Trump's first 100 days

841,345 Views | 14944 Replies | Last: 9 hrs ago by boognish_bear
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

ATL Bear said:

The_barBEARian said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

ATL Bear said:

KaiBear said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:



Media must believe Trump is likely to win in Iran......as they are already massaging our electorate for the next crisis.

However there is nothing he can do politically, or realistically d, to balance the budget.


Budget needs to do more than balance. Some of the debt needs to be paid down so we can be ready for the next major crisis.

Dems will never allow freebies to be cut ......Republicans will never permit massive cuts to the defense budget or to increase taxes.

And neither want to touch SS and Medicare.

The problem isn't SS and Medicare. It's Republicans. Every time they get into office, they cut taxes and increase spending on war. Enough already.

There are ways to address SS and Medicare, and they can be done through bipartisan compromise. What we can't keep doing is cutting taxes and then spending trillions on war efforts. I'd much rather a 67-year-old get $1500 per month in SS than bomb another Middle East country.




I agree.

The only steps taken to reduce spending over the last decade have all been Medicare related.

Defense spending has skyrocketed.

Spending on all other entitlements has skyrocketed.

Social Security isnt the problem and there have been several positive steps under Biden and Trump to reduce Medicare spending.

Anyone deflecting blame onto those programs is being disingenuous and is probably personally enriching themselves at the expense of fellow Americans.

The steps have primarily been in Medicare B and D. They were mostly nods to the insurance and pharma industries, have pushed higher premium costs to individuals, and have seen the medical expenses outpace inflation by almost 4 times.


The cost cutting measures I know of would primarily fall under Medicare Part D and are Pharma related.

Biden's Inflation Reduction Act requires Medicare now negotiate drug prices on the top 10 most expensive drugs every year and Trump's Most-Favored Nation executive order requires Pharma to price match whichever country is paying the lowest price for the medication.

If insurers are pushing higher premiums (source?) it certainly isnt because of these cost cutting initiatives.

I find it suspect you always seem deflect from cutting the defense budget to Medicare and Social Security.

The defense budget has grown to over $1 trillion a year and the pentagon hasnt passed an audit in a decade.

We could cut the defense budget in half and 99% of Americans wouldnt even notice.

If we cut the defense budget in half waaaaaay more than 1% of the American population would notice.

Because a cut of 50% would mean massive reductions in number of military personnel. So all of those cut would notice.

It would mean massive drawbacks on buying new military equipment which would mean layoffs at those companies that make the items. Everything from uniform makers to missile factories.

It would mean closing some bases. Which everyone in the area would notice as suddenly there is a huge drop in number of people living in an area, buying, going to school, etc.

A cut that big would have massive ripple effects throughout the economy for a long time.

Just look at how areas were impacted in the 90s with bases being closed. Some of those bases are still just nothing but abandoned buildings, runways, etc. Over 30 years later and they are still empty. The towns nearly died. For the bases in bigger cities they struggled for a while but finally saw development near the empty bases.


Way more than 1% would notice.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



Exactly what JR has been trying to tell us!
"Perhaps this is the moment for which you have been created"." Esther 4:14
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Perhaps this is the moment for which you have been created"." Esther 4:14
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

The_barBEARian said:

ATL Bear said:

The_barBEARian said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

ATL Bear said:

KaiBear said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:



Media must believe Trump is likely to win in Iran......as they are already massaging our electorate for the next crisis.

However there is nothing he can do politically, or realistically d, to balance the budget.


Budget needs to do more than balance. Some of the debt needs to be paid down so we can be ready for the next major crisis.

Dems will never allow freebies to be cut ......Republicans will never permit massive cuts to the defense budget or to increase taxes.

And neither want to touch SS and Medicare.

The problem isn't SS and Medicare. It's Republicans. Every time they get into office, they cut taxes and increase spending on war. Enough already.

There are ways to address SS and Medicare, and they can be done through bipartisan compromise. What we can't keep doing is cutting taxes and then spending trillions on war efforts. I'd much rather a 67-year-old get $1500 per month in SS than bomb another Middle East country.




I agree.

The only steps taken to reduce spending over the last decade have all been Medicare related.

Defense spending has skyrocketed.

Spending on all other entitlements has skyrocketed.

Social Security isnt the problem and there have been several positive steps under Biden and Trump to reduce Medicare spending.

Anyone deflecting blame onto those programs is being disingenuous and is probably personally enriching themselves at the expense of fellow Americans.

