Johnny Bear said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

ShooterTX said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

ShooterTX said:

---

At least they are bringing out the best and brightest of the democrat party to defund the pedophile in chief.

It’s so easy to sound sassy and ignore all the evidence. Just a complete embarrassment. pic.twitter.com/swu4haH0hu

— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) September 28, 2023

---

She has a point. What is the crime being investigated?

---

Tell me that you've been ignoring the truth, without telling me that you have been ignoring the truth.

Besides the laptop and the multiple witness statements and the IRS investigation and the records of payments... yeah... no evidence of a crime at all.

---

What "high crime or misdemeanor" is there evidence that Joe Biden committed?

Can you answer that question?

---

Can you answer the question of who "the big guy" is? Can you answer the question of what service(s) or product(s) were delivered in exchange for the $millions from foreign entities (usually hostile to the USA) bank transaction records prove were laundered through shell LLCs to various Biden family members? Since the obvious and only possible answer is a clear cut case of influence peddling, can you answer the question of who the person is that can deliver on those bribes (hint: it's NOT Hunter Biden)? Can you answer the question of who through eye witness accounts Tony Bobulinski confirmed is in fact "the big guy"? What is your explanation for the accounts of multiple whistleblowers that have come forward implicating said "big guy"??

I seriously believe if there was a video of Biden raping a 6 year old you and your ilk would claim it doesn't prove anything and furthermore you would be asking why did the 6 year old seduce the President like that??

---

Biden is clearly the big guy and Hunter Biden was clearly selling his connection to the big guy.

But unitl there is evidence that the big guy used his influence while in office to benefit Hunter's client there is no evidence of a crime. There is no evidence of Biden using his office to beneift Hunter's clients. I don't mind at all the GOP looking for that evidence. Acting like they found the evidence is stupid, particlarly in the face of their own witnesses testifying tha they havenot found it and several reps and many GOP senators saying they have not found it, and thae fact that if they had found it, you would need an "impeachmanr inquiry" you would just file articles of impeachment.

If they had it, they would have led with it. No less a MAGAite than Steve Bannon scorched the House GOP yesterday on that very point.

And the Ukranioan prosecuotur thing does not qualify. First, our leaders are supposed to use US influence-including tax dollars-to make things happen. Second, at the time we/Biden forced the change in prosecutors there was broad bipartisan support for it. Third, there is just as much evidence that the prosecutor was in the bag for Burisma as he was a threat to the company. Fourth it happened almost a decade ago. If it was a high crime or misdemeanor Biden should have been proscuted long ago.

Frank Galvin said:

---

Johnny Bear said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

ShooterTX said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

ShooterTX said:

---

At least they are bringing out the best and brightest of the democrat party to defund the pedophile in chief.

It’s so easy to sound sassy and ignore all the evidence. Just a complete embarrassment. pic.twitter.com/swu4haH0hu

— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) September 28, 2023

---

She has a point. What is the crime being investigated?

---

Tell me that you've been ignoring the truth, without telling me that you have been ignoring the truth.

Besides the laptop and the multiple witness statements and the IRS investigation and the records of payments... yeah... no evidence of a crime at all.

---

What "high crime or misdemeanor" is there evidence that Joe Biden committed?

Can you answer that question?

---

Can you answer the question of who "the big guy" is? Can you answer the question of what service(s) or product(s) were delivered in exchange for the $millions from foreign entities (usually hostile to the USA) bank transaction records prove were laundered through shell LLCs to various Biden family members? Since the obvious and only possible answer is a clear cut case of influence peddling, can you answer the question of who the person is that can deliver on those bribes (hint: it's NOT Hunter Biden)? Can you answer the question of who through eye witness accounts Tony Bobulinski confirmed is in fact "the big guy"? What is your explanation for the accounts of multiple whistleblowers that have come forward implicating said "big guy"??

I seriously believe if there was a video of Biden raping a 6 year old you and your ilk would claim it doesn't prove anything and furthermore you would be asking why did the 6 year old seduce the President like that??

---

Biden is clearly the big guy and Hunter Biden was clearly selling his connection to the big guy.

