For the conspiracy theorists out there:

Did Putin just send Trump over a billion dollars and no one is noticing? Doesn't this at least add another conflict of interest to many others for Trump? Are Trumps ties to Russian investments a conflict and provide more reason to pressure Ukraine?

TAE Technologies recently announced a merger with Trump Media & Technology Group (TMTG). This deal, valued at $6 billion, is expected to close in mid-2026, at which point current TAE shareholders and TMTG shareholders will each own approximately 50% of the combined, publicly traded entity.

Key details regarding Rusnano's investment:

• Investor Role: Rusnano has been an investor for several years, contributing to the over $1.3 billion in total funding TAE has raised.
• Government Ownership: Rusnano is a fully state-owned Russian company.

Rusnano is a key investor in TAE Technologies, but public information does not specify if its share is considered "major" (e.g., a controlling interest). Rusnano is part of a large group of investors, including Google, Venrock, and Vulcan Capital.

Flat Eartb - we were so afraid you had gotten kidnapped by aliens. I speak for us all appreciating your return and reposting QAnon topics.

Over the next few years, Ukraine will fall out of the news. Outside of being a money laundering scheme for the most corrupt Democrats and Republicans in our government, it has no strategic relevance to us.

Over the next few years, the US and China will trade Venezuela for Taiwan.

GrowlTowel said:

---

Why would Biden start a war that would enrich Trump?

---

That is insanely dumb. To give Biden credit for Russia's aggression and Putin's life long goal of expansion. Wow. If you don't want to discuss the topic presented, you don't have to post.

Realitybites said:

---

Over the next few years, Ukraine will fall out of the news. Outside of being a money laundering scheme for the most corrupt Democrats and Republicans in our government, it has no strategic relevance to us.

Over the next few years, the US and China will trade Venezuela for Taiwan.

---

That is crazy. The US would lose big in that trade. No, we will want to see our cake, and to eat it too.

Porteroso said:

---

GrowlTowel said:

---

Why would Biden start a war that would enrich Trump?

---

That is insanely dumb. To give Biden credit for Russia's aggression and Putin's life long goal of expansion. Wow. If you don't want to discuss the topic presented, you don't have to post.

---

Then don't read my posts. Do not lecture me or anyone else.

If you cannot see the point of my post then it is you, not me, that needs to change.

GrowlTowel said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

GrowlTowel said:

---

Why would Biden start a war that would enrich Trump?

---

That is insanely dumb. To give Biden credit for Russia's aggression and Putin's life long goal of expansion. Wow. If you don't want to discuss the topic presented, you don't have to post.

---

Then don't read my posts. Do not lecture me or anyone else.

If you cannot see the point of my post then it is you, not me, that needs to change.

---

The point of your post is insanely stupid.

If he wants to lecture you, and you don't like it, don't read his posts.

Isn't this fun!

GrowlTowel said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

GrowlTowel said:

---

Why would Biden start a war that would enrich Trump?

---

That is insanely dumb. To give Biden credit for Russia's aggression and Putin's life long goal of expansion. Wow. If you don't want to discuss the topic presented, you don't have to post.

---

Then don't read my posts. Do not lecture me or anyone else.

If you cannot see the point of my post then it is you, not me, that needs to change.

---

The point of your post is to dismiss the topic entirely. Bad point to make. You might not want to participate, but others do.

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Flat Eartb - we were so afraid you had gotten kidnapped by aliens. I speak for us all appreciating your return and reposting QAnon topics.

---

FEB - You'll find your QAnon topics on an Epstein Trump coverup thread. Turns out all the pedophilia you QAnoners were worried about was Epstein and Trump.

Porteroso said:

---

Also, I'll be honest, Trump leveraging his Presidency into billions is downright impressive. No Republican is going to touch that level of corruption, because they pretended to be frothing in the mouth over $10m for Hunter here, $5m there... Some on this board said it was the end of democracy.

