KaiBear said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Trump was told by Bondi his name appeared multiple times in Epstein files: Report

The officials told Trump of their plan not to release any additional documents.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-told-bondi-appeared-multiple-times-epstein-files/story?id=124014441

According to a report in the Wall Street Journal, Attorney General Pam Bondi and her deputy Todd Blanche informed President Donald Trump in May that his name appeared multiple times in the government's files on Jeffrey Epstein that the Department of Justice and the FBI reviewed.

The officials told Trump of their plan not to release any additional documents, the report says, because the material contained child pornography and the personal information of victims…….

---

Yet Biden did not use this 'evidence' against Donald Trump at any time leading up to the 2024 election ?

Why would Joe Biden protect Trump ?

---

They're making it seem like this is the first time the FBI really went through and made lists of names. It's pretty incredible if that's true. But it would fit with the narrative that nobody, including the Biden administration, wanted all those records combed through, lists made, names released.

---

Have no idea exactly what point you are attempting to make here.

---

Reading can be hard. I didn't really see who I had replied to.

MAYBE FBI HAS NEVER REALLY GONE THROUGH EPSTEIN FILES. CRAZY, RIGHT?????

Porteroso said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Trump was told by Bondi his name appeared multiple times in Epstein files: Report

The officials told Trump of their plan not to release any additional documents.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-told-bondi-appeared-multiple-times-epstein-files/story?id=124014441

According to a report in the Wall Street Journal, Attorney General Pam Bondi and her deputy Todd Blanche informed President Donald Trump in May that his name appeared multiple times in the government's files on Jeffrey Epstein that the Department of Justice and the FBI reviewed.

The officials told Trump of their plan not to release any additional documents, the report says, because the material contained child pornography and the personal information of victims…….

---

Yet Biden did not use this 'evidence' against Donald Trump at any time leading up to the 2024 election ?

Why would Joe Biden protect Trump ?

---

They're making it seem like this is the first time the FBI really went through and made lists of names. It's pretty incredible if that's true. But it would fit with the narrative that nobody, including the Biden administration, wanted all those records combed through, lists made, names released.

---

Have no idea exactly what point you are attempting to make here.

---

Reading can be hard. I didn't really see who I had replied to.

MAYBE FBI HAS NEVER REALLY GONE THROUGH EPSTEIN FILES. CRAZY, RIGHT?????

---

No crazier than 95% of your other comments on this free message board.

Whoever is continuing to support you ; deserves a far better return on their money.

GrowlTowel said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Trump was told by Bondi his name appeared multiple times in Epstein files: Report

The officials told Trump of their plan not to release any additional documents.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-told-bondi-appeared-multiple-times-epstein-files/story?id=124014441

According to a report in the Wall Street Journal, Attorney General Pam Bondi and her deputy Todd Blanche informed President Donald Trump in May that his name appeared multiple times in the government's files on Jeffrey Epstein that the Department of Justice and the FBI reviewed.

The officials told Trump of their plan not to release any additional documents, the report says, because the material contained child pornography and the personal information of victims…….

---

Yet Biden did not use this 'evidence' against Donald Trump at any time leading up to the 2024 election ?

Why would Joe Biden protect Trump ?

---

In order to get Trump, the left has done:

1. Spied on his 2016 campaign and transition team.
2. Invented the Russian hoax to derail his presidency.
3. Impeached him twice.
4. Set up the January 6th insurrection.
5. Sent the number 3 DOJ attorney to New York to begin the lawfare.
6. Got a ridiculous judgment against him in order to bankrupt him.
7. Convicted him a crime that still has not been identified.
8. Changed the laws of New York to allow a civil case to go forward.
9. Funded and directed the lawfare against him in Georgia.
10. Invented a classified document charge, appointed a special counsel, and raided his residency with orders to kill if obstructed.
11. Tried to remove him from the 2024 ballots.
12. Shot him.
13. Attempted a second assignation.