But unitl there is evidence that the big guy used his influence while in office to benefit Hunter's client there is no evidence of a crime. There is no evidence of Biden using his office to beneift Hunter's clients. I don't mind at all the GOP looking for that evidence. Acting like they found the evidence is stupid, particlarly in the face of their own witnesses testifying tha they havenot found it and several reps and many GOP senators saying they have not found it, and thae fact that if they had found it, you would need an "impeachmanr inquiry" you would just file articles of impeachment.

If they had it, they would have led with it. No less a MAGAite than Steve Bannon scorched the House GOP yesterday on that very point.

And the Ukranioan prosecuotur thing does not qualify. First, our leaders are supposed to use US influence-including tax dollars-to make things happen. Second, at the time we/Biden forced the change in prosecutors there was broad bipartisan support for it. Third, there is just as much evidence that the prosecutor was in the bag for Burisma as he was a threat to the company. Fourth it happened almost a decade ago. If it was a high crime or misdemeanor Biden should have been proscuted long ago.

---

Your post makes no sense. You start out correctly agreeing that dementia Joe is indeed the "big guy" and that influence peddling (i.e. bribes paid in exchange for favors/preferential treatment) occurred. And guess what - accepting bribes is expressly set out in the Constitution as an impeachable offense. Then you contradict yourself in the rest of the post to try and somehow establish that there is no proof that what you just admitted happened actually happened. Unbelievable.

Why not just admit you're never going to believe your guy is a blatantly corrupt criminal no matter how much evidence is presented.

Johnny Bear said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

Johnny Bear said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

ShooterTX said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

ShooterTX said:

---

At least they are bringing out the best and brightest of the democrat party to defund the pedophile in chief.

It’s so easy to sound sassy and ignore all the evidence. Just a complete embarrassment. pic.twitter.com/swu4haH0hu

— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) September 28, 2023

---

She has a point. What is the crime being investigated?

---

Tell me that you've been ignoring the truth, without telling me that you have been ignoring the truth.

Besides the laptop and the multiple witness statements and the IRS investigation and the records of payments... yeah... no evidence of a crime at all.

---

What "high crime or misdemeanor" is there evidence that Joe Biden committed?

Can you answer that question?

---

Can you answer the question of who "the big guy" is? Can you answer the question of what service(s) or product(s) were delivered in exchange for the $millions from foreign entities (usually hostile to the USA) bank transaction records prove were laundered through shell LLCs to various Biden family members? Since the obvious and only possible answer is a clear cut case of influence peddling, can you answer the question of who the person is that can deliver on those bribes (hint: it's NOT Hunter Biden)? Can you answer the question of who through eye witness accounts Tony Bobulinski confirmed is in fact "the big guy"? What is your explanation for the accounts of multiple whistleblowers that have come forward implicating said "big guy"??

I seriously believe if there was a video of Biden raping a 6 year old you and your ilk would claim it doesn't prove anything and furthermore you would be asking why did the 6 year old seduce the President like that??

---

Biden is clearly the big guy and Hunter Biden was clearly selling his connection to the big guy.

But unitl there is evidence that the big guy used his influence while in office to benefit Hunter's client there is no evidence of a crime. There is no evidence of Biden using his office to beneift Hunter's clients. I don't mind at all the GOP looking for that evidence. Acting like they found the evidence is stupid, particlarly in the face of their own witnesses testifying tha they havenot found it and several reps and many GOP senators saying they have not found it, and thae fact that if they had found it, you would need an "impeachmanr inquiry" you would just file articles of impeachment.

If they had it, they would have led with it. No less a MAGAite than Steve Bannon scorched the House GOP yesterday on that very point.

And the Ukranioan prosecuotur thing does not qualify. First, our leaders are supposed to use US influence-including tax dollars-to make things happen. Second, at the time we/Biden forced the change in prosecutors there was broad bipartisan support for it. Third, there is just as much evidence that the prosecutor was in the bag for Burisma as he was a threat to the company. Fourth it happened almost a decade ago. If it was a high crime or misdemeanor Biden should have been proscuted long ago.

---

Your post makes no sense. You start out correctly agreeing that dementia Joe is indeed the "big guy" and that influence peddling (i.e. bribes paid in exchange for favors/preferential treatment) occurred. And guess what - accepting bribes is expressly set out in the Constitution as an impeachable offense. Then you contradict yourself in the rest of the post to try and somehow establish that there is no proof that what you just admitted happened actually happened. Unbelievable.

