Trump's first 100 days

614,273 Views | 12070 Replies | Last: 2 min ago by boognish_bear
nein51
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to boognish_bear • 2:45p, 12/24/25
Data centers drive up energy prices.

They should be a terrific candidate for alternative energy though.
Reply Quote
1
william
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to nein51 • 3:07p, 12/24/25
nein51 said:
Data centers drive up energy prices.

They should be a terrific candidate for alternative energy though.

yep - ideal for small modular reactors.......

- UF

https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/what-are-small-modular-reactors-smrs
arbyscoin - the only crypto you can eat....
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:38p, 12/24/25
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:39p, 12/24/25
Reply Quote
ATL Bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FLBear5630 • 3:53p, 12/24/25
FLBear5630 said:
ATL Bear said:
KaiBear said:
Harrison Bergeron said:
Oldbear83 said:
Harrison Bergeron said:
Oldbear83 said:
" Will be impressed if they have a new design that can withstand China's drones and super-sonic ICBMs."

Last I checked, all ICBMs are supersonic.

Fair enough - what is the new missile it has ... maybe it is hypersonic. Regardless, not sure an other big carrier makes sense.

depends on what it does besides the obvious.

Carriers are force projection, which drones/missiles cannot accomplish.

It's also important that new carriers do more than the older classes.

Anyway, a new carrier makes more sense than, say, the F-35 or DEI.

I'm definitely not an expert, but afraid China takes out all our carriers in a couple of days with those hypersonic missiles or massive drone attacks. Hope I'm wrong.

Carriers are hopelessly obsolete.

Easy to detect, a floating mega explosion loaded with jet fuel and bombs.

Multi billion dollar target for cheap drones and missiles.

And each CV is manned by approx 5000 sailors.




Unfortunately we are still fighting and planning for WW2 sea battles.

Even with the recent example of the Russians losing several warships in their Black Sea fleet to Ukranian drones.


I'm sorry, but you couldn't be more wrong in your assessment. Russia is literally still deploying some mostly mid 20th century naval tech, not to mention they only have 1 troubled aircraft carrier from the Soviet Union days. The US Navy is a completely different animal than any of our adversaries, including China.. They've been dealing with swarm missile attack threats for decades, and are now transitioning to the new drone type threats. Perhaps you didn't know the large amount of unmanned warfare capability (both offensive and defensive) the navy commands. Heck they're building future "ghost fleets" with air, sea, and subsurface capabilities.. Look up things like HELIOS, ODIN, Phalanx, and Switchblades as just a few defensive and offensive capabilities in the drone fight.

Carrier groups are military ecosystems that tie together multi ship, air, as well as other branches such as space force, Air Force, and Army capabilities. They are the ultimate forward operating force. If anything, drones are a greater threat to ground based assets. It's why we have had drone casualties in Syria and not in the Persian Gulf or Arabian Sea. This isn't your Father's or Grandfather's Navy.

Now that isn't meant to diminish the China threat. The problem is solving the cost and capacity calculus. Using million dollar missiles to stop thousand dollar drones is a poor equation. China also has a production advantage. We can and are maintaining the innovation advantage, but the production issue is unsolved. They are also advancing their capabilities that we have to counter.

A lot of new tech being developed is focusing on cheaper stopping costs such as advanced signal jamming, lasers, and microwaves. The defensive arcs around carriers are combos of long, medium, and short range matrices, meaning any strike at a carrier, whether hypersonic missiles or drones must succeed through each barrier. You also have the F35s being used as drone "commanders" bringing that element to their war fighting as a force multiplier. As you bring in these unmanned ships and "ghost fleets" you further extend your offensive and defensive range, and without the human casualty concern.

One thing is for sure, aircraft carriers aren't just some big floating dinghy filled with sailors waiting to get sunk by drones.

The use of lasers is very interesting and cost effective. The issue for the Navy is still swarming. 90% is not good enough if a hypersonic gets through to a carrier. How do you overcome swarms and rolling swarm attacks? If you look at the missile capabilities the number of anti-missile assets, the numbers game gets problematic. But, as you say the environment is changing. Just look at the Arleigh Burke loadouts and how they are changing.