But after all of that, they kept quite about his Epstein contacts despite having exclusive access to that evidence for four years.

---

Donald is that you?

J.R. said:

---

GrowlTowel said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Trump was told by Bondi his name appeared multiple times in Epstein files: Report

The officials told Trump of their plan not to release any additional documents.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-told-bondi-appeared-multiple-times-epstein-files/story?id=124014441

According to a report in the Wall Street Journal, Attorney General Pam Bondi and her deputy Todd Blanche informed President Donald Trump in May that his name appeared multiple times in the government's files on Jeffrey Epstein that the Department of Justice and the FBI reviewed.

The officials told Trump of their plan not to release any additional documents, the report says, because the material contained child pornography and the personal information of victims…….

---

Yet Biden did not use this 'evidence' against Donald Trump at any time leading up to the 2024 election ?

Why would Joe Biden protect Trump ?

---

In order to get Trump, the left has done:

1. Spied on his 2016 campaign and transition team.
2. Invented the Russian hoax to derail his presidency.
3. Impeached him twice.
4. Set up the January 6th insurrection.
5. Sent the number 3 DOJ attorney to New York to begin the lawfare.
6. Got a ridiculous judgment against him in order to bankrupt him.
7. Convicted him a crime that still has not been identified.
8. Changed the laws of New York to allow a civil case to go forward.
9. Funded and directed the lawfare against him in Georgia.
10. Invented a classified document charge, appointed a special counsel, and raided his residency with orders to kill if obstructed.
11. Tried to remove him from the 2024 ballots.
12. Shot him.
13. Attempted a second assignation.

But after all of that, they kept quite about his Epstein contacts despite having exclusive access to that evidence for four years.

---

Donald is that you?

---

Is this the extent of your rebuttal to the facts presented ?

A pithy one liner ?

Come on JR ….take the time to describe how these events didn't happen.

Stefano DiMera said:

---

This is exactly what was happening in the SWC in the 80s.

Everyone was cheating.. including us...and everyone had dirt on every school.

Until Peruna started winning too much.

---

Kinda like the Briles fiasco.

Every campus had issues with sexual assault or unwanted sexual advances.
The UT Austin campus reported about a 25% rate among coeds.

All football teams had bad dudes as they liked to call them. Nothing different about
what was going on at Baylor. TCU may have been worse, TT and UT almost certainly was
campus wide.

Baylor started winning too much for Baylor, and the hit was on.

We had a weak administration and got what you get when there is no backbone.

Then there was that opportunist woman who used these "incidents" to mark schools
as unacceptable and blackmailed them to use her "programs" or they would be blackballed.

That grift was strong for several years. It became a cottage industry.

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Stefano DiMera said:

---

This is exactly what was happening in the SWC in the 80s.

Everyone was cheating.. including us...and everyone had dirt on every school.

Until Peruna started winning too much.

---

Kinda like the Briles fiasco.

Every campus had issues with sexual assault or unwanted sexual advances.
The UT Austin campus reported about a 25% rate among coeds.

All football teams had bad dudes as they liked to call them. Nothing different about
what was going on at Baylor. TCU may have been worse, TT and UT almost certainly was
campus wide.

Baylor started winning too much for Baylor, and the hit was on.

We had a weak administration and got what you get when there is no backbone.

Then there was that opportunist woman who used these "incidents" to mark schools
as unacceptable and blackmailed them to use her "programs" or they would be blackballed.

That grift was strong for several years. It became a cottage industry.

---

Kind of like Briles in that there is a large overlap of inbred morons that believe their heroes are never guilty

ron.reagan said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Stefano DiMera said:

---

This is exactly what was happening in the SWC in the 80s.

Everyone was cheating.. including us...and everyone had dirt on every school.

Until Peruna started winning too much.

---

Kinda like the Briles fiasco.

Every campus had issues with sexual assault or unwanted sexual advances.
The UT Austin campus reported about a 25% rate among coeds.