The steps have primarily been in Medicare B and D. They were mostly nods to the insurance and pharma industries, have pushed higher premium costs to individuals, and have seen the medical expenses outpace inflation by almost 4 times.


The cost cutting measures I know of would primarily fall under Medicare Part D and are Pharma related.

Biden's Inflation Reduction Act requires Medicare now negotiate drug prices on the top 10 most expensive drugs every year and Trump's Most-Favored Nation executive order requires Pharma to price match whichever country is paying the lowest price for the medication.

If insurers are pushing higher premiums (source?) it certainly isnt because of these cost cutting initiatives.

I find it suspect you always seem deflect from cutting the defense budget to Medicare and Social Security.

The defense budget has grown to over $1 trillion a year and the pentagon hasnt passed an audit in a decade.

We could cut the defense budget in half and 99% of Americans wouldnt even notice.

If we cut the defense budget in half waaaaaay more than 1% of the American population would notice.

Because a cut of 50% would mean massive reductions in number of military personnel. So all of those cut would notice.

It would mean massive drawbacks on buying new military equipment which would mean layoffs at those companies that make the items. Everything from uniform makers to missile factories.

It would mean closing some bases. Which everyone in the area would notice as suddenly there is a huge drop in number of people living in an area, buying, going to school, etc.

A cut that big would have massive ripple effects throughout the economy for a long time.

Just look at how areas were impacted in the 90s with bases being closed. Some of those bases are still just nothing but abandoned buildings, runways, etc. Over 30 years later and they are still empty. The towns nearly died. For the bases in bigger cities they struggled for a while but finally saw development near the empty bases.


Way more than 1% would notice.


Ok. I'll double it. 2% of Americans would notice.

500 billion a year is still an unfathomable amount of money and more than enough to maintain most personnel.

Mb some get forced into early retirement. So be it.

It would still be 2x China's military spending.

Defense contractors can pivot their business model towards the private sector. Adapt or die.

Hopefully they can pass an audit and we can re-evaluate from there.




boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin said:

boognish_bear said:



Exactly what JR has been trying to tell us!

So disingenuous , not based in fact. What a freaking bootlicker. Farmer's growing broke all over. Ask the soybean farmers. Cost of diesel . how bout that Brooke? No fertilizer getting through the straight of Hormuz. how bout that Brooke, you disgusting Trumpian Ttart. Assman. you get your govt cheddar this week? Farmers just like you ....on govt subsidies/dole. Our farmers are some of the hardest working people in our country unlike you who doesn't even have a job. huh Capt. Stubing?
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

The_barBEARian said:

ATL Bear said:

The_barBEARian said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

ATL Bear said:

KaiBear said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:



Media must believe Trump is likely to win in Iran......as they are already massaging our electorate for the next crisis.

However there is nothing he can do politically, or realistically d, to balance the budget.


Budget needs to do more than balance. Some of the debt needs to be paid down so we can be ready for the next major crisis.

Dems will never allow freebies to be cut ......Republicans will never permit massive cuts to the defense budget or to increase taxes.

And neither want to touch SS and Medicare.

The problem isn't SS and Medicare. It's Republicans. Every time they get into office, they cut taxes and increase spending on war. Enough already.

There are ways to address SS and Medicare, and they can be done through bipartisan compromise. What we can't keep doing is cutting taxes and then spending trillions on war efforts. I'd much rather a 67-year-old get $1500 per month in SS than bomb another Middle East country.




I agree.

The only steps taken to reduce spending over the last decade have all been Medicare related.

Defense spending has skyrocketed.

Spending on all other entitlements has skyrocketed.

Social Security isnt the problem and there have been several positive steps under Biden and Trump to reduce Medicare spending.

Anyone deflecting blame onto those programs is being disingenuous and is probably personally enriching themselves at the expense of fellow Americans.

The steps have primarily been in Medicare B and D. They were mostly nods to the insurance and pharma industries, have pushed higher premium costs to individuals, and have seen the medical expenses outpace inflation by almost 4 times.


The cost cutting measures I know of would primarily fall under Medicare Part D and are Pharma related.

Biden's Inflation Reduction Act requires Medicare now negotiate drug prices on the top 10 most expensive drugs every year and Trump's Most-Favored Nation executive order requires Pharma to price match whichever country is paying the lowest price for the medication.

If insurers are pushing higher premiums (source?) it certainly isnt because of these cost cutting initiatives.

I find it suspect you always seem deflect from cutting the defense budget to Medicare and Social Security.