Missile Loadouts: Arleigh Burke (1991-2018)

This is a really interesting article if you are interested in this.

DDG(X) Unveiled - What Can We Learn?
The layered defense shields are what solves the swarm issue. You use everything from SM-2s to laser precision targeting, then last mile defenses like the Phalanx and eventually something like microwave systems such as Leonides. The reality is that cruise missiles and not drones continue to be the biggest threat to ships. The true threat of drones is the overwhelming of defense capabilities to allow hypersonic or other cruise missiles to slip through. That ls why layering and coordinated targeting becomes so critical in a battle situation against an opponent like China.

The future success and upgrades of our warships, as your DDG article discussed, is about power systems. Power for advanced radar, unmanned vehicle charging, future laser and microwave systems are all power hogs.

If you have time, this guy and Warzone do a great job assessing current and future military capabilities. This one discusses the newly announced Trump class battleship, and how it does or doesn't fit into Naval war strategy. Long but interesting if you're into this stuff, and it touches on the concerns around swarming. Also has interesting videos on new tech like the Leonides, drone strategy, etc.


Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:55p, 12/24/25
Hope a kid from California doesn't end up calling in...







Reply Quote
1
1 edit
Assassin
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BigGameBaylorBear • 6:03p, 12/24/25
BigGameBaylorBear said:


MNGA!!! Make Nigeria Great Again

  • The post accurately reports a $2.1 billion U.S. grant to Nigeria, signed December 20, 2025, for HIV, TB, malaria, and polio prevention over five years, part of new health pacts with nine African nations aligning with Trump's priorities.
  • Replies predominantly criticize the aid as contradicting "America First" rhetoric, citing U.S. $38 trillion debt and unmet domestic needs, with similar backlash to Bush-era PEPFAR grants.
  • PEPFAR, a comparable program since 2003, has saved 26 million lives and prevented 5.5 million HIV transmissions to infants per State Department data, though studies highlight persistent challenges in eradicating diseases long-term.
    • “So we must presume that the worst, rather than the best, choice will be made. The sober and responsible elements will be defeated in the present clash.” Philip K. Dick, The Man in the High Castle
    Reply Quote
    1
    boognish_bear
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    6:27p, 12/24/25
    Reply Quote
    1
    boognish_bear
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    In reply to Assassin • 6:44p, 12/24/25
    Assassin said:
    BigGameBaylorBear said:


    MNGA!!! Make Nigeria Great Again

  • The post accurately reports a $2.1 billion U.S. grant to Nigeria, signed December 20, 2025, for HIV, TB, malaria, and polio prevention over five years, part of new healthy pacts with nine African nations aligning with Trump's priorities.
  • Replies predominantly criticize the aid as contradicting "America First" rhetoric, citing U.S. $38 trillion debt and unmet domestic needs, with similar backlash to Bush-era PEPFAR grants.
  • PEPFAR, a comparable program since 2003, has saved 26 million lives and prevented 5.5 million HIV transmissions to infants per State Department data, though studies highlight persistent challenges in eradicating diseases long-term.



    • Didn't the DOGE cuts eliminate billions from foreign humanitarian aide?

    Reply Quote
    1
    Assassin
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    6:49p, 12/24/25
    “So we must presume that the worst, rather than the best, choice will be made. The sober and responsible elements will be defeated in the present clash.” Philip K. Dick, The Man in the High Castle
    Reply Quote
    3
    boognish_bear
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    6:50p, 12/24/25
    Reply Quote
    2
    boognish_bear
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    6:57p, 12/24/25
    Reply Quote
    1
    Jack Bauer
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    7:20p, 12/24/25
    Reply Quote
    2
    Jack Bauer
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    9:40p, 12/24/25
    Reply Quote
    5
    Redbrickbear
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    11:05p, 12/24/25
    Reply Quote
    1
    whiterock
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    In reply to FLBear5630 • 5:57a, 12/25/25
    FLBear5630 said:
    whiterock said:
    FLBear5630 said:
    whiterock said:
    FLBear5630 said:
    boognish_bear said:


    I am not only one who sees it.

    supporting incumbents is the rule. always has been. both parties. across all ideological strata. There is no party discipline without it.

