Oldbear83 said:

---

Keep in mind that this ruling from SCOTUS came after a lot of time available to consider wording and explanation.

They left it muddy on purpose.

---

Of course they did. Zero chance of building a five vote consensus. Punting the cleanup is very much their style.

How many cases get filed within the next 72 hours?
How much time, money and manpower is wasted to delay handling the inevitable issue?

If POTUS has an out, why not simply rule that way?
If not, the money issue needs to be resolved.

Punting is politics not good faith jurisprudence.

New Tariff from Trump

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Keep in mind that this ruling from SCOTUS came after a lot of time available to consider wording and explanation.

They left it muddy on purpose.

---

Of course they did. Zero chance of building a five vote consensus. Punting the cleanup is very much their style.

How many cases get filed within the next 72 hours?
How much time, money and manpower is wasted to delay handling the inevitable issue?

If POTUS has an out, why not simply rule that way?
If not, the money issue needs to be resolved.

Punting is politics not good faith jurisprudence.

---

Remember that time SCOTUS let Obamacare stand because Obama had the power to do Obamacare a different way?

after Trump got humiliated, if I'm another country, I ain't signing anything. I'm playing 4 corners and wait out Piggy

Didn't Trump just tell us this past week that our country is getting rich from tariffs? The Federal Court reminds him that only Congress has the ability to levy taxes, which includes tariffs.

https://www.investmentnews.com/regulation-legal-compliance/trumps-10-global-tariffs-struck-down-by-federal-court-in-new-blow-to-presidents-policy/266489

SO MUCH WINNING!!!!