Donald Trump Town Hall- Tonight 8:00 PM- Fox News

1,776 Views | 15 Replies | Last: 2 yr ago by Oldbear83
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just one hour long. I wish he was on the debate stage tomorrow night at the last Republican Party debate. Don't think he wants any part of DeSantis and Haley on the debate stage. I get it.

Hope he concentrates on focusing on Biden's failures and how he would fix them. Hope he addresses the Ukranian and Israeli wars. Hope he does NOT waste any time attacking his Republican challengers.

"Stand with anyone when he is right; Stand with him while he is right and part with him when he goes wrong." - Abraham Lincoln
Guy Noir
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It appears to me Fox is showing favoritism by covering this Town Hall Meeting rather than expecting Trump to attend debates like the rest of the field.
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Guy Noir said:

It appears to me Fox is showing favoritism by covering this Town Hall Meeting rather than expecting Trump to attend debates like the rest of the field.
Agree with you, Guy. Most of of the Conservative talk news media is all in for Trump, although most won't admit it. Hannity, Buck Sexton, Clay Travis, and Joe Pags are in this group.
"Stand with anyone when he is right; Stand with him while he is right and part with him when he goes wrong." - Abraham Lincoln
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lomers with the tip! Here we go.
"Stand with anyone when he is right; Stand with him while he is right and part with him when he goes wrong." - Abraham Lincoln
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump is still extremely sharp compared to mashed potato head Biden. Not even close.
"Stand with anyone when he is right; Stand with him while he is right and part with him when he goes wrong." - Abraham Lincoln
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Close the border.
Drill Baby, drill!
Kill the electric car mandates!!!


"Stand with anyone when he is right; Stand with him while he is right and part with him when he goes wrong." - Abraham Lincoln
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zero interest on the right. Guess they are too busy watching The Voice! Embarrassing.

This race is pretty much over. If Biden survives, he wins in a landslide! What a ****ing joke we have become.
"Stand with anyone when he is right; Stand with him while he is right and part with him when he goes wrong." - Abraham Lincoln
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Check the polls lately?
Mitch Blood Green
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Just one hour long. I wish he was on the debate stage tomorrow night at the last Republican Party debate. Don't think he wants any part of DeSantis and Haley on the debate stage. I get it.

Hope he concentrates on focusing on Biden's failures and how he would fix them. Hope he addresses the Ukranian and Israeli wars. Hope he does NOT waste any time attacking his Republican challengers.




I'm gonna reply BEFORE I read. I didn't watch the debate. He will focus on grievance not solutions.

Now I'll read.
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Check the polls lately?
I love you man, but do you honestly think the Democrats are going to allow Donald Trump to win another election? Dems will "win" by any means necessary. 2020 was the template. I expect the Dems to find 91 million votes if necessary.
"Stand with anyone when he is right; Stand with him while he is right and part with him when he goes wrong." - Abraham Lincoln
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Oldbear83 said:

Check the polls lately?
I love you man, but do you honestly think the Democrats are going to allow Donald Trump to win another election? Dems will "win" by any means necessary. 2020 was the template. I expect the Dems to find 91 million votes if necessary.
Yep. "Election season flu" will suddenly appear. Midnight vote counting stoppages while the republican leads and then once the counting resumes a magical comeback win from behind by the democrat. 100% of votes in certain areas to the democrat candidate despite that being a statistical impossibility. Signature verification thrown out the window on mail in ballots. Deadlines ignored. If a recount happens anywhere it will be the same set of ballots from the whole recounted rather than all ballots. Ballot box drop offs stuffed with hundreds of ballots by a single individual. Hide and watch.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Oldbear83 said:

Check the polls lately?
I love you man, but do you honestly think the Democrats are going to allow Donald Trump to win another election? Dems will "win" by any means necessary. 2020 was the template. I expect the Dems to find 91 million votes if necessary.
Oboy.