    What? Really? What world are you living in? Biden is supporting Trump? MAGA/Trump supported Biden? GOP supported Obama? Kerry/Reid supported Bush?

    Even within the same Party the GOP has a long history of challenging policies that they do not agree with or that are not successful. Trump supported Bush? A little Kettle and Pot?

    Trump is and was the first one to come out and not "fall in line" to follow Party politics.

    Honestly, we can use a little more George H.W. Bush nowadays and separate Government from Politics. Not much of that going on. It is Politics with a little Government.

    ....Sigh....

    one of the widest and most well-worn trails in politics is that parties protect their incumbents. First priority is protecting the seats you have. Second priority is competing for open seats. Last priority is throwing money at trying to defeat incumbents (meaning incumbents of the other party).

    Primary challenges are so rare because it makes no sense to have a political party which tolerates, much less encourages primary challenges to its own incumbents.

    No one is talking of a Primary Challenge to anyone. 2028 is open, there is no incumbent as Trump termed out. Yet, you overlook that Trump thinks NOTHING of primarying those that don't agree with him. But, that is OK? Trump is not about the Party, he could care less about the Party. Trump is about Trump and if you don't get in line with him he will Primary you in a heart beat, he has done it


    Trump Threatens to Primary Any Republican Who Votes for Continuing Resolution
    Senate Republicans who could face primary over Trump Cabinet picks
    GOP senators responding to Trump allies' primary threats

    I can go on. Yeah, support the Party. Trump is about Trump, either you are at the trough or you are a target. Very simplistic view of the world and consistent from his NY days. He was a Dem just as easy as a Republican when it suited him. Vance is the perfect match, goes where the wind blows...



    you've got a reading comprehension problem going on. The whole thread is about a primary challenge to a sitting incumbent. Read the first post. It's questioning why Trump would support a guy with a very poor voting record over a primary challenger alleged to be considerably more conservative. You chimed in to support it. I merely pointed out that the first rule of partisan politics is that you support your incumbents (because if you don't, party discipline evaporates).

    Has nothing to do with Trump at all. Has nothing to do with whether or not Gonzalez is conservative enough on any scale objective or subjective. It's merely an observation of reality = parties support their incumbents. Always have. Always will. Party discipline evaporates with out it.

    Equally important is the obvious common sense of it. Don't spend your time & money challenging people on your own side on a fool's errand - to achieve ever higher levels of ideological perfection. Focus the resources you have on taking seats away from the opposing party. It's a bit of common sense that crosses disciplines. The quail biologists have an impressive stack of field study indicating that there's more ROI by turning cover with zero quail into suitable habitat than there is in trying to turn suitable habitat into perfect habit. So don't put out feeders & plant crops & such to try to increase the size of your covies; bulldoze thickets that have no birds in order to make brand new covies.
    Reply Quote
    william
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    In reply to Jack Bauer • 9:47a, 12/25/25
    Jack Bauer said:

    attaboy sweet donny!

    - el uncle fred

    D!
    arbyscoin - the only crypto you can eat....
    Reply Quote
    william
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    11:07a, 12/25/25

    >>
    Newsweek

    Trump Digs Out of the Biden Ditch

    The United States is set to see the largest one-year decline in murders ever recorded, according to a crime data analyst.

    Jeff Asher, the co-founder of AH Datalytics, says the Real-Time Crime Index (RTCI), a collection of monthly crime data from hundreds of law enforcement agencies nationwide, shows murder has dropped by about 19.8 percent from January through October compared to 2024.