All football teams had bad dudes as they liked to call them. Nothing different about
what was going on at Baylor. TCU may have been worse, TT and UT almost certainly was
campus wide.

Baylor started winning too much for Baylor, and the hit was on.

We had a weak administration and got what you get when there is no backbone.

Then there was that opportunist woman who used these "incidents" to mark schools
as unacceptable and blackmailed them to use her "programs" or they would be blackballed.

That grift was strong for several years. It became a cottage industry.

---

Kind of like Briles in that there is a large overlap of inbred morons that believe their heroes are never guilty

---

All campuses are guilty, Briles was a very minor player here. The administration, and the "Baylor way" are the real culprits. They swept these incidents under the rug for many decades, just like virtually all campuses did.

Robert Wilson said:

---

They're all in the Epstein files. Unbelievable that neither side wants to release the info. That tells you all you need to know.

And agree that does not sound anything like the voice of DJT, and if it was it would've come out long ago.

But they're all on a list, in an address book, on a flight log, etc. etc. Hell, they're all in pictures with Epstein and/or Maxwell. And, frankly, that doesn't prove much of anything other than Epstein was great at making powerful contacts.

There have been some pretty good law firms (Boies Schiller among them) that have taken aim at supposed Epstein clients and not scored a direct hit. If there was a juicy treasure trove of real actual evidence of Gates, Clinton, Trump et al engaging in the purchasing of sexual services from underage girls, I think we'd have it by now.

---

I think it is the opposite, there is so much about BOTH sides that there is no value in bringing anything forward. It just brings both sides down. We may have found the one thing that they can work across the aisle on, keeping Epstein info buried.

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

ron.reagan said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Stefano DiMera said:

---

This is exactly what was happening in the SWC in the 80s.

Everyone was cheating.. including us...and everyone had dirt on every school.

Until Peruna started winning too much.

---

Kinda like the Briles fiasco.

Every campus had issues with sexual assault or unwanted sexual advances.
The UT Austin campus reported about a 25% rate among coeds.

All football teams had bad dudes as they liked to call them. Nothing different about
what was going on at Baylor. TCU may have been worse, TT and UT almost certainly was
campus wide.

Baylor started winning too much for Baylor, and the hit was on.

We had a weak administration and got what you get when there is no backbone.

Then there was that opportunist woman who used these "incidents" to mark schools
as unacceptable and blackmailed them to use her "programs" or they would be blackballed.

That grift was strong for several years. It became a cottage industry.

---

Kind of like Briles in that there is a large overlap of inbred morons that believe their heroes are never guilty

---

All campuses are guilty, Briles was a very minor player here. The administration, and the "Baylor way" are the real culprits. They swept these incidents under the rug for many decades, just like virtually all campuses did.

---

Yep. And hung Briles out to dry in order to try and do damage control for the school, which of course did not work at all. Unbelievable how poorly that was handled.

KaiBear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Trump was told by Bondi his name appeared multiple times in Epstein files: Report

The officials told Trump of their plan not to release any additional documents.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-told-bondi-appeared-multiple-times-epstein-files/story?id=124014441

According to a report in the Wall Street Journal, Attorney General Pam Bondi and her deputy Todd Blanche informed President Donald Trump in May that his name appeared multiple times in the government's files on Jeffrey Epstein that the Department of Justice and the FBI reviewed.

The officials told Trump of their plan not to release any additional documents, the report says, because the material contained child pornography and the personal information of victims…….

---

Yet Biden did not use this 'evidence' against Donald Trump at any time leading up to the 2024 election ?

Why would Joe Biden protect Trump ?

---

First of all I don't really believe there is anything new, or anything that would stick in a court of law relating to anyone else, or most anyone else that hung out with Epstein. There is probably a lot of documentation with prominent people around Epstein and his events. There likely wasn't enough solid evidence to charge anyone else. But you have to consider the information regarding Prince Andrew.