Why not just admit you're never going to believe your guy is a blatantly corrupt criminal no matter how much evidence is presented.

---

You are incapable of understanding a simple concept.

Its not a bribe unless: (1) Joe recieved it or (2) Hunter received it and Joe agreed to use his office to benefit Hunter's client based on the payment. To date there is no evidence of Joe receiving money or Joe using his office to benefit Hunter's clients because of what they paid Hunter.

Frank Galvin said:

---

Johnny Bear said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

Johnny Bear said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

ShooterTX said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

ShooterTX said:

---

At least they are bringing out the best and brightest of the democrat party to defund the pedophile in chief.

It’s so easy to sound sassy and ignore all the evidence. Just a complete embarrassment. pic.twitter.com/swu4haH0hu

— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) September 28, 2023

---

She has a point. What is the crime being investigated?

---

Tell me that you've been ignoring the truth, without telling me that you have been ignoring the truth.

Besides the laptop and the multiple witness statements and the IRS investigation and the records of payments... yeah... no evidence of a crime at all.

---

What "high crime or misdemeanor" is there evidence that Joe Biden committed?

Can you answer that question?

---

Can you answer the question of who "the big guy" is? Can you answer the question of what service(s) or product(s) were delivered in exchange for the $millions from foreign entities (usually hostile to the USA) bank transaction records prove were laundered through shell LLCs to various Biden family members? Since the obvious and only possible answer is a clear cut case of influence peddling, can you answer the question of who the person is that can deliver on those bribes (hint: it's NOT Hunter Biden)? Can you answer the question of who through eye witness accounts Tony Bobulinski confirmed is in fact "the big guy"? What is your explanation for the accounts of multiple whistleblowers that have come forward implicating said "big guy"??

I seriously believe if there was a video of Biden raping a 6 year old you and your ilk would claim it doesn't prove anything and furthermore you would be asking why did the 6 year old seduce the President like that??

---

Biden is clearly the big guy and Hunter Biden was clearly selling his connection to the big guy.

But unitl there is evidence that the big guy used his influence while in office to benefit Hunter's client there is no evidence of a crime. There is no evidence of Biden using his office to beneift Hunter's clients. I don't mind at all the GOP looking for that evidence. Acting like they found the evidence is stupid, particlarly in the face of their own witnesses testifying tha they havenot found it and several reps and many GOP senators saying they have not found it, and thae fact that if they had found it, you would need an "impeachmanr inquiry" you would just file articles of impeachment.

If they had it, they would have led with it. No less a MAGAite than Steve Bannon scorched the House GOP yesterday on that very point.

And the Ukranioan prosecuotur thing does not qualify. First, our leaders are supposed to use US influence-including tax dollars-to make things happen. Second, at the time we/Biden forced the change in prosecutors there was broad bipartisan support for it. Third, there is just as much evidence that the prosecutor was in the bag for Burisma as he was a threat to the company. Fourth it happened almost a decade ago. If it was a high crime or misdemeanor Biden should have been proscuted long ago.

---

Your post makes no sense. You start out correctly agreeing that dementia Joe is indeed the "big guy" and that influence peddling (i.e. bribes paid in exchange for favors/preferential treatment) occurred. And guess what - accepting bribes is expressly set out in the Constitution as an impeachable offense. Then you contradict yourself in the rest of the post to try and somehow establish that there is no proof that what you just admitted happened actually happened. Unbelievable.

Why not just admit you're never going to believe your guy is a blatantly corrupt criminal no matter how much evidence is presented.

---

You are incapable of understanding a simple concept.

Its not a bribe unless: (1) Joe recieved it or (2) Hunter received it and Joe agreed to use his office to benefit Hunter's client based on the payment. To date there is no evidence of Joe receiving money or Joe using his office to benefit Hunter's clients because of what they paid Hunter.

---

You are obviously incapable of understanding the simple (and obvious) fact that we have an immensely corrupt POTUS that is guilty 9 ways to Sunday. Do you even have an ounce of common sense?

Frank Galvin said:

---

Johnny Bear said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

Johnny Bear said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

ShooterTX said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

ShooterTX said:

---

At least they are bringing out the best and brightest of the democrat party to defund the pedophile in chief.