    "A roughly 20 percent drop in murder in 2025, as is suggested by the current data, would be by far the largest decline ever recorded, eclipsing the decline in 2024currently pegged at -15 percent by the FBI, but that's subject to a likely upward revision next year," Asher wrote in his Sub

    Why It Matters

    The decline comes as President Donald Trump has prioritized a combating violent crime since returning to the White House in January. He has sent the National Guard to several Democrat-led cities as part of his administration's crackdown on illegal immigration and crime, sparking an intense backlash and legal challenges.


    While Trump officials are taking credit, the decline in murder is part of a larger trend dating back several years. Homicides surged during the pandemic, but as Asher notes, the drop in crime this year "continues a trend that began in 2023, accelerated in 2024, and likely became historic in 2025."

    What To Know

    The RTCI data is currently only available through October. The data from a sample of 570 agencies shows there were 5,912 murders through October this year, compared to 7,369 in 2024.

    Murder is down significantly in big cities that saw the most homicides in 2024, Asher notes.

    Birmingham, Alabama, saw the biggest decline since 2024, with a 49 percent drop. Murder has fallen by almost 30.9 percent in Baltimore compared to last year, by 28.8 percent in Chicago, by 20.9 percent in New York City, 26.3 percent in Atlanta and 15.8 percent in Philadelphia.

    But some of the cities with the most murders in 2024 saw an increase this year. Milwaukee had an increase of 11.3 percent, while murders in Los Angeles rose by 5.3 percent and Kansas City saw an increase of 6.2 percent.

    Asher noted that looking at individual cities "highlights the historic nature in the drop in murder."

    He wrote: "New Orleans is on pace for the fewest murders since 1970. New York City reported the fewest shootings ever recorded (though the start of recording is probably the 1990s). Numerous cities recorded the lowest murders through November since the 1960s, including Detroit (since 1964), Baltimore (1962), Philadelphia (1966), Oakland (1967), and San Francisco (likely since at least 1942)."

    What People Are Saying

    Jeff Asher wrote that overall, there "were likely around 12,000 fewer people murdered in the United States in 2024 and 2025 than in 2020 and 2021. That is tremendous progress that should be celebrated, while acknowledging that 14,000 or so murders this year in the United States is still far too many."

    The Department of Homeland Security wrote on X: "Here at DHS we've been operating by this radical idea that removing murderers from our country would bring down the murder rate. Who could have guessed it would work?"

    FBI Director Kash Patel wrote on X: "U.S. murders on pace for largest one-year drop on recordnot an accident. @realDonaldTrump's policy letting good cops be cops WORKS. Lives being saved every single day under this administration with great local partners across the country. And more work to do."

    Elon Musk wrote on X: "Removing murderers from the streets works wonders."
    <<
    arbyscoin - the only crypto you can eat....
    Reply Quote
    2
    FLBear5630
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    In reply to whiterock • 11:17a, 12/25/25
    whiterock said:
    FLBear5630 said:
    whiterock said:
    FLBear5630 said:
    whiterock said:
    FLBear5630 said:
    boognish_bear said:


    I am not only one who sees it.

    supporting incumbents is the rule. always has been. both parties. across all ideological strata. There is no party discipline without it.

    What? Really? What world are you living in? Biden is supporting Trump? MAGA/Trump supported Biden? GOP supported Obama? Kerry/Reid supported Bush?

    Even within the same Party the GOP has a long history of challenging policies that they do not agree with or that are not successful. Trump supported Bush? A little Kettle and Pot?

    Trump is and was the first one to come out and not "fall in line" to follow Party politics.

    Honestly, we can use a little more George H.W. Bush nowadays and separate Government from Politics. Not much of that going on. It is Politics with a little Government.

    ....Sigh....

    one of the widest and most well-worn trails in politics is that parties protect their incumbents. First priority is protecting the seats you have. Second priority is competing for open seats. Last priority is throwing money at trying to defeat incumbents (meaning incumbents of the other party).

    Primary challenges are so rare because it makes no sense to have a political party which tolerates, much less encourages primary challenges to its own incumbents.

