Church of England to consider gender-neutral God

7,254 Views | 75 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by quash
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
[A new report issued by the Church of England calls for, in essence, the normalization of singleness, putting it on equal footing with married life. They write:

Quote:

The Commission believes strongly that single people must be valued at the heart of our society. Jesus' own singleness should ensure that the Church of England celebrates singleness and does not regard it as lesser than living in a couple relationship. Loving relationships and being able to give and receive love matter to everyone. We have an amazing opportunity to reimagine a diverse society in which all families and loving relationships are valued and strengthened, promoting the stability that enables us all to thrive in a variety of family constellations, including being single.

Note that it's not just that it's ok to be single, but we must "celebrate" singleness. As we've seen with many other formerly alternative lifestyles, this suggests we will soon be in a situation where singles are specifically celebrated while married couples are downgraded and relegated to the background. Centering singleness will inevitably mean de-centering and peripherizing marriage.
In keeping with the descriptions of single life in the Bible, in which singleness is desired because it allows one's undivided attention to be devoted to serving God, traditionally singleness was associated with things such as the celibate vocations. Naturally the Church of England specifically rejects that singleness implies celibacy, and they decline to say that singleness should be used for the sake of Christian service.

Quote:

As the Commission affirmed the importance of love as an essential ingredient in all relationships, we thought about the growing number of people who do not live in a couple relationship or with family members. Singleness can be a deliberate choice sometimes the right partner has not been found, and sometimes separation, divorce or death has resulted in the loss of a partner. Inevitably, singleness does not necessarily imply celibacy, although this is the choice some single people in faith communities make.

Note that they recognize singleness as potentially resulting from a lifestyle choice. The commission's report "urges the Church of England" to "Honour and celebrate singleness, whether through choice or circumstance, and recognise the full place of single people within the Church and society."

Many Americans like to pooh-pooh the Church of England, but this is the same trend we see in the American evangelical church as well. It's not about pastorally responding to the fact that there are more single people today. Rather, it's a theological normalization of post-familialism, including singleness as a lifestyle choice, accompanied by calls to center singles and de-center families in ministry, no doubt to be followed by many demands from singles for affirmation, attention, services, etc.

Undoubtedly it's important to welcome and include singles in the life of the church. But a church, to saying nothing of a society, that embraces a post-familial future is unhealthy. And of course conformed to the world.]
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Of course YHWH is male, he had a female consort, Asherah with him him on the divine council.

And Sky Daddy.

Ez
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Coke Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

Of course YHWH is male, he had a female consort, Asherah with him him on the divine council.

And Sky Daddy.

Ez

Sadly, I can't tell whether your serious or just trolling when you makes comments are this uninformed.

This is a link from Catholic Answers that I listed to several months ago that explains this misunderstanding.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Coke Bear said:

quash said:

Of course YHWH is male, he had a female consort, Asherah with him him on the divine council.

And Sky Daddy.

Ez

Sadly, I can't tell whether your serious or just trolling when you makes comments are this uninformed.

This is a link from Catholic Answers that I listed to several months ago that explains this misunderstanding.


Some are blissfully ignorant. Others pretend to be ignorant because in some weird way, it makes them feel superior.
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Coke Bear said:

quash said:

Of course YHWH is male, he had a female consort, Asherah with him him on the divine council.

And Sky Daddy.

Ez

Sadly, I can't tell whether your serious or just trolling when you makes comments are this uninformed.

This is a link from Catholic Answers that I listed to several months ago that explains this misunderstanding.


It's not a misunderstanding. It's just something your church refuses to acknowledge. I certainly understand why.

“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.