Abd even if Trump divested or went double blind, at the end of the day he knows he is coming back to billions, and he knows what the big fish want in return. It's not like the old days where a bribe might be $250,000 into a campaign fund.... this is actual billions he is making. Starting with the Saudis giving Jared a billion in Trump's first term.

It is unimaginable levels of wealth, yes we should be talking about it, and certainly the conflict of interest thing is so out of control that where do we even start?

---

It will have to start with SCOTUS. They opened the way for this, and they will have to put a stop to it. 2028 will be a crucial election year - likely will chart and define the course of our country.

GrowlTowel said:

---

Why would Biden start a war that would enrich Trump?

---

Ok, how is this now Biden's fault? And, there is no conflict?

Porteroso said:

---

Also, I'll be honest, Trump leveraging his Presidency into billions is downright impressive. No Republican is going to touch that level of corruption, because they pretended to be frothing in the mouth over $10m for Hunter here, $5m there... Some on this board said it was the end of democracy.

Abd even if Trump divested or went double blind, at the end of the day he knows he is coming back to billions, and he knows what the big fish want in return. It's not like the old days where a bribe might be $250,000 into a campaign fund.... this is actual billions he is making. Starting with the Saudis giving Jared a billion in Trump's first term.

It is unimaginable levels of wealth, yes we should be talking about it, and certainly the conflict of interest thing is so out of control that where do we even start?

---

It is going further than just a money grab. He is changing the structure of how we do business and his companies are right in the middle.

Forbes has an article on it.

Trump's First Year For Digital Assets: Reflections And What Lies Ahead

I know Forbes is not a legit source for Business discussions now, but I see Breitbart getting positive response.

Forbes - Bias and Credibility - Media Bias/Fact Check

FLBear5630 said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Also, I'll be honest, Trump leveraging his Presidency into billions is downright impressive. No Republican is going to touch that level of corruption, because they pretended to be frothing in the mouth over $10m for Hunter here, $5m there... Some on this board said it was the end of democracy.

Abd even if Trump divested or went double blind, at the end of the day he knows he is coming back to billions, and he knows what the big fish want in return. It's not like the old days where a bribe might be $250,000 into a campaign fund.... this is actual billions he is making. Starting with the Saudis giving Jared a billion in Trump's first term.

It is unimaginable levels of wealth, yes we should be talking about it, and certainly the conflict of interest thing is so out of control that where do we even start?

---

It is going further than just a money grab. He is changing the structure of how we do business and his companies are right in the middle.

Forbes has an article on it.

Trump's First Year For Digital Assets: Reflections And What Lies Ahead

I know Forbes is not a legit source for Business discussions now, but I see Breitbart getting positive response.

Forbes - Bias and Credibility - Media Bias/Fact Check

---

Who checks Media Bias?

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Also, I'll be honest, Trump leveraging his Presidency into billions is downright impressive. No Republican is going to touch that level of corruption, because they pretended to be frothing in the mouth over $10m for Hunter here, $5m there... Some on this board said it was the end of democracy.

Abd even if Trump divested or went double blind, at the end of the day he knows he is coming back to billions, and he knows what the big fish want in return. It's not like the old days where a bribe might be $250,000 into a campaign fund.... this is actual billions he is making. Starting with the Saudis giving Jared a billion in Trump's first term.

It is unimaginable levels of wealth, yes we should be talking about it, and certainly the conflict of interest thing is so out of control that where do we even start?

---

It is going further than just a money grab. He is changing the structure of how we do business and his companies are right in the middle.

Forbes has an article on it.

Trump's First Year For Digital Assets: Reflections And What Lies Ahead

I know Forbes is not a legit source for Business discussions now, but I see Breitbart getting positive response.

Forbes - Bias and Credibility - Media Bias/Fact Check

---

Who checks Media Bias?