    No one is talking of a Primary Challenge to anyone. 2028 is open, there is no incumbent as Trump termed out. Yet, you overlook that Trump thinks NOTHING of primarying those that don't agree with him. But, that is OK? Trump is not about the Party, he could care less about the Party. Trump is about Trump and if you don't get in line with him he will Primary you in a heart beat, he has done it


    Trump Threatens to Primary Any Republican Who Votes for Continuing Resolution
    Senate Republicans who could face primary over Trump Cabinet picks
    GOP senators responding to Trump allies' primary threats

    I can go on. Yeah, support the Party. Trump is about Trump, either you are at the trough or you are a target. Very simplistic view of the world and consistent from his NY days. He was a Dem just as easy as a Republican when it suited him. Vance is the perfect match, goes where the wind blows...



    you've got a reading comprehension problem going on. The whole thread is about a primary challenge to a sitting incumbent. Read the first post. It's questioning why Trump would support a guy with a very poor voting record over a primary challenger alleged to be considerably more conservative. You chimed in to support it. I merely pointed out that the first rule of partisan politics is that you support your incumbents (because if you don't, party discipline evaporates).

    Has nothing to do with Trump at all. Has nothing to do with whether or not Gonzalez is conservative enough on any scale objective or subjective. It's merely an observation of reality = parties support their incumbents. Always have. Always will. Party discipline evaporates with out it.

    Equally important is the obvious common sense of it. Don't spend your time & money challenging people on your own side on a fool's errand - to achieve ever higher levels of ideological perfection. Focus the resources you have on taking seats away from the opposing party. It's a bit of common sense that crosses disciplines. The quail biologists have an impressive stack of field study indicating that there's more ROI by turning cover with zero quail into suitable habitat than there is in trying to turn suitable habitat into perfect habit. So don't put out feeders & plant crops & such to try to increase the size of your covies; bulldoze thickets that have no birds in order to make brand new covies.

    Two items.

    One - I went back and read the 1st post, something I need to do more of, and you are right. I came in the middle and misunderstood. On me, I apologize. We can discuss Trump primarying his own Party in another thread.

    Reply Quote
    KaiBear
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    In reply to william • 1:54p, 12/25/25
    william said:

    >>
    Newsweek

    Trump Digs Out of the Biden Ditch

    The United States is set to see the largest one-year decline in murders ever recorded, according to a crime data analyst.

    Jeff Asher, the co-founder of AH Datalytics, says the Real-Time Crime Index (RTCI), a collection of monthly crime data from hundreds of law enforcement agencies nationwide, shows murder has dropped by about 19.8 percent from January through October compared to 2024.

    "A roughly 20 percent drop in murder in 2025, as is suggested by the current data, would be by far the largest decline ever recorded, eclipsing the decline in 2024currently pegged at -15 percent by the FBI, but that's subject to a likely upward revision next year," Asher wrote in his Sub

    Why It Matters

    The decline comes as President Donald Trump has prioritized a combating violent crime since returning to the White House in January. He has sent the National Guard to several Democrat-led cities as part of his administration's crackdown on illegal immigration and crime, sparking an intense backlash and legal challenges.


    While Trump officials are taking credit, the decline in murder is part of a larger trend dating back several years. Homicides surged during the pandemic, but as Asher notes, the drop in crime this year "continues a trend that began in 2023, accelerated in 2024, and likely became historic in 2025."

    What To Know

    The RTCI data is currently only available through October. The data from a sample of 570 agencies shows there were 5,912 murders through October this year, compared to 7,369 in 2024.

    Murder is down significantly in big cities that saw the most homicides in 2024, Asher notes.

    Birmingham, Alabama, saw the biggest decline since 2024, with a 49 percent drop. Murder has fallen by almost 30.9 percent in Baltimore compared to last year, by 28.8 percent in Chicago, by 20.9 percent in New York City, 26.3 percent in Atlanta and 15.8 percent in Philadelphia.

    But some of the cities with the most murders in 2024 saw an increase this year. Milwaukee had an increase of 11.3 percent, while murders in Los Angeles rose by 5.3 percent and Kansas City saw an increase of 6.2 percent.