I don't think Biden would protect Trump. I think he would protect prominent Democrats and dignitaries, if there was anything to it or that might prove embarrassing. I do think Trump's behavior makes him look guilty, and it wouldn't surprise me if he had some questionable involvement. But it's entertaining to watch Trump's conspiracy theorist supporters reactions and his reactions.

Robert Wilson said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

ron.reagan said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Stefano DiMera said:

---

This is exactly what was happening in the SWC in the 80s.

Everyone was cheating.. including us...and everyone had dirt on every school.

Until Peruna started winning too much.

---

Kinda like the Briles fiasco.

Every campus had issues with sexual assault or unwanted sexual advances.
The UT Austin campus reported about a 25% rate among coeds.

All football teams had bad dudes as they liked to call them. Nothing different about
what was going on at Baylor. TCU may have been worse, TT and UT almost certainly was
campus wide.

Baylor started winning too much for Baylor, and the hit was on.

We had a weak administration and got what you get when there is no backbone.

Then there was that opportunist woman who used these "incidents" to mark schools
as unacceptable and blackmailed them to use her "programs" or they would be blackballed.

That grift was strong for several years. It became a cottage industry.

---

Kind of like Briles in that there is a large overlap of inbred morons that believe their heroes are never guilty

---

All campuses are guilty, Briles was a very minor player here. The administration, and the "Baylor way" are the real culprits. They swept these incidents under the rug for many decades, just like virtually all campuses did.

---

Yep. And hung Briles out to dry in order to try and do damage control for the school, which of course did not work at all. Unbelievable how poorly that was handled.

---

So now the Briles firing is part of this! I guess it was only a matter of time.

TexasScientist said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Trump was told by Bondi his name appeared multiple times in Epstein files: Report

The officials told Trump of their plan not to release any additional documents.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-told-bondi-appeared-multiple-times-epstein-files/story?id=124014441

According to a report in the Wall Street Journal, Attorney General Pam Bondi and her deputy Todd Blanche informed President Donald Trump in May that his name appeared multiple times in the government's files on Jeffrey Epstein that the Department of Justice and the FBI reviewed.

The officials told Trump of their plan not to release any additional documents, the report says, because the material contained child pornography and the personal information of victims…….

---

Yet Biden did not use this 'evidence' against Donald Trump at any time leading up to the 2024 election ?

Why would Joe Biden protect Trump ?

---

First of all I don't really believe there is anything new, or anything that would stick in a court of law relating to anyone else, or most anyone else that hung out with Epstein. There is probably a lot of documentation with prominent people around Epstein and his events. There likely wasn't enough solid evidence to charge anyone else. But you have to consider the information regarding Prince Andrew.

I don't think Biden would protect Trump. I think he would protect prominent Democrats and dignitaries, if there was anything to it or that might prove embarrassing. I do think Trump's behavior makes him look guilty, and it wouldn't surprise me if he had some questionable involvement. But it's entertaining to watch Trump's conspiracy theorist supporters reactions and his reactions.

---

As usual a lot of words avoiding the point.

If the Epstein files could have damaged Trumps election chances; Biden certainly would have LEAKED those specific items.

J.R. said:

---

GrowlTowel said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Trump was told by Bondi his name appeared multiple times in Epstein files: Report

The officials told Trump of their plan not to release any additional documents.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-told-bondi-appeared-multiple-times-epstein-files/story?id=124014441

According to a report in the Wall Street Journal, Attorney General Pam Bondi and her deputy Todd Blanche informed President Donald Trump in May that his name appeared multiple times in the government's files on Jeffrey Epstein that the Department of Justice and the FBI reviewed.

The officials told Trump of their plan not to release any additional documents, the report says, because the material contained child pornography and the personal information of victims…….

---

Yet Biden did not use this 'evidence' against Donald Trump at any time leading up to the 2024 election ?

Why would Joe Biden protect Trump ?