---

You don't? Don't you want to see if the information is at least vetted a little bit? You can argue sources, but some source verification is better than no source verification or Bannon says so. What do you have better, that isn't Breitbart...

FLBear5630 said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Also, I'll be honest, Trump leveraging his Presidency into billions is downright impressive. No Republican is going to touch that level of corruption, because they pretended to be frothing in the mouth over $10m for Hunter here, $5m there... Some on this board said it was the end of democracy.

Abd even if Trump divested or went double blind, at the end of the day he knows he is coming back to billions, and he knows what the big fish want in return. It's not like the old days where a bribe might be $250,000 into a campaign fund.... this is actual billions he is making. Starting with the Saudis giving Jared a billion in Trump's first term.

It is unimaginable levels of wealth, yes we should be talking about it, and certainly the conflict of interest thing is so out of control that where do we even start?

---

It is going further than just a money grab. He is changing the structure of how we do business and his companies are right in the middle.

Forbes has an article on it.

Trump's First Year For Digital Assets: Reflections And What Lies Ahead

I know Forbes is not a legit source for Business discussions now, but I see Breitbart getting positive response.

Forbes - Bias and Credibility - Media Bias/Fact Check

---

Who checks Media Bias?

---

You don't? Don't you want to see if the information is at least vetted a little bit? You can argue sources, but some source verification is better than no source verification or Bannon says so. What do you have better, that isn't Breitbart...

---

Here is what I found on your fact checking source

He has a degree in healthcare so that makes no sense as being a fat checker, especially with Covid cover-up

— Angela (@finn20142017) September 17, 2025

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Also, I'll be honest, Trump leveraging his Presidency into billions is downright impressive. No Republican is going to touch that level of corruption, because they pretended to be frothing in the mouth over $10m for Hunter here, $5m there... Some on this board said it was the end of democracy.

Abd even if Trump divested or went double blind, at the end of the day he knows he is coming back to billions, and he knows what the big fish want in return. It's not like the old days where a bribe might be $250,000 into a campaign fund.... this is actual billions he is making. Starting with the Saudis giving Jared a billion in Trump's first term.

It is unimaginable levels of wealth, yes we should be talking about it, and certainly the conflict of interest thing is so out of control that where do we even start?

---

It is going further than just a money grab. He is changing the structure of how we do business and his companies are right in the middle.

Forbes has an article on it.

Trump's First Year For Digital Assets: Reflections And What Lies Ahead

I know Forbes is not a legit source for Business discussions now, but I see Breitbart getting positive response.

Forbes - Bias and Credibility - Media Bias/Fact Check

---

Who checks Media Bias?

---

You don't? Don't you want to see if the information is at least vetted a little bit? You can argue sources, but some source verification is better than no source verification or Bannon says so. What do you have better, that isn't Breitbart...

---

Here is what I found on your fact checking source

He has a degree in healthcare so that makes no sense as being a fat checker, especially with Covid cover-up

— Angela (@finn20142017) September 17, 2025

---

Well, if he doesnt meet Grok's discerning standards there can be no truth in anything they research.

Just for the record, what is a source that does meet Groks standards?

Nothing like a good Appeal to Authority...

So, is Forbes ok?

FLBear5630 said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Also, I'll be honest, Trump leveraging his Presidency into billions is downright impressive. No Republican is going to touch that level of corruption, because they pretended to be frothing in the mouth over $10m for Hunter here, $5m there... Some on this board said it was the end of democracy.

Abd even if Trump divested or went double blind, at the end of the day he knows he is coming back to billions, and he knows what the big fish want in return. It's not like the old days where a bribe might be $250,000 into a campaign fund.... this is actual billions he is making. Starting with the Saudis giving Jared a billion in Trump's first term.

It is unimaginable levels of wealth, yes we should be talking about it, and certainly the conflict of interest thing is so out of control that where do we even start?

---

It is going further than just a money grab. He is changing the structure of how we do business and his companies are right in the middle.

Forbes has an article on it.

