House Republican Report Finds No Evidence of Wrongdoing by President Biden

13,236 Views | 122 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Doc Holliday
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wangchung said:

RMF5630 said:

Wangchung said:

4th and Inches said:

RMF5630 said:

Wangchung said:

RMF5630 said:

Wangchung said:

RMF5630 said:

Wangchung said:

RMF5630 said:

Life long Conservative, every election since Reagan. Vet, deployed to Kuwait in Gulf War. Been conservative, this crowd! Recessions, military actions, politics, stayed true. This loyalty to Trump is insane and the convoluted logic to keep defending him for years is insane.

Move over Sam and Compsny, they have convinced me. The Conservatives have gone over the line, they are certifiable. All bets are off if they run this nutjob and these people are defending him. If the Dems seem more reasonable I may go Dem for 1st time every. These people are nuts.
Neat. So about Nick Sandman...?


Yeah, I read about him. Here is the outcome:

"He claimed that the media falsely portrayed him as the aggressor and racially motivated25. He sought a combined $1.25 billion from eight media organizations, including The New York Times, CBS, ABC, NBC, CNN, Gannett, Rolling Stone, and The Washington Post. He settled with CNN, NBC News, and The Washington Post on undisclosed terms. A federal judge dismissed his lawsuits against The New York Times, CBS, ABC, Gannett, and Rolling Stone, saying they reported opinion protected by the First Amendment.

He went 3 out of 8. Apparently the 3 that settled were wrong. See the Court system works, if it is a true issue! The 3 that wronged him, settled. No issues. The other 5 was dismissed, apparently they didn't wrong Sandman.

You see, the guilty settled, the innocent fought to the end and had charges dismissed. Poetry in action. How many election fraud cases were successful? How many of Trumps accusations were successful?
So three mainstream media companies not named fox settled a recent defamation case? Thank you for admitting you lied when you claimed it was only Fox. Now Google Kyle Rittenhouse.


Typical misdirection. You see no difference between the Dominion case and Sandman?

How is Samdman getting nuisance level money of 25k or so the same as FOX claiming systematic election fraud and paying 786m, scrapping its on air personalities? This is not the only one, Smartmatic is coming.

How is Sandman or Rittenhouse, two civilians, the same as Former President Trump and GOP elected official claims of fraud? Last I heard neither are part of the establishment. Trump, GOP and media are. You don't get that...
You defined settling as a loss in court, not me, and then claimed none of the other mainstream media outlets lost in court as Fox had. Fox was accused of defamation, right ? Same as the three mainstream media outlets you now admit lost in court, right?
Show me where you got those settlement amounts. I'd like to see your sources on that one. Rittenhouse and Sandman were INTERNATIONAL news stories, stop pretending they were small time cases. You claimed no other media outlets suffered your definition of a loss in court. Now you have proven that your initial claims were wrong. Well done.


Are you really this obsessed with minutia? You settle when you are going to lose. Settling is not a good thing. Simple enough for you? Settling was not good for Sandman, all expectations are he got nuisance level money. Not sime 250m settlement. Why settle? Because you can't win. Spin it any way that let's you sleep at night. GOP has not proved one election or conspiracy charge from the 2020 election yet. That is what Trump is going off about! Not 2016 or 1996 Clinton ***** Fox proves it didn't happen like they reported. To the tune of 750m. Gey it, big number. Think how big if it goes through the trial. Out of business big.
settling doesnt mean a particular party is going to lose.. I thought you were a lawyer.

Settling creates fastest most effecient outcome agreeable to both parties. Settling limits exposure on both sides. Dominion didnt get the 1.6 Billion it sued for..

Back to whatever yall were doing..

Sorry. It's just entertaining to watch someone defend the credibility of the rest of the leftist mainstream media by saying Fox was the only outlet to settle for a defamation claim. The more he tried to squirm out of it the funnier it got. I'll lay off.


Lay off? You lost your ass. You went on some rabbit trail! Talk about a f-ing clown. Make up your own argument. I literally thought you have a learning disability.
Feel better now.
You used the idea that Fox had no credibility based on settling a defamation claim to support your claim that republicans were conspiracy nuts since Fox is THE conservative outlet. You defended such "brilliant" reasoning by claiming that Fox was sued and settled and NONE of the other mainstream media companies had done the same. You made claims that turned out to be totally false and you were dumb enough to debunk them yourself. I get why you're embarrassed.


You are going off on some crusade here. I said Fox lost to Dominion and paid out the ass. I also said not one of the 2020 election conspiracy theories Trump is spouting have held. Pretty comfortable with those positions.

I have no idea why you are bring in Sandman, Rittenhouse and this other stuff. FOX was forced to settle and still have at least one coming. It is not a sure thing they survive. Not a winners situation. But, whatever gets you off.
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hey, at least we agree in the other thread.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wangchung said:

Hey, at least we agree in the other thread.


I usually agree with most everyone on here on some points. This group agree quietly, disagree violently
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RMF5630 said:

Wangchung said:

Hey, at least we agree in the other thread.


I usually agree with most everyone on here on some points. This group agree quietly, disagree violently
The insults don't land as well when you're in agreement, though.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wangchung said:

RMF5630 said:

Wangchung said:

Hey, at least we agree in the other thread.


I usually agree with most everyone on here on some points. This group agree quietly, disagree violently
The insults don't land as well when you're in agreement, though.


True, but throw one in anyway. We have an agreement
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I was agreeing with you. Your arguments make sense to me because they point to the truth about Trump.
Waco1947 ,la
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

I was agreeing with you. Your arguments make sense to me because they point to the truth about Trump.