It’s so easy to sound sassy and ignore all the evidence. Just a complete embarrassment. pic.twitter.com/swu4haH0hu

— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) September 28, 2023

---

She has a point. What is the crime being investigated?

---

Tell me that you've been ignoring the truth, without telling me that you have been ignoring the truth.

Besides the laptop and the multiple witness statements and the IRS investigation and the records of payments... yeah... no evidence of a crime at all.

---

What "high crime or misdemeanor" is there evidence that Joe Biden committed?

Can you answer that question?

---

Can you answer the question of who "the big guy" is? Can you answer the question of what service(s) or product(s) were delivered in exchange for the $millions from foreign entities (usually hostile to the USA) bank transaction records prove were laundered through shell LLCs to various Biden family members? Since the obvious and only possible answer is a clear cut case of influence peddling, can you answer the question of who the person is that can deliver on those bribes (hint: it's NOT Hunter Biden)? Can you answer the question of who through eye witness accounts Tony Bobulinski confirmed is in fact "the big guy"? What is your explanation for the accounts of multiple whistleblowers that have come forward implicating said "big guy"??

I seriously believe if there was a video of Biden raping a 6 year old you and your ilk would claim it doesn't prove anything and furthermore you would be asking why did the 6 year old seduce the President like that??

---

Biden is clearly the big guy and Hunter Biden was clearly selling his connection to the big guy.

But unitl there is evidence that the big guy used his influence while in office to benefit Hunter's client there is no evidence of a crime. There is no evidence of Biden using his office to beneift Hunter's clients. I don't mind at all the GOP looking for that evidence. Acting like they found the evidence is stupid, particlarly in the face of their own witnesses testifying tha they havenot found it and several reps and many GOP senators saying they have not found it, and thae fact that if they had found it, you would need an "impeachmanr inquiry" you would just file articles of impeachment.

If they had it, they would have led with it. No less a MAGAite than Steve Bannon scorched the House GOP yesterday on that very point.

And the Ukranioan prosecuotur thing does not qualify. First, our leaders are supposed to use US influence-including tax dollars-to make things happen. Second, at the time we/Biden forced the change in prosecutors there was broad bipartisan support for it. Third, there is just as much evidence that the prosecutor was in the bag for Burisma as he was a threat to the company. Fourth it happened almost a decade ago. If it was a high crime or misdemeanor Biden should have been proscuted long ago.

---

Your post makes no sense. You start out correctly agreeing that dementia Joe is indeed the "big guy" and that influence peddling (i.e. bribes paid in exchange for favors/preferential treatment) occurred. And guess what - accepting bribes is expressly set out in the Constitution as an impeachable offense. Then you contradict yourself in the rest of the post to try and somehow establish that there is no proof that what you just admitted happened actually happened. Unbelievable.

Why not just admit you're never going to believe your guy is a blatantly corrupt criminal no matter how much evidence is presented.

---

You are incapable of understanding a simple concept.

Its not a bribe unless: (1) Joe recieved it or (2) Hunter received it and Joe agreed to use his office to benefit Hunter's client based on the payment. To date there is no evidence of Joe receiving money or Joe using his office to benefit Hunter's clients because of what they paid Hunter.

---

To be guilty of the charge of bribery, does not require that Biden used his office to benefit anyone. Just the fact that they paid him money because they thought he MIGHT help them in the future, is enough evidence to be guilty of bribery.

The fact that Hunter was sent out to solicit these monies from individuals all over the planet, just makes it even worse.

ShooterTX said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

Johnny Bear said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

Johnny Bear said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

ShooterTX said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

ShooterTX said:

---

At least they are bringing out the best and brightest of the democrat party to defund the pedophile in chief.

It’s so easy to sound sassy and ignore all the evidence. Just a complete embarrassment. pic.twitter.com/swu4haH0hu

— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) September 28, 2023

---

She has a point. What is the crime being investigated?

---

Tell me that you've been ignoring the truth, without telling me that you have been ignoring the truth.

Besides the laptop and the multiple witness statements and the IRS investigation and the records of payments... yeah... no evidence of a crime at all.

---

What "high crime or misdemeanor" is there evidence that Joe Biden committed?

Can you answer that question?