First, 2020 was an outlier by any rational standard. Democrats controlled the Congress and had manipulated a virus, making it a weapon unlikely to be available now, and further had managed to trick Trump into several unforced errors.

And for all of that, the key states Biden won were by very thin margins.

If Biden had done even a half-decent job, he would have enjoyed enough support to be untouchable, since the media protected/defended him at every turn. Instead, the Democrats have proved that there actually is a candidate they could run that is worse than Hillary Clinton.

Let me say here - again - that I prefer the GOP nominate someone besides Donald Trump for President in 2024. But the claim that there is no way Trump wins in 2024 is clearly just a myth being sold by the Democrat-controlled media. Part of the strategy in an election is damaging the opponent's supporters confidence.

The economy is always the main issue in an election, and there's no way possible to sell Biden as deserving a second term. Everyone knows that, which is why so many people say he won't be the nominee in 2024.

But the calendar is a big problem now for the Democrats, as is History. Without going into all the details, a party cannot change its leadership close to an election. Two examples would be Johnson's bitter withdrawal in 1968 and McGovern's running-mate switch in 1972. In 1968, the Democrats decided late that President Johnson was not the man they wanted, and LBJ was forced to withdraw from the race. Johnson was bitter and refused to support Humphrey after he won the nomination, opening the door for Wallace to further disrupt the race and allow Nixon to win with just 43% of the Popular Vote.

In 1972, McGovern was running against a deeply unpopular Richard Nixon and was making some traction, when he decided Senator Thomas Eagleton was unsuitable and dumped him as running mate, replacing him with Sargent Shriver, former head of the Peace Corps. That change proved to be a bad idea, and despite his unpopular personality and style, Richard Nixon absolutely destroyed McGovern with over 60 percent of the Popular Vote.

Frankly, the Democrats should have had Biden declare he was not running for re-election no later than this past June. That would have allowed the Democrats time to have a full primary process to find their most viable candidate. Instead, they seem determined to repeat the 2016 and 2020 election strategies, down to the same blunders and stupid assumptions.

A lot remains to play out, but by no means is this election decided.
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sweet donny baby!

- kkm

arbyscoin - the only crypto you can eat.
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Zero interest on the right. Guess they are too busy watching The Voice! Embarrassing.

This race is pretty much over. If Biden survives, he wins in a landslide! What a ****ing joke we have become.
right there with ya. Is all we got????????
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Oldbear83 said:

Check the polls lately?
I love you man, but do you honestly think the Democrats are going to allow Donald Trump to win another election? Dems will "win" by any means necessary. 2020 was the template. I expect the Dems to find 91 million votes if necessary.
Oboy.

First, 2020 was an outlier by any rational standard. Democrats controlled the Congress and had manipulated a virus, making it a weapon unlikely to be available now, and further had managed to trick Trump into several unforced errors.

And for all of that, the key states Biden won were by very thin margins.

If Biden had done even a half-decent job, he would have enjoyed enough support to be untouchable, since the media protected/defended him at every turn. Instead, the Democrats have proved that there actually is a candidate they could run that is worse than Hillary Clinton.

Let me say here - again - that I prefer the GOP nominate someone besides Donald Trump for President in 2024. But the claim that there is no way Trump wins in 2024 is clearly just a myth being sold by the Democrat-controlled media. Part of the strategy in an election is damaging the opponent's supporters confidence.

The economy is always the main issue in an election, and there's no way possible to sell Biden as deserving a second term. Everyone knows that, which is why so many people say he won't be the nominee in 2024.

But the calendar is a big problem now for the Democrats, as is History. Without going into all the details, a party cannot change its leadership close to an election. Two examples would be Johnson's bitter withdrawal in 1968 and McGovern's running-mate switch in 1972. In 1968, the Democrats decided late that President Johnson was not the man they wanted, and LBJ was forced to withdraw from the race. Johnson was bitter and refused to support Humphrey after he won the nomination, opening the door for Wallace to further disrupt the race and allow Nixon to win with just 43% of the Popular Vote.

