RFK, Jr. secretly got rich of his vaccine conspiracy garbage

3,946 Views | 97 Replies | Last: 7 days ago by historian
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He got confirmed, now for the hard part.. getting something accomplished.
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”

Jon Stewart
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
NeuroticBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tempus Edax Rerum said:

Mothra said:

sombear said:

Mothra said:

sombear said:

Tempus Edax Rerum said:

See the editorial below from the WSJ from January 23rd, 2025. Is the WSJ lying too? Is it a left wing nut job hack piece as well?


Senate Republicans are burying their heads to avoid many of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s positions. The question is whether the ostrich routine risks allowing Mr. Kennedy, should he win confirmation as health and human services secretary, to put trial lawyers in charge of American business, regulators and Congress itself.

The longtime Democrat's nomination hearings begin next week. The Republican effort to excuse or divert attention from Mr. Kennedy's disqualifying views has been a mix of hilarity and cringe. How to rationalize a nominee who rejects basic science, who labels U.S. farmers a greater threat than al Qaeda, who wants to "punish" climate "deniers," who loves big government? Senators have variously mumbled that Mr. Kennedy didn't understand, or was misunderstood, or has shed 50 years of leftist ideology.

Yet it all fails to confront the motivating impulse behind Mr. Kennedy's dubious positions. To understand how Mr. Kennedy arrived at his outlier views, one must first understand his interest in getting there. The short answer: He's a trial lawyer, a specialist in extortion by litigation, a practice he acknowledges he wants to encourage via public office.

His colorful past obscures the reality of Mr. Kennedy's lifetime calling: suing, and suing more. He started in the nonprofit world but joined the ranks of plaintiffs firms that squeeze companies for settlementsthe lawyers getting huge contingency fees while clients sometimes get little. His recent government ethics filing notes his continuing legal work or positions with trial firms that include Kennedy & Madonna (which changed its name to Madonna & Madonna on Jan. 13), Morgan & Morgan, and Wisner Baum.

That career puts Mr. Kennedy's campaigns in a different context. To listen to the nominee, his war against the weed killer glyphosate is motivated by his desire to save humans from "poison." Then again, it was Mr. Kennedy's claim that glyphosate is carcinogenica position rejected by most health agenciesthat enabled him and other lawyers to land a $289 million judgment against Roundup maker Monsanto. (The judgment was reduced on appeal.)

This tort mindset matters deeply because it isby Mr. Kennedy's own admissionbehind his goal of running HHS. In an interview in July with "Dr. Phil" McGraw, Mr. Kennedy, then an independent presidential candidate, said that Congress and regulators were all on industry "payrolls" and useless. So he had a different plan. He'd "go down to NIH"the National Institutes of Health, which is part of HHSand order it to "find out" what products are "causing" chronic disease. "Once you have that science that makes that causal connection between an exposure and an injury," he said, that "allows attorneys to bring lawsuits." He adds that "you can't do it through Congress," so "attorneys can come in and it's the market fixing the problem, rather than government."

He emphasized the same strategy after endorsing Mr. Trump. On Fox's "Jesse Watters Primetime" in September, he said that his "plan" to unravel "corporate capture" was to take the "$42 billion dollar budget of NIH," "figure out what is causing" chronic disease," and "name names." Then, "once we have a good science out there, the litigators come in and we'll solve the problem."

Mr. Kennedy still has his trial-lawyer friends in mind as he goes about his public campaigns. Consider his November tweet promising to "remove fluoride from public water" since he says it's behind everything from arthritis to thyroid disease. He tagged Michael Connett, an attorney suing the Environmental Protection Agency and makers of children's toothpaste and mouthwash over fluoride.

Even "Make America Healthy Again" becomes ethically suspect in Mr. Kennedy's hands. Consider his war on "junk" or "ultraprocessed" foods. Mr. Kennedy currently has a referral agreement and of-counsel position with Morgan & Morgan, a law firm that last month bragged it had filed a giant, "first of its kind" lawsuit against Kraft and others for engineering their "ultra-processed food products to be addictive" and causing "chronic disease." Every time an HHS Secretary Kennedy opens his mouth, he'd potentially be providing an in-kind contribution to trial lawyers who'll use his words as evidence in court. (The White House didn't respond to a request for comment.)

Which gets to Mr. Kennedy's own ethics issues. In his filing, he says he will relinquish his legal positions on confirmation, though he plans to continue collecting 10% of fees awarded in contingency cases he referred to Wisner Baum. That firm is suing Merck over its HPV vaccine. According to government records, Mr. Kennedy has collected $2.5 million from the firm over the past two years. While he says he'll collect fees only in cases where the U.S. isn't a party, that means little when he has the power to trash-talk the companies and products in the trial bar's sights.

The GOP has rightly taken a dim view of the trial bar's manipulation of the legal system. Every senator now must consider how to justify placing an unrepentant advocate of that industry in a position of power to facilitate further abuse in a way that negates the role of Congress.
Write to kim@wsj.com.
He's a narcistic whacko fraud, but I guess people like his position on seed oils . . . .
You're right on a long of things. This isn't one of them, nor is your position in vaccines.
Respect your position as always, but fact is, if RFK Jr. had not become affiliated with Trump, conservatives would see him as the leftist radical he always was and I think still is.
Been following RFK for about 14 years now. Heard his speak on several occasions, and have reviewed a lot of the evidence he's presented at his talks. I am not sure leftist is a word I would ever use to describe him, though he is certainly to the left of me.

But he's not all wrong on vaccines, or the vaccine schedule. I think you'd be surprised at the evidence, quite frankly.