---

Can you answer the question of who "the big guy" is? Can you answer the question of what service(s) or product(s) were delivered in exchange for the $millions from foreign entities (usually hostile to the USA) bank transaction records prove were laundered through shell LLCs to various Biden family members? Since the obvious and only possible answer is a clear cut case of influence peddling, can you answer the question of who the person is that can deliver on those bribes (hint: it's NOT Hunter Biden)? Can you answer the question of who through eye witness accounts Tony Bobulinski confirmed is in fact "the big guy"? What is your explanation for the accounts of multiple whistleblowers that have come forward implicating said "big guy"??

I seriously believe if there was a video of Biden raping a 6 year old you and your ilk would claim it doesn't prove anything and furthermore you would be asking why did the 6 year old seduce the President like that??

---

Biden is clearly the big guy and Hunter Biden was clearly selling his connection to the big guy.

But unitl there is evidence that the big guy used his influence while in office to benefit Hunter's client there is no evidence of a crime. There is no evidence of Biden using his office to beneift Hunter's clients. I don't mind at all the GOP looking for that evidence. Acting like they found the evidence is stupid, particlarly in the face of their own witnesses testifying tha they havenot found it and several reps and many GOP senators saying they have not found it, and thae fact that if they had found it, you would need an "impeachmanr inquiry" you would just file articles of impeachment.

If they had it, they would have led with it. No less a MAGAite than Steve Bannon scorched the House GOP yesterday on that very point.

And the Ukranioan prosecuotur thing does not qualify. First, our leaders are supposed to use US influence-including tax dollars-to make things happen. Second, at the time we/Biden forced the change in prosecutors there was broad bipartisan support for it. Third, there is just as much evidence that the prosecutor was in the bag for Burisma as he was a threat to the company. Fourth it happened almost a decade ago. If it was a high crime or misdemeanor Biden should have been proscuted long ago.

---

Your post makes no sense. You start out correctly agreeing that dementia Joe is indeed the "big guy" and that influence peddling (i.e. bribes paid in exchange for favors/preferential treatment) occurred. And guess what - accepting bribes is expressly set out in the Constitution as an impeachable offense. Then you contradict yourself in the rest of the post to try and somehow establish that there is no proof that what you just admitted happened actually happened. Unbelievable.

Why not just admit you're never going to believe your guy is a blatantly corrupt criminal no matter how much evidence is presented.

---

You are incapable of understanding a simple concept.

Its not a bribe unless: (1) Joe recieved it or (2) Hunter received it and Joe agreed to use his office to benefit Hunter's client based on the payment. To date there is no evidence of Joe receiving money or Joe using his office to benefit Hunter's clients because of what they paid Hunter.

---

To be guilty of the charge of bribery, does not require that Biden used his office to benefit anyone. Just the fact that they paid him money because they thought he MIGHT help them in the future, is enough evidence to be guilty of bribery.

The fact that Hunter was sent out to solicit these monies from individuals all over the planet, just makes it even worse.

---

You just convicted Clarence Thomas of corruption.

Bribery is the payment, corruption is the acceptance or solicitation of the bribe. The federal bribery statue requires a specific intent to obtain a government action.

Otherwise it's a gift like the gifts given to Thomas. There is no evidence yet that Joe Biden took money or did anything with his office because Hunter took money.

There is a reason that MAGA's intellectual legal leader, Jonathan Turley, says there is no evidence impeach yet. That's it.

ShooterTX said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

ShooterTX said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

ShooterTX said:

---

At least they are bringing out the best and brightest of the democrat party to defund the pedophile in chief.

It’s so easy to sound sassy and ignore all the evidence. Just a complete embarrassment. pic.twitter.com/swu4haH0hu

— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) September 28, 2023

---

She has a point. What is the crime being investigated?

---

Tell me that you've been ignoring the truth, without telling me that you have been ignoring the truth.

Besides the laptop and the multiple witness statements and the IRS investigation and the records of payments... yeah... no evidence of a crime at all.

---

What "high crime or misdemeanor" is there evidence that Joe Biden committed?

Can you answer that question?

---

how about the one he admitted to?

you know... the "son of a *****" brag about how he used tax payer money to get rid of a Ukrainian investigator.

---

Good question.

It's hard to keep track from day to day, but are y'all Trump-lovers still pretending to care about this stuff?