Trump's First Year For Digital Assets: Reflections And What Lies Ahead

I know Forbes is not a legit source for Business discussions now, but I see Breitbart getting positive response.

Forbes - Bias and Credibility - Media Bias/Fact Check

---

Who checks Media Bias?

---

You don't? Don't you want to see if the information is at least vetted a little bit? You can argue sources, but some source verification is better than no source verification or Bannon says so. What do you have better, that isn't Breitbart...

---

Here is what I found on your fact checking source

He has a degree in healthcare so that makes no sense as being a fat checker, especially with Covid cover-up

— Angela (@finn20142017) September 17, 2025

---

Well, if he doesnt meet Grok's discerning standards there can be no truth in anything they research.

Just for the record, what is a source that does meet Groks standards?

Nothing like a good Appeal to Authority...

So, is Forbes ok?

---

Let me guess, prior to this one instance, you'd never heard of your source , right?

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Also, I'll be honest, Trump leveraging his Presidency into billions is downright impressive. No Republican is going to touch that level of corruption, because they pretended to be frothing in the mouth over $10m for Hunter here, $5m there... Some on this board said it was the end of democracy.

Abd even if Trump divested or went double blind, at the end of the day he knows he is coming back to billions, and he knows what the big fish want in return. It's not like the old days where a bribe might be $250,000 into a campaign fund.... this is actual billions he is making. Starting with the Saudis giving Jared a billion in Trump's first term.

It is unimaginable levels of wealth, yes we should be talking about it, and certainly the conflict of interest thing is so out of control that where do we even start?

---

It is going further than just a money grab. He is changing the structure of how we do business and his companies are right in the middle.

Forbes has an article on it.

Trump's First Year For Digital Assets: Reflections And What Lies Ahead

I know Forbes is not a legit source for Business discussions now, but I see Breitbart getting positive response.

Forbes - Bias and Credibility - Media Bias/Fact Check

---

Who checks Media Bias?

---

You don't? Don't you want to see if the information is at least vetted a little bit? You can argue sources, but some source verification is better than no source verification or Bannon says so. What do you have better, that isn't Breitbart...

---

Here is what I found on your fact checking source

He has a degree in healthcare so that makes no sense as being a fat checker, especially with Covid cover-up

— Angela (@finn20142017) September 17, 2025

---

Well, if he doesnt meet Grok's discerning standards there can be no truth in anything they research.

Just for the record, what is a source that does meet Groks standards?

Nothing like a good Appeal to Authority...

So, is Forbes ok?

---

Let me guess, prior to this one instance, you'd never heard of your source , right?

---

i actually check bias for every source, i would never use say Breitbart or MSNBC, clearly bussed. Forbes for Business, i am good with.

Bur unlike you, I do not use whether i like what they say as to whether it is credible. or judge by some clown on Instagram. You do realize there is no degree in "fact checking' and scientific degrees do focus on methods? You just didn't like what Forbes said. Do it is bad. You guys are predictable. Politics of personality, Trump+ites sort of a cult.

FLBear5630 said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Also, I'll be honest, Trump leveraging his Presidency into billions is downright impressive. No Republican is going to touch that level of corruption, because they pretended to be frothing in the mouth over $10m for Hunter here, $5m there... Some on this board said it was the end of democracy.

Abd even if Trump divested or went double blind, at the end of the day he knows he is coming back to billions, and he knows what the big fish want in return. It's not like the old days where a bribe might be $250,000 into a campaign fund.... this is actual billions he is making. Starting with the Saudis giving Jared a billion in Trump's first term.

It is unimaginable levels of wealth, yes we should be talking about it, and certainly the conflict of interest thing is so out of control that where do we even start?

---

It is going further than just a money grab. He is changing the structure of how we do business and his companies are right in the middle.

Forbes has an article on it.

Trump's First Year For Digital Assets: Reflections And What Lies Ahead

I know Forbes is not a legit source for Business discussions now, but I see Breitbart getting positive response.