I apologize if I missed it. Literally doing this in spare time on phone! Off mainland right now, so big ti.e delay.

If people reach out or discuss, I am good. Regardless of subject or if agree. For example, even now knowing Wangchun likes to.throw an insult in, I am good as long as I know. Of the age group that likes knowing people when arguing or discussing. Getting old!

This is supposed to be fun, right!
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Increasingly Unhinged Jim Jordan Subpoenas Himself
By Andy Borowitz
April 12, 2023

WASHINGTON (The Borowitz Report)House Republicans expressed alarm after an increasingly unhinged Rep. Jim Jordan subpoenaed himself to testify before Congress.

In a blistering statement, the House Judiciary Committee chairman demanded that he comply with his subpoena and called himself a "toadying Soros-backed flunky."

"The message to Jim Jordan is clear: you can run, but you can't hide," Jordan said.

The Ohio congressman warned that, if he refused to testify, he would have "no other choice" but to call for himself to be jailed.

Behind the scenes, Jordan's G.O.P. colleagues discussed replacing him as the chair of the Judiciary Committee with a more mentally stable member of their conference, such as Lauren Boebert or Marjorie Taylor Greene.

So Boebert is now dating Billy Pray Cyrus?
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Some news.
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HuMcK said:

Some news.

The Republicans don't want Hunter. They want China Joe. And the bank records are damning.

And all indications from recent days are that the mainstream news media wants Nose Candy Joe out as well.

The Democrats diverse replacement will be Gavin Newsom. Kamala gonna call for rioting in the streets.

Should be entertaining to watch. Popcorn ready.
"Stand with anyone when he is right; Stand with him while he is right and part with him when he goes wrong." - Abraham Lincoln
HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

HuMcK said:

Some news.

The Republicans don't want Hunter. They want China Joe. And the bank records are damning.

And all indications from recent days are that the mainstream news media wants Nose Candy Joe out as well.

The Democrats diverse replacement will be Gavin Newsom. Kamala gonna call for rioting in the streets.

Should be entertaining to watch. Popcorn ready.

For a second there I thought you were talking about Trump's bank records, which showed that he withdrew $17 million from his secret Chinese bank account while he was President.

I know you aren't talking about Joe's bank or tax records, because they show no such thing.

I just thought it was newsworthy that the star "witness" against Joe Biden is an arms smuggling Chinese agent, and that the Trump appointed Prosecutor who ran the investigation says the IRS Hunter Biden "whistleblower" is full of sh/t. Weird how those developments in the case get ignored around here...
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HuMcK said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

HuMcK said:

Some news.

The Republicans don't want Hunter. They want China Joe. And the bank records are damning.

And all indications from recent days are that the mainstream news media wants Nose Candy Joe out as well.

The Democrats diverse replacement will be Gavin Newsom. Kamala gonna call for rioting in the streets.

Should be entertaining to watch. Popcorn ready.

For a second there I thought you were talking about Trump's bank records, which showed that he withdrew $17 million from his secret Chinese bank account while he was President.

I know you aren't talking about Joe's bank or tax records, because they show no such thing.

I just thought it was newsworthy that the star "witness" against Joe Biden is an arms smuggling Chinese agent, and that the Trump appointed Prosecutor who ran the investigation says the IRS Hunter Biden "whistleblower" is full of sh/t. Weird how those developments in the case get ignored around here...
Please tell us more about this top secret Chinese bank account. Does it smell like feces because you pulled it out of your ass?
"Stand with anyone when he is right; Stand with him while he is right and part with him when he goes wrong." - Abraham Lincoln
HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
My bad, he only withdrew $15 million from the Chinese account while he was POTUS.

"In 2017, the company reported an unusually large spike in revenue some $17.5 million, more than the previous five years' combined. It was accompanied by a $15.1 million withdrawal by Mr. Trump from the company's capital account."

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/20/us/trump-taxes-china.html
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The New York Times. LOL!!!
"Stand with anyone when he is right; Stand with him while he is right and part with him when he goes wrong." - Abraham Lincoln
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I remember all the way back to when the US intelligence agencies declared the mere claim of the existence of Hunter's laptop was Russian disinformation. Now the whistleblower is a Chinese spy. Imagine being dumb enough to believe them.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HuMcK said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

HuMcK said:

Some news.

The Republicans don't want Hunter. They want China Joe. And the bank records are damning.

And all indications from recent days are that the mainstream news media wants Nose Candy Joe out as well.

The Democrats diverse replacement will be Gavin Newsom. Kamala gonna call for rioting in the streets.

Should be entertaining to watch. Popcorn ready.
For a second there I thought you were talking about Trump's bank records, which showed that he withdrew $17 million from his secret Chinese bank account while he was President.

I know you aren't talking about Joe's bank or tax records, because they show no such thing.

I just thought it was newsworthy that the star "witness" against Joe Biden is an arms smuggling Chinese agent, and that the Trump appointed Prosecutor who ran the investigation says the IRS Hunter Biden "whistleblower" is full of sh/t. Weird how those developments in the case get ignored around here...

Quote:

"Orange man bad, establishment good".

- You 24/7


Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Its so hypocritical of you to insinuate that Trump was dirty when you ignore all the following facts about Hunter:

Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HuMcK said:

My bad, he only withdrew $15 million from the Chinese account while he was POTUS.

"In 2017, the company reported an unusually large spike in revenue some $17.5 million, more than the previous five years' combined. It was accompanied by a $15.1 million withdrawal by Mr. Trump from the company's capital account."

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/20/us/trump-taxes-china.html
Btw this has nothing to do with Rudy Giuliani

 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.