Actually, he is very wrong and the medical establishment has disowned this clown a long time ago.
"Medical establishment", bought to you by Pfizer.
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
Married A Horn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:




Death Jab Stikes Back
Married A Horn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Three people in my extended family got the death jab. My Dad (Baylor football '64-'68) whose heart developed tachy-brady (sp?) And had to have a pacemaker put in... his heart kept stopping.
And my brother-in-law, who died in heart surgery.
My mom is fine.

Parents stopped taking the death jab immediately at the strong advice of their 4 sons.
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Married A Horn said:

Three people in my extended family got the death jab. My Dad (Baylor football '64-'68) whose heart developed tachy-brady (sp?) And had to have a pacemaker put in... his heart kept stopping.
And my brother-in-law, who died in heart surgery.
My mom is fine.

Parents stopped taking the death jab immediately at the strong advice of their 4 sons.
interesting, I have two family members that have had pacemakers put in recently. One of them also now has severe bouts of RA type joint inflammation.

I am not saying the jab was the cause but i wonder if there has been an increase in pacemaker implants since covid

Edit:
https://www.escardio.org/The-ESC/Press-Office/Press-releases/severe-covid-19-linked-with-16-fold-risk-of-life-threatening-heart-rhythm-within

Severe covid cases were more likely to develop arrhythmias
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”

Jon Stewart
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is what actual fascism looks like. Bernie over here saying you can't even question muh "science".

Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Married A Horn said:

Assassin said:




Death Jab Stikes Back
Is that the Covid 19 shot?

Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
TinFoilHatPreacherBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Proud 1992 Alum said:

As a 3-time Trump voter and life-long conservative, RFK Jr is not remotely conservative and is an embarrassing choice for HHS secretary. Just because Trump nominated him doesn't mean conservatives have to stop using their brains and defend his indefensible record. He is a dishonest crank. Appreciate his help with the campaign but give him something where he can't screw things up. Maybe ambassador to Bolivia.
Yep I'm not sold on RFK either but I tend to trust Trump enough to wait and see.

And quite honestly Repubs alone can't be trusted with our food health. They're the ones that removed country of origin, they like their Dem counterparts don't care much, they will settle on protecting the globalist food supply chain over the American people.

And maybe under Trump we'll see the US build up its own production of medication rather than outsourcing 90% to China.
Thee tinfoil hat couch-potato prognosticator, not a bible school preacher.


Married A Horn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Do we trust RFK on everything in the conservative agenda? No way. But his anti big pharma and get the poison out of our food is what we hired him for. So under Trump's admin, I'll give RFK a chance for now.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

This is what actual fascism looks like. Bernie over here saying you can't even question muh "science".




Enjoy listening to Bernie. Plays the righteous liberal passionately; often a good piece of theater and his constituents eat it up.

Meanwhile he takes millions of dollars from lobbyists and his net worth grows.
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They just said on Fox that 70% of the folks that are trying to join the Armed Forces, fail the medical part.

That is simply an incredible number

Dr. Robert Redfield was the guest speaker
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?

4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:


no patient should be on a statin unless they have had a CT scan checking the arteries of the neck and heart with positive findings
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”

Jon Stewart
Tempus Edax Rerum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Married A Horn said:

Do we trust RFK on everything in the conservative agenda? No way. But his anti big pharma and get the poison out of our food is what we hired him for. So under Trump's admin, I'll give RFK a chance for now.
Poison out of our food? What sort of goofy stuff are you reading? Yet, you trust a turd who says HIV isn't caused by a virus? God help us.
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
drahthaar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tempus Edax Rerum said:

https://newrepublic.com/post/190262/robert-f-kennedy-jr-anti-vax-nonprofit-money?fbclid=IwY2xjawH1dwdleHRuA2FlbQIxMQABHf3nLRKmS93XskWiRBWosSVcghq9LmxbjE3TgGbTq6jYft04E9IYxyUCjw_aem_zwmqMDf1JMSe3Z2iaJfP6A


It'd be a travesty if he were the only one to "get rich" that way.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's amazing how many people trust fascist propaganda rags fork news. If an organization, especially media, is "progressive" then they are Marxist and definitely NOT to be believed. About anything. Ever.
sombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

Assassin said:


no patient should be on a statin unless they have had a CT scan checking the arteries of the neck and heart with positive findings
I just did some quick research, and dementia has decreased in the U.S. and Europe over the last 25 years.

And there have numerous studies all over the world, and guess what they show: If anything, Statins reduce dementia.

What am I missing here?
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sombear said:

4th and Inches said:

Assassin said:


no patient should be on a statin unless they have had a CT scan checking the arteries of the neck and heart with positive findings
I just did some quick research, and dementia has decreased in the U.S. and Europe over the last 25 years.

And there have numerous studies all over the world, and guess what they show: If anything, Statins reduce dementia.

What am I missing here?
Facebook Groups at; Memories of: Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Through a Texas Lens and also Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
sombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:

sombear said:

4th and Inches said:

Assassin said:


no patient should be on a statin unless they have had a CT scan checking the arteries of the neck and heart with positive findings
I just did some quick research, and dementia has decreased in the U.S. and Europe over the last 25 years.

And there have numerous studies all over the world, and guess what they show: If anything, Statins reduce dementia.

What am I missing here?

Thanks for posting. I'm new to this issue, but it seems rates have long been declining, but with population increases and an aging population, there are more total cases. That sound right?


Neurology Journals

Twenty-seven-year time trends in dementia incidence in Europe and the United States

The Alzheimer Cohorts Consortium

July 2020

Conclusion

The incidence rate of dementia in Europe and North America has declined by 13% per decade over the past 25 years, consistently across studies. Incidence is similar for men and women, although declines were somewhat more profound in men. These observations call for sustained efforts to finding the causes for this decline, as well as determining their validity in geographically and ethnically diverse populations.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.