---

In order to get Trump, the left has done:

1. Spied on his 2016 campaign and transition team.
2. Invented the Russian hoax to derail his presidency.
3. Impeached him twice.
4. Set up the January 6th insurrection.
5. Sent the number 3 DOJ attorney to New York to begin the lawfare.
6. Got a ridiculous judgment against him in order to bankrupt him.
7. Convicted him a crime that still has not been identified.
8. Changed the laws of New York to allow a civil case to go forward.
9. Funded and directed the lawfare against him in Georgia.
10. Invented a classified document charge, appointed a special counsel, and raided his residency with orders to kill if obstructed.
11. Tried to remove him from the 2024 ballots.
12. Shot him.
13. Attempted a second assignation.

But after all of that, they kept quite about his Epstein contacts despite having exclusive access to that evidence for four years.

---

Donald is that you?

---

JR, was that false?

TexasScientist said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Trump was told by Bondi his name appeared multiple times in Epstein files: Report

The officials told Trump of their plan not to release any additional documents.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-told-bondi-appeared-multiple-times-epstein-files/story?id=124014441

According to a report in the Wall Street Journal, Attorney General Pam Bondi and her deputy Todd Blanche informed President Donald Trump in May that his name appeared multiple times in the government's files on Jeffrey Epstein that the Department of Justice and the FBI reviewed.

The officials told Trump of their plan not to release any additional documents, the report says, because the material contained child pornography and the personal information of victims…….

---

Yet Biden did not use this 'evidence' against Donald Trump at any time leading up to the 2024 election ?

Why would Joe Biden protect Trump ?

---

First of all I don't really believe there is anything new, or anything that would stick in a court of law relating to anyone else, or most anyone else that hung out with Epstein. There is probably a lot of documentation with prominent people around Epstein and his events. There likely wasn't enough solid evidence to charge anyone else. But you have to consider the information regarding Prince Andrew.

I don't think Biden would protect Trump. I think he would protect prominent Democrats and dignitaries, if there was anything to it or that might prove embarrassing. I do think Trump's behavior makes him look guilty, and it wouldn't surprise me if he had some questionable involvement. But it's entertaining to watch Trump's conspiracy theorist supporters reactions and his reactions.

---

Biden would protect himself. Anything he would have done to bring others down would have opened up a floodgate of info on him regarding a world of kickbacks.

If the Dems had anything on Trump
It would have been used already. If anything comes up it's fabricated. Not because he is such a great guy but because the Dems again would have used it in the past election. If there is anything it's irrelevant. The Dems are like terrorists they want to scare you with what might be. Not what actually is

STxBear81 said:

---

If the Dems had anything on Trump
It would have been used already. If anything comes up it's fabricated. Not because he is such a great guy but because the Dems again would have used it in the past election. If there is anything it's irrelevant. The Dems are like terrorists they want to scare you with what might be. Not what actually is

---

That's what Kai is saying and it's just a dumb argument. The fact that just now they had the FBI scrambling to comb the documents and create lists of names, suggests it hadn't been done before.

So no, I don't think they did have this ammo ready to go. And even if they did, we all know Clinton is in there, so how much of the DNC do they want to take out, just to put out yet another bad story about Trump?

If you're a Democrat strategist, why would you think being in the Epstein files would finally be the thing to turn MAGA on Trump? He has survived everything so far, every scandal, every offensive remark, everything. You'd be risking so much loss, for an uncertain reward.

KaiBear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Trump was told by Bondi his name appeared multiple times in Epstein files: Report

The officials told Trump of their plan not to release any additional documents.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-told-bondi-appeared-multiple-times-epstein-files/story?id=124014441

According to a report in the Wall Street Journal, Attorney General Pam Bondi and her deputy Todd Blanche informed President Donald Trump in May that his name appeared multiple times in the government's files on Jeffrey Epstein that the Department of Justice and the FBI reviewed.

The officials told Trump of their plan not to release any additional documents, the report says, because the material contained child pornography and the personal information of victims…….

---

Yet Biden did not use this 'evidence' against Donald Trump at any time leading up to the 2024 election ?

Why would Joe Biden protect Trump ?