Trump received at least $7.8 million in payments from foreign governments and officials of 20 countries during his presidency. The bulk of it came from China, but Saudia Arabia, Qatar and others chipped in. From the House Oversight Committee's new report: https://t.co/lMLlXP2oWD

— Tim O'Brien (@TimOBrien) January 4, 2024

HuMcK said:

---

It's hard to keep track from day to day, but are y'all Trump-lovers still pretending to care about this stuff?

Trump received at least $7.8 million in payments from foreign governments and officials of 20 countries during his presidency. The bulk of it came from China, but Saudia Arabia, Qatar and others chipped in. From the House Oversight Committee's new report: https://t.co/lMLlXP2oWD

— Tim O'Brien (@TimOBrien) January 4, 2024

---

China Don?

And it's important to remember, these cash flows are in addition to the three entire floors of Trump Tower Manhattan that a Chinese state owned bank rented for years.

Johnny Bear said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

Johnny Bear said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

ShooterTX said:

---

Frank Galvin said:

---

ShooterTX said:

---

At least they are bringing out the best and brightest of the democrat party to defund the pedophile in chief.

It’s so easy to sound sassy and ignore all the evidence. Just a complete embarrassment. pic.twitter.com/swu4haH0hu

— Ian Miles Cheong (@stillgray) September 28, 2023

---

She has a point. What is the crime being investigated?

---

Tell me that you've been ignoring the truth, without telling me that you have been ignoring the truth.

Besides the laptop and the multiple witness statements and the IRS investigation and the records of payments... yeah... no evidence of a crime at all.

---

What "high crime or misdemeanor" is there evidence that Joe Biden committed?

Can you answer that question?

---

Can you answer the question of who "the big guy" is? Can you answer the question of what service(s) or product(s) were delivered in exchange for the $millions from foreign entities (usually hostile to the USA) bank transaction records prove were laundered through shell LLCs to various Biden family members? Since the obvious and only possible answer is a clear cut case of influence peddling, can you answer the question of who the person is that can deliver on those bribes (hint: it's NOT Hunter Biden)? Can you answer the question of who through eye witness accounts Tony Bobulinski confirmed is in fact "the big guy"? What is your explanation for the accounts of multiple whistleblowers that have come forward implicating said "big guy"??

I seriously believe if there was a video of Biden raping a 6 year old you and your ilk would claim it doesn't prove anything and furthermore you would be asking why did the 6 year old seduce the President like that??

---

Biden is clearly the big guy and Hunter Biden was clearly selling his connection to the big guy.

But unitl there is evidence that the big guy used his influence while in office to benefit Hunter's client there is no evidence of a crime. There is no evidence of Biden using his office to beneift Hunter's clients. I don't mind at all the GOP looking for that evidence. Acting like they found the evidence is stupid, particlarly in the face of their own witnesses testifying tha they havenot found it and several reps and many GOP senators saying they have not found it, and thae fact that if they had found it, you would need an "impeachmanr inquiry" you would just file articles of impeachment.

If they had it, they would have led with it. No less a MAGAite than Steve Bannon scorched the House GOP yesterday on that very point.

And the Ukranioan prosecuotur thing does not qualify. First, our leaders are supposed to use US influence-including tax dollars-to make things happen. Second, at the time we/Biden forced the change in prosecutors there was broad bipartisan support for it. Third, there is just as much evidence that the prosecutor was in the bag for Burisma as he was a threat to the company. Fourth it happened almost a decade ago. If it was a high crime or misdemeanor Biden should have been proscuted long ago.

---

Your post makes no sense. You start out correctly agreeing that dementia Joe is indeed the "big guy" and that influence peddling (i.e. bribes paid in exchange for favors/preferential treatment) occurred. And guess what - accepting bribes is expressly set out in the Constitution as an impeachable offense. Then you contradict yourself in the rest of the post to try and somehow establish that there is no proof that what you just admitted happened actually happened. Unbelievable.

Why not just admit you're never going to believe your guy is a blatantly corrupt criminal no matter how much evidence is presented.

---

Slow down and use your thinker up there. Hunter selling his influence is not the same as Biden accepting a bribe. Proof that Biden committed a crime is what is in question. Whether Hunter engaged in bribery is a different thing, and not in question.