits on "marriage." The end goal always has been to have every sexual proclivity not only acknowledged but celebrated.
https://3speak.tv/watch?v=rairfoundation/souqkhxo
The abolition of the family has always been a core feature of the left, it’s not some new radical development
— Auron MacIntyre (@AuronMacintyre) January 3, 2023
Be it Friedrich Engels or Mikhail Bakunin the left has understood the family as a barrier to “equality” and has viewed its protections as a barrier to their power
asked, answered.Harrison Bergeron said:Logically consistent. Once you move from one man - one woman there is really no reason to have any limits on "marriage." The end goal always has been to have every sexual proclivity not only acknowledged but celebrated.Redbrickbear said:The slippery slope remains the undefeated champion https://t.co/Szz8lfb51x
— Auron MacIntyre (@AuronMacintyre) January 3, 2023
https://lapa.princeton.edu/content/was-justice-scalia-right-about-slippery-slope-end-all-morals-legislation-after-same-sex
whiterock said:asked, answered.Harrison Bergeron said:Logically consistent. Once you move from one man - one woman there is really no reason to have any limits on "marriage." The end goal always has been to have every sexual proclivity not only acknowledged but celebrated.Redbrickbear said:The slippery slope remains the undefeated champion https://t.co/Szz8lfb51x
— Auron MacIntyre (@AuronMacintyre) January 3, 2023
https://lapa.princeton.edu/content/was-justice-scalia-right-about-slippery-slope-end-all-morals-legislation-after-same-sex
I love how liberal law professors still argue that polygamy is somehow wrong and it's legitimate to have "morals based legislation" against it….but that gay marriage is somehow great.
If you are going to allow one type of disordered sexual union it's basic fairness to allow the other types.
The Academy has basically devolved into a place where regressives can cite and "expert" to tell you everything in front of your eyes and all the data you can read are wrong because, well "t'science."whiterock said:asked, answered.Harrison Bergeron said:Logically consistent. Once you move from one man - one woman there is really no reason to have any limits on "marriage." The end goal always has been to have every sexual proclivity not only acknowledged but celebrated.Redbrickbear said:The slippery slope remains the undefeated champion https://t.co/Szz8lfb51x
— Auron MacIntyre (@AuronMacintyre) January 3, 2023
https://lapa.princeton.edu/content/was-justice-scalia-right-about-slippery-slope-end-all-morals-legislation-after-same-sex
"
Sanford had publicly lobbied to kill the medical conscience rights and youth sex-change laws. After all, its business interests were implicated in these bills—the healthcare company profits from sex-change surgeries + drugs.
— Nate Hochman (@njhochman) January 5, 2023
Here's what one state lawmaker told me at the time: pic.twitter.com/9vwU6lUSyU
It's a crazy 180° for society to go from castigating the Catholic church for covering up pedophilia to supporting the sexualization of children. In one generation pretty much. https://t.co/NM9UiIOeC4
— Zatonietzsche (@zatonietzsche) January 5, 2023
Doesn't Paul talk about the poop hole loop hole in his fight of sexual abstinence?
Not in any Scripture I know of.ron.reagan said:
Doesn't Paul talk about the poop hole loop hole in his fight of sexual abstinence?
Maybe in the San Francisco Version?
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
AgreedJ.R. said:
I could care less who sleeps with whom and who marries who. However, kids at a drag show is NOT OK.
Waco1947 ,la
"If God didn't send Jesus into the world to condemn it, I doubt he sent you." - David HuskinsHe Hate Me said:Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
I was asking about it from a religious standpoint. I had never heard that hetero backdoor action was forbidden. Hoping hetero oral is ok.
If you are not married, then the specific act is unimportant. They will all be forbidden.
Waco1947 ,la
I can see you typing this about pedophiles.Waco1947 said:"If God didn't send Jesus into the world to condemn it, I doubt he sent you." - David HuskinsHe Hate Me said:Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
I was asking about it from a religious standpoint. I had never heard that hetero backdoor action was forbidden. Hoping hetero oral is ok.
If you are not married, then the specific act is unimportant. They will all be forbidden.
If you think typing one sentence that it reflective of Biblical sexual ethics is condemnation, then you need to check yourself.Waco1947 said:"If God didn't send Jesus into the world to condemn it, I doubt he sent you." - David HuskinsHe Hate Me said:Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
I was asking about it from a religious standpoint. I had never heard that hetero backdoor action was forbidden. Hoping hetero oral is ok.
If you are not married, then the specific act is unimportant. They will all be forbidden.
Waco1947 said:"If God didn't send Jesus into the world to condemn it, I doubt he sent you." - David HuskinsHe Hate Me said:Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
I was asking about it from a religious standpoint. I had never heard that hetero backdoor action was forbidden. Hoping hetero oral is ok.
If you are not married, then the specific act is unimportant. They will all be forbidden.
But Christ was sent into our earthly reality to redeem mankind and judge the world.
He even said, "If anyone causes one of these little ones, those who believe in me, to stumble, it would be better for them to have a large millstone hung around their neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea."
One can only speculate what will happen to child groomers and child sexual abusers on the Day of Judgement.
In your eyes, did Jesus condemn anything?Waco1947 said:"If God didn't send Jesus into the world to condemn it, I doubt he sent you." - David HuskinsHe Hate Me said:Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
I was asking about it from a religious standpoint. I had never heard that hetero backdoor action was forbidden. Hoping hetero oral is ok.
If you are not married, then the specific act is unimportant. They will all be forbidden.
The absolute state of the UK - required to attend a voluntary interview because you criticized rainbow ideology. pic.twitter.com/cgfG4I7B9T
— Patrick Basedman🌲🦉🌲 (@patrickbasedmn) January 7, 2023
There is no true freedom of speech in the UK. It's why things like this occur, and certain churches or church doctrines could be (or already are) criminalized.Redbrickbear said:The absolute state of the UK - required to attend a voluntary interview because you criticized rainbow ideology. pic.twitter.com/cgfG4I7B9T
— Patrick Basedman🌲🦉🌲 (@patrickbasedmn) January 7, 2023
It’s an attack on normal, an attack on family, a quest to dismantle civilization and drink the power released as each bond is broken
— Auron MacIntyre (@AuronMacintyre) January 7, 2023
But also pic.twitter.com/atcNIoUwfa
I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess that no Islamic church doctrines will ever be questioned.ATL Bear said:There is no true freedom of speech in the UK. It's why things like this occur, and certain churches or church doctrines could be (or already are) criminalized.Redbrickbear said:The absolute state of the UK - required to attend a voluntary interview because you criticized rainbow ideology. pic.twitter.com/cgfG4I7B9T
— Patrick Basedman🌲🦉🌲 (@patrickbasedmn) January 7, 2023