Conspiracies on the Las Vegas shooting

26,540 Views | 149 Replies | Last: 7 yr ago by 80sBEAR
Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

Florda_mike said:

quash said:

Florda_mike said:

Bear8084 said:

Doc Holliday said:

Bear8084 said:

Doc Holliday said:

Autopsy report:
Vegas shooter committed act on 10.01.17 @ 10:05pm. The death certificate that they fought from being released shows his time of death as 10.02.17 @ 12pm noon. THE NEXT DAY. And he had bruises and signs of trauma.

Link

Also he was an arms dealer: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4349486-Warrants-1.html

Here's a theory:
Saudis set up a weapons purchase from Paddock. Paddock brought the guns and ammo to the hotel. Saudis killed Paddock and planned to make an attempt on King Salmans life. Plan was foiled, they opened fire on a crowd as cover for them to escape. It was then all pinned on Paddock.

It makes sense too:

1.) Prince Al Waleed owned the upper floors of the Mandalay Bay resort, including the 32nd floor that was one of the points of shooting at the strip.

2.) The Mandalay Bay has a heli-pad on the roof. That is important, because that was the escape route after the carnage.

Paddock was a pilot. He was also a gun runner between the Philippines and the US.
He was running guns for Prince Al Waleed.
He didn't win at the casino. Those millions came from smuggling.

On the night of the attack King Salman was in Las Vegas.



About as realistic and over the top as a Michael Bay movie.
The autopsy literally ruled his death as a murder just today...


All news sites are saying suicide, which it was. The death date typo is just going to fuel Muslim-ninja conspiracy nuts.


Doc I've heard same as you state

But unfortunately on this site the deniers, as above, attack in full force just because ........ they aren't capable of imagining such a thing

Unbelievable how unsuspecting some people are

Sheltered lives?

The deniers are you and Doc, denying the rational in favor of the paranoid.


Is anything even possible outside your "box?"
His problem is he needs others to tell him how to feel.

If it's not a story on MSM then it's fake news to him.

The kind of guy who looks around the room to see how everyone is acting and the acts like them to fit in.

He was shocked when Trump won after saying it wouldn't happen...all because that's what MSM was saying.

Sooner or later these corrupt *******s will get locked up and we'll be right back to the same scenario of "I told you so".


Yep!!!
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

Florda_mike said:

BaylorBJM said:

Lulz, why am I not the lease bit surprised Florduh is a LV conspiracist?


I'll consider the source of above statement, while some of you are unable to consider..... anything at all

I'll consider evidence. Got any?

Guess not.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
BaylorBJM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Alternatively, there's nothing outside Mike's box. You could tell him 365 is a secret, underground recruiting site for the University of Texas which is largely responsible for their landing of Tom Herman and a top ranked recruiting class and I guaranty he would run with it.

"Don't you know Ashley's brother-in-law is a big time donor for Texas football!? They pay Jkb as a recruiting analyst under the guise of Baylor recruiting and immediately send all the tapes to Austin. If you can't see that's clear as day, it's just sad!!"
Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BJM and Quash the libertarian: "Obama and Hillary have never done anything any other politician has done. They are innocent of any wrongdoings"

Mike: "I question that"

BJM and Quash the libertarian: "There he goes again with his outlandish conspiracy theories"
BaylorBJM
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Florda_mike said:

BJM and Quash the libertarian: "Obama and Hillary have never done anything any other politician has done. They are innocent of any wrongdoings"

Mike: "I question that"

BJM and Quash the libertarian: "There he goes again with his outlandish conspiracy theories"


BJM: I've never have and likely never would vote for Obama nor Hillary because I disagree with 99.9% of their policies. I also feel very similar about Trump."

Mike: "I question that by taking the most extreme, outlandish positions possible. Obama is a African-born Muslim and Hillary killed a guy. I don't use facts in any of my logic and conspiracy bias is my best friend. Oh yea, Jade Helm is coming."