In 1972, McGovern was running against a deeply unpopular Richard Nixon and was making some traction, when he decided Senator Thomas Eagleton was unsuitable and dumped him as running mate, replacing him with Sargent Shriver, former head of the Peace Corps. That change proved to be a bad idea, and despite his unpopular personality and style, Richard Nixon absolutely destroyed McGovern with over 60 percent of the Popular Vote.

Frankly, the Democrats should have had Biden declare he was not running for re-election no later than this past June. That would have allowed the Democrats time to have a full primary process to find their most viable candidate. Instead, they seem determined to repeat the 2016 and 2020 election strategies, down to the same blunders and stupid assumptions.

A lot remains to play out, but by no means is this election decided.
You are much more optimistic at this point than me, my friend.

I feel like half the country is dumber than a box of rocks and the other half is apathetic and just doesn't give a
$ h i t. Hope you are right and I am wrong.
"Stand with anyone when he is right; Stand with him while he is right and part with him when he goes wrong." - Abraham Lincoln
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Oldbear83 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Oldbear83 said:

Check the polls lately?
I love you man, but do you honestly think the Democrats are going to allow Donald Trump to win another election? Dems will "win" by any means necessary. 2020 was the template. I expect the Dems to find 91 million votes if necessary.
Oboy.

First, 2020 was an outlier by any rational standard. Democrats controlled the Congress and had manipulated a virus, making it a weapon unlikely to be available now, and further had managed to trick Trump into several unforced errors.

And for all of that, the key states Biden won were by very thin margins.

If Biden had done even a half-decent job, he would have enjoyed enough support to be untouchable, since the media protected/defended him at every turn. Instead, the Democrats have proved that there actually is a candidate they could run that is worse than Hillary Clinton.

Let me say here - again - that I prefer the GOP nominate someone besides Donald Trump for President in 2024. But the claim that there is no way Trump wins in 2024 is clearly just a myth being sold by the Democrat-controlled media. Part of the strategy in an election is damaging the opponent's supporters confidence.

The economy is always the main issue in an election, and there's no way possible to sell Biden as deserving a second term. Everyone knows that, which is why so many people say he won't be the nominee in 2024.

But the calendar is a big problem now for the Democrats, as is History. Without going into all the details, a party cannot change its leadership close to an election. Two examples would be Johnson's bitter withdrawal in 1968 and McGovern's running-mate switch in 1972. In 1968, the Democrats decided late that President Johnson was not the man they wanted, and LBJ was forced to withdraw from the race. Johnson was bitter and refused to support Humphrey after he won the nomination, opening the door for Wallace to further disrupt the race and allow Nixon to win with just 43% of the Popular Vote.

In 1972, McGovern was running against a deeply unpopular Richard Nixon and was making some traction, when he decided Senator Thomas Eagleton was unsuitable and dumped him as running mate, replacing him with Sargent Shriver, former head of the Peace Corps. That change proved to be a bad idea, and despite his unpopular personality and style, Richard Nixon absolutely destroyed McGovern with over 60 percent of the Popular Vote.

Frankly, the Democrats should have had Biden declare he was not running for re-election no later than this past June. That would have allowed the Democrats time to have a full primary process to find their most viable candidate. Instead, they seem determined to repeat the 2016 and 2020 election strategies, down to the same blunders and stupid assumptions.

A lot remains to play out, but by no means is this election decided.
You are much more optimistic at this point than me, my friend.

I feel like half the country is dumber than a box of rocks and the other half is apathetic and just doesn't give a
$ h i t. Hope you are right and I am wrong.
Just looking back at History. Trump wasn't supposed to have a chance in 2016, Bush in 2000 was supposed to be a dumb frat guy who would get smoked by Gore, Reagan was supposed to be a washed-up actor who would fall apart under pressure, etc.

Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.