---

First of all I don't really believe there is anything new, or anything that would stick in a court of law relating to anyone else, or most anyone else that hung out with Epstein. There is probably a lot of documentation with prominent people around Epstein and his events. There likely wasn't enough solid evidence to charge anyone else. But you have to consider the information regarding Prince Andrew.

I don't think Biden would protect Trump. I think he would protect prominent Democrats and dignitaries, if there was anything to it or that might prove embarrassing. I do think Trump's behavior makes him look guilty, and it wouldn't surprise me if he had some questionable involvement. But it's entertaining to watch Trump's conspiracy theorist supporters reactions and his reactions.

---

As usual a lot of words avoiding the point.

If the Epstein files could have damaged Trumps election chances; Biden certainly would have LEAKED those specific items.

---

You just don't like the point. I already answered why he may not have leaked them. Once you start down that path its hard to stop or control what gets out. Very likely the same reason, or one reason Trump doesn't want the information out there either.

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Trump was told by Bondi his name appeared multiple times in Epstein files: Report

The officials told Trump of their plan not to release any additional documents.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-told-bondi-appeared-multiple-times-epstein-files/story?id=124014441

According to a report in the Wall Street Journal, Attorney General Pam Bondi and her deputy Todd Blanche informed President Donald Trump in May that his name appeared multiple times in the government's files on Jeffrey Epstein that the Department of Justice and the FBI reviewed.

The officials told Trump of their plan not to release any additional documents, the report says, because the material contained child pornography and the personal information of victims…….

---

Yet Biden did not use this 'evidence' against Donald Trump at any time leading up to the 2024 election ?

Why would Joe Biden protect Trump ?

---

First of all I don't really believe there is anything new, or anything that would stick in a court of law relating to anyone else, or most anyone else that hung out with Epstein. There is probably a lot of documentation with prominent people around Epstein and his events. There likely wasn't enough solid evidence to charge anyone else. But you have to consider the information regarding Prince Andrew.

I don't think Biden would protect Trump. I think he would protect prominent Democrats and dignitaries, if there was anything to it or that might prove embarrassing. I do think Trump's behavior makes him look guilty, and it wouldn't surprise me if he had some questionable involvement. But it's entertaining to watch Trump's conspiracy theorist supporters reactions and his reactions.

---

Biden would protect himself. Anything he would have done to bring others down would have opened up a floodgate of info on him regarding a world of kickbacks.

---

That's a real point, and part of what I'm saying.

TexasScientist said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Trump was told by Bondi his name appeared multiple times in Epstein files: Report

The officials told Trump of their plan not to release any additional documents.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-told-bondi-appeared-multiple-times-epstein-files/story?id=124014441

According to a report in the Wall Street Journal, Attorney General Pam Bondi and her deputy Todd Blanche informed President Donald Trump in May that his name appeared multiple times in the government's files on Jeffrey Epstein that the Department of Justice and the FBI reviewed.

The officials told Trump of their plan not to release any additional documents, the report says, because the material contained child pornography and the personal information of victims…….

---

Yet Biden did not use this 'evidence' against Donald Trump at any time leading up to the 2024 election ?

Why would Joe Biden protect Trump ?

---

First of all I don't really believe there is anything new, or anything that would stick in a court of law relating to anyone else, or most anyone else that hung out with Epstein. There is probably a lot of documentation with prominent people around Epstein and his events. There likely wasn't enough solid evidence to charge anyone else. But you have to consider the information regarding Prince Andrew.

I don't think Biden would protect Trump. I think he would protect prominent Democrats and dignitaries, if there was anything to it or that might prove embarrassing. I do think Trump's behavior makes him look guilty, and it wouldn't surprise me if he had some questionable involvement. But it's entertaining to watch Trump's conspiracy theorist supporters reactions and his reactions.

---

As usual a lot of words avoiding the point.

If the Epstein files could have damaged Trumps election chances; Biden certainly would have LEAKED those specific items.