The defense budget has grown to over $1 trillion a year and the pentagon hasnt passed an audit in a decade.

We could cut the defense budget in half and 99% of Americans wouldnt even notice.

If we cut the defense budget in half waaaaaay more than 1% of the American population would notice.

Because a cut of 50% would mean massive reductions in number of military personnel. So all of those cut would notice.

It would mean massive drawbacks on buying new military equipment which would mean layoffs at those companies that make the items. Everything from uniform makers to missile factories.

It would mean closing some bases. Which everyone in the area would notice as suddenly there is a huge drop in number of people living in an area, buying, going to school, etc.

A cut that big would have massive ripple effects throughout the economy for a long time.

Just look at how areas were impacted in the 90s with bases being closed. Some of those bases are still just nothing but abandoned buildings, runways, etc. Over 30 years later and they are still empty. The towns nearly died. For the bases in bigger cities they struggled for a while but finally saw development near the empty bases.


Way more than 1% would notice.


But isnt that feeding at the public trough?
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



Positive Woodrow Wilson would have flunked the test very easily after his massive stroke.

FDR would have failed it by the end of his 3rd term, yet won a 4th.

Biden was clearly suffering from dementia from Day One. Yet the Democratic Party nominated him anyway in their desire to keep the black vote and beat trump.

And Trump is ok for now; but let's be honest. NO ONE should be nominated to be president past the age of 74.
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

cowboycwr said:

The_barBEARian said:

ATL Bear said:

The_barBEARian said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

ATL Bear said:

KaiBear said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:



Media must believe Trump is likely to win in Iran......as they are already massaging our electorate for the next crisis.

However there is nothing he can do politically, or realistically d, to balance the budget.


Budget needs to do more than balance. Some of the debt needs to be paid down so we can be ready for the next major crisis.

Dems will never allow freebies to be cut ......Republicans will never permit massive cuts to the defense budget or to increase taxes.

And neither want to touch SS and Medicare.

The problem isn't SS and Medicare. It's Republicans. Every time they get into office, they cut taxes and increase spending on war. Enough already.

There are ways to address SS and Medicare, and they can be done through bipartisan compromise. What we can't keep doing is cutting taxes and then spending trillions on war efforts. I'd much rather a 67-year-old get $1500 per month in SS than bomb another Middle East country.




I agree.

The only steps taken to reduce spending over the last decade have all been Medicare related.

Defense spending has skyrocketed.

Spending on all other entitlements has skyrocketed.

Social Security isnt the problem and there have been several positive steps under Biden and Trump to reduce Medicare spending.

Anyone deflecting blame onto those programs is being disingenuous and is probably personally enriching themselves at the expense of fellow Americans.

The steps have primarily been in Medicare B and D. They were mostly nods to the insurance and pharma industries, have pushed higher premium costs to individuals, and have seen the medical expenses outpace inflation by almost 4 times.


The cost cutting measures I know of would primarily fall under Medicare Part D and are Pharma related.

Biden's Inflation Reduction Act requires Medicare now negotiate drug prices on the top 10 most expensive drugs every year and Trump's Most-Favored Nation executive order requires Pharma to price match whichever country is paying the lowest price for the medication.

If insurers are pushing higher premiums (source?) it certainly isnt because of these cost cutting initiatives.

I find it suspect you always seem deflect from cutting the defense budget to Medicare and Social Security.

The defense budget has grown to over $1 trillion a year and the pentagon hasnt passed an audit in a decade.

We could cut the defense budget in half and 99% of Americans wouldnt even notice.

If we cut the defense budget in half waaaaaay more than 1% of the American population would notice.

Because a cut of 50% would mean massive reductions in number of military personnel. So all of those cut would notice.

It would mean massive drawbacks on buying new military equipment which would mean layoffs at those companies that make the items. Everything from uniform makers to missile factories.

It would mean closing some bases. Which everyone in the area would notice as suddenly there is a huge drop in number of people living in an area, buying, going to school, etc.

A cut that big would have massive ripple effects throughout the economy for a long time.

Just look at how areas were impacted in the 90s with bases being closed. Some of those bases are still just nothing but abandoned buildings, runways, etc. Over 30 years later and they are still empty. The towns nearly died. For the bases in bigger cities they struggled for a while but finally saw development near the empty bases.


Way more than 1% would notice.


Ok. I'll double it. 2% of Americans would notice.

500 billion a year is still an unfathomable amount of money and more than enough to maintain most personnel.

Mb some get forced into early retirement. So be it.

It would still be 2x China's military spending.