Forbes - Bias and Credibility - Media Bias/Fact Check

---

Who checks Media Bias?

---

You don't? Don't you want to see if the information is at least vetted a little bit? You can argue sources, but some source verification is better than no source verification or Bannon says so. What do you have better, that isn't Breitbart...

---

Here is what I found on your fact checking source

He has a degree in healthcare so that makes no sense as being a fat checker, especially with Covid cover-up

— Angela (@finn20142017) September 17, 2025

---

Well, if he doesnt meet Grok's discerning standards there can be no truth in anything they research.

Just for the record, what is a source that does meet Groks standards?

Nothing like a good Appeal to Authority...

So, is Forbes ok?

---

Let me guess, prior to this one instance, you'd never heard of your source , right?

---

i actually check bias for every source, i would never use say Breitbart or MSNBC, clearly bussed. Forbes for Business, i am good with.

Bur unlike you, I do not use whether i like what they say as to whether it is credible. or judge by some clown on Instagram. You do realize there is no degree in "fact checking' and scientific degrees do focus on methods? You just didn't like what Forbes said. Do it is bad. You guys are predictable. Politics of personality, Trump+ites sort of a cult.

---

Missed again. I simply questioned a source's bias. I posted who the individual was . From that point on, I let you run with it. Your imagination, post fact checking as always (lol) , has now taken us to your shotgun approach of "you guys are predictable" and "cult".

You should probably work on your research skills.

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Also, I'll be honest, Trump leveraging his Presidency into billions is downright impressive. No Republican is going to touch that level of corruption, because they pretended to be frothing in the mouth over $10m for Hunter here, $5m there... Some on this board said it was the end of democracy.

Abd even if Trump divested or went double blind, at the end of the day he knows he is coming back to billions, and he knows what the big fish want in return. It's not like the old days where a bribe might be $250,000 into a campaign fund.... this is actual billions he is making. Starting with the Saudis giving Jared a billion in Trump's first term.

It is unimaginable levels of wealth, yes we should be talking about it, and certainly the conflict of interest thing is so out of control that where do we even start?

---

It is going further than just a money grab. He is changing the structure of how we do business and his companies are right in the middle.

Forbes has an article on it.

Trump's First Year For Digital Assets: Reflections And What Lies Ahead

I know Forbes is not a legit source for Business discussions now, but I see Breitbart getting positive response.

Forbes - Bias and Credibility - Media Bias/Fact Check

---

Who checks Media Bias?

---

You don't? Don't you want to see if the information is at least vetted a little bit? You can argue sources, but some source verification is better than no source verification or Bannon says so. What do you have better, that isn't Breitbart...

---

Here is what I found on your fact checking source

He has a degree in healthcare so that makes no sense as being a fat checker, especially with Covid cover-up

— Angela (@finn20142017) September 17, 2025

---

Well, if he doesnt meet Grok's discerning standards there can be no truth in anything they research.

Just for the record, what is a source that does meet Groks standards?

Nothing like a good Appeal to Authority...

So, is Forbes ok?

---

Let me guess, prior to this one instance, you'd never heard of your source , right?

---

i actually check bias for every source, i would never use say Breitbart or MSNBC, clearly bussed. Forbes for Business, i am good with.

Bur unlike you, I do not use whether i like what they say as to whether it is credible. or judge by some clown on Instagram. You do realize there is no degree in "fact checking' and scientific degrees do focus on methods? You just didn't like what Forbes said. Do it is bad. You guys are predictable. Politics of personality, Trump+ites sort of a cult.

---

Missed again. I simply questioned a source's bias. I posted who the individual was . From that point on, I let you run with it. Your imagination, post fact checking as always (lol) , has now taken us to your shotgun approach of "you guys are predictable" and "cult".

You should probably work on your research skills.

---

Well, enlighten me. What is a source for bias checking?