---

You just don't like the point. I already answered why he may not have leaked them. Once you start down that path it's hard to stop or control what gets out. Very likely the same reason, or one reason Trump doesn't want the information out there either.

---

Ridiculous

The party of lawfare would have easily leaked only the info damaging to Trump and bury the rest.

Trump announced in 2015 he was a candidate . If there was something bad there don't you think it would have come out already. He's almost 80, let it go.

KaiBear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Trump was told by Bondi his name appeared multiple times in Epstein files: Report

The officials told Trump of their plan not to release any additional documents.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-told-bondi-appeared-multiple-times-epstein-files/story?id=124014441

According to a report in the Wall Street Journal, Attorney General Pam Bondi and her deputy Todd Blanche informed President Donald Trump in May that his name appeared multiple times in the government's files on Jeffrey Epstein that the Department of Justice and the FBI reviewed.

The officials told Trump of their plan not to release any additional documents, the report says, because the material contained child pornography and the personal information of victims…….

---

Yet Biden did not use this 'evidence' against Donald Trump at any time leading up to the 2024 election ?

Why would Joe Biden protect Trump ?

---

First of all I don't really believe there is anything new, or anything that would stick in a court of law relating to anyone else, or most anyone else that hung out with Epstein. There is probably a lot of documentation with prominent people around Epstein and his events. There likely wasn't enough solid evidence to charge anyone else. But you have to consider the information regarding Prince Andrew.

I don't think Biden would protect Trump. I think he would protect prominent Democrats and dignitaries, if there was anything to it or that might prove embarrassing. I do think Trump's behavior makes him look guilty, and it wouldn't surprise me if he had some questionable involvement. But it's entertaining to watch Trump's conspiracy theorist supporters reactions and his reactions.

---

As usual a lot of words avoiding the point.

If the Epstein files could have damaged Trumps election chances; Biden certainly would have LEAKED those specific items.

---

You just don't like the point. I already answered why he may not have leaked them. Once you start down that path it's hard to stop or control what gets out. Very likely the same reason, or one reason Trump doesn't want the information out there either.

---

Ridiculous

The party of lawfare would have easily leaked only the info damaging to Trump and bury the rest.

---

It's not always that easy and simple. Why are you afraid for the information to be released?

TexasScientist said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Trump was told by Bondi his name appeared multiple times in Epstein files: Report

The officials told Trump of their plan not to release any additional documents.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-told-bondi-appeared-multiple-times-epstein-files/story?id=124014441

According to a report in the Wall Street Journal, Attorney General Pam Bondi and her deputy Todd Blanche informed President Donald Trump in May that his name appeared multiple times in the government's files on Jeffrey Epstein that the Department of Justice and the FBI reviewed.

The officials told Trump of their plan not to release any additional documents, the report says, because the material contained child pornography and the personal information of victims…….

---

Yet Biden did not use this 'evidence' against Donald Trump at any time leading up to the 2024 election ?

Why would Joe Biden protect Trump ?

---

First of all I don't really believe there is anything new, or anything that would stick in a court of law relating to anyone else, or most anyone else that hung out with Epstein. There is probably a lot of documentation with prominent people around Epstein and his events. There likely wasn't enough solid evidence to charge anyone else. But you have to consider the information regarding Prince Andrew.

I don't think Biden would protect Trump. I think he would protect prominent Democrats and dignitaries, if there was anything to it or that might prove embarrassing. I do think Trump's behavior makes him look guilty, and it wouldn't surprise me if he had some questionable involvement. But it's entertaining to watch Trump's conspiracy theorist supporters reactions and his reactions.

---

As usual a lot of words avoiding the point.

If the Epstein files could have damaged Trumps election chances; Biden certainly would have LEAKED those specific items.

---

You just don't like the point. I already answered why he may not have leaked them. Once you start down that path it's hard to stop or control what gets out. Very likely the same reason, or one reason Trump doesn't want the information out there either.

---

Ridiculous

The party of lawfare would have easily leaked only the info damaging to Trump and bury the rest.