Defense contractors can pivot their business model towards the private sector. Adapt or die.

Hopefully they can pass an audit and we can re-evaluate from there.







So I provide factual information about what would happen and has happened with decreased military spending and you don't want to accept it?

Provide a factual study to support your claim.

While still a large number you are thinking as an individual who can't relate to that amount of spending compared to your level of spending. But that is flawed thinking. When talking nationwide and the millions of people involved it is a huge amount to be cut.

Way more than 2% would notice.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigGameBaylorBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




He's gone off the deep end
Sic 'em Bears and Go Birds
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BigGameBaylorBear said:

boognish_bear said:




He's gone off the deep end


About a year ago...
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

The_barBEARian said:

cowboycwr said:

The_barBEARian said:

ATL Bear said:

The_barBEARian said:

Mitch Blood Green said:

ATL Bear said:

KaiBear said:

EatMoreSalmon said:

KaiBear said:

boognish_bear said:



Media must believe Trump is likely to win in Iran......as they are already massaging our electorate for the next crisis.

However there is nothing he can do politically, or realistically d, to balance the budget.


Budget needs to do more than balance. Some of the debt needs to be paid down so we can be ready for the next major crisis.

Dems will never allow freebies to be cut ......Republicans will never permit massive cuts to the defense budget or to increase taxes.

And neither want to touch SS and Medicare.

The problem isn't SS and Medicare. It's Republicans. Every time they get into office, they cut taxes and increase spending on war. Enough already.

There are ways to address SS and Medicare, and they can be done through bipartisan compromise. What we can't keep doing is cutting taxes and then spending trillions on war efforts. I'd much rather a 67-year-old get $1500 per month in SS than bomb another Middle East country.




I agree.

The only steps taken to reduce spending over the last decade have all been Medicare related.

Defense spending has skyrocketed.

Spending on all other entitlements has skyrocketed.

Social Security isnt the problem and there have been several positive steps under Biden and Trump to reduce Medicare spending.

Anyone deflecting blame onto those programs is being disingenuous and is probably personally enriching themselves at the expense of fellow Americans.

The steps have primarily been in Medicare B and D. They were mostly nods to the insurance and pharma industries, have pushed higher premium costs to individuals, and have seen the medical expenses outpace inflation by almost 4 times.


The cost cutting measures I know of would primarily fall under Medicare Part D and are Pharma related.

Biden's Inflation Reduction Act requires Medicare now negotiate drug prices on the top 10 most expensive drugs every year and Trump's Most-Favored Nation executive order requires Pharma to price match whichever country is paying the lowest price for the medication.

If insurers are pushing higher premiums (source?) it certainly isnt because of these cost cutting initiatives.

I find it suspect you always seem deflect from cutting the defense budget to Medicare and Social Security.

The defense budget has grown to over $1 trillion a year and the pentagon hasnt passed an audit in a decade.

We could cut the defense budget in half and 99% of Americans wouldnt even notice.

If we cut the defense budget in half waaaaaay more than 1% of the American population would notice.

Because a cut of 50% would mean massive reductions in number of military personnel. So all of those cut would notice.

It would mean massive drawbacks on buying new military equipment which would mean layoffs at those companies that make the items. Everything from uniform makers to missile factories.

It would mean closing some bases. Which everyone in the area would notice as suddenly there is a huge drop in number of people living in an area, buying, going to school, etc.

A cut that big would have massive ripple effects throughout the economy for a long time.

Just look at how areas were impacted in the 90s with bases being closed. Some of those bases are still just nothing but abandoned buildings, runways, etc. Over 30 years later and they are still empty. The towns nearly died. For the bases in bigger cities they struggled for a while but finally saw development near the empty bases.


Way more than 1% would notice.


Ok. I'll double it. 2% of Americans would notice.

500 billion a year is still an unfathomable amount of money and more than enough to maintain most personnel.

Mb some get forced into early retirement. So be it.

It would still be 2x China's military spending.

Defense contractors can pivot their business model towards the private sector. Adapt or die.

Hopefully they can pass an audit and we can re-evaluate from there.







So I provide factual information about what would happen and has happened with decreased military spending and you don't want to accept it?

Provide a factual study to support your claim.

While still a large number you are thinking as an individual who can't relate to that amount of spending compared to your level of spending. But that is flawed thinking. When talking nationwide and the millions of people involved it is a huge amount to be cut.

Way more than 2% would notice.