Research skills - Grok? Yeah, you sure showed me.

FLBear5630 said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Porteroso said:

---

Also, I'll be honest, Trump leveraging his Presidency into billions is downright impressive. No Republican is going to touch that level of corruption, because they pretended to be frothing in the mouth over $10m for Hunter here, $5m there... Some on this board said it was the end of democracy.

Abd even if Trump divested or went double blind, at the end of the day he knows he is coming back to billions, and he knows what the big fish want in return. It's not like the old days where a bribe might be $250,000 into a campaign fund.... this is actual billions he is making. Starting with the Saudis giving Jared a billion in Trump's first term.

It is unimaginable levels of wealth, yes we should be talking about it, and certainly the conflict of interest thing is so out of control that where do we even start?

---

It is going further than just a money grab. He is changing the structure of how we do business and his companies are right in the middle.

Forbes has an article on it.

Trump's First Year For Digital Assets: Reflections And What Lies Ahead

I know Forbes is not a legit source for Business discussions now, but I see Breitbart getting positive response.

Forbes - Bias and Credibility - Media Bias/Fact Check

---

Who checks Media Bias?

---

You don't? Don't you want to see if the information is at least vetted a little bit? You can argue sources, but some source verification is better than no source verification or Bannon says so. What do you have better, that isn't Breitbart...

---

Here is what I found on your fact checking source

He has a degree in healthcare so that makes no sense as being a fat checker, especially with Covid cover-up

— Angela (@finn20142017) September 17, 2025

---

Well, if he doesnt meet Grok's discerning standards there can be no truth in anything they research.

Just for the record, what is a source that does meet Groks standards?

Nothing like a good Appeal to Authority...

So, is Forbes ok?

---

Let me guess, prior to this one instance, you'd never heard of your source , right?

---

i actually check bias for every source, i would never use say Breitbart or MSNBC, clearly bussed. Forbes for Business, i am good with.

Bur unlike you, I do not use whether i like what they say as to whether it is credible. or judge by some clown on Instagram. You do realize there is no degree in "fact checking' and scientific degrees do focus on methods? You just didn't like what Forbes said. Do it is bad. You guys are predictable. Politics of personality, Trump+ites sort of a cult.

---

You didn't answer my question

Forbes? of course i heard of Forbes I read weekly.

FLBear5630 said:

---

Forbes? of course i heard of Forbes I read weekly.

---

Your link didn't go to Forbes. It went to MBFC

I think your bias is showing as much if not more than the Trumpites you accuse everyone of being.

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Forbes? of course i heard of Forbes I read weekly.

---

Your link didn't go to Forbes. It went to MBFC

I think your bias is showing as much if not more than the Trumpites you accuse everyone of being.

---

It was a site that rated bias of publications and media, it did not provide the story. It said Forbes is slightly right of center in terms of bias. Get it.

Trump is dumb.

Trump is not a billionaire.



Trump is an evil genius making billions of dollars.

The stories keep changing.


Gotta luv the internet.

KaiBear said:

---

Trump is dumb.

Trump is not a billionaire.



Trump is an evil genius making billions of dollars.

The stories keep changing.


Gotta luv the internet.

---

Believe nothing you read on the internet. It was created by Al Gore for the trilateral commission

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Trump is dumb.

Trump is not a billionaire.



Trump is an evil genius making billions of dollars.

The stories keep changing.


Gotta luv the internet.

---

Believe nothing you read on the internet. It was created by Al Gore for the trilateral commission

---

Of course you can believe some of what you read on the internet. Takes a discerning eye though, sure.

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Trump is dumb.

Trump is not a billionaire.



Trump is an evil genius making billions of dollars.

The stories keep changing.


Gotta luv the internet.

---

Believe nothing you read on the internet. It was created by Al Gore for the trilateral commission

---

Amazing how many individuals are mediocre in every facet of their lives……..but on the internet they demand to be taken seriously.