    Asher noted that looking at individual cities "highlights the historic nature in the drop in murder."

    He wrote: "New Orleans is on pace for the fewest murders since 1970. New York City reported the fewest shootings ever recorded (though the start of recording is probably the 1990s). Numerous cities recorded the lowest murders through November since the 1960s, including Detroit (since 1964), Baltimore (1962), Philadelphia (1966), Oakland (1967), and San Francisco (likely since at least 1942)."

    What People Are Saying

    Jeff Asher wrote that overall, there "were likely around 12,000 fewer people murdered in the United States in 2024 and 2025 than in 2020 and 2021. That is tremendous progress that should be celebrated, while acknowledging that 14,000 or so murders this year in the United States is still far too many."

    The Department of Homeland Security wrote on X: "Here at DHS we've been operating by this radical idea that removing murderers from our country would bring down the murder rate. Who could have guessed it would work?"

    FBI Director Kash Patel wrote on X: "U.S. murders on pace for largest one-year drop on recordnot an accident. @realDonaldTrump's policy letting good cops be cops WORKS. Lives being saved every single day under this administration with great local partners across the country. And more work to do."

    Elon Musk wrote on X: "Removing murderers from the streets works wonders."
    <<


    Excellent info


    Thanks
    Reply Quote
    1
    william
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    In reply to boognish_bear • 2:59p, 12/25/25
    boognish_bear said:

    Yuuuuuuuuuuuuuuge........

    - UF

    D!
    arbyscoin - the only crypto you can eat....
    Reply Quote
    Jack Bauer
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    5:35p, 12/25/25
    Are you ok, sir?

    Reply Quote
    1
    william
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    6:48p, 12/25/25
    WAR!

    >>
    Tonight, at my direction as Commander in Chief, the United States launched a powerful and deadly strike against ISIS Terrorist Scum in Northwest Nigeria, who have been targeting and viciously killing, primarily, innocent Christians, at levels not seen for many years, and even Centuries! I have previously warned these Terrorists that if they did not stop the slaughtering of Christians, there would be hell to pay, and tonight, there was. The Department of War executed numerous perfect strikes, as only the United States is capable of doing. Under my leadership, our Country will not allow Radical Islamic Terrorism to prosper. May God Bless our Military, and MERRY CHRISTMAS to all, including the dead Terrorists, of which there will be many more if their slaughter of Christians continues.

    DONALD J. TRUMP
    PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
    <<

    D!

    - UF

    { sipping coffee }
    arbyscoin - the only crypto you can eat....
    Reply Quote
    boognish_bear
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    7:49p, 12/25/25
    Maybe a cause and effect with so many EOs

    Reply Quote
    2
    nein51
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    In reply to boognish_bear • 7:58p, 12/25/25
    boognish_bear said:
    Maybe a cause and effect with so many EOs


    Good. The government is at its very best when it does nothing
    Reply Quote
    3
    boognish_bear
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    8:04p, 12/25/25
    Reply Quote
    whiterock
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    In reply to boognish_bear • 6:20a
    boognish_bear said:

    There are of course a lot of pros & cons to a US/Russia joint venture on the Zapo plant, but it would substantially raise the stakes for Russian military adventurism in Ukraine. Russia would not be just attacking Ukraine, but strategic American interests.
    Reply Quote
    1
    boognish_bear
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    12:11p
    Reply Quote
    boognish_bear
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    12:14p
    Reply Quote
    Jack Bauer
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    In reply to boognish_bear • 12:20p
    boognish_bear said:


    Yes the only immigrants for Stephen are his maid, nanny, landscapers, painter and that token restaurant down the street
    Reply Quote
    1
    boognish_bear
    User Profile
    Private Message
    Ignore User Stop Ignoring
    How long do you want to ignore this user?
    24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
    12:23p
    Reply Quote
    First Page Refresh
    Page 345 of 345 ▼
     
    ×
    subscribe Verify your student status
    See Subscription Benefits
    Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.