Xi and Putin would notice.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ok...the cabinet is on record that 2026 is the year the economy takes off and deportations ramp up

nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

Ok...the cabinet is on record that 2026 is the year the economy takes off and deportations ramp up



I know an economist pretty well. He does forecasting for manufacturers and Fortune 50s.

Last year he told me his forecast was for pretty large growth in Q1 2027. I said I hoped he was wrong. Now I'm hoping he's right. It's ugly right now.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51 said:

boognish_bear said:

Ok...the cabinet is on record that 2026 is the year the economy takes off and deportations ramp up



I know an economist pretty well. He does forecasting for manufacturers and Fortune 50s.

Last year he told me his forecast was for pretty large growth in Q1 2027. I said I hoped he was wrong. Now I'm hoping he's right. It's ugly right now.


Did he explain why he saw it taking off in 2027?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51 said:

boognish_bear said:

Ok...the cabinet is on record that 2026 is the year the economy takes off and deportations ramp up



I know an economist pretty well. He does forecasting for manufacturers and Fortune 50s.

Last year he told me his forecast was for pretty large growth in Q1 2027. I said I hoped he was wrong. Now I'm hoping he's right. It's ugly right now.

A good friend of mine once quipped that an Economist observes something which works in practice, and wonders if it also works in theory.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

nein51 said:

boognish_bear said:

Ok...the cabinet is on record that 2026 is the year the economy takes off and deportations ramp up



I know an economist pretty well. He does forecasting for manufacturers and Fortune 50s.

Last year he told me his forecast was for pretty large growth in Q1 2027. I said I hoped he was wrong. Now I'm hoping he's right. It's ugly right now.


Did he explain why he saw it taking off in 2027?

Said that's when the demand curve looked to be headed up. Bunch of places also moved production facilities which takes time and a lot should come online Q4 2026 which will impact availability in Q1 2027
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Let me help rephrase for you Bernie.

Need a loan for college so you can party for a semester and drop out? Taxpayers will loan you money for it.

Need an SBA loan for your business ? Taxpayers will guarantee it.

For a house ? Taxpayers will guarantee it. And local gov will give you money for your first down payment !

Get sick or are in an accident and you can't afford your deductible, insurance company denied prescribed care or are uninsured ?

You are on your own

Let me add Bernie, the one debt not a single one of us will ever pay off till the day we die ? Our health insurance premiums

And before you go in and on about single payer, ask @claudeai to take a look at your proposed Single Payer legislation.

You want the Sec of HHS to run it. You can't have a political appointee run an apolitical position

And you expect every provider and doctor to accept whatever rate is set by Medicare. Big hospitals don't know their costs. They couldn't do a BOM for any procedure. They have negligible transparency.

If they don't know their costs, and you don't know their costs, how is it possible for taxpayers, caregivers and patients to get a fair deal ?

And the concept of "every other country does it " ignores the fact that they all converted decades and decades ago, long before you and your peers allowed the extreme vertical integration we face now.

Which leads to the question. @BernieSanders , why have you not advocated for the Break Up Big Medicine Bill ?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nein51 said:

boognish_bear said:

nein51 said:

boognish_bear said:

Ok...the cabinet is on record that 2026 is the year the economy takes off and deportations ramp up



I know an economist pretty well. He does forecasting for manufacturers and Fortune 50s.

Last year he told me his forecast was for pretty large growth in Q1 2027. I said I hoped he was wrong. Now I'm hoping he's right. It's ugly right now.


Did he explain why he saw it taking off in 2027?

Said that's when the demand curve looked to be headed up. Bunch of places also moved production facilities which takes time and a lot should come online Q4 2026 which will impact availability in Q1 2027


Ty
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I keep location services turned off on almost all of my apps

FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

nein51 said:

boognish_bear said:

Ok...the cabinet is on record that 2026 is the year the economy takes off and deportations ramp up



I know an economist pretty well. He does forecasting for manufacturers and Fortune 50s.

Last year he told me his forecast was for pretty large growth in Q1 2027. I said I hoped he was wrong. Now I'm hoping he's right. It's ugly right now.


Did he explain why he saw it taking off in 2027?

All our numbers are showing growth, but the rate is less. More stable, not new highs every month. At least in FL.
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



Ground drones.
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

I keep location services turned off on almost all of my apps



I have one app that I allow constant location. The rest are only allowed - if at all - when using it.

That said, it is obvious that Google queries always use my location even before I approve. This is even as my browser asks if it is ok for Google to use my location.
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:



pro ecclesia, pro javelina
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
First Page Refresh
Page 427 of 427
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.