Totally agree. Having legislation to baby sit us is for fools.KaiBear said:ron.reagan said:Trying to say the long list of "narcotics" are worse than alcohol really shows you actually don't understand the problem.KaiBear said:Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
You call it silly. I have posted several articles that claim otherwise. If we can both find articles to support our opinion maybe its about a tie. Alcohol has done much more damage to my family ( my youngest bro.) and people I know. I cant understand your acceptance and support of one and desire to execute someone for selling the other.
Don't care to convince you of anything.
I see the damage of narcotics every single day .
I see the damage to our peoples standard of living with these open borders every single day.
Have long realized you are incapable of recognizing either problem.
No doubt due to some kind of personal gratification.
Anyone who attempts to justify the legislation of LSD, meth, crack, speed, heroin or other hard narcotics by comparing them to the toxicity of alcohol is either a fool , is a drug user, or has never visited the mental ward of their local hospital .
Other than the rare Coors Light , I don't drink.
However I am aware alcohol can be abused . Yes alcoholics exist in significant numbers .
But the concept of increasing the availability of hard narcotics by legalizing them is simply stupid and destructive in the extreme.