I keep seeing Dem governors and mayors saying they won't assist Trump in deporting illegals, even illegals that have additional crimes. So, how is this going to play out. This issue was near the top of the list of issues in this campaign. And Trump has said he will use the military to get this process going. So....how does this play out in a lib state like say Massachusetts?
Post Reply
1 of 1
Trump vs Dem Govs and Mayors on Deportation
467 Views |
7 Replies |
Last: 1 mo ago by STxBear81
ScottS said:
I keep seeing Dem governors and mayors saying they won't assist Trump in deporting illegals, even illegals that have additional crimes. So, how is this going to play out. This issue was near the top of the list of issues in this campaign. And Trump has said he will use the military to get this process going. So....how does this play out in a lib state like say Massachusetts?
I assume all these sanctuary cities/states get Federal funding right? I'm sure their constituents won't mind paying extra millions/billions. Godless progressives are the worst.
All these "ballots" that show up 2 weeks after the election always almost 100 percent dem might disappear suddenly.
Note the California Rep race is now down to 200 votes.
Note the California Rep race is now down to 200 votes.
By the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved.
Eisenhower sent the 101st Airborne to Little Rock in 1957 to patrol the streets with slung arms and fixed bayonets. The intended purpose was to put Arkansas on notice that it's capitol was an 'occupied' city. Ike certainly knew how to use the military to achieve his goals and leave no doubt about his intentions to what was a rogue governor of a defiant state.
Trump, and the entire country would benefit if he were to employ similar occupation tactics in this case. Ike knew that if he didn't make an example of Arkansas, he would see other governors across the South defying Brown v. Board of Education ruling of 1954.
Trump has the law and overwhelming public opinion on his side to put down this current renegade state rebellion and he should use it.
Trump, and the entire country would benefit if he were to employ similar occupation tactics in this case. Ike knew that if he didn't make an example of Arkansas, he would see other governors across the South defying Brown v. Board of Education ruling of 1954.
Trump has the law and overwhelming public opinion on his side to put down this current renegade state rebellion and he should use it.
Quote:
Godless progressives are the worst.
"Christian" progressives are no better.
ABC BEAR said:
Eisenhower sent the 101st Airborne to Little Rock in 1957 to patrol the streets with slung arms and fixed bayonets. The intended purpose was to put Arkansas on notice that it's capitol was an 'occupied' city. Ike certainly knew how to use the military to achieve his goals and leave no doubt about his intentions to what was a rogue governor of a defiant state.
Trump, and the entire country would benefit if he were to employ similar occupation tactics in this case. Ike knew that if he didn't make an example of Arkansas, he would see other governors across the South defying Brown v. Board of Education ruling of 1954.
Trump has the law and overwhelming public opinion on his side to put down this current renegade state rebellion and he should use it.
That will not happen
DC will only allow Federal troops to be used to enforce liberal cultural priorities
Never conservative ones
"Desegregation is good....sending 3rd world peasants home is bad"
Just like it did in NYC. You flood them with illegal aliens and break their budget and their support from woke libs.ScottS said:
I keep seeing Dem governors and mayors saying they won't assist Trump in deporting illegals, even illegals that have additional crimes. So, how is this going to play out. This issue was near the top of the list of issues in this campaign. And Trump has said he will use the military to get this process going. So....how does this play out in a lib state like say Massachusetts?
It's easy to talk a liberal game but impossible to live it out.
why be so stubborn in regards to your own community? makes no sense to have dangerous people in community and encourage them