Supreme Court Season 2024.

1. Mifepristone can stay on the market as is.

...We have the first opinion and it is the mifepristone case. It is FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine and the author is Justice Kavanaugh for a unanimous court...

— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) June 13, 2024

...Once again, the Court defies those who insist that it is dysfunctionally and ideologically divided on major cases...

— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) June 13, 2024

...Here is the opinion: https://t.co/nv5uhlWcVX

— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) June 13, 2024

...Thomas wrote for the Court in reversing the federal circuit and supporting the the Patent and Trademark Office. Upholds the denial of registration the "Trump too small" mark. https://t.co/RlRbdtLlsq

— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) June 13, 2024

...In the Starbucks case, Thomas again writes for the Court and, in ruling for Starbucks, raised the standard required for the National Labor Relations Board to seek judicial intervention to halt unfair labor practices.

— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) June 13, 2024

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Supreme Court Season 2024.

1. Mifepristone can stay on the market as is.

---

Sad day.

Quote:

---

Mifepristone is a drug that blocks a hormone called progesterone that is needed for a pregnancy to continue. Mifepristone, when used together with another medicine called misoprostol, is used to end a pregnancy through ten weeks gestation (70 days or less since the first day of the last menstrual period).

---

So abortion is truly legal in all 50 states, as this is accessible in all 50 states.

Virtually everybody would know they were pregnant this far out.
Sure there are a few clueless people out there, but 95% would know by this time.

Another study shows it works at 11 weeks, up to 95% of the time.

Thanks for the info, I didn't know it. My friend needed help writing his college essay, so I suggested he check out www.linkedin.com/pulse/best-5-sites-pay-someone-write-my-college-essay-review-samplius-tegne website. It has a detailed list of the best services to use, with reviews and user experiences. He found it extremely helpful and was able to choose a service that fit his needs perfectly. If you need essay writing help, this is a great place to start. I am sure you won't regret your decision.

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

ortion is truly legal in all 50 states, as this is accessible in all 50 states.

---

Basically the combined effect of the Roe reversal and this decision was to legalize chemical abortion through ten weeks in all 50 states, and leave surgical abortion as a form of birth control up to the time of delivery legal in Democrat run states.

Bump Stock ban illegal.

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Bump Stock ban illegal.

---

BREAKING: The Supreme Court has just overturned the ban on bumpstocks!

“We conclude that semiautomatic rifle equipped with a bump stock is not a “machinegun” because it does not fire
more than one shot “by a single function of the trigger.””

SOURCE: https://t.co/gxIKX6vnjX pic.twitter.com/zgBNvbY3NG

— Eric Spracklen🇺🇸 (@EricSpracklen) June 14, 2024

Both of these rulings underscore the Left's constant attack on the Court is projection and completely misguided.

So-called conservative Justices consistently place the law above politics, and so-called liberal judges consistent place politics above the law.

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Both of these rulings underscore the Left's constant attack on the Court is projection and completely misguided.

---

yes its projection but its not misguided.

They are trying to lay the ground work for a possible change in the SCOTUS via packing it with more justices or delegitimizing its more conservative rulings for the future when they will be overruled.

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Bump Stock ban illegal.

---

Really, I kinda thought that was a good idea.

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Bump Stock ban illegal.

---

Really, I kinda thought that was a good idea.

---

If you read the ruling carefully, you can see where the Congress has means to redefine 'automatic weapon' and in so doing include accessories like bump stocks.

It's actually a pretty narrow ruling.

Oldbear83 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Bump Stock ban illegal.

---

Really, I kinda thought that was a good idea.

---

If you read the ruling carefully, you can see where the Congress has means to redefine 'automatic weapon' and in so doing include accessories like bump stocks.

It's actually a pretty narrow ruling.

---

God help us if any of us are downwind of a person with an AR and bump stock.

Let me have a grenade.

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Both of these rulings underscore the Left's constant attack on the Court is projection and completely misguided.

So-called conservative Justices consistently place the law above politics, and so-called liberal judges consistent place politics above the law.

---

In what jurisdiction do you think banning bump stock wouldn't pass?

This isn't an "arm" protected by the 4th amendment.

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Bump Stock ban illegal.

---

Really, I kinda thought that was a good idea.

---

It's a great idea.

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Both of these rulings underscore the Left's constant attack on the Court is projection and completely misguided.

So-called conservative Justices consistently place the law above politics, and so-called liberal judges consistent place politics above the law.