---

It's not always that easy and simple. Why are you afraid for the information to be released?

---

Have called for their release constantly

TexasScientist said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Trump was told by Bondi his name appeared multiple times in Epstein files: Report

The officials told Trump of their plan not to release any additional documents.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-told-bondi-appeared-multiple-times-epstein-files/story?id=124014441

According to a report in the Wall Street Journal, Attorney General Pam Bondi and her deputy Todd Blanche informed President Donald Trump in May that his name appeared multiple times in the government's files on Jeffrey Epstein that the Department of Justice and the FBI reviewed.

The officials told Trump of their plan not to release any additional documents, the report says, because the material contained child pornography and the personal information of victims…….

---

Yet Biden did not use this 'evidence' against Donald Trump at any time leading up to the 2024 election ?

Why would Joe Biden protect Trump ?

---

First of all I don't really believe there is anything new, or anything that would stick in a court of law relating to anyone else, or most anyone else that hung out with Epstein. There is probably a lot of documentation with prominent people around Epstein and his events. There likely wasn't enough solid evidence to charge anyone else. But you have to consider the information regarding Prince Andrew.

I don't think Biden would protect Trump. I think he would protect prominent Democrats and dignitaries, if there was anything to it or that might prove embarrassing. I do think Trump's behavior makes him look guilty, and it wouldn't surprise me if he had some questionable involvement. But it's entertaining to watch Trump's conspiracy theorist supporters reactions and his reactions.

---

Biden would protect himself. Anything he would have done to bring others down would have opened up a floodgate of info on him regarding a world of kickbacks.

---

That's a real point, and part of what I'm saying.

---

please, never agree with me again. It feels…. creepy

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Trump was told by Bondi his name appeared multiple times in Epstein files: Report

The officials told Trump of their plan not to release any additional documents.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-told-bondi-appeared-multiple-times-epstein-files/story?id=124014441

According to a report in the Wall Street Journal, Attorney General Pam Bondi and her deputy Todd Blanche informed President Donald Trump in May that his name appeared multiple times in the government's files on Jeffrey Epstein that the Department of Justice and the FBI reviewed.

The officials told Trump of their plan not to release any additional documents, the report says, because the material contained child pornography and the personal information of victims…….

---

Yet Biden did not use this 'evidence' against Donald Trump at any time leading up to the 2024 election ?

Why would Joe Biden protect Trump ?

---

First of all I don't really believe there is anything new, or anything that would stick in a court of law relating to anyone else, or most anyone else that hung out with Epstein. There is probably a lot of documentation with prominent people around Epstein and his events. There likely wasn't enough solid evidence to charge anyone else. But you have to consider the information regarding Prince Andrew.

I don't think Biden would protect Trump. I think he would protect prominent Democrats and dignitaries, if there was anything to it or that might prove embarrassing. I do think Trump's behavior makes him look guilty, and it wouldn't surprise me if he had some questionable involvement. But it's entertaining to watch Trump's conspiracy theorist supporters reactions and his reactions.

---

Biden would protect himself. Anything he would have done to bring others down would have opened up a floodgate of info on him regarding a world of kickbacks.

---

That's a real point, and part of what I'm saying.

---

please, never agree with me again. It feels…. creepy

---

It's just cognitive dissonance.

chriscbear said:

---

Trump announced in 2015 he was a candidate . If there was something bad there don't you think it would have come out already. He's almost 80, let it go.

---

That may be your wish, but Trump has earned the hatred. He's spent 10 years trying to insult and rile up Democrats. They are not gonna let this go lol.

Why didn't they act on it during the Biden administration?

Thats the point, not whether Trump is an azzhole or not.

ScottS said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

ScottS said:

---

They would have used it in 2024.

---

How do you know?

---

Because they came at him from all sides in 2024. Smith, James etc with cases that were nothing. If they had Epstein stuff woah nelly.

---

You need to read the indictments. Those cases weren't nothing.