BJM (and Qualsh and everyone else): "Yea, you're insane."
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You conspiracy guys are nuts!

https://www.google.com/amp/s/timeline.com/amp/p/2739dc7351b8
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BaylorBJM said:

Florda_mike said:

BJM and Quash the libertarian: "Obama and Hillary have never done anything any other politician has done. They are innocent of any wrongdoings"

Mike: "I question that"

BJM and Quash the libertarian: "There he goes again with his outlandish conspiracy theories"


BJM: I've never have and likely never would vote for Obama nor Hillary because I disagree with 99.9% of their policies. I also feel very similar about Trump."

Mike: "I question that by taking the most extreme, outlandish positions possible. Obama is a African-born Muslim and Hillary killed a guy. I don't use facts in any of my logic and conspiracy bias is my best friend. Oh yea, Jade Helm is coming."

BJM (and quash and everyone else): "Yea, you're insane."

Spot on.

If you haven't denounced Hillary for 30 consecutive days you back her 100%. I mean, obviously.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

BaylorBJM said:

Florda_mike said:

BJM and Quash the libertarian: "Obama and Hillary have never done anything any other politician has done. They are innocent of any wrongdoings"

Mike: "I question that"

BJM and Quash the libertarian: "There he goes again with his outlandish conspiracy theories"


BJM: I've never have and likely never would vote for Obama nor Hillary because I disagree with 99.9% of their policies. I also feel very similar about Trump."

Mike: "I question that by taking the most extreme, outlandish positions possible. Obama is a African-born Muslim and Hillary killed a guy. I don't use facts in any of my logic and conspiracy bias is my best friend. Oh yea, Jade Helm is coming."

BJM (and quash and everyone else): "Yea, you're insane."

Spot on.

If you haven't denounced Hillary for 30 consecutive days you back her 100%. I mean, obviously.


^^^ .... perhaps all that would be missing from this equation would be your not be given that "opportunity" to defend Hillary for 30 consecutive days??? Suuuuure, riiiight
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Florda_mike said:

quash said:

BaylorBJM said:

Florda_mike said:

BJM and Quash the libertarian: "Obama and Hillary have never done anything any other politician has done. They are innocent of any wrongdoings"

Mike: "I question that"

BJM and Quash the libertarian: "There he goes again with his outlandish conspiracy theories"


BJM: I've never have and likely never would vote for Obama nor Hillary because I disagree with 99.9% of their policies. I also feel very similar about Trump."

Mike: "I question that by taking the most extreme, outlandish positions possible. Obama is a African-born Muslim and Hillary killed a guy. I don't use facts in any of my logic and conspiracy bias is my best friend. Oh yea, Jade Helm is coming."

BJM (and quash and everyone else): "Yea, you're insane."

Spot on.

If you haven't denounced Hillary for 30 consecutive days you back her 100%. I mean, obviously.


^^^ .... perhaps all that would be missing from this equation would be your not be given that "opportunity" to defend Hillary for 30 consecutive days??? Suuuuure, riiiight

Can I get a translation? An edit?
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Has anyone watched the footage that has been released the last few days of the shooter throughout the hotel in the days before the attack?

I saw one news story on CNN that showed him taking in 3 or 4 large suitcases on one of the carts plus a wheeled one. To me he could easily have hidden several guns in those (broken down) and then put them together in the room.

So to me it means the "how did he get that many guns into the room unnoticed" conspiracy theory has just been solved/ answered.
80sBEAR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

Has anyone watched the footage that has been released the last few days of the shooter throughout the hotel in the days before the attack?

I saw one news story on CNN that showed him taking in 3 or 4 large suitcases on one of the carts plus a wheeled one. To me he could easily have hidden several guns in those (broken down) and then put them together in the room.

So to me it means the "how did he get that many guns into the room unnoticed" conspiracy theory has just been solved/ answered.
I saw it. It looks like he make at least three or four trips to his room over the course of the week. I agree with you and can see how in a busy hotel/ casino, that it would have easily gone unnoticed by employees. Especially the fact that he was a regular customer and had a home within driving distance of the casino.
"This is not an institution of football."
-- Dr. David Garland
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.