---

And here it is….

Rashida Tlaib: "It's time to expand the Supreme Court. We need to enact term limits and expedite impeachment proceedings. Thomas and Alito need to be impeached and removed from the bench now." pic.twitter.com/PhJZ3VseGN

— Real Mac Report (@RealMacReport) June 14, 2024

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Bump Stock ban illegal.

---

Really, I kinda thought that was a good idea.

---

If you read the ruling carefully, you can see where the Congress has means to redefine 'automatic weapon' and in so doing include accessories like bump stocks.

It's actually a pretty narrow ruling.

---

God help us if any of us are downwind of a person with an AR and bump stock.

Let me have a grenade.

---

You can have a dummy grenade, you with any live ammunition is really bad idea, judging from your emotional posts.

Those of you who understand the law can correct me if needed.

Isn't the SC just disagreeing with an executive order? If Congress will enact a bump stock ban law, then bump stocks will be banned. There seems to be enough to pass the law. At least one of the justices who voted to overturn seems to believe they ACT like machine guns but technically aren't.

The 3 dissenters want to legislate from the bench. They are only to interpret the law. It's Congress who needs to get their act together.

Then again, I haven't followed this too closely.

midgett said:

---

Those of you who understand the law can correct me if needed.

Isn't the SC just disagreeing with an executive order? If Congress will enact a bump stock ban law, then bump stocks will be banned. There seems to be enough to pass the law. At least one of the justices who voted to overturn seems to believe they ACT like machine guns but technically aren't.

The 3 dissenters want to legislate from the bench. They are only to interpret the law. It's Congress who needs to get their act together.

Then again, I haven't followed this too closely.

---

I haven't followed this closely either.

I'm not sure that the dissenters want to legislate from the bench any more than Trump wanted to legislate via pressure on the ATF, but the majority seems to say that you're correct otherwise:

Congress needs to do its job if it wants to outlaw bump stocks.

For that reason, I agree with the decision.

midgett said:

---

Those of you who understand the law can correct me if needed.

Isn't the SC just disagreeing with an executive order? If Congress will enact a bump stock ban law, then bump stocks will be banned. There seems to be enough to pass the law. At least one of the justices who voted to overturn seems to believe they ACT like machine guns but technically aren't.

The 3 dissenters want to legislate from the bench. They are only to interpret the law. It's Congress who needs to get their act together.

Then again, I haven't followed this too closely.

---

Didn't congress ban machine guns before we met? This is just another way to make a machine gun.

Oldbear83 said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Bump Stock ban illegal.

---

Really, I kinda thought that was a good idea.

---

If you read the ruling carefully, you can see where the Congress has means to redefine 'automatic weapon' and in so doing include accessories like bump stocks.

It's actually a pretty narrow ruling.

---

God help us if any of us are downwind of a person with an AR and bump stock.

Let me have a grenade.

---

You can have a dummy grenade, you with any live ammunition is really bad idea, judging from your emotional posts.

---

Only *****es think things are emotional. Are you a ***** 83?

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Bump Stock ban illegal.

---

Really, I kinda thought that was a good idea.

---

If you read the ruling carefully, you can see where the Congress has means to redefine 'automatic weapon' and in so doing include accessories like bump stocks.

It's actually a pretty narrow ruling.

---

God help us if any of us are downwind of a person with an AR and bump stock.

Let me have a grenade.

---

You can have a dummy grenade, you with any live ammunition is really bad idea, judging from your emotional posts.

---

Only *****es think things are emotional. Are you a ***** 83?

---

Language.

Oldbear83 said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Bump Stock ban illegal.

---

Really, I kinda thought that was a good idea.

---

If you read the ruling carefully, you can see where the Congress has means to redefine 'automatic weapon' and in so doing include accessories like bump stocks.

It's actually a pretty narrow ruling.

---

God help us if any of us are downwind of a person with an AR and bump stock.

Let me have a grenade.

---

You can have a dummy grenade, you with any live ammunition is really bad idea, judging from your emotional posts.

---

Only *****es think things are emotional. Are you a ***** 83?

---

Language.

---

I didn't see an answer.

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Bump Stock ban illegal.

---

Really, I kinda thought that was a good idea.

---

If you read the ruling carefully, you can see where the Congress has means to redefine 'automatic weapon' and in so doing include accessories like bump stocks.

It's actually a pretty narrow ruling.

---

God help us if any of us are downwind of a person with an AR and bump stock.

Let me have a grenade.

---

You can have a dummy grenade, you with any live ammunition is really bad idea, judging from your emotional posts.

---

Only *****es think things are emotional. Are you a ***** 83?

---

Language.

---

I didn't see an answer.

---

I am not obliged to reply to an expletive with no content.

It's precisely because "Justice" Jackson is functionally illiterate that she was put on the Supreme Court. https://t.co/YGMqi9M6Co

— James Kirkpatrick (@VDAREJamesK) June 27, 2024

The Supreme Court is a dangerous threat to democracy when it rules against the left but a towering force for progress when it opts to advance the civil rights revolution over the will of the voters https://t.co/nxkt3k1r95

— Auron MacIntyre (@AuronMacintyre) June 27, 2024

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Bump Stock ban illegal.

---

Really, I kinda thought that was a good idea.

---

If you read the ruling carefully, you can see where the Congress has means to redefine 'automatic weapon' and in so doing include accessories like bump stocks.

It's actually a pretty narrow ruling.

---

God help us if any of us are downwind of a person with an AR and bump stock.

Let me have a grenade.

---

You can have a dummy grenade, you with any live ammunition is really bad idea, judging from your emotional posts.

---

Only *****es think things are emotional. Are you a ***** 83?

---

Language.

---

I didn't see an answer.

---

Look closer.

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

midgett said:

---

Those of you who understand the law can correct me if needed.

Isn't the SC just disagreeing with an executive order? If Congress will enact a bump stock ban law, then bump stocks will be banned. There seems to be enough to pass the law. At least one of the justices who voted to overturn seems to believe they ACT like machine guns but technically aren't.

The 3 dissenters want to legislate from the bench. They are only to interpret the law. It's Congress who needs to get their act together.

Then again, I haven't followed this too closely.

---

Didn't congress ban machine guns before we met? This is just another way to make a machine gun.

---

The only possible way you can think that is if you've never fired an actual fully automatic rifle.

They should be banned because they are absolute junk. They cause jams constantly, they require a stupid amount of luck to fire more than 3-5 rounds consistently as the rifle is moving around all over the damned place and they make a rifle designed to be super accurate not even remotely accurate.

An automatic rifle will quite literally fire until the barrel melts if you have enough ammunition and it does it effortlessly and with incredible accuracy. It also may be one of the more fun things on the planet to do if you've never been to a range that has them.

This is the part where I tell you that anyone with a 3D printer can print an auto sear for less than a dollar (but you shouldn't because that illegal and federal prison for a long time sounds like a terrible plan that I think most everyone would hate) and actual criminals are buying black market automatic rifles anyhow.

nein51 said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

midgett said:

---

Those of you who understand the law can correct me if needed.

Isn't the SC just disagreeing with an executive order? If Congress will enact a bump stock ban law, then bump stocks will be banned. There seems to be enough to pass the law. At least one of the justices who voted to overturn seems to believe they ACT like machine guns but technically aren't.

The 3 dissenters want to legislate from the bench. They are only to interpret the law. It's Congress who needs to get their act together.

Then again, I haven't followed this too closely.

---

Didn't congress ban machine guns before we met? This is just another way to make a machine gun.

---

The only possible way you can think that is if you've never fired an actual fully automatic rifle.

They should be banned because they are absolute junk. They cause jams constantly, they require a stupid amount of luck to fire more than 3-5 rounds consistently as the rifle is moving around all over the damned place and they make a rifle designed to be super accurate not even remotely accurate.

An automatic rifle will quite literally fire until the barrel melts if you have enough ammunition and it does it effortlessly and with incredible accuracy. It also may be one of the more fun things on the planet to do if you've never been to a range that has them.

This is the part where I tell you that anyone with a 3D printer can print an auto sear for less than a dollar (but you shouldn't because that illegal and federal prison for a long time sounds like a terrible plan that I think most everyone would hate) and actual criminals are buying black market automatic rifles anyhow.

---

Sure, they're not accurate but the LV guy didn't care about accuracy. He cared about speed. These things take a semi auto and give it the speed of a machine gun.

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

nein51 said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

midgett said:

---

Those of you who understand the law can correct me if needed.

Isn't the SC just disagreeing with an executive order? If Congress will enact a bump stock ban law, then bump stocks will be banned. There seems to be enough to pass the law. At least one of the justices who voted to overturn seems to believe they ACT like machine guns but technically aren't.

