Clarence Thomas's explanations fail the laugh test

9,130 Views | 84 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Oldbear83
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

Porteroso said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

Get back to me when you want the same critical look at any of the Left-leaning Justices.

For now, go play in traffic.
I want the same critical look at all of the justices. They're supposed to conduct themselves in a non partisan manner, without even the appearance of a conflict, or partisanship, when they accept a position on the bench.
Not true. You have not raised one word against any of Obama's awful picks.

Not one of them would stand up to serious scrutiny, but you gotta target the black conservative Justice.'

Don't know if that speaks more about your racism or proves the lie about your claim to your political balance, but it sure fails the smell test.
You're full of it. I didn't support any of Obama's picks. However, tell me which ones have accepted lavish gifts, and I'll denounce them also. I will say this though. If any of Obama's picks had accepted lavish trips from say... George Soros, you would be the first to allege fowl.
Vice versa. You can't show me even one post where you went after Obama's picks.

Go play in traffic you Leftist, no one is fooled.

Lmao death to the leftists. You zealots crack me up.
Still waiting to see you or TS go after even one of the left-leaning Justices.

You are total hypocrites, and fooling no one.

I honestly don't follow the Supreme Court like some of you. When I see idiotic decisions I rarely read through the opinions. Its just not my field. Only read sometimes because I want to be at least a tiny bit informed. I still remember that you want leftists to die BTW. No matter which justices i may write about on an internet forum, you are still a zealot.
You are an hypocrite and a liar. Not a peep against Sotomeyer or Kagan or Jackson, but you love you a good smear against Thomas or Kavanaugh.

And no, I don't 'want leftists to die' anymore than you want to vote for Trump. But when you post stupid claims, I will speak to the sort of behavior that reflects.

If you want to be taken seriously, Porteroso, either make a serious effort an objectivity or just admit you are a shameless partisan. Pretending you are balanced is a lazy and laughable look for you.

If you read the thread about Sotomayor you read me saying it was shady and she should have refused herself.... Although there was a helpful reply detailing why she shouldn't have, which was new to me.

The only reason a moderate conservative like me could look like a partisan leftist is how far right this board is. Texas Baptist graduates lol, of course it is.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
P: "moderate conservative like me"

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
JXL
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This controversy actually has little to do with ethics and more to do with power.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2023/05/the-left-wing-assault-on-the-supreme-court/?lctg=547fa9453b35d0210c8c20ef&utm_source=Sailthru&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=NR%20Daily%20Saturday%202023-05-08&utm_term=NRDaily-Smart
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Poor TS, still can do no better than use someone else's words and pretend he made a point.
^^^^ OB - King of projection!
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TS proves me right, yet again.
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

TS proves right, yet again.
FIFY
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TS proves right, yet again.
FIFY
So, what's it like to re-live everyday in the 3rd grade, TS?

Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

P: "moderate conservative like me"

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Oh believe me I think the same thing times infinity about you zealots.
Aliceinbubbleland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:


Let's not pretend the lefties on the SC are any different.
Yeah, I tend to agree. But Thomas is way over the line based on his ruling in Citizens United. Once the SCOTUS ruled in 2014 to strike down limits on political contributions by wealthy donors I gave up any hope they could rule based on law rather then influence.

That 5-4 decision was right down the conservative/progressive lineup with Clarence Thomas saying it didn't go far enough to stop limits.

Piss on him.
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TS proves right, yet again.
FIFY
So, what's it like to re-live everyday in the 3rd grade, TS?


You're much better in an elementary environment. I'll let you answer that question.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TS proves right, yet again.
FIFY
So, what's it like to re-live everyday in the 3rd grade, TS?


You're much better in an elementary environment. I'll let you answer that question.
Nice try son. Sad to hear you have devolved to pre-school.
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TS proves right, yet again.
FIFY
So, what's it like to re-live everyday in the 3rd grade, TS?


You're much better in an elementary environment. I'll let you answer that question.
Nice try son. Sad to hear you have devolved to pre-school.
Have you ever considered why you find yourself with no way out, other than resorting to juvenile ad hominem attacks?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TS proves right, yet again.
FIFY
So, what's it like to re-live everyday in the 3rd grade, TS?


You're much better in an elementary environment. I'll let you answer that question.
Nice try son. Sad to hear you have devolved to pre-school.
Have you ever considered why you find yourself with no way out, other than resorting to juvenile ad hominem attacks?
Thanks for proving you don't read my posts, TS.
Aliceinbubbleland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Would you agree that the failure of Thomas to disclose these transactions from Crow looks highly inappropriate?

I cannot imagine a situation where a SCOTUS Justice needs contributions.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aliceinbubbleland said:

Would you agree that the failure of Thomas to disclose these transactions from Crow looks highly inappropriate?

I cannot imagine a situation where a SCOTUS Justice needs contributions.
No, and here's why:

Any time you focus on just one justice, the narrative is manufactured.

My BS meter tells me this is a cheap-shot character smear.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.