The 3 dissenters want to legislate from the bench. They are only to interpret the law. It's Congress who needs to get their act together.

Then again, I haven't followed this too closely.

---

Didn't congress ban machine guns before we met? This is just another way to make a machine gun.

---

The only possible way you can think that is if you've never fired an actual fully automatic rifle.

They should be banned because they are absolute junk. They cause jams constantly, they require a stupid amount of luck to fire more than 3-5 rounds consistently as the rifle is moving around all over the damned place and they make a rifle designed to be super accurate not even remotely accurate.

An automatic rifle will quite literally fire until the barrel melts if you have enough ammunition and it does it effortlessly and with incredible accuracy. It also may be one of the more fun things on the planet to do if you've never been to a range that has them.

This is the part where I tell you that anyone with a 3D printer can print an auto sear for less than a dollar (but you shouldn't because that illegal and federal prison for a long time sounds like a terrible plan that I think most everyone would hate) and actual criminals are buying black market automatic rifles anyhow.

---

Sure, they're not accurate but the LV guy didn't care about accuracy. He cared about speed. These things take a semi auto and give it the speed of a machine gun.

---

So what? With $20 instead of many hundred he could have purchased an auto sear from China or simply printed one and had an actual full automatic.

Because one guy used one once it should be banned? We banning SUVs after dude drove one through a parade or are we, rightly, saying "people who want to kill people can find many ways of accomplishing that and 99.9999% of owners would never use their SUV as a killing machine"

Redbrickbear said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Both of these rulings underscore the Left's constant attack on the Court is projection and completely misguided.

So-called conservative Justices consistently place the law above politics, and so-called liberal judges consistent place politics above the law.

---

And here it is….

Rashida Tlaib: "It's time to expand the Supreme Court. We need to enact term limits and expedite impeachment proceedings. Thomas and Alito need to be impeached and removed from the bench now." pic.twitter.com/PhJZ3VseGN

— Real Mac Report (@RealMacReport) June 14, 2024

---

She is coming from the anti-american branch of the democratic party, so nothing she says pretty much will I ever agree with.

nein51 said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

nein51 said:

---

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

midgett said:

---

Those of you who understand the law can correct me if needed.

Isn't the SC just disagreeing with an executive order? If Congress will enact a bump stock ban law, then bump stocks will be banned. There seems to be enough to pass the law. At least one of the justices who voted to overturn seems to believe they ACT like machine guns but technically aren't.

The 3 dissenters want to legislate from the bench. They are only to interpret the law. It's Congress who needs to get their act together.

Then again, I haven't followed this too closely.

---

Didn't congress ban machine guns before we met? This is just another way to make a machine gun.

---

The only possible way you can think that is if you've never fired an actual fully automatic rifle.

They should be banned because they are absolute junk. They cause jams constantly, they require a stupid amount of luck to fire more than 3-5 rounds consistently as the rifle is moving around all over the damned place and they make a rifle designed to be super accurate not even remotely accurate.

An automatic rifle will quite literally fire until the barrel melts if you have enough ammunition and it does it effortlessly and with incredible accuracy. It also may be one of the more fun things on the planet to do if you've never been to a range that has them.

This is the part where I tell you that anyone with a 3D printer can print an auto sear for less than a dollar (but you shouldn't because that illegal and federal prison for a long time sounds like a terrible plan that I think most everyone would hate) and actual criminals are buying black market automatic rifles anyhow.

---

Sure, they're not accurate but the LV guy didn't care about accuracy. He cared about speed. These things take a semi auto and give it the speed of a machine gun.

---

So what? With $20 instead of many hundred he could have purchased an auto sear from China or simply printed one and had an actual full automatic.

Because one guy used one once it should be banned? We banning SUVs after dude drove one through a parade or are we, rightly, saying "people who want to kill people can find many ways of accomplishing that and 99.9999% of owners would never use their SUV as a killing machine"

---

Yes, we ban things because one guy used it. Good enough for me. Truth is, it's actually the first guy used it and it will be used again, that's why it was banned.

Mitch Blood Green said:

---

Bump Stock ban illegal.

---

I think a bump stock ban would be a good thing. More extensive and thorough background checks are a good thing.

Going back to abortion, I believe Liberal Democrats should be allowed to murder their unborn children up to the 40th week. The world be a better place in the long run. Would be best if crazy doesn't reproduce. EVERYBODY wins